Book contents
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Italian Renaissance
- Part II Sixteenth-Century France
- Part III The “Cambridge Platonists”
- Chapter 5 Henry More and Descartes
- Chapter 6 Ralph Cudworth as Interpreter of Plotinus
- Chapter 7 John Smith on the Immortality of the Soul
- Part IV German Romanticism
- Part V The Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
- Appendix: Chronology of Editions and Translations of Plotinus1
- Index
- References
Chapter 7 - John Smith on the Immortality of the Soul
from Part III - The “Cambridge Platonists”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Italian Renaissance
- Part II Sixteenth-Century France
- Part III The “Cambridge Platonists”
- Chapter 5 Henry More and Descartes
- Chapter 6 Ralph Cudworth as Interpreter of Plotinus
- Chapter 7 John Smith on the Immortality of the Soul
- Part IV German Romanticism
- Part V The Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
- Appendix: Chronology of Editions and Translations of Plotinus1
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Plotinus' LegacyThe Transformation of Platonism from the Renaissance to the Modern Era, pp. 160 - 180Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Armstrong, A. H. (ed. and trans.) (1966–1988) Plotinus: Enneads, 7 vols., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Carter, B. (2010) “Ralph Cudworth and the Theological Origins of Consciousness,” History of the Human Sciences 23: 29–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charleton, W. (1652) The Darknes of Atheism Dispelled by the Light of Nature […] London.Google Scholar
Clark, S. R. L. (2017) “Patrides, Plotinus and the Cambridge Platonists,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25: 858–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D. (eds.) (1991a) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vols. I–II, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., Murdoch, D., and Kenny, A. (eds.) (1991b) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. III: The Correspondence, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. and Plantinga, A. (2010) Science and Religion: Are They Compatible? New York.Google Scholar
Dewhurst, K. (1963) John Locke (1632–1704) Physician and Philosopher: A Medical Biography, London.Google Scholar
Diehl, H. (ed.) (1903–1906) Proclus: In Platonis Timaeum Commentarii, 3 vols., Leipzig.Google Scholar
Digby, K. (1644) Two Treatises in the one of which the Nature of Bodies, in the other, the Nature of Mans Soule is looked into in way of Discovery of the Immortality of Reasonable Soules, Paris.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E. K. (1988) Plotinus on Sense-Perception: A Philosophical Study, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleet, B. (ed.) (2016) Plotinus: Ennead IV.7: On the Immortality of the Soul, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
Forstrom, K. J. S. (2010) John Locke and Personal Identity: Immortality and Bodily Resurrection in 17th-Century Philosophy, London.Google Scholar
Guyer, P. and Wood, A. (eds.) (1998) Immanuel Kant: Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Jacob, A. (1987) “Introduction,” in Jacob, A. (ed.) Henry More, The Immortality of the Soul, Dordrecht, i–ciii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, P. (1884) The Life and Letters of John Locke, with Extracts from his Journals and Common-place Books, London.Google Scholar
Leech, D. (2013) The Hammer of the Cartesians: Henry More’s Philosophy of Spirit and the Origins of Modern Atheism, Leuven.Google Scholar
Lennon, T. M. (2008) “Cudworth and Boyle: An Odd Couple?,” in Lennon, T. M. and Stainton, R. J. (eds.) Achilles of Rationalist Psychology, Dordrecht, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitin, D. (2015) Ancient Wisdom in the Age of the New Science, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LoLordo, A. (2011) “Epicureanism and Early Modern Naturalism,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19: 647–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenna, S. (trans.) (1992) Plotinus: The Enneads, Burdett, NY [Originally published 1917–1930].Google Scholar
Michaud, D. A. (2017) Reason Turned into Sense: John Smith on Spiritual Sensation, Leuven.Google Scholar
More, H. (1653) An Antidote Against Atheisme, Or an Appeal to the Natural Faculties of Man, whether there be not a God, London.Google Scholar
Morel, P.-M. (2016) “Plotinus, Epicurus and the Problem of Intellectual Evidence: Tr. 32 (Enn. V 5) I,” in Longo, A. and Taormina, D. P. (eds.) Plotinus and Epicurus: Matter, Perception, Pleasure, New York, 96–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nidditch, P. (ed.) (1975) John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Oxford.Google Scholar
Purinton, J. S. (1999) “Epicurus on ‘Free Volition’ and the Atomic Swerve,” Phronesis 44: 253–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St. John, J. A. (ed.) (1906) John Locke, An Examination of Pere Malebranche’s Opinion of Seeing All Things in God, in The Philosophical Works of John Locke, London.Google Scholar
Schachter, J.-P. (2008) “Locke and the Achilles Argument,” in Lennon, T. M. and Stainton, R. J. (eds.) The Achilles of Rationalist Psychology, Dordrecht, 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, K. (2015) Anti-Atheism in Early Modern England 1580–1720: ‘The Atheist Answered and His Error Confuted,’ Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. (1660b) “Discourse of the Immortality of the Soul,” in Select Discourses, London, 59–120.Google Scholar
Smith, J. (1660c) “The Excellency and Nobleness of True Religion,” in Select Discourses, London, 377–451.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. G. (2011) “Marsilio Ficino’s Critique of the Lucretian Alternative,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 72: 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern-Gillet, S. (2016) “Plotinus and the Problem of Consciousness,” in Leach, S. and Tartaglia, J. (eds.) Consciousness and the Great Philosophers: What Would They Have Said about Our Mind-Body Problem?, New York, 19–27.Google Scholar
Taormina, D. P. (2016) “‘What is known through Sense Perception is an Image’: Plotinus’ tr. 32 (Enn. V 5) I. 12–19: An Anti-Epicurean Argument?,” in Longo, A. and Taormina, D. P. (eds.) Plotinus and Epicurus, New York, 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthington, J. (1660) “To the Reader,” in Smith, J., Select Discourses, London, iii–xxxi.Google Scholar