Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJK, Curtin, SC, Mathews, TJ. Births: Final data for 2013. Mon Vital Stat Rep 2015 Jan 15;64(1):1–65.Google Scholar

Gibbons, L, Belizan, JM, Lauer, JA, Betran, AP, Merialdi, M, Althabe, F. The Global Numbers and Costs of Additionally Needed and Unnecessary Caesarean Sections Performed per Year: Overuse as a Barrier to Universal Coverage. World Health Report (2010). Background Paper, No 30.Google Scholar

Speert, H. Obstetrics and Gynecology in America – A History. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1980.Google Scholar

Plass, ED. Forceps and Cesarean Section, in White House Conference on Child Health and Protection. Fetal, Newborn, and Maternal Mortality and Morbidity. Appleton-Century, 1933, pp. 215–247.Google Scholar

Smith, EF, MacDonald, FA. Cesarean section: An evaluation of current practice in the New York Lying-in Hospital. Obstet Gynecol 1953;6:593.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Elective Surgery and Patient Choice. Committee Opinion 578, November 2013.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. Committee Opinion 559, April 2013, reaffirmed 2015.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Patient Safety in the Surgical Environment. Committee Opinion 464. September 2010, reaffirmed 2014.Google Scholar

Geller, EJ, Wu, JM, Jannelli, ML, Nguyen, TV, Visco, AG. Maternal outcomes associated with planned vaginal versus planned primary cesarean delivery. Am J Perinatol 2010 Oct;27(9):675–83.Google Scholar

Visco, AG, Viswanathan, M, Lohr, KN, Wechter, ME, Gartlehner, G, Wu, JM, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2006 Dec;108(6):1517–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Quiroz, LH, Chang, H, Blomquist, JL, Okoh, YK, Handa, VL. Scheduled cesarean delivery: Maternal and neonatal risks in primiparous women in a community hospital setting. Am J Perinatol 2009 Apr; 26(4): 271–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guise, JM, Denman, MA, Emeis, C, Marshall, N, Walker, M, Fu, R, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010 Jun;115(6):1267–78.Google Scholar

Smith, GC, Pell, JP, Cameron, AD, Dobbie R. Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies. JAMA 2002 May 22–29;287(20):2684–90.Google Scholar

Lydon-Rochelle, M, Holt, VL, Easterling, TR, Martin, DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001 Jul 5;345(1):3–8.Google Scholar

Hannah, ME, Hannah, WJ, Hodnett, ED, Chalmers, B, Kung, R, Willan, A, et al. Outcomes at 3 months after planned cesarean vs planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. JAMA 2002 Apr 10;287(14):1822–31.Google Scholar

MacLennan, AH, Taylor, AW, Wilson, DH, Wilson, D. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. BJOG 2000 (December) 107 (12):1460–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vincenzo, B, Baxter, JK, Chauhan, SP Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1607–17.Google Scholar

Dahlke, JD, Mendez-Figueroa, H, Rouse, DJ, Berghella, V, Baxter, JK, Chauhan, SP Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013 Oct;209(4):294–306.Google Scholar

Ng, KW, Parsons, J, Cyna, AM, Middleton, P. Spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; Issue 2. Art. No.: CD003765.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, P, Dahlback, B, Marsal, K. Thrombotic risk during pregnancy: A population study. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:595–9.Google Scholar

Tooher, R, Gates, S, Dowswell, T, Davis, LJ. Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolic disease in pregnancy and the early postnatal period. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; Issue 5. Art. No.: CD001689. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001689.pub2.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Thromboembolism in Pregnancy. August, 2011, reaffirmed 2014.Google Scholar

Burrows, RF, Gan, ET, Gallus, AS, Wallace, EM, Burrows, EA. A randomised double-blind placebo controlled trial of low molecular weight heparin as prophylaxis in preventing venous thrombolic events after caesarean section: a pilot study. BJOG 2001;108:835–9.Google Scholar

Bates, SM, et al, for the American College of Chest Physicians. VTE, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e691S–736S.Google Scholar

Nasr, AM, Bigawy, El Abdelamid, AF Al-Khulaidi, AE Al-Inany, S Sayed, HG , EH. Evaluation of the use vs nonuse of urinary catheterization during cesarean delivery: A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlledtrial. J Perinatol 2009;29:416–21.Google Scholar

Ghoreishi, J. Indwelling urinary catheters in cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003;83:267–70.Google Scholar

Duff, P. Prophylactic antibiotics for cesarean delivery: A simple cost effective strategy for prevention of postoperative morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1987;157:794–8.Google Scholar

Watson, WJ, George, RJ, Welter, S, Day, D. High-risk obstetric patients. J Reprod Med 1997;42:267–70.Google ScholarPubMed

Rudge, MV, Atallah, AN, Peracoli, JC, Tristao Ada, R, Mendonca Neto, M. Randomized controlled trial on prevention of postcesarean infection using penicillin and cephalothin in Brazil. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:945–8.Google Scholar

Alekwe, LO, Kuti, O, Orji, EO, Ogunniyi, SO. Comparison of ceftriaxone versus triple drug regimen in the prevention of cesarean section infectious morbidities. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21:638–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sullivan, SA, Smith, T, Chang, E, Hulsey, T, Vandorsten, JP, Soper, D. Administration of cefazolin prior to skin incision is superior to cefazolin at cord clamping in preventing postcesarean infectious morbidity: A randomized, controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196: 455.e1–5.Google Scholar

