Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:42:28.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Food Systems and Land Use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2021

Andy Haines
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Howard Frumkin
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

Providing equitable access to nutritious and affordable food for a growing world population in the face of multiple environmental changes is one of the greatest challenges facing humanity. Despite steep increases in agricultural yields beginning in the mid-twentieth century, the global food system is failing to provide nutritious food for much of the world’s population. The food system also imposes a heavy burden on Earth systems; it is a major driver of land use change, biodiversity loss, freshwater depletion, air and water pollution and climate change, as outlined in Chapters 1–3. Current food systems are also grossly inefficient, with, for example, overuse of nitrogen and phosphorus in some regions and underuse in others, together with high levels of food loss and waste, such that about 30% of food produced is never eaten (1). This chapter focuses on potential strategies to improve nutrition and health while reducing the environmental footprint of food systems, with the aim of staying within planetary boundaries.

Type
Chapter
Information
Planetary Health
Safeguarding Human Health and the Environment in the Anthropocene
, pp. 310 - 359
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

FAO. The State of Food and Agriculture. Moving Forward on Food Loss and Waste Reduction. Rome: FAO; 2019.Google Scholar
UN. Updated Comprehensive Framework for Action. UN High Level Task Force on the Global Food Security Crisis; 2010.Google Scholar
Frankema, E. Africa and the green revolution: a global historical perspective. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. 2014;70:1724.Google Scholar
Pingali, PL. Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(31):12302–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912953109.Google Scholar
Bioversity International. Mainstreaming Agrobiodiversity in Sustainable Food Systems: Scientific Foundations for an Agrobiodiversity Index. Rome: Bioversity International; 2017.Google Scholar
Bentham, J, Singh, GM, Danaei, G, et al. Multidimensional characterization of global food supply from 1961 to 2013. Nature Food. 2020;1(1):70–5.Google Scholar
UNCTAD. Key Statistics and Trends in International Trade 2018; 2019.Google Scholar
Alliot, C, Bartz, D, Becheva, S, et al. Agrifood Atlas. 2017. Available from www.boell.de/en/agrifood-atlas.Google Scholar
Herrero, M, Thornton, PK, Power, B, et al. Farming and the geography of nutrient production for human use: a transdisciplinary analysis. The Lancet Planet Health. 2017;1(1):e33–42. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30007-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ren, C, Liu, S, van Grinsven, H, et al. The impact of farm size on agricultural sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;220:357–67.Google Scholar
Masters, WA, Djurfeldt, AA, De Haan, C, et al. Urbanization and farm size in Asia and Africa: implications for food security and agricultural research. Global Food Security. 2013;2(3):156–65. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2013.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doss, C. and the SOFA Team. The Role of Women in Agriculture. Rome: FAO; 2010.Google Scholar
Bharucha, Z, Pretty, J. The roles and values of wild foods in agricultural systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2010;365(1554):2913–26. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0123.Google Scholar
Alae-Carew, C, Nicoleau, S, Bird, FA, et al. The impact of environmental changes on the yield and nutritional quality of fruits, nuts and seeds: a systematic review. Environmental Research Letters. 2020;15(2):023002. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab5cc0.Google Scholar
Scheelbeek, PFD, Bird, FA, Tuomisto, HL, et al. Effect of environmental changes on vegetable and legume yields and nutritional quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;115(26):6804–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800442115.Google Scholar
Zhu, C, Kobayashi, K, Loladze, I, et al. Carbon dioxide (CO2) levels this century will alter the protein, micronutrients, and vitamin content of rice grains with potential health consequences for the poorest rice-dependent countries. Science Advances. 2018;4(5):19. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaq1012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beach, RH, Sulser, TB, Crimmins, A, et al. Combining the effects of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide on protein, iron, and zinc availability and projected climate change on global diets: a modelling study. The Lancet Planet Health. 2019;3(7):e307–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searchinger, T, Waite, R, Hanson, C, et al. World Resources Report: Creating a Sustainable Food Future. World Resources Institute, EcoAgiculture Partners; 2018.Google Scholar
Foley, JA, Ramankutty, N, Brauman, KA, et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature. 2011;478(7369):337–42. doi: 10.1038/nature10452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAO, IFAD, WFP. The State of Food Insecurity in the World. Meeting the 2015 International Hunger Targets: Taking Stock of Uneven Progress. Rome: FAO; 2015.Google Scholar
FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World: Transforming Food Systems for Affordable Healthy Diets. The State of the World. Rome: FAO; 2020.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Overweight and Obesity. Global Health Observatory (GHO) data.Google Scholar
Willett, W, Rockström, J, Loken, B, et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet. 2019;6736:349. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4.Google Scholar
Zhong, VW, Van Horn, L, Greenland, P, et al. Associations of processed meat, unprocessed red meat, poultry, or fish intake with incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2020;180(4):503–12.Google Scholar
Johnston, BC, Zeraatkar, D, Han, MA, et al. Unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: dietary guideline recommendations from the nutritional recommendations (NUTRIRECS) consortium. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2019;171(10):756–64. doi: 10.7326/m19-1621.Google Scholar
Zeraatkar, D, Johnston, BC, Bartoszko, J, et al. Effect of lower versus higher red meat intake on cardiometabolic and cancer outcomes. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2019;171(10):721–31. doi: 10.7326/m19-0622.Google Scholar
Zeraatkar, D, Han, MA, Guyatt, GH, et al. Red and processed meat consumption and risk for all-cause mortality and cardiometabolic outcomes. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2019;171(10):703–10. doi: 10.7326/m19-0655.Google Scholar
Naghshi, S, Sadeghi, O, Willett, WC, Esmaillzadeh, A. Dietary intake of total, animal, and plant proteins and risk of all cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 2020;370:m2412. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2412.Google Scholar
Swinburn, BA, Kraak, VI, Allender, S, et al. The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition, and climate change: the Lancet Commission report. The Lancet. 2019;393(10173):791846. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32822-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, M, Clair, S. Syndemics and public health: reconceptualizing disease in bio-social context. Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 2003;17(4):423–41.Google Scholar
Hendrie, GA, Baird, D, Ridoutt, B, Hadjikakou, M, Noakes, M. Overconsumption of energy and excessive discretionary food intake inflates dietary greenhouse gas emissions in Australia. Nutrients. 2016;8(11):690. doi: 10.3390/nu8110690.Google Scholar
Hadjikakou, M. Trimming the excess: environmental impacts of discretionary food consumption in Australia. Ecological Economics. 2017;131:119–28.Google Scholar
Loring, B, Robertson, A. Obesity and Inequities: Guidance for Addressing Inequities in Overweight and Obesity. World Health Organization Europe; 2014 pp.1–6.Google Scholar
Steffen, W, Richardson, K, Rockström, J, et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science. 2015;347(6223):1259855.Google Scholar
Cucurachi, S, Scherer, L, Guinée, J, Tukker, A. Life cycle assessment of food systems. One Earth. 2019;1(3):292–7. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.014.Google Scholar
Shukla, PR, Skea, J, Calvo Buendia, E, et al. Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Summary For Policymakers; 2019. Available from www.ipcc.ch/srccl/.Google Scholar
Vermeulen, S, Park, T, Khoury, CK, et al. Changing Diets and Transforming Food Systems. Working Paper No. 282. Wageningen, the Netherlands: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS); 2019.Google Scholar
Behrens, P, Kiefte-de Jong, JC, Bosker, T, et al. Evaluating the environmental impacts of dietary recommendations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017;114(51):201711889. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711889114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teague, WR, Apfelbaum, S, Lal, R, et al. The role of ruminants in reducing agriculture’s carbon footprint in North America. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 2016;71(2):156–64. doi: 10.2489/jswc.71.2.156.Google Scholar
Clark, M, Tilman, D. Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice. Environmental Research Letters. 2017;12(6):064016. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cd5.Google Scholar
Mcsherry, ME, Ritchie, ME. Effects of grazing on grassland soil carbon: a global review. Global Change Biology. 2013;19(5):1347–57. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12144.Google Scholar
Hayek, MN, Garrett, RD. Nationwide shift to grass-fed beef requires larger cattle population. Environmental Research Letters. 2018;13(8):84005.Google Scholar
Scheidel, A, Del Bene, D, Liu, J, et al. Environmental conflicts and defenders: a global overview. Global Environmental Change. 2020;63:102104.Google Scholar
Díaz, S, Settele, J, Brondízio, ES, et al., editors. Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat; 2019.Google Scholar
Borrini-Feyerabend, G, Dudley, N, Jaeger, T, et al. Governance of Protected Areas: From Understanding to Action. Vol. 20, Best Practice Protected Area Guideline Series No. 20. IUCN; 2013.Google Scholar
Shukla, PR, Skea, J, Calvo Buendia, E, et al. IPCC 2019: Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems. IPCC; 2020. pp. 1–36. Available from www.ipcc.ch/srccl/.Google Scholar
Montgomery, DR. Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104(33):13268–72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611508104.Google Scholar
Flandroy, L, Poutahidis, T, Berg, G, et al. The impact of human activities and lifestyles on the interlinked microbiota and health of humans and of ecosystems. Science of The Total Environment. 2018;627:1018–38.Google Scholar
Kritee, K, Nair, D, Zavala-araiza, D, et al. Changing diets and transforming food systems. Land Use Policy. 2019;9(Working Paper no. 282):16.Google Scholar
Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma. 2004;123(1–2):122. doi: 10.1126/science.1097396.Google Scholar
Amundson, R, Biardeau, L. Opinion: Soil carbon sequestration is an elusive climate mitigation tool. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;115(46):11652–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1815901115.Google Scholar
Harris, FB, Green, R, Joy, E, Haines, A, Dangour, A. The water use of diets in India. Annals of Global Health. 2017;83(1):8990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steward, DR, Bruss, PJ, Yang, X, et al. Tapping unsustainable groundwater stores for agricultural production in the High Plains Aquifer of Kansas, projections to 2110. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110(37):E3477–86.Google Scholar
Green, RF, Joy, EJM, Harris, F, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions and water footprints of typical dietary patterns in India. Science of The Total Environment. 2018;643:1411–18. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.258.Google Scholar
Gadde, B, Bonnet, S, Menke, C, Garivait, S. Air pollutant emissions from rice straw open field burning in India, Thailand and the Philippines. Environmental Pollution. 2009;157(5):1554–8. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.01.004.Google Scholar
Wang, Z, Zhao, J, Xu, J, et al. Influence of straw burning on urban air pollutant concentrations in northeast China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(8):1379. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081379.Google Scholar
Bauer, SE, Tsigaridis, K, Miller, R. Significant atmospheric aerosol pollution caused by world food cultivation. Geophysical Research Letters. 2016;43(10):5394–400.Google Scholar
Lelieveld, J, Evans, JS, Fnais, M, Giannadaki, D, Pozzer, A. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature. 2015;525(7569):367–71. doi: 10.1038/nature15371.Google Scholar
Springmann, M, Clark, M, Mason-D’Croz, D, et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature. 2018;562(7728):519–25.Google Scholar
Krishna Bahadur, K, Dias, GM, Veeramani, A, et al. When too much isn’t enough: does current food production meet global nutritional needs? PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0205683.Google Scholar
FAO. Food Wastage Footprint. Impacts on Natural Resources. Rome: FAO; 2013.Google Scholar
Ishangulyyev, R, Kim, S, Lee, SH. Understanding food loss and waste: why are we losing and wasting food? Foods. 2019;8(8). doi: 10.3390/foods8080297.Google Scholar
Cassidy, ES, West, PC, Gerber, JS, Foley, JA. Redefining agricultural yields: from tonnes to people nourished per hectare. Environmental Research Letters. 2013;8(3).Google Scholar
Burlingame, B, Dernini, S, eds. Sustainable Diets and Biodiversity: Directions and Solutions for Policy, Research and Action. Proceedings of the International Scientific Symposium, Biodiversity and Sustainable Diets United against Hunger, 3–5 November, 2020. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Bioversity International, 2010. Available from www.bioversityinternational.org/e-library/publications/detail/sustainable-diets-and-biodiversity/.Google Scholar
Aleksandrowicz, L, Green, R, Joy, EJM, et al. Environmental impacts of dietary shifts in India: a modelling study using nationally-representative data. Environment International. 2019;126:207–15. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.004.Google Scholar
Aleksandrowicz, L, Green, R, Joy, EJM, Smith, P, Haines, A. The impacts of dietary change on greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and health: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0165797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165797.Google Scholar
Ridoutt, BG, Hendrie, GA, Noakes, M. Dietary strategies to reduce environmental impact: a critical review of the evidence base. Advances in Nutrition. 2017;8(6):933–46.Google Scholar
Scheelbeek, P, Green, R, Papier, K, et al. Health impacts and environmental footprints of diets that meet the Eatwell Guide recommendations: analyses of multiple UK studies. BMJ Open. 2020;10:37554. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037554.Google Scholar
