Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: September 2014

3 - Legitimacy and Legality, Thinking and Ruling in the Closed Society and the World State

Summary

Leo Strauss’s exchange with Alexandre Kojève concerning Xenophon’s On Tyranny is among the most famous debates between philosophers in the twentieth century – popularized but also distorted by Allan Bloom and, especially, Francis Fukuyama in his The End of History and the Last Man. The essay by Strauss that initiated the controversy, “On Tyranny”, was penned at the end of his stint at the New School, shortly before moving from New York to Chicago. Here we observe for the first time Strauss explicitly deploying the classical perspective on thinking and political action in responding to the challenge described in “German Nihilism” at the beginning of the New School period, namely, the need to answer and check philosophical temptations to political extremism. Studying the way in which Strauss deploys the classics in On Tyranny will allow us to understand the complexity and subtlety of Strauss’s approach to thinkers such as Machiavelli and Thucydides in later works, readings that have given rise to much suspicion, controversy, and confusion among specialists and public intellectuals alike.

The issues that are raised in the debate with Kojève go to the core of Strauss’s thinking about the relationship(s) among law, philosophy, and political violence. The topics of controversy include the relation of legality to legitimacy and of both to violence; whether and how philosophers and intellectuals ought to guide violent political change; and whether a world state or universal society is possible, desirable, or even inevitable.

Smith, Steven, “Introduction: Leo Strauss Today” in The Cambridge Companion to Leo Strauss, edited by Smith, Steven (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 13–40, 25
Bloom, Allan, The Closing of the American Mind: How Higher Education Has Failed Democracy and Impoverished the Souls of Today’s Students (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1987), p. 222, n. 6
Nichols, James H., Alexandre Kojève at the End of History (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007)
Lilla, Mark, The Reckless Mind: Intellectuals in Politics (New York: New York Review of Books, 2006), ch. 4
Howse, Robert and Frost, Bryan-Paul, “Introduction: The Plausibility of the Universal and Homogenous State,” in Kojève, Alexandre, Outline of a Phenomenology of Right, edited by Frost, Bryan-Paul, translated by Howse, Robert and Frost, Bryan-Paul (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000), pp. 1–27
Xenos, Nicholas, Cloaked in Virtue: Unveiling Leo Strauss and the Rhetoric of American Foreign Policy (New York: Abingdon, 2008)
Hirst, Aggie, “Leo Strauss and International Relations: The Politics of Modernity’s Abyss,” International Politics (2012) 49, pp. 645–670
Sartre, Jean-Paul, No Exit and Three Other Plays, translated by Abel, Lionel (New York: Vintage International, 1989), p. 218
Walzer, Michael’s discussion of Les Main sales in “Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (1973), pp. 160–180
Tarcov, Nathan, “Preface to the Japanese Translation of On Tyranny,” Perspectives on Political Science 33, no. 4 (Fall 2004), pp. 221–226
Filoni, Marco, Le philosophie du dimanche: La vie et la pensée d’Alexandre Kojève (Paris: Gallimard, 2010), p. 263
Batnitzky, , Leo Strauss and Emmanuel Levinas: Philosophy and the Politics of Revelation (New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006), pp. 128–132
Gourevitch, Victor, “Philosophy and Politics II,” The Review of Metaphysics (1968), pp. 281–328, 323
Bloom, Allan, “Interpretive Essay” in The Republic of Plato, translated by Bloom (New York: Basic Books, 1991), p. 426
Tarcov, Nathan, “Philosophy as the Right Way of Life,” in Natural Right and History in Modernity and What Has Been Lost: Considerations on the Legacy of Leo Strauss, edited by Armada, Pawel and Arkadiusz, (South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 2012), pp. 50–51
Pangle, , Leo Strauss: An Introduction to his Thought and Intellectual Legacy (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006), p. 104
Schmitt, Carl, “State Movement, People: The Triadic Structure of the Political Unity,” in State Movement, People: The Triadic Structure of the Political Unity. The Question of Legality, tr. Draghici, Simona (Corvallis, OR: Plutarch Press, 2001), p. 48
Cohen, Jean, Globalization and Sovereignty: Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy, and Constitutionalism (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012)
Nicolaidis, Kalypso and Howse, Robert (eds.), The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the US and EU (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)
Agamben, Giorgio, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1998)
“Les Romans de la sagesse,” Critique, no. 60 (1952), pp. 387–397
Norton, , Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004), p. 63
Strauss, , Xenophon’s Socratic Discourse: An Interpretation of the Oeconomicus (S. Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 1998), p. 89
Strauss, , Xenophon’s Socrates (S. Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 1998), p. 126
de Vries, Erik, Policy Review (2004)
Howse, Robert, “Kojève’s Latin Empire,” Policy Review (2004), pp. 41–50
Berns, , “The Case Against World Government,” in Readings in World Politics, edited by Goldwin, Robert (New York: Oxford University Press, 1968), pp. 531–544
Rabkin, , Why Sovereignty Matters (Washington, DC: AEI Press, 1998)