Book contents
- Maternal Hemodynamics
- Maternal Hemodynamics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Section 1 Physiology of Normal Pregnancy
- Section 2 Pathological Pregnancy: Screening and Established Disease
- Section 3 Techniques: How To Do
- Chapter 11 How to Assess Arterial Function?
- Chapter 12 How to Do a Maternal Venous Doppler Assessment
- Chapter 13 Noninvasive Techniques for Measuring Cardiac Output During Pregnancy
- Chapter 14 Techniques of Measuring Plasma Volume Changes in Pregnancy
- Section 4 Cardiovascular Therapies
- Section 5 Controversies
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Chapter 13 - Noninvasive Techniques for Measuring Cardiac Output During Pregnancy
from Section 3 - Techniques: How To Do
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2018
Book contents
- Maternal Hemodynamics
- Maternal Hemodynamics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Section 1 Physiology of Normal Pregnancy
- Section 2 Pathological Pregnancy: Screening and Established Disease
- Section 3 Techniques: How To Do
- Chapter 11 How to Assess Arterial Function?
- Chapter 12 How to Do a Maternal Venous Doppler Assessment
- Chapter 13 Noninvasive Techniques for Measuring Cardiac Output During Pregnancy
- Chapter 14 Techniques of Measuring Plasma Volume Changes in Pregnancy
- Section 4 Cardiovascular Therapies
- Section 5 Controversies
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Maternal Hemodynamics , pp. 120 - 133Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Singh, S, Goyal, A. The origin of echocardiography: a tribute to Inge Edler. Tex Heart Inst J. 2007;34(4):431–8.Google Scholar
Oxborough, D. A practical approach to transthoracic echocardiography. Brit J Cardiac Nurs. 2008;3:163–9.Google Scholar
Regitz-Zagrosek, V, Blomstrom Lundqvist, C, Borghi, C, et al. ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: the Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011;32(24):3147–97.Google Scholar
Teichholz, LE, Kreulen, T, Herman, MV, Gorlin, R. Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence of absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol. 1976;37(1):7–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kronik, G, Slany, J, Mosslacher, H. Comparative value of eight M-mode echocardiographic formulas for determining left ventricular stroke volume. A correlative study with thermodilution and left ventricular single-plane cineangiography. Circulation. 1979;60(6):1308–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Oppen, AC, Stigter, RH, Bruinse, HW. Cardiac output in normal pregnancy: a critical review. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(2):310–8.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, H. Role of M-mode technique in today’s echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(3):240–57; 335–7.Google Scholar
Melchiorre, K, Sharma, R, Thilaganathan, B. Cardiac structure and function in normal pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;24(6):413–21.Google Scholar
McNamara, H, Barclay, P, Sharma, V. Accuracy and precision of the ultrasound cardiac output monitor (USCOM 1A) in pregnancy: comparison with three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(4):669–76.Google Scholar
Poppas, A, Shroff, SG, Korcarz, CE, et al. Serial assessment of the cardiovascular system in normal pregnancy. Role of arterial compliance and pulsatile arterial load. Circulation. 1997;95(10):2407–15.Google Scholar
Dey, I, Sprivulis, P. Emergency physicians can reliably assess emergency department patient cardiac output using the USCOM continuous wave Doppler cardiac output monitor. Emerg Med Australas. 2005;17(3):193–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marik, PE. Noninvasive cardiac output monitors: a state-of the-art review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27(1):121–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahendru, AA, Everett, TR, Wilkinson, IB, Lees, CC, McEniery, CM. A longitudinal study of maternal cardiovascular function from preconception to the postpartum period. J Hypertens. 2014;32(4):849–56.Google Scholar
Jhanji, S, Dawson, J, Pearse, RM. Cardiac output monitoring: basic science and clinical application. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(2):172–81.Google Scholar
Staelens, AS, Bertrand, PB, Vonck, S, Malbrain, MLNG, Gyselaers, W. Non-invasive methods for maternal cardiac output monitoring. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2015:1–17.Google Scholar
Wallenburg, HC. Maternal haemodynamics in pregnancy. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 1990;2(01):45–66.Google Scholar
Keren, H, Burkhoff, D, Squara, P. Evaluation of a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;293(1):H583–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Easterling, TR, Benedetti, TJ, Carlson, KL, Watts, DH. Measurement of cardiac output in pregnancy by thermodilution and impedance techniques. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96(1):67–9.Google Scholar
Dyson, KS, Shoemaker, JK, Arbeille, P, Hughson, RL. Model flow estimates of cardiac output compared with Doppler ultrasound during acute changes in vascular resistance in women. Exp Physiol. 2010;95(4):561–8.Google Scholar
Rang, S, de Pablo Lapiedra, B, van Montfrans, GA, Bouma, BJ, Wesseling, KH, Wolf, H. Modelflow: a new method for noninvasive assessment of cardiac output in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(3):235 e1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elvan-Taspinar, A, Uiterkamp, LA, Sikkema, JM, et al. Validation and use of the Finometer for blood pressure measurement in normal, hypertensive and pre-eclamptic pregnancy. J Hypertens. 2003;21(11):2053–60.Google Scholar
Gibbons, RJ, Balady, GJ, Beasley, JW, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Exercise Testing. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30(1):260–311.Google Scholar
Meah, VL, Cockcroft, J, Stöhr, EJ. Maternal cardiac twist pre-pregnancy: potential as a novel marker of pre-eclampsia. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2013;24(4):289–95.Google Scholar
Armstrong, WF, Ryan, T. Feigenbaum’s Echocardiography. 7th edn: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.Google Scholar
Lorenz, CH, Walker, ES, Morgan, VL, Klein, SS, Graham, TP, Jr. Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 1999;1(1):7–21.Google Scholar
La Gerche, A, Claessen, G, Van de Bruaene, A, et al. Cardiac MRI: a new gold standard for ventricular volume quantification during high-intensity exercise. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(2):329–38.Google ScholarPubMed
Jakovljevic, DG, Nunan, D, Donovan, G, Hodges, LD, Sandercock, GR, Brodie, DA. Comparison of cardiac output determined by different rebreathing methods at rest and at peak exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;102(5):593–9.Google Scholar
Peyton, PJ, Bailey, M, Thompson, BR. Reproducibility of cardiac output measurement by the nitrous oxide rebreathing technique. J Clin Monit Comput. 2009;23(4):233–6.Google Scholar
Schutte, AE, Huisman, HW, Van Rooyen, JM, Oosthuizen, W, Jerling, JC. Sensitivity of the Finometer device in detecting acute and medium-term changes in cardiovascular function. Blood Press Monit. 2003;8(5):195–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed