Angelelli, P., Judica, A., Spinelli, D., Zoccolotti, P. & Luzzatti, C. (2004). Characteristics of writing disorders in Italian dyslexic children. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 17, 18–31.Google Scholar

Angelelli, P., Marinelli, C. & Burani, C. (2014). The effect of morphology on spelling and reading accuracy: A study on Italian children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 875.Google Scholar

Angelelli, P., Marinelli, C. V. & Zoccolotti, P. (2010). Single or dual orthographic representations for reading and spelling? A study on Italian dyslexic and dysgraphic children. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27, 305–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Angelelli, P., Notarnicola, A., Costabile, D., Marinelli, C. V., Judica, A., Zoccolotti, P. & Luzzatti, C. (2008). DDO–Diagnosi dei disturbi ortografici in etá evolutiva [Diagnosis of orthographic deficits in childhood]. Trento: Erickson.Google Scholar

Angelelli, P., Notarnicola, A., Judica, A., Zoccolