Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Historical introduction: on widely foraging for Kalahari lizards
- I Organismal patterns of variation with foraging mode
- II Environmental influences on foraging mode
- 12 The foraging biology of the Gekkota: life in the middle
- 13 Foraging mode in the African cordylids and plasticity of foraging behavior in Platysaurus broadleyi
- 14 Interactions between habitat use, behavior, and the trophic niche of lacertid lizards
- 15 Food acquisition modes and habitat use in lizards: questions from an integrative perspective
- 16 The evolution of foraging behavior in the Galápagos marine iguana: natural and sexual selection on body size drives ecological, morphological, and behavioral specialization
- 17 The evolution of the foraging mode paradigm in lizard ecology
- Index
- References
14 - Interactions between habitat use, behavior, and the trophic niche of lacertid lizards
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2010
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Historical introduction: on widely foraging for Kalahari lizards
- I Organismal patterns of variation with foraging mode
- II Environmental influences on foraging mode
- 12 The foraging biology of the Gekkota: life in the middle
- 13 Foraging mode in the African cordylids and plasticity of foraging behavior in Platysaurus broadleyi
- 14 Interactions between habitat use, behavior, and the trophic niche of lacertid lizards
- 15 Food acquisition modes and habitat use in lizards: questions from an integrative perspective
- 16 The evolution of foraging behavior in the Galápagos marine iguana: natural and sexual selection on body size drives ecological, morphological, and behavioral specialization
- 17 The evolution of the foraging mode paradigm in lizard ecology
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
The existence of evolutionary trade-offs prevents simultaneous optimization of different functions that require opposing biomechanical or physiological adaptations (Stearns, 1992). Consequently, trade-offs likely play an important role in niche partitioning, in that species specialized in exploiting one type of niche (e.g. microhabitat) are expected to be less proficient at exploiting others. For instance, in Anolis lizards, a trade-off exists between sprint speed and sure-footedness because long limbs are required to move fast, whereas short limbs aid sure-footedness (Losos and Sinervo, 1989; Losos and Irschick, 1996). Accordingly, species that predominantly move on broad surfaces (i.e. trunk–ground ecomorph) specialize for speed and have long limbs, whereas species living on narrow substrates (i.e. twig ecomorph) are specialized in slower but secure movements.
In a similar fashion, species specializing in different dietary niches may have diverged morphologically because the biomechanical demands on the feeding and/or locomotor apparatus are often not reconcilable within one phenotype. Clearly, the ability of a predator to exploit a certain prey type will depend on the functional characteristics of the prey (e.g. prey distribution, hardness, and escape response) and the performance of the feeding and locomotor system of the predator. For instance, in labrid fishes the amount of force potentially generated by the jaws trades off with the speed of jaw movement because of differences in the four-bar linkage system of the jaws and hyoid (long links aid high force outputs, but rapid movements are realized by short links) (Westneat, 1994, 1995).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Lizard Ecology , pp. 427 - 449Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
, , and (2002). Ecomorphological analysis of trophic niche partitioning in a tropical savannah bat community. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B269, 1271–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2003). The implications of food hardness for diet in bats. Funct. Ecol. 17, 201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1997). Food habits of the green lizard, Lacerta bilineata, in central Italy and a reliability test of faecal pellet analysis. Ital. J. Zool. 64, 267–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989). Towards a phylogeny and biogeography of the Lacertidae: relationships within an old-world family of lizards derived from morphology. Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.) 55, 209–57.Google Scholar
(1998). Structural niche, limb morphology and locomotion in lacertid lizards (Squamata, Lacertidae); a preliminary survey. Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.) 64, 63–89.Google Scholar
Arnold, S. J. (1993). Foraging theory and prey size – predator size relations in snakes. In Snakes: Ecology and Behaviour, ed. and , pp. 87–112. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
, , and (1995). Evolution of sprint speed in lacertid lizards: morphological, physiological, and behavioural covariation. Evolution 49, 848–63.Google ScholarPubMed
and (2002). Patterns of morphological variation and correlates of habitat use in Chameleons. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 76, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartmill, M. (1985). Climbing. In Functional Vertebrate Morphology, ed. , , and , pp. 73–88. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999). Foraging modes in lacertid lizards from southern Africa. Amph.-Rept. 20, 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, S. B., Greene, H. W. and Charnov, E. L. (1994). Allometric aspects of predator-prey interactions. In Ecological Morphology, ed. and , pp. 123–39. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1988). Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19, 445–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). Toward the phylogeny of the family Lacertidae – Why 4708 base pairs of mtDNA sequences cannot draw the picture. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 71, 203–17.Google Scholar
(1992). Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41, 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). Laboratory endurance capacity predicts variation in field locomotor behaviour among lizard species. Anim. Behav. 58, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1999). An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral states. Am. Zool. 39, 374–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003). Evolutionary maintenance of sexual dimorphism in head size in the lizard Zootoca vivipara: a test of two hypotheses. J. Zool. Lond. 259, 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999). Relationships of wall lizards, Podarcis (Reptilia: Lacertidae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Copeia 1999, 749–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1999). Sexual dimorphism of head size in Gallotia galloti; testing the niche divergence hypothesis by functional analyses. Funct. Ecol. 13, 289–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2001a). Head shape and bite performance in xenosaurid lizards. J. Exp. Zool. 290, 101–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2001b). Correlation between habitat use and body shape in a phrynosomatid lizard (Urosaurus ornatus): a population-level analysis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 74, 305–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2001c). The implications of bite performance for diet in two species of lacertid lizards. Can. J. Zool. 79, 662–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002a). Relations between microhabitat use and limb shape in phrynosomatid lizards. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 77, 149–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002b). Evolution of bite performance in turtles. J. Evol. Biol. 15, 1083–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004). Omnivory in lacertid lizards: adaptive evolution or constraint? J. Evol. Biol. 17, 974–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (2005). Bite performance and morphology in a population of Darwin's finches: implications for the evolution of beak shape. Funct. Ecol. 19, 43–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1984). Locomotor capacity and foraging behaviour of Kalahari lacertid lizards. Anim. Behav. 32, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996). The effects of perch diameter on the escape behaviour of Anolis lizards: laboratory based predictions and field tests. Anim. Behav. 51, 593–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1989). The effects of morphology and perch diameter on sprint performance of Anolis lizards. J. Exp. Biol. 245, 23–30.Google Scholar
(2004). The relationship between skull morphology, biting performance and foraging mode in Kalahari lacertid lizards. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 140, 403–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005). Prey capture kinematics of ant-eating lizards. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 113–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, D. B. (1994). Covariation between morphology and locomotory performance in Sceloporine lizards. In Lizard Ecology: Historical and Experimental Perspectives, ed. and , pp. 207–35. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991). Notes on alimentary habits and spatial-temporal distribution of eating behaviour patterns in a natural population of lizards (Gallotia galloti). Vieraea 20, 1–9.Google Scholar
, and (1997). Intrapopulation variability in morphology, coloration, and body size in two races of the lacertid lizard, Gallotia galloti. J. Herpetol. 31, 499–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1986). Régime alimentaire d' une population de lézard des murailles, Podarcis muralis (Laurent, 1768) dans le Sud-Ouest de la France. Amph.-Rept. 7, 171–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1984). Field energetics and foraging mode of Kalahari lacertid lizards. Ecology 65, 588–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1983). Partage des resources alimentaires entre deux Lacertidae sympatriques des iles Kerkennah (Tunisie): Acanthodactylus pardalis et Eremias olivieri. Soc. Zool. Fr. 1983, 477–83.Google Scholar
Olsson, M. and Madsen, T. (1998). Sexual selection and sperm competition in reptiles. In Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, ed. and , pp. 503–610. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
and (1993). Dietary adaptations and herbivory in lacertid lizards of the genus Podarcis from western Mediterranean islands (Reptilia-Sauria). Bonn. Zool. Beitr. 44, 193–220.Google Scholar
(1999). The evolution of search modes: ecological versus phylogenetic perspectives. Am. Nat. 153, 98–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1988). Trophic ecology of a taxocenosis of Mediterranean Lacertidae. Ecolog. Mediterranea 14, 131–46.Google Scholar
(1988). Ecomorphology, locomotion, and microhabitat structure: patterns in a tropical mainland Anolis community. Ecol. Monogr. 58, 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000). Aerobic and anaerobic swimming performance of individual Atlantic cod. J. Exp. Biol. 203, 347–57.Google ScholarPubMed
Roig-Fernandez, J. M. (1998). Ecologia trófica de una población pirenaica de lagartija de turbera Zootoca vivipara (Jacquin, 1787). Tesis de licenciatura, University of Barcelona, Spain.
and (1995). Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd edn. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
and (2004). The effects of surface diameter and incline of the hindlimb kinematics of an arboreal lizard (Anolis sagrei). J. Exp. Biol. 207, 2115–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1994). Frugivory and seed dispersal by the lizard Gallotia galloti (Lacertidae) in a xeric habitat of the Canary Islands. Oikos 70, 403–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003). Digestive ecology of two omnivorous Canarian lizard species (Gallotia, Lacertidae). Amph.-Rept. 24, 331–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2002). Performance constraints in decathletes. Nature 415, 755–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1999). Evolutionary relationships between body shape and habitat use in lacertid lizards. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1, 785–805.Google Scholar
and (2001). Evolutionary trade-offs in locomotor capacities in lacertid lizards: are splendid sprinters clumsy climbers? J. Evol. Biol. 14, 48–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2003). Relationships between locomotor performance, microhabitat use and antipredator behaviour in lacertid lizards. Funct. Ecol. 17, 160–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001). Speed and stamina trade-off in lacertid lizards. Evolution 55, 1040–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2002). Relationships between head size, bite force, prey handling efficiency and diet in two sympatric lacertid lizards. Funct. Ecol. 16, 842–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). Transmission forces and velocity in the feeding mechanisms of labrid fishes (Teleostei, Perciformes). Zoomorphology 114, 103–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995). Feeding, function, and phylogeny: analysis of historical biomechanics in labrid fishes using comparative methods. Syst. Biol. 44, 361–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2001). Spatio-temporal gait characteristics of level and vertical locomotion in a ground-dwelling and a climbing gecko. J. Exp. Biol. 204, 1233–46.Google Scholar
- 35
- Cited by