Milner, J, Joy, EJM, Green, R, et al. Projected health effects of realistic dietary changes to address freshwater constraints in India: a modelling study. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2017;1(1):e26–32. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30001-3.Google Scholar
Kayatz, B, Harris, F, Hillier, J, et al. ‘More crop per drop’: exploring India’s cereal water use since 2005. Science of The Total Environment. 2019;673:207–17.Google Scholar
Harris, F, Moss, C, Joy, EJM, et al. The water footprint of diets: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Advances in Nutrition. 2020;11(2):375–86.Google Scholar
Hirvonen, K, Bai, Y, Headey, D, Masters, WA. Affordability of the EAT–Lancet reference diet: a global analysis. The Lancet Global Health. 2020;8(1):e59–66.Google Scholar
Garcia, D, Galaz, V, Daume, S. EATLancet vs yes2meat: the digital backlash to the planetary health diet. The Lancet. 2019;394(10215):2153–4.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. A Healthy Diet Sustainably Produced. 2018. Available from www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-NMH-NHD-18.12Google Scholar
Gonzalez Fischer, C, Garnett, T. Plates, Pyramids and Planets. Developments in National Healthy and Sustainable Dietary Guidelines: A State of Play Assessment. Rome: FAO; 2016.Google Scholar
Springmann, M, Spajic, L, Clark, MA, et al. The healthiness and sustainability of national and global food based dietary guidelines: modelling study. BMJ. 2020;370:2322. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2322.Google Scholar
Blake, P, Durão, S, Naude, CE, Bero, L. An analysis of methods used to synthesize evidence and grade recommendations in food-based dietary guidelines. Nutrition Reviews. 2018;76(4):111. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nux074.Google Scholar
Hedin, B, Katzeff, C, Eriksson, E, Pargman, D. A systematic review of digital behaviour change interventions for more sustainable food consumption. Sustain. 2019;11(9).Google Scholar
Katz, DL, Meller, S. Can we say what diet is best for health? Annual Review of Public Health. 2014;35:83103. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182351.Google Scholar
Webb, D, Byrd-Bredbenner, C. Overcoming consumer inertia to dietary guidance. Advances in Nutrition. 2015;6(4):391–6. doi: 10.3945/an.115.008441.Google Scholar
Merrigan, K, Griffin, T. Building a case, over time, for adding sustainability to nutritional guidelines. The Conversation. 13 October 2015. Available from https://theconversation.com/building-a-case-over-time-for-adding-sustainability-to-nutritional-guidelines-48556.Google Scholar
Browne, S, Minozzi, S, Bellisario, C, Sweeney, MR, Susta, D. Effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving dietary behaviours among people at higher risk of or with chronic non-communicable diseases: an overview of systematic reviews. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2019;73:923. doi: 10.1038/s41430-018-0327-3.Google Scholar
Ashton, LM, Sharkey, T, Whatnall, MC, et al. Effectiveness of interventions and behaviour change techniques for improving dietary intake in young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Nutrients. 2019;11(4):825.Google Scholar
Marteau, TM, Hollands, GJ, Fletcher, PC. Changing human behavior to prevent disease: the importance of targeting automatic processes. Science. 2012;337(6101):1492–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1226918.Google Scholar
Shemilt, I, Hollands, GJ, Marteau, TM, et al. Economic instruments for population diet and physical activity behaviour change: a systematic scoping review. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e75070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075070.Google Scholar
Afshin, A, Peñalvo, JL, Gobbo, L, et al. The prospective impact of food pricing on improving dietary consumption: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(3). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, R, Cornelsen, L, Dangour, AD, et al. The effect of rising food prices on food consumption: systematic review with meta-regression. BMJ. 2013;347(7915):19.Google Scholar
Thaler, R, Sunstein, CR. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New York: Penguin Books; 2009.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. New York: W.W. Norton; 2015.Google Scholar
Skov, LR, Lourenço, S, Hansen, GL, Mikkelsen, BE, Schofield, C. Choice architecture as a means to change eating behaviour in self-service settings: a systematic review. Obesity Reviews. 2013;14(3):187–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01054.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehner, M, Mont, O, Heiskanen, E. Nudging – a promising tool for sustainable consumption behaviour? Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;134:166–77.Google Scholar
Marteau, TM, Ogilvie, D, Roland, M, Suhrcke, M, Kelly, MP. Judging nudging: can nudging improve population health? BMJ. 2011;342(7791):263–5.Google Scholar
Rust, NA, Ridding, L, Ward, C, et al. How to transition to reduced-meat diets that benefit people and the planet. Science of The Total Environment. 2020;718:137208.Google Scholar
Garnett, EE, Balmford, A, Sandbrook, C, Pilling, MA, Marteau, TM. Impact of increasing vegetarian availability on meal selection and sales in cafeterias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;116(42):20923–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907207116.Google Scholar
Bacon, L, Wise, J, Attwood, S, Vennard, D. The language of sustainable diets: a field study exploring the impact of renaming vegetarian dishes on U.K. café menus. World Resources Institute; 2018.Google Scholar
Ranganathan, J, Vennard, D, Waite, R, et al. Shifting diets for a sustainable food future. Installment 11 of Creating a Sustainable Food Future. World Resources Institute; 2016.Google Scholar
Fischer, J, Abson, DJ, Butsic, V, et al. Land sparing versus land sharing: moving forward. Conservation Letters. 2014;7(3):149–57. doi: 10.1111/conl.12084.Google Scholar
Usubiaga-Liaño, A, Mace, GM, Ekins, P. Limits to agricultural land for retaining acceptable levels of local biodiversity. Nature Sustainability. 2019;2(6):491–8.Google Scholar
Xie, Z, Game, ET, Hobbs, RJ, et al. Conservation opportunities on uncontested lands. Nature Sustainability. 2019;3:915.Google Scholar
Garnett, T, Godde, C, Muller, A, et al. Grazed and confused? Ruminating on cattle, grazing systems, methane, nitrous oxide, the soil carbon sequestration question – and what it all means for greenhouse gas emissions. Food Climate Research Network, University of Oxford; 2017.Google Scholar
Roe, S, Streck, C, Obersteiner, M, et al. Contribution of the land sector to a 1.5 °C world. Nature Climate Change. 2019;9(11):817–28. doi: 10.1038/s41558-019-0591-9.Google Scholar
Smith, P, Adams, J, Beerling, DJ, et al. Land-management options for greenhouse gas removal and their impacts on ecosystem services and the Sustainable Development Goals. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2019;7:40.Google Scholar
Norton, M, Baldi, A, Buda, V, et al. Serious mismatches continue between science and policy in forest bioenergy. GCB Bioenergy. 2019;11(11):1256–63.Google Scholar
Walsh, BJ, Rydzak, F, Palazzo, A, et al. New feed sources key to ambitious climate targets. Carbon Balance Management. 2015;10(1).Google Scholar
Turner, PA, Field, CB, Lobell, DB, Sanchez, DL, Mach, KJ. Unprecedented rates of land-use transformation in modelled climate change mitigation pathways. Nature Sustainability. 2018;1(5):240–5. doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0063-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrman, J, McJeon, H, Patel, P, et al. Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future. Nature Climate Change. 2020;10:920–7.Google Scholar
Madeira, MS, Cardoso, C, Lopes, PA, et al. Microalgae as feed ingredients for livestock production and meat quality: a review. Livestock Science. 2017;205:111–21.Google Scholar
Fajardy, M, Koberle, A, Mac Dowell, N, Fantuzzi, A. BECCS Deployment: A Reality Check. Grantham Institute: Briefing Paper 28; 2019.Google Scholar
West, TAP, Börner, J, Sills, EO, Kontoleon, A. Overstated carbon emission reductions from voluntary REDD+ projects in the Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020;117(39):202004334.Google Scholar
Fridahl, M, Lehtveer, M. Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): global potential, investment preferences, and deployment barriers. Energy Research and Social Science. 2018;42:155–65. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.019.Google Scholar
Mader, S. Plant trees for the planet: the potential of forests for climate change mitigation and the major drivers of national forest area. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 2019;25(4):519–36. doi: 10.1007/s11027-019-09875-4.Google Scholar
Herrera, D, Ellis, A, Fisher, B, et al. Upstream watershed condition predicts rural children’s health across 35 developing countries. Nature Communications. 2017;8(1):811.Google Scholar
Bauch, SC, Birkenbach, AM, Pattanayak, SK, Sills, EO. Public health impacts of ecosystem change in the Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112(24):7414–19. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406495111.Google Scholar
Deng, L, Zhu, GY, Tang, ZS, Shangguan, ZP. Global patterns of the effects of land-use changes on soil carbon stocks. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2016;5:127–38.Google Scholar
Lal, R. Digging deeper: a holistic perspective of factors affecting soil organic carbon sequestration in agroecosystems. Global Change Biology. 2018;24(8):3285–301.Google Scholar
Sykes, AJ, Macleod, M, Eory, V, et al. Characterising the biophysical, economic and social impacts of soil carbon sequestration as a greenhouse gas removal technology. Global Change Biology. 2020;26(3):1085–108. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14844.Google Scholar
Follett, RF, Stewart, CE, Pruessner, EG, Kimble, JM. Effects of climate change on soil carbon and nitrogen storage in the US Great Plains. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 2012;67(5):331–42. doi: 10.2489/jswc.67.5.331.Google Scholar