Costantine, MM, Rahman, M, Ghulmiyah, L, et al. Timing of perioperative antibiotics for cesarean delivery: A metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:301.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bloom, SL, for the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Cesarean Registry. Decision to incision times and infant outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185:S121.Google Scholar

Bloom, SL, for the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2006 Jul;108(1):6–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Onwudiegwu, U, Makinde, ON, Ezechi, OC, Adeyemi, A. Decision-caesarean delivery interval in a Nigerian university hospital: implications for maternal morbidity and mortality. J Obstet Gynecol 1999 Jan; 19(1):30–3.Google Scholar

Water, EG, Supravesical extraperitoneal cesarean section: Presentation of a new technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1940;39:423–32.Google Scholar

Powell, JL. The Kerr Incision: John Martin Munro Kerr (1868–1960). J Pelvic Surgery 2001 May/June; 7(3):177–8.Google Scholar

Williams Obstetrics, 24th edition. Cunningham, FG, Leveno, KJ, Bloom, SL, Spong, CY, et al. McGraw-Hill, 2014, Chapter 30.Google Scholar

Holmgren, G1, Sjöholm, L, Stark, M. The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: Method description. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999 Aug;78(7):615–21.Google Scholar

Williams Obstetrics, 24th edition. Cunningham, FG, Leveno, KJ, Bloom, SL, Spong, CY, et al. McGraw-Hill, 2014, Chapter 30, figure 6.Google Scholar

Wylie, BJ, Gilbert, S, Landon, MB, Spong, CY, Rouse, DJ, Leveno, KJ, et al. and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU). Comparison of transverse and vertical skin incision for emergency cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010 Jun;115(6):1134–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Matha, M, Hofmeyr, GJ. Abdominal surgical incisions for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;Issue 1. Art. No.: CD004453.Google Scholar

Finan, MA, Mastrogiannis, DS, Spellacy, WN. The “Allis” test for easy cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991 March; 164(3):772–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

CAESAR study collaborative group. Caesarean section surgical techniques: A randomised factorial trial (CAESAR). BJOG 2010 Oct;117(11):1366–76.Google Scholar

Cromi, A, Ghezzi, F, Di Naro, E, Siesto, G, Loverro, G, Bolis, P. Blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision at cesarean delivery: A randomized comparison of 2 techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:292.e1–292.e6.Google Scholar

Hohlagschwandtner, M, Ruecklinger, E, Husslein, P, Joura, EA. Is the formation of a bladder flap at cesarean necessary? A randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2001, December:98 (6)1089–92.Google Scholar

Baksu, A, Kalan, A, Ozkan, A, Baksu, B, Tekelioğlu, M, Goker, N. The effect of placental removal method and site of uterine repair on postcesarean endometritis and operative blood loss. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005 Mar;84(3):266–9.Google Scholar

Walsh, CA, Walsh, SR. Extraabdominal vs intraabdominal uterine repairs at cesarean delivery: A metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:625.e1–8 (large meta-analysis showing no difference in outcomes for exteriorization of uterus at repair).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Roberge, S, Chaillet, N, Boutin, A, Moore, L, Jastrow, N, Brassard, N, et al. Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011 Oct;115(1):5–10.Google Scholar

Raftery, AT. Regeneration of parietal and visceral peritoneum: An electron microscopical study. J Anat 1973 115(3):375–92.Google Scholar

Connolly, WB, Stephens, FO. Factors influencing the incidence of intraperitoneal adhesions: An experimental study. Surgery 1968 June;63(6):976–9.Google Scholar

Mackeen, AD, Berghella, V, Larsen, ML. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11:CD003577.Google Scholar

Geller, SE, Rosenberg, D, Cox, S, Brown, M, Simonson, L, Kilpatrick, S. A scoring system identified near-miss maternal morbidity during pregnancy. J Clin Epidemiol 2004 July;57(7):716–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Callaghan, WM, Creanga, AA, Kuklina, EV. Severe maternal morbidity among delivery and postpartum hospitalizations in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2012 Nov;120(5):1029–36.Google Scholar

Eller, AG, Bennett, MA, Sharshiner, M, Masheter, C, Soisson, AP, Dodson, M, Silver, RM. Maternal morbidity in cases of placenta accreta managed by a multidisciplinary care team compared with standard obstetric care. Obstet Gynecol 2011 Feb;117(2 Pt 1):331–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rossi, AC, Lee, RH, Chmait, RH. Emergency postpartum hysterectomy for uncontrolled postpartum bleeding – A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:637–44.Google Scholar

Imudia, AN, Hobson, DT, Awonuga, AO, Diamond, MP, Bahado-Singh, RO, Determinants and complications of emergent cesarean hysterectomy: Supracervical vs total hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010 Sep; 203(3):221.e1–5.Google Scholar

Balestrieri, P, Simmons, G, Hill, D, Brown, J, Jackson, A, Brull, SJ, Maneatis, TJ, Shefrin, A, Bynum, L, O’Hara, DA. The effect of intravenous ketorolac given intraoperatively versus postoperatively on outcome from gynecologic abdominal surgery. J Clin Anesth 1997 Aug;9(5):358–64.Google Scholar

Everett, B. Salamonson, Y. Differences in postoperative opioid consumption in patients prescribed patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular injection. Pain Manag Nurs 2005 Dec;6(4):137–44.Google Scholar

Bayar, U. Basaran, M. Atasoy, N. Ayoglu, H. Sade, H. Altunkaya, H. Comparison of satisfaction and pain relief between patients-controlled analgesia and interval analgesia after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. J Psychosom Obst Gyn 2008 Jun;29(2):139–45.Google Scholar