Book contents
- New Private Law Theory
- New Private Law Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- New Private Law Theory
- Part I Methods and Disciplines
- Part II Social Ordering, Constitutionalism and Private Law
- Part III Transactions and Risk: Private Law and the Market
- Part IV Persons and Organizations
- Part V Private Law (Rule-Setting) beyond the State
- Index
- References
Part I - Methods and Disciplines
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 April 2021
Book contents
- New Private Law Theory
- New Private Law Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- New Private Law Theory
- Part I Methods and Disciplines
- Part II Social Ordering, Constitutionalism and Private Law
- Part III Transactions and Risk: Private Law and the Market
- Part IV Persons and Organizations
- Part V Private Law (Rule-Setting) beyond the State
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- New Private Law TheoryA Pluralist Approach, pp. 33 - 128Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Esser, Josef, Vorverständnis und Methodenwahl in der Rechtsfindung: Rationalitätsgrundlagen richterlicher Entscheidungspraxis (Frankfurt: Athenäum, 1972), pp. 7–9, 116–41 (English translation available on the book website)Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, Between Authority and Interpretation: On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), namely Chapter 12 on interpretationGoogle Scholar
Fuller, L, ‘Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart’, 71 Harvard Law Review (1958), 630–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grechening, K / Gelter, M, ‘Divergente Evolution des Rechtsdenkens: Von amerikanischer Rechtsökonomie und deutscher Dogmatik’, 72 RabelsZ (2008), 513–61Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961, 2nd ed., 1994)Google Scholar
Nourse, V / Shaffer, G, ‘Varieties of New Legal Realism: Can a New World Order Prompt a New Legal Theory?’ 95 Cornell Law Review 61–138 (2009)Google Scholar
Ripert, G, Aspects juridiques du capitalisme moderne (2nd ed., Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1951)Google Scholar
Weber, Max, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978 [1921/22]), pp. 753–84Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile, The Division of Labour in Society (New York: Free Press, 1933 [1893]), pp. 206–19Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Eugen, Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts (Munich: Duncker & Humblot, 1913)Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl, The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study (Dobbs Ferry: Oceana, 1930)Google Scholar
Nee, Victor / Swedberg, Richard, ‘Economic Sociology and New Institutional Economics’, in Menard, Claude / Shirley, Mary M. (eds.), The Handbook of New Institutional Economics (Dordrecht: Springer, 2005), pp. 789–818Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time (Boston: Beacon Press Books, 2001)Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald, ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, 3 Journal of Law and Economics 1–44 (1960)Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism – Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (New York: Free Press, 1985), namely chapter 1: ‘Transaction Cost Economics’Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert, ‘A Behavioural Model of Rational Choice’, 69 The Quarterly Journal of Economics 99–118 (1955)Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido, ‘Some Thoughts on Risk Distribution and the Law of Torts’, 70 The Yale Law Journal 499–553 (1961)Google Scholar
Jolls, Christine, Behavioral Economics and the Law (Boston / Delft: Now Publishers, 2011)Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel / Tversky, Amos, ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk’, 47 Econometrica 263–91 (1979)Google Scholar
Mestmäcker, Ernst-Joachim, A Legal Theory without Law: Posner v. Hayek on Economic Analysis of Law (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007)Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard / Sunstein, Cass, ‘Libertarian Paternalism’, 93 The American Economic Review 175–9 (2003)Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos / Kahneman, Daniel, ‘Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions’, 59 The Journal of Business 251–78 (1986)Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, Law as a Social System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 88–120Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge / MA: MIT Press, 1996), pp. 84–104Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, ‘Critical Systems Theory’, 38 Philosophy & Social Criticism 3–23 (2012).Google Scholar
Kjaer, Poul, ‘Systems in Context: On the Outcome of the Habermas/Luhmann-debate’, Ancilla Iuris 66–77 (2006).Google Scholar
Lomfeld, Bertram, ‘Contract as Deliberation’, 76 Law and Contemporary Problems 1–18 (2013).Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, Law as an Autopoietic System (Oxford, UK / Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1993)Google Scholar
Thornhill, Chris, ‘Systems Theory and Legal Theory: Luhmann, Heidegger and the False Ends of Metaphysics’, 116 Radical Philosophy 7–20 (2002).Google Scholar
Wieacker, F, Voraussetzungen europäischer Rechtskultur (Göttingen: Göttinger Tageblatt, 1985) trans. by E. Bodenheimer as ‘Foundations of European legal culture’ (1990) 38 The American Journal of Comparative Law 1–29Google Scholar
La Porta, R, Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F, Shleifer, A and Vishny, R. W., ‘Law and finance’ (1998) 106(6) Journal of Political Economy 1113–55Google Scholar
La Porta, R, Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F, Shleifer, A, ‘The economic consequences of legal origins’ (2008) 46(2) Journal of Economic Literature 285–332Google Scholar
Cheffins, B. R. / Bank, S. A. / Wells, H, ‘Law and history by numbers: use, but with care’ (2014) 5 University of Illinois Law Review 1739–64Google Scholar
Duve, T, ‘European Legal History: Global Perspectives’, Max Planck Institute for European Legal History Research Paper Series no. 2013–06Google Scholar
Michaels, R, ‘Comparative law by numbers? Legal origins thesis, doing business reports, and the silence of traditional comparative law’ (2009) 57 American Journal of Comparative Law 765–95.Google Scholar
Moréteau, O / Masferrer, A / Modéer, K. A., Comparative Legal History (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2019)Google Scholar
Schnyder, G / Siems, M / Aguilera, R, ‘Twenty Years of “Law and Finance”: Time to Take Law Seriously’, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Working Paper No. 501, 2018Google Scholar