Aneja, VP, Schlesinger, WH, Li, Q, Nahas, A, Battye, WH. Characterization of atmospheric nitrous oxide emissions from global agricultural soils. SN Applied Sciences. 2019;1(12):111. doi: 10.1007/s42452-019-1688-5.Google Scholar
Lecours, N, Almeida, GEG, Abdallah, JM, Novotny, TE. Environmental health impacts of tobacco farming: a review of the literature. Tobacco Control. 2012;21(2):191–6.Google Scholar
Geist, HJ. Global assessment of deforestation related to tobacco farming. Tobacco Control. 1999;8:1828.Google Scholar
Novotny, TE, Bialous, SA, Burt, L, et al. The environmental and health impacts of tobacco agriculture, cigarette manufacture and consumption. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2015;93(12):877–80. doi: 10.2471/blt.15.152744.Google Scholar
Davis, KF, Rulli, MC, Seveso, A, D’Odorico, P. Increased food production and reduced water use through optimized crop distribution. Nature Geoscience. 2017;10(12):919–24.Google Scholar
Huang, J, Ridoutt, BG, Sun, Z, et al. Balancing food production within the planetary water boundary. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;253:119900.Google Scholar
Ijumba, JN, Lindsay, SW. Impact of irrigation on malaria in Africa: paddies paradox. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 2001;15(1):111.Google Scholar
Godfray, HCJ, Garnett, T. Food security and sustainable intensification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2014;369(1639):20120273. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, BM, Thornton, P, Zougmoré, R, van Asten, P, Lipper, L. Sustainable intensification: what is its role in climate smart agriculture? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2014;8:3943. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.002.Google Scholar
Montpelier Panel. Sustainable Intensification: A New Paradigm for African Agriculture. Ag4Impact; 2013.Google Scholar
Andrews, O, Le Quéré, C, Kjellstrom, T, Lemke, B, Haines, A. Implications for workability and survivability in populations exposed to extreme heat under climate change: a modelling study. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2018;2(12):e540–7.Google Scholar
Poore, J, Nemecek, T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science. 2018;360(6392):987–92. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0216.Google Scholar
Cazzolla Gatti, R, Velichevskaya, A. Certified ‘sustainable’ palm oil took the place of endangered Bornean and Sumatran large mammals habitat and tropical forests in the last 30 years. Science of The Total Environment. 2020;742:140712.Google Scholar
Waldman, KB, Kerr, JM. Limitations of certification and supply chain standards for environmental protection in commodity crop production. Annual Review of Resource Economics. 2014;6(1):429–49.Google Scholar
Rosenstock, TS, Wilkes, A, Jallo, C, et al. Making trees count: measurement and reporting of agroforestry in UNFCCC national communications of non-Annex I countries. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2019;284:106569.Google Scholar
Kuyah, S, Öborn, I, Jonsson, M, et al. Trees in agricultural landscapes enhance provision of ecosystem services in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Biodiversity Science. 2016;12(4):255–73.Google Scholar
Rosenstock, TS, Dawson, IK, Aynekulu, E, et al. A planetary health perspective on agroforestry in Sub-Saharan Africa. One Earth. 2019;1(3):330–44.Google Scholar
Garrity, DP, Akinnifesi, FK, Ajayi, OC, et al. Evergreen agriculture: a robust approach to sustainable food security in Africa. Food Security. 2010;2(3):197214.Google Scholar
Smith, LG, Kirk, GJD, Jones, PJ, Williams, AG. The greenhouse gas impacts of converting food production in England and Wales to organic methods. Nature Communications. 2019;10(1):110. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12622-7.Google Scholar
Dangour, AD, Dodhia, SK, Hayter, A, et al. Nutritional quality of organic foods: a systematic review. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2009;90(3):680–5.Google Scholar
Dangour, AD, Lock, K, Hayter, A, et al. Nutrition-related health effects of organic foods: a systematic review. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2010;92(1):203–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith-Spangler, C, Brandeau, ML, Hunter, GE, et al. Are organic foods safer or healthier than conventional alternatives? A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2012;157:348–66. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-5-201209040-00007.Google Scholar
Curl, CL, Beresford, SAA, Fenske, RA, et al. Estimating pesticide exposure from dietary intake and organic food choices: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Environmental Health Perspectives. 2014;123(5):475–83.Google Scholar
Giannadaki, D, Giannakis, E, Pozzer, A, Lelieveld, J. Estimating health and economic benefits of reductions in air pollution from agriculture. Science of The Total Environment. 2018;622–3:1304–16. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.064.Google Scholar
Scholz, RW, Ulrich, AE, Eilittä, M, Roy, A. Sustainable use of phosphorus: a finite resource. Science of The Total Environment. 2013;461–2:799803.Google Scholar
Cordell, D, Neset, TSS. Phosphorus vulnerability: a qualitative framework for assessing the vulnerability of national and regional food systems to the multi-dimensional stressors of phosphorus scarcity. Global Environmental Change. 2014;24(1):108–22.Google Scholar
Schneider, KD, Thiessen Martens, JR, Zvomuya, F, et al. Options for improved phosphorus cycling and use in agriculture at the field and regional scales. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2019;48(5):1247–64. doi: 10.2134/jeq2019.02.0070.Google Scholar
Powers, SM, Chowdhury, RB, MacDonald, GK, et al. Global opportunities to increase agricultural independence through phosphorus recycling. Earth’s Future. 2019;7(4):370–83. doi: 10.1029/2018EF001097.Google Scholar
Golroudbary, SR, El Wali, M, Kraslawski, A. Environmental sustainability of phosphorus recycling from wastewater, manure and solid wastes. Science of The Total Environment. 2019;672:515–24. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.439.Google Scholar
Mills, G, Sharps, K, Simpson, D, et al. Ozone pollution will compromise efforts to increase global wheat production. Global Change Biology. 2018;24(8):3560–74.Google Scholar
Shindell, D, Kuylenstierna, JCI, Vignati, E, et al. Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science. 2012;335(6065):183–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1210026.Google Scholar
Health and Safety Executive. The Expert Committee on Pesticide Residues in Food (PRiF) Annual Report 2017; 2017.Google Scholar
Nicolopoulou-Stamati, P, Maipas, S, Kotampasi, C, Stamatis, P, Hens, L. Chemical pesticides and human health: the urgent need for a new concept in agriculture. Frontiers in Public Health. 2016;4:148. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00148.Google Scholar
Bergman, Å, Heindel, JJ, Jobling, S, Kidd, KA, Zoeller, TR. The State of Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals 2012. Summary for Decision-Makers. Inter-organization programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals. UNEP, WHO; 2012.Google Scholar
Richardson, JR, Fitsanakis, V, Westerink, RHS, Kanthasamy, AG. Neurotoxicity of pesticides. Acta Neuropathologica. 2019;138:343–62. doi: 10.1007/s00401-019-02033-9.Google Scholar
Kim, K-H, Kabir, E, Jahan, SA. Exposure to pesticides and the associated human health effects. Science of The Total Environment. 2017;575:525–35.Google Scholar
Cimino, AM, Boyles, AL, Thayer, KA, Perry, MJ. Effects of neonicotinoid pesticide exposure on human health: a systematic review. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2017;125(2):155–62. doi: 10.1289/ehp515.Google Scholar
Whitty, CJM, Jones, M, Tollervey, A, Wheeler, T. Biotechnology: Africa and Asia need a rational debate on GM crops. Nature. 2013;497:31–3. doi: 10.1038/497031a.Google Scholar
Kettenburg, AJ, Hanspach, DJ, Abson, J, Fischer, J. From disagreements to dialogue: unpacking the Golden Rice debate. Sustainable Science. 2018;13:1469–82.Google Scholar
Hunter, J, Duff, G. GM crops – lessons from medicine. Science. 2016;353(6305):1187.Google Scholar
Domingo, JL. Safety assessment of GM plants: an updated review of the scientific literature. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2016;95:12–18.Google Scholar
Bailey-Serres, J, Parker, JE, Ainsworth, EA, Oldroyd, GED, Schroeder, JI. Genetic strategies for improving crop yields. Nature. 2019;575:109–18.Google Scholar
Septiningsih, EM, Pamplona, AM, Sanchez, DL, et al. Development of submergence-tolerant rice cultivars: the Sub1 locus and beyond. Annals of Botany. 2009;103(2):151–60.Google Scholar
Sarkar, RK, Bhattacharjee, B. Rice genotypes with SUB1 QTL differ in submergence tolerance, elongation ability during submergence and re-generation growth at re-emergence. Rice. 2011;5(1).Google Scholar
Zhao, C, Liu, B, Piao, S, et al. Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017;114(35):9326–31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701762114.Google Scholar
Qaim, M, Kouser, S. Genetically modified crops and food security. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e64879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064879.Google Scholar
Godfray, HCJ, Beddington, JR, Crute, IR, et al. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science. 2010;327(5967):812–18.Google Scholar
Golden, CD, Fernald, LCH, Brashares, JS, Rasolofoniaina, BJR, Kremen, C. Benefits of wildlife consumption to child nutrition in a biodiversity hotspot. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(49):19653–6.Google Scholar
Brashares, JS, Arcese, P, Sam, MK, et al. Bushmeat hunting, wildlife declines, and fish supply in West Africa. Science. 2004;306(5699):1180–3.Google Scholar
Mabhaudhi, T, Chibarabada, TP, Chimonyo, VGP, et al. Mainstreaming underutilized indigenous and traditional crops into food systems: a South African perspective. Sustainability. 2018;11(1). doi: 10.3390/su11010172.Google Scholar
Whitmee, S, Haines, A, Beyrer, C, et al. Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene Epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on Planetary Health. The Lancet. 2015;386:19732028. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60901-1.Google Scholar
