Book contents
- New Private Law Theory
- New Private Law Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- New Private Law Theory
- Part I Methods and Disciplines
- Part II Social Ordering, Constitutionalism and Private Law
- Part III Transactions and Risk: Private Law and the Market
- Part IV Persons and Organizations
- Part V Private Law (Rule-Setting) beyond the State
- Index
- References
Part IV - Persons and Organizations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 April 2021
Book contents
- New Private Law Theory
- New Private Law Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- New Private Law Theory
- Part I Methods and Disciplines
- Part II Social Ordering, Constitutionalism and Private Law
- Part III Transactions and Risk: Private Law and the Market
- Part IV Persons and Organizations
- Part V Private Law (Rule-Setting) beyond the State
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- New Private Law TheoryA Pluralist Approach, pp. 339 - 434Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Demogue, R, ‘La notion de sujet de droit’ (1909) 8 Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil 611–55, (English translation available on the book website)Google Scholar
MacCormick, N, Legal Right and Social Democracy: Essays in Legal and Political Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, N, ‘Zivilrechtstheorie, Sozialwissenschaft und Verbraucherschutz’ (1974) 7(8) Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 187–94, (English translation available on the book website)Google Scholar
Kennedy, D, ‘Three globalisations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000’, in Trubek, D. M. and Santos, A (eds.), The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 19–73Google Scholar
Ben-Shahar, O, ‘The paradox of access justice, and its application to mandatory arbitration’ (2016) 83 The University of Chicago Law Review 1755–817Google Scholar
von Gierke, Otto, Die Genossenschaftstheorie und die deutsche Rechtsprechung (Hildesheim: Olms, 1887), pp. 603–672 (English translation available on the book website)Google Scholar
Berle, Adolf A. and Means, Gardiner C., The Modern Corporation and Private Property (New York: Macmillan, 1947 (1932))Google Scholar
Grossman, Sanford D. and Hart, Oliver D., ‘The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration’, 94 Journal of Political Economy 691–719 (1986)Google Scholar
Jensen, Michael and Meckling, William, ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’, 3 Journal of Financial Economics 305–60 (1976)Google Scholar
Berle, Adolf / Means, Gardiner, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (New York / Chicago / Washington: Commerce Clearing House Publishing, 1932) ( book II, chapter 8, and book III, chapter 1)Google Scholar
Jensen, Michael / Meckling, William, ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’, 3 Journal of Financial Economics 305–60 (1976)Google Scholar
Alchian, Armen / Demsetz, Harold, ‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization’, 62 The American Economic Review 777–95 (1972)Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold, ‘Toward a Theory of Property Rights’, 57 The American Economic Review 347–59 (1967)Google Scholar
Fama, Eugene, ‘Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work’, 25 Journal of Finance 383–417 (1970)Google Scholar
Fama, Eugene, ‘Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm’, 88 Journal of Political Economy 288–307 (1980)Google Scholar
Walgenbach, Peter, ‘Neoinstitutionalistische Ansätze in der Organisationstheorie’, in A. Kieser / M. Ebers (eds.), Organisationstheorien (8th ed., Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2019), pp.300–50Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert, Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Cambridge, MA / London: Harvard University Press, 1970)Google Scholar
Manne, Henry, ‘Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control’, 73 Journal of Political Economy 110–20 (1965)Google Scholar
Alchian, Armen / Demsetz, Harold, ‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization’, 62 The American Economic Review 777–95 (1972)Google Scholar
Aoki, Masahiko, Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis (Cambridge MA / London: MIT Press, 2001) (especially chapter 11)Google Scholar
Grossman, Sanford / Hart, Oliver, ‘One Share/One Vote and the Market for Corporate Control’, 20 Journal of Financial Economics 175–202 (1988)Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H, ‘The Transformation of Europe’, 8 Yale Law Journal 2403–83 (1991)Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D, ‘An introduction to varieties of capitalism’, in Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 1–20Google Scholar
Vogel, D, ‘Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility’ (2005) 47(4) California Management Review 19–45Google Scholar
Bohle, D and Greskovits, B, ‘Varieties of capitalism and capitalism “tout court”’ (2009) 50(3) European Journal of Sociology 355–86Google Scholar
Brammer, S, Jackson, G and Matten, D, ‘Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance’ (2012) 10(1) Socio-Economic Review 3–28Google Scholar
Caroll, A. B. and Shabana, K. M., ‘The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice’ (2010) 12(1) International Journal of Management Reviews 85–105Google Scholar
Gond, J.-P., Kang, N, and Moon, J, ‘The government of self-regulation: on the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility’ (2011) 40(4) Economy and Society 640–71Google Scholar
Kinderman, D, ‘Corporate social responsibility in the EU, 1993–2013: institutional ambiguity, economic crises, business legitimacy and bureaucratic politics’ (2013) 51(4) Journal of Common Market Studies 701–20Google Scholar
Nölke, A, ’Economic causes of the Eurozone crisis: the analytical contribution of comparative capitalism’ (2016) 14(1) Socio-Economic Review 141–61Google Scholar