Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:05:22.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Learning to Read Turkish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2017

Ludo Verhoeven
Affiliation:
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Charles Perfetti
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarts, R., Demir, S. & Vallen, T. (2011). Characteristics of academic language register occurring in caretaker-child interaction: Development and validation of a coding scheme. Language Learning, 61, 11731221.Google Scholar
Acarlar, A., Ege, P. & Turan, F. (2002). Türk çocuklarinda üstdil becerilerinin gelişimi ve okuma ile ilişkisi [Development of metalinguistic abilities and its relationship with reading in Turkish children]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 17(50), 6373.Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A. (2008). Bilişsel gelişim ve dil gelişim [Cognitive and linguistic development]. Presentation at Mother Child Education Foundation, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A. A. & Slobin, D. I. (1985). The acquisition of Turkish. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. I (pp. 839880). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Babayiğit, S. & Stainthorp, R. (2007). Preliterate phonological awareness and early literacy skills in Turkish. Journal of Research in Reading, 30, 394413.Google Scholar
Babayiğit, S. & Stainthorp, R. (2010). Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 23, 539568.Google Scholar
Babayiğit, S. & Stainthorp, R. (2011). Modeling the relationships between cognitive–linguistic skills and literacy skills: New insights from a transparent orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 169189.Google Scholar
Boeschoten, H. (1991). Aspects of language variation. In Boeschoten, H. & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.), Turkish linguistics today (pp. 150176). Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Cain, K. & Oakhill, J. (2007). Reading comprehension difficulties: Correlates, causes, and consequences. In Cain, K. & Oakhill, J. (Eds.), Children’s comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective (pp. 4175). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cain, K., Oakhill, J. & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 3142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candan, A., Küntay, A., Yeh, Y. C., Gheung, H., Wagnerd, L. & Naigles, L. (2012). Language and age effects in children’s processing of word order. Cognitive Development, 27, 205221.Google Scholar
Catts, H. W., Hogan, T. P. & Adlof, S. M. (2005). Developmental changes in reading and reading disabilities. In Catts, H. & Kamhi, A. (Eds.), The connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 2540). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Demiral, Ş. B., Schlesewsky, M. & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2008). On the universality of language comprehension strategies: Evidence from Turkish. Cognition, 106, 484500. DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.01.008.Google Scholar
Durgunoğlu, A. Y. (2003). Recognizing morphologically complex words in Turkish. In Assink, E. & Sandra, D. (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 8192). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Durgunoğlu, A. Y. (2009). The impact of L1 oral proficiency on L2 (reading) comprehension. Commissioned paper for the US National Academy of Sciences oral language task force.Google Scholar
Durgunoğlu, A. Y. & Öney, B. (1999). A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition. Reading and Writing, 11, 281299.Google Scholar
Durgunoğlu, A. Y., Öney, B. & Kuşcul, H. (2003). Development and evaluation of an adult literacy program in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 23, 1736.Google Scholar
Erguvanlı-Taylan, E. (1987). The role of semantic features in Turkish word order. Folia Linguistica, 21, 215228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakkani-Tür, D., Oflazer, K. & Tür, G. (2002). Statistical morphological disambiguation for agglutinative languages. Computers and the Humanities, 36, 381410.Google Scholar
Joshi, R. M., Tao, S., Aaron, P. G. & Quiroz, B. (2012). Cognitive component of componential model of reading applied to different orthographies. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 480486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendeou, P., Bohn-Gettler, C., White, M. J. & van den Broek, P. (2008). Children’s inference generation across different media. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 259272.Google Scholar
Kendeou, P., Lynch, J. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C. A., White, M. J. & Kremer, K. E. (2005). Developing successful readers: Building early comprehension skills through television viewing and listening. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33, 9198.Google Scholar
Kiliç, S. (1991). Türkiye de latin harfleri meselesi (1908–1928). Ankara Üniversitesi Türk İnkılap Tarihi Enstitüsü Atatürk Yolu Dergisi, 2(7). Retrieved from http://dergiler.ankara.edu.tr/dergiler/45/784/10087.pdf.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.-S., Wagner, R. K. & Lopez, D. (2012). Developmental relations between reading fluency and reading comprehension: A longitudinal study from Grade 1 to Grade 2. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 93111.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, J. (1990). Turkish and the Turkic languages. In Comrie, B. (Ed.), The world’s major languages (pp. 619644). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lepola, J., Lynch, J., Laakkonen, E., Silvén, M. & Niemi, P. (2012). The role of inference making and other language skills in the development of narrative listening comprehension in 4–6-year-old children. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 259282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancilla-Martinez, J. & Lesaux, N. K. (2011). The gap between Spanish speakers’ word reading and word knowledge: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 82, 15441560.Google Scholar
Oflazer, K., Say, B., Hakkani-Tür, D. Z. & Tür, G. (2003). Building a Turkish treebank. In Abeillé, A. (Ed.), Treebanks: Building and using parsed corpora, 20, 261227. DOI:10.1007/978-94-010-0201-1_15.Google Scholar
Öney, B. & Durgunoğlu, A. Y. (1997). Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 115.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357383.Google Scholar
Potocki, A., Ecalle, J. & Magnan, A. (2013). Narrative comprehension skills in 5-year-old children: Correlational analysis and comprehender profiles. The Journal of Educational Research, 106, 1426.Google Scholar
Proctor, C. P., Carlo, M., August, D. & Snow, C. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 246256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raman, I. & Baluch, B. (2001). Semantic effects as a function of reading skill in word naming of a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing, 14, 599614.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. & Bever, T. G. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12, 229265.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, H. & van de Weijer, J. (1991). Topics in Turkish phonology. In Boeschoten, H. & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.), Turkish linguistics today (pp. 1159). Leiden: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L. (1991). Acquisition of Turkish in mono- and bilingual settings. In Boeschoten, H. & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.), Turkish linguistics today (pp. 113149). Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. & van Leeuwe, J. (2008). Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 407423.Google Scholar
Ural, A. E., Yuret, D., Ketrez, F. N., Koçbaş, D. & Küntay, A. C. (2009). Morphological cues vs. number of nominals in learning verb types in Turkish: The syntactic bootstrapping mechanism revisited. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 13931405.Google Scholar
Yavuz, H. & Balcı, A. (2011). Turkish phonology and morphology. T.C. Anadolu Üniversitesi yayını (No. 2290). Retrieved from http://eogrenme.anadolu.edu.tr/eKitap/TUR401U.pdf.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×