Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:06:20.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Addressing Conceptual, Knowledge, and Implementation Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2021

Andy Haines  and
Howard Frumkin
Andy Haines
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Howard Frumkin
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

The Anthropocene Epoch offers both unprecedented challenges and opportunities for humanity. Which of those prevails will depend on decisions made at all levels, from global to individual, over coming years. There have been many warnings of the risks arising from our current myopic development pathways but the prospect of serious, and even catastrophic, effects may not motivate action on the scale and pace required; indeed it can result in feelings of impotence and resignation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Planetary Health
Safeguarding Human Health and the Environment in the Anthropocene
 , pp. 178 - 212
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Whitmee, S, Haines, A, Beyrer, C, et al. Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene Epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on Planetary Health. The Lancet. 2015;386(10007):1973–2028. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60901-1.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, CJA, Giam, X, Sodhi, NS. Evaluating the relative environmental impact of countries. PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010440.Google Scholar
Stern, DI, Common, MS, Barbier, EB. Economic growth and environmental degradation: the environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Development. 1996;24(7):1151–60. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00032-0.Google Scholar
Ward, JD, Sutton, PC, Werner, AD, et al. Is decoupling GDP growth from environmental impact possible? PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0164733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164733.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, PR, Holdren, JP. Impact of population growth. Science. 1971;171:1212–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raworth, K. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. London: Random House; 2017.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions. New York: MacMillan; 1899.Google Scholar
de Graaf, J, Wann, D, Naylor, TH. Affluenza: The All-Consuming Epidemic. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler; 2002.Google Scholar
Egolf, B, Lasker, J, Wolf, S, Potvin, L. The Roseto effect: a 50-year comparison of mortality rates. American Journal of Public Health. 1992;82(8):1089–92.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, PS, Ehrlich, PR. Pervasive externalities at the population, consumption, and environment nexus. Science. 2013;340(6130):324–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1224664.Google Scholar
Miller, D. Consumption and Its Consequences. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press; 2012.Google Scholar
Nieuwenhuijsen, M, Khries, H, editors. Integrating Human Health into Urban and Transport Planning. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2018.Google Scholar
Ruvio, AA, Belk, RW, editors. The Routledge Companion to Identity and Consumption. Abingdon, UK and New York: Routledge; 2012.Google Scholar
Hogg, MK, Michell, PCN. Identity, self and consumption: a conceptual framework. Journal of Marketing Management. 1996;12(7):629–44. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.1996.9964441.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. The World of Goods: Towards an Anthropology of Consumption (Revised edition). London and New York: Routledge; 1996.Google Scholar
Jackson, T. Motivating Sustainable Consumption: A Review of Evidence on Consumer Behaviour and Behavioural Change. Guildford, UK: University of Surrey Centre for Environmental Strategy; 2004.Google Scholar
Kubiszewski, I, Costanza, R, Franco, C, et al. Beyond GDP: measuring and achieving global genuine progress. Ecological Economics. 2013;93:57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.019.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, JE, Sen, A, Fitoussi, J-P. Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn’t Add Up. New York: The New Press; 2010.Google Scholar
Oldenkamp, R, van Zelm, R, Huijbregts, MAJ. Valuing the human health damage caused by the fraud of Volkswagen. Environmental Pollution. 2016;212:121–7.Google Scholar
Hou, L, Zhang, K, Luthin, M, Baccarelli, A. Public health impact and economic costs of Volkswagen’s lack of compliance with the United States’ emission standards. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2016;13(9):891.Google Scholar
Watts, N, Amann, M, Arnell, N, et al. The 2018 report of the Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change: shaping the health of nations for centuries to come. The Lancet. 2018;392(10163):2479–514. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32594-7.Google Scholar
Lutz, W, Kebede, E. Education and health: redrawing the Preston curve. Population and Development Review. 2018;44(2):343–61. doi: 10.1111/padr.12141.Google Scholar
Preston, S. The changing relation between mortality and economic development. Population Studies. 1975;29:231–48. doi: 10.2307/2173509.Google Scholar
Easterlin, R. Will raising the incomes of all improve the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 1995;27(1):35–47. doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(95)00003-B.Google Scholar