International Nut & Dried Fruit Council. Nuts & Dried Fruits Statistical Yearbook 2017/2018; 2018.Google Scholar
Vanham, D, Mekonnen, MM, Hoekstra, AY. Treenuts and groundnuts in the EAT-Lancet reference diet: concerns regarding sustainable water use. Global Food Security. 2020;24:100357. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100357.Google Scholar
Van Huis, A. Edible insects are the future? In Conference on ‘The Future of Animal Products in the Human Diet: Health and Environmental Concerns’. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2016;75(3):294305.Google Scholar
Stull, V, Patz, J. Research and policy priorities for edible insects. Sustainability Science. 2019;15:633–45. doi: 10.1007/s11625-019-00709-5.Google Scholar
Stull, VJ, Finer, E, Bergmans, RS, et al. Impact of edible cricket consumption on gut microbiota in healthy adults, a double-blind, randomized crossover trial. Science Reports. 2018;8(1):113. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29032-2.Google Scholar
Tuorila, H, Hartmann, C. Consumer responses to novel and unfamiliar foods. Current Opinion in Food Science. 2020;33:18. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2019.09.004.Google Scholar
Appenroth, KJ, Sowjanya Sree, K, Bog, M, et al. Nutritional value of the duckweed species of the Genus Wolffia (Lemnaceae) as human food. Frontiers in Chemistry. 2018;6.Google Scholar
de Beukelaar, MFA, Zeinstra, GG, Mes, JJ, Fischer, ARH. Duckweed as human food. The influence of meal context and information on duckweed acceptability of Dutch consumers. Food Quality and Preference. 2019;71:7686.Google Scholar
Kaplan, A, Zelicha, H, Tsaban, G, et al. Protein bioavailability of Wolffia globosa duckweed, a novel aquatic plant – a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Nutrition. 2019;38(6):2576–82.Google Scholar
Sillman, J, Nygren, L, Kahiluoto, H, et al. Bacterial protein for food and feed generated via renewable energy and direct air capture of CO2: can it reduce land and water use? Global Food Security. 2019;22:2532. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.09.007.Google Scholar
Alexander, P, Brown, C, Arneth, A, et al. Could consumption of insects, cultured meat or imitation meat reduce global agricultural land use? Global Food Security. 2017;15:2232. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2017.04.001.Google Scholar
Gelsomin, E. Impossible and beyond: how healthy are these meatless burgers? Harvard Health blog. 2019. Available from www.health.harvard.edu/blog/impossible-and-beyond-how-healthy-are-these-meatless-burgers-2019081517448.Google Scholar
Parodi, A, Leip, A, De Boer, IJM, et al. The potential of future foods for sustainable and healthy diets. Nature Sustainability. 2018;1(12):782–9.Google Scholar
High Level Panel of Experts on World Food Security. Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture for Food Security and Nutrition. Rome: FAO; 2014 (June):1–119.Google Scholar
Golden, C. Fall in fish catch threatens human health. Nature. 2016;534:317–20.Google Scholar
Naylor, RL, Hardy, RW, Bureau, DP, et al. Feeding aquaculture in an era of finite resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106(36):15103–10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905235106.Google Scholar
Tacon, AGJ, Metian, M. Feed matters: satisfying the feed demand of aquaculture. Reviews in Fisheries Science and Aquaculture. 2015;23(1):110.Google Scholar
Troell, M, Naylor, RL, Metian, M, et al. Does aquaculture add resilience to the global food system? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111(37):13257–63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404067111.Google Scholar
Caswell, BL, Talegawkar, SA, Siamusantu, W, West, KP, Palmer, AC. A 10-food group dietary diversity score outperforms a 7-food group score in characterizing seasonal variability and micronutrient adequacy in rural Zambian children. Journal of Nutrition. 2018;148(1):131–9.Google Scholar
Food and Land Use Coalition. Growing Better: Ten Critical Transitions to Transform Food and Land Use. The Global Consultation Report of the Food and Land Use Coalition; 2019.Google Scholar
Springmann, M, Mason-D’Croz, D, Robinson, S, et al. Mitigation potential and global health impacts from emissions pricing of food commodities. Nature Climate Change. 2017;7(1):6974. doi: 10.1038/nclimate3155.Google Scholar
Scheelbeek, PFD, Cornelsen, L, Marteau, TM, Jebb, SA, Smith, RD. Potential impact on prevalence of obesity in the UK of a 20% price increase in high sugar snacks: modelling study. BMJ. 2019;366. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4786.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, T, Fujimori, S, Takahashi, K, Masui, T. Scenarios for the risk of hunger in the twenty-first century using Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Environmental Research Letters. 2015;10(1):14010. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/014010.Google Scholar
European Coordination Via Campesina. Food Sovereignty Now! A Guide to Food Sovereignty; 2018.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×