Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-qmf6w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T09:53:55.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 13 - Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2017

By
Georgia Ferrell
Edited by
Martin Olsen
Martin Olsen
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Obstetric Care , pp. 116 - 125
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dildy, GA. Intrapartum assessment of the fetus: Historical and evidence-based practice. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2005;32:255–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vintzileos, AM, Nochimson, DJ, Guzman, ER, Knuppel, RA, Lake, M, Schifrin, BS. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: A meta-analysis. SO Obstet Gynecol 1995 Jan; 85(1):149–55.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol 2009:114:192.Google Scholar
Alfirevic, Z, Devane, D, Gyte, G. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;CD006066.Google Scholar
MacDonald, D, Grant, A, Sheridan-Pereira, M, et al. The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;152:524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Sutton, PD, Ventura, SJ, MEnacker, F, Munson, ML. Births: final data for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2003;52:1–113.Google Scholar
www.monicahealthcare.com. Accessed February 1, 2016.Google Scholar
Bakker, JJ, Janssen, PF, van Halem, K, et al. Internal versus external tocodynamometry during induced or augmented labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 8:CD006947.Google Scholar
Hofmeyr, GJ. Amnioinfusion for potential or suspected umbilical cord compression in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Reviews 1998; Issue 1. Art. No.: CD000013. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 116: Management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings. Obstet Gynecol 2010 Nov;116(5):1232–40.Google Scholar
Westgate, JA, Wibbens, B, Bennet, L, et al. The intrapartum deceleration in center stage: A physiologic approach to the interpretation of fetal heart rate changes in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007 ;197:236.Google Scholar
Jackson, M, Holmgren, CM, Esplin, MS, et al. Frequency of fetal heart rate categories and short-term neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:803.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Neonatal Encephalopathy and Cerebral Palsy: Defining the Pathogenesis and Pathophysiology. Elk Grove Village, IL: AAP; Washington, DC: ACOG, 2003.Google Scholar
Macones, GA, Hankins, GD, Spong, CY, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: Update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112:661.Google Scholar
Johnson, TR Jr, Compton, AA, Rotmensch, J, et al. Significance of the sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;139:446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Copel, JA, Liang, RI, Demasio, K, et al. The clinical significance of the irregular fetal heart rhythm. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCurdy, CM, Reed, KL. Fetal Arrhythmias. In: Doppler Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Copel, JA, Reed, KL (Eds), New York: Raven Press, 1995. p. 253.Google Scholar
Eliasson, H, Wahren-Herlenius, M, Sonesson, SE. Mechanisms in fetal bradyarrhythmia: 65 cases in a single center analyzed by Doppler flow echocardiographic techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37:172.Google Scholar
Liston, R, Sawchuck, D, Young, D, et al. Fetal health surveillance: antepartum and intrapartum consensus guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007;29:S3.Google Scholar
Skupski, DW, Rosenberg, CR, Eglinton, GS. Intrapartum fetal stimulation tests: A meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:129.Google Scholar
Cahill, AG, Roehl, KA, Odibo, AO, Macones, GA. Association and prediction of neonatal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:206.e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garite, TJ, Dildy, GA, McNamara, H, Nageotte, MP, Boehm, FH, Dellinger, EH, et al. A multicenter controlled trialof fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1049–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Sl, Leveno, KJ, Spong, CY, Gilbert, S, Hauth, JC, Landon, MB, et al. Decision to incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:6–11.Google Scholar
Guideline for Fetal Monitoring in Labor and Delivery. December 2012. NNEPQIN.Google Scholar
Vayssiere, C, Haberstich, R, Sebahoun, V, et al. Fetal electrocardiogram ST-segment analysis and prediction of neonatal acidosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2007;97:110.Google Scholar
Goodwin, TM, Milner-Masterson, L, Paul, RH. Elimination of fetal scalp blood sampling on a large clinical service. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:971–4.Google Scholar
East, CE, Begg, L, Colditz, PB, Lau, R. Fetal pulse oximetry for fetal assessment in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;10:CD004075.Google Scholar
Page, FO, Martin, JN, Palmer, SM, et al. Correlation of neonatal acid–base status with Apgar scores and fetal heart rate tracings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;154:1306.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×