Pretty, J, Barton, J, Bharucha, ZP, et al. Improving health and well-being independently of GDP: dividends of greener and prosocial economies. International Journal of Environmental Health Research. 2016;26(1):11–36. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2015.1007841.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, JE, Sen, AK, Fitoussi, J-P. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Paris: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress; 2009.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2014.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, JE, Fitoussi, J-P, Durand, M. Beyond GDP: Measuring What Counts for Economic and Social Performance. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2018.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, JE, Fitoussi, J-P, Durand, M. For Good Measure: An Agenda for Moving Beyond GDP. New York: New Press; 2019.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, JE, Fitoussi, J-P, Durand, M. For Good Measure: Advancing Research on Well-Being Metrics Beyond GDP. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2018.Google Scholar
Helliwell, JF, Layard, R, Sachs, JD, De Neve, J-E. World Happiness Report 2020. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network; 2020.Google Scholar
Ortiz-Ospina, E, Roser, M. Happiness and life satisfaction. Our World in Data. 2017. Available from https://ourworldindata.org/happiness-and-life-satisfaction.Google Scholar
Helliwell, JF, Layard, R, Sachs, JD. World Happiness Report 2018. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network; 2018.Google Scholar
Sachs, JD. America’s health crisis and the Easterlin paradox. In Helliwell, JF, Layard, R, Sachs, JD, editors. World Happiness Report 2018. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network; 2018. pp. 146–59.Google Scholar
Woolf, SH, Schoomaker, H. Life expectancy and mortality rates in the United States, 1959–2017. JAMA. 2019;322(20):1996–2016. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.16932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Case, A, Deaton, A. Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112(49):15078–83. 10.1073/pnas.1518393112.Google Scholar
Easterlin, RA, Morgan, R, Switek, M, Wang, F. China’s life satisfaction, 1990–2010. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(25):9775–80.Google Scholar
Ho, JY, Hendi, AS. Recent trends in life expectancy across high income countries: retrospective observational study. BMJ. 2018;362:k2562. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2562.Google Scholar
Hiam, L, Harrison, D, McKee, M, Dorling, D. Why is life expectancy in England and Wales ‘stalling’? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2018;72(5):404–8. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-210401.Google Scholar
Lewer, D, Jayatunga, W, Aldridge, RW, et al. Premature mortality attributable to socioeconomic inequality in England between 2003 and 2018: an observational study. The Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(1):e33–41. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30219-1.Google Scholar
Full Fact. UK death rates have stayed the same since 2011. 2020. Available from https://fullfact.org/health/deaths-in-the-UK-graph/.Google Scholar
UNDP. Human Development Indices and Indicators: 2018 Statistical Update. New York: United Nations Development Programme; 2018.Google Scholar
Abdallah, S, Thompson, S, Michaelson, J, Nic, M, Steuer, N. The Happy Planet Index 2.0. London: New Economics Foundation; 2009.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, M, Beyers, B. Ecological Footprint: Managing Our Biocapacity Budget. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers; 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irfan, U. Costa Rica has an ambitious new climate policy – but no, it’s not banning fossil fuels. Vox. 17 July 2018.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, S. Costa Rica launches ‘unprecedented’ push for zero emissions by 2050. Reuters. 25 February 2019.Google Scholar
Buse, CG, Oestreicher, JS, Ellis, NR, et al. A public health guide to field developments linking ecosystems, environments and health in the Anthropocene. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2018;72(5):420–5. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-210082.Google Scholar
OECD. Mortality Risk Valuation in Environment, Health and Transport Policies. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2012.Google Scholar
Mauser, W, Klepper, G, Rice, M, et al. Transdisciplinary global change research: the co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2013;5(3–4):420–31.Google Scholar
Choi, BC, Pak, AW. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine. 2006;29(6):351–64.Google Scholar
Royal Society and Academy of Medical Sciences. Evidence Synthesis for Policy: A Statement of Principles. London: Royal Society and Academy of Medical Sciences; 2018.Google Scholar
Shemilt, I, Simon, A, Hollands, GJ, et al. Pinpointing needles in giant haystacks: use of text mining to reduce impractical screening workload in extremely large scoping reviews. Research Synthesis Methods. 2014;5(1):31–49. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1093.Google Scholar
Thomas, J, Noel-Storr, A, Marshall, I, et al. Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2017;91:31–7.Google Scholar
WHO Regional Office for Europe. Setting Research Priorities in Environment and Health: Report of a Meeting in Cascais, Portugal, 27–28 April 2017. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2017.Google Scholar
NIEHS. NIEHS Strategic Plan 2018–2023: Advancing Environmental Health Sciences, Improving Health. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences; 2018.Google Scholar
Pongsiri, MJ, Gatzweiler, FW, Bassi, AM, Haines, A, Demassieux, F. The need for a systems approach to planetary health. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2017;1(7):e257–9.Google Scholar
Fiksel, J, Bruins, R, Gatchett, A, Gilliland, A, ten Brink, M. The triple value model: a systems approach to sustainable solutions. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 2014;16(4):691–702.Google Scholar
