Book contents
- Maternal Hemodynamics
- Maternal Hemodynamics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Section 1 Physiology of Normal Pregnancy
- Section 2 Pathological Pregnancy: Screening and Established Disease
- Section 3 Techniques: How To Do
- Chapter 11 How to Assess Arterial Function?
- Chapter 12 How to Do a Maternal Venous Doppler Assessment
- Chapter 13 Noninvasive Techniques for Measuring Cardiac Output During Pregnancy
- Chapter 14 Techniques of Measuring Plasma Volume Changes in Pregnancy
- Section 4 Cardiovascular Therapies
- Section 5 Controversies
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Chapter 11 - How to Assess Arterial Function?
from Section 3 - Techniques: How To Do
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2018
Book contents
- Maternal Hemodynamics
- Maternal Hemodynamics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Section 1 Physiology of Normal Pregnancy
- Section 2 Pathological Pregnancy: Screening and Established Disease
- Section 3 Techniques: How To Do
- Chapter 11 How to Assess Arterial Function?
- Chapter 12 How to Do a Maternal Venous Doppler Assessment
- Chapter 13 Noninvasive Techniques for Measuring Cardiac Output During Pregnancy
- Chapter 14 Techniques of Measuring Plasma Volume Changes in Pregnancy
- Section 4 Cardiovascular Therapies
- Section 5 Controversies
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Maternal Hemodynamics , pp. 101 - 112Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Laurent, S, Cockcroft, J, Van Bortel, L, et al. Expert Consensus Document on Arterial Stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 2006;27:2588–605.Google Scholar
Green, D. Point: flow-mediated dilation does reflect nitric oxide-mediated endothelial function. J Appl Physiol 2005; 99:1233–1234; discussion 1237–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verma, S, Buchanan, MR, Anderson, TJ. Endothelial function testing as a biomarker of vascular disease. Circulation 2003;108:2054–9.Google Scholar
Harris, RA, Nishiyama, SK, Wray, DW, and Richardson, RS. Ultrasound Assessment of Flow-Mediated Dilation. Hypertension 2010;55:1075–85, originally published April 14, 2010.Google Scholar
Savvidou, MD, Kametas, NA, Donald, AE, Nicolaides, KH. Non-invasive assessment of endothelial function in normal pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:502–7.Google Scholar
Savvidou, MD, Hingorani, AD, Tsikas, D, Frölich, JC, Vallance, P, Nicolaides, KH. Endothelial dysfunction and raised plasma concentrations of asymmetric dimethylarginine in pregnant women who subsequently develop pre-eclampsia.The Lancet, 2003;361(9368):1511–17.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, I, Webb, D. Venous occlusion plethysmography in cardiovascular research: methodology and clinical applications. Br J ClinPharmacol 2001;52:631–46.Google Scholar
Whitney, RJ. The measurement of volume changes in human limbs. J Physiol (Lond). 1953;121:1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benjamin, N, Calver, A, Collier, J, Robinson, B, Vallance, P, Webb, D. Measuring forearm blood flow and interpreting the responses to drugs and mediators. Hypertension 1995;25:918–23.Google Scholar
Hausvater, A, Giannone, T, Sandoval, YH, et al. The association between preeclampsia and arterial stiffness. J Hypertens. 2012; 30:17–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panza, JA, Epstein, SE, Quyyumi, AA. Circadian variation in vascular tone and its relation to alpha sympathetic vasoconstriction. N Engl J Med 1991;325:986–90.Google Scholar
Horváth, IG1, Németh, A, Lenkey, Z, et al. Invasive validation of a new oscillometric device (Arteriograph) for measuring augmentation index, central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens 2010;28:2068–75.Google Scholar
London, GM, Blacher, J, Pannier, B et al. Arterial wave reflections and survival in end-stage renal failure. Hypertension 2001;38:434–8.Google Scholar
Khalil, A, Jauniaux, E, Cooper, D, Harrington, K. Pulse wave analysis in normal pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study. PLoS ONE 2009; 4: e6134Google Scholar
van Leeuwen-Segarceanu, EM, Tromp, WF, Bos, WJ, Vogels, OJ, Groothoff, JW, van der Lee, JH.Comparison of two instruments measuring carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: Vicorder versus SphygmoCor. J Hypertens 2010;28: 1687–91.Google Scholar
Karamanoglu, M, O’Rourke, MF, Avolio, AP, et al. An analysis of the relationship between central aortic and peripheral upper limb pressure waves in man. Eur Heart J 1993;14:160–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen-Huan, C, Nevo, E, Fetics, B, et al. Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure. Circulation 1997;95:1827–36.Google Scholar
Khalil, A, Garcia-Mandujano, R, Maiz, N, Elkhouli, M, Nicolaides, KH. Longitudinal changes in maternal hemodynamics in a population at risk for pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:197–204.Google Scholar
Khalil, A, Akolekar, R, Syngelaki, A, Elkhouli, M, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal hemodynamics at 11–13 weeks’ gestation and risk of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;40:28–34.Google Scholar
Khalil, A, Garcia-Mandujano, R, Chiriac, R, Akolekar, R, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal hemodynamics at 11–13 weeks’ gestation in gestational diabetes mellitus. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012;31:216–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hwang, MH, Yoo, JK, Kim, HK, et al. Validity and reliability of aortic pulse wave velocity and augmentation index determined by the new cuff-based SphygmoCorXcel. J Hum Hypertens 2014;28:475–81.Google Scholar
Park, CM, Korolkova, O, Davies, JE, et al. Arterial pressure: agreement between a brachial cuff-based device and radial tonometry. J Hypertens. 2014;32(4):865–72.Google Scholar
Praciano De Sousa, PC, GurgelAlves, JA, Bezerra, ME, et al. Brachial artery flowmediated dilation and pulsatility index change as independent predictors for hypertensive disorders in the second trimester of pregnancy. Eur J ObstetGynecolReprod Biol. 2016;200: 94–7.Google Scholar
Iacobaeus, C, Kahan, T, Jörneskog, G, Bremme, K, Thorsell, M, Andolf, E. Fetal growth is associated with first-trimester maternal vascular function. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;48(4):483–90.Google Scholar
Brewster, S, Floras, J, Zinman, B, Retnakaran, R. Endothelial function in women with and without a history of glucose intolerance in pregnancy. J Diabetes Res. 2013;2013:382670.Google Scholar
Lampinen, KH, Rönnback, M, Groop, PH, Kaaja, RJ. A relationship between insulin sensitivity and vasodilation in women with a history of preeclamptic pregnancy.Hypertension. 2008;52(2):394–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agatisa, PK, Ness, RB, Roberts, JM, Costantino, JP, Kuller, LH, McLaughlin, MK.Impairment of endothelial function in women with a history of preeclampsia: an indicator of cardiovascular risk. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;286(4):H1389–93.Google Scholar
Savvidou, MD, Kaihura, C, Anderson, JM, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal arterial stiffness in women who subsequently develop pre-eclampsia. Berger, JS, ed. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(5):e18703.Google Scholar
Macedo, ML, Luminoso, D, Savvidou, MD, McEniery, CM, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal wave reflections and arterial stiffness in normal pregnancy as assessed by applanation tonometry. Hypertension. 2008;51:1047–51.Google Scholar
Kaihura, C, Savvidou, MD, Anderson, JM, McEniery, CM, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal arterial stiffness in pregnancies affected by preeclampsia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ. 2009;297(2):H759–H764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stea, F, Bozec, E, Millasseau, S, Khettab, H, Boutouyrie, P, Laurent, S. Comparison of the Complior Analyse device with Sphygmocor and Complior SP for pulse wave velocity and central pressure assessment.J Hypertens. 2014;32(4):873–80.Google Scholar
Everett, TR, Mahendru, A, McEniery, CM, Lees, CC, Wilkinson, IB. A comparison of SphygmoCor and Vicorder devices for measuring aortic pulse wave velocity in pregnancy. Artery Research, 2012;6(2):92–6.Google Scholar
Lan, P, Keehn, L, Milne, L, McNeill, K, Chowienczyk, P, Sinha, MD. Pulse wave analysis and the risk of early-onset pre-eclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertension. 2016;5:1:26.Google Scholar