Rocha, JC, Peterson, GD, Biggs, R. Regime shifts in the anthropocene: drivers, risks, and resilience. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0134639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134639.Google Scholar
O’Fallon, LR, Wolfle, GM, Brown, D, Dearry, A, Olden, K. Strategies for setting a national research agenda that is responsive to community needs. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2003;111(16):1855–60. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6267.Google Scholar
Campbell, H, Vanderhoven, D. Knowledge That Matters: Realising the Potential of Co-Production. Manchester, UK: N8/ESRC Research Programme; 2016.Google Scholar
Jäger, J, Pálsson, G, Goodsite, M, et al. Responses to Environmental and Societal Challenges for Our Unstable Earth (RESCUE). Strasbourg and Brussels: European Science Foundation Forward Look – ESF-COST ‘Frontier of Science’ joint initiative; 2012.Google Scholar
Scammell, MK. Qualitative environmental health research: an analysis of the literature, 1991–2008. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2010;118(8):1146–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, P. Qualitative methods in environmental health research. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2003;111(14):1789–98. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6196.Google Scholar
Cámara-Leret, R, Fortuna, MA, Bascompte, J. Indigenous knowledge networks in the face of global change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;116(20):9913–18. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821843116.Google Scholar
Finn, S, Herne, M, Castille, D. The value of traditional ecological knowledge for the environmental health sciences and biomedical research. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2017;125(8):085006. doi: 10.1289/ehp858.Google Scholar
Gomez-Baggethun, E, Corbera, E, Reyes-Garcia, V. Traditional ecological knowledge and global environmental change: research findings and policy implications. Ecology and Society. 2013;18(4):72. doi: 10.5751/es-06288-180472.Google Scholar
Haines, A, Kuruvilla, S, Borchert, M. Bridging the implementation gap between knowledge and action for health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2004;82(10):724–31; discussion 32.Google Scholar
Donnelly, CA, Boyd, I, Campbell, P, et al. Four principles to make evidence synthesis more useful for policy. Nature. 2018;558(7710):361–4. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05414-4.Google Scholar
Hopf, H, Krief, A, Mehta, G, Matlin, SA. Fake science and the knowledge crisis: ignorance can be fatal. Royal Society Open Science. 2019;6(5):190161.Google Scholar
Editorial. Vaccine hesitancy: a generation at risk. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 2019;3(5):281.Google Scholar
Ball, P, Maxmen, A. The epic battle against coronavirus misinformation and conspiracy theories. Nature. 2020;581(7809):371–4. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01452-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oreskes, N, Conway, EM. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. London: Bloomsbury Press; 2010.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, S, Howard, PN. The global organization of social media disinformation campaigns. Journal of International Affairs. 2018;71(1.5):23–32.Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, S, Gignac, GE, Oberauer, K. The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e75637.Google Scholar
Wang, Y, McKee, M, Torbica, A, Stuckler, D. Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Social Science & Medicine. 2019;240:112552. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552.Google Scholar
Scheufele, DA, Krause, NM. Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;116(16):7662–9.Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, S, Ecker, UKH, Cook, J. Beyond misinformation: understanding and coping with the ‘post-truth’ era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2017;6(4):353–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008.Google Scholar
van der Linden, S, Leiserowitz, A, Rosenthal, S, Maibach, E. Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change. Global Challenges. 2017;1(2):1600008.Google Scholar
Margolin, DB, Hannak, A, Weber, I. Political fact-checking on Twitter: when do corrections have an effect? Political Communication. 2018;35(2):196–219.Google Scholar
Vraga, EK, Bode, L. I do not believe you: how providing a source corrects health misperceptions across social media platforms. Information, Communication & Society. 2018;21(10):1337–53. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1313883.Google Scholar
Vraga, EK, Bode, L. Using expert sources to correct health misinformation in social media. Science Communication. 2017;39(5):621–45. doi: 10.1177/1075547017731776.Google Scholar
Pennycook, G, Rand, DG. Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;116(7):2521–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806781116.Google Scholar
Yaqub, W, Kakhidze, O, Brockman, ML, Memon, N, Patil, S. Effects of credibility indicators on social media news sharing intent. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Honolulu, HI: Association for Computing Machinery; 2020. pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Jones, MD, Crow, DA. How can we use the ‘science of stories’ to produce persuasive scientific stories? Palgrave Communications. 2017;3(1):53. doi: 10.1057/s41599-017-0047-7.Google Scholar
Pattanayak, SK, Haines, A. Implementation of policies to protect planetary health. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2017;1(7):e255–6.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, T, Fujimori, S, Takahashi, K, Masui, T. Scenarios for the risk of hunger in the twenty-first century using Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Environmental Research Letters. 2015;10(1):014010. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/014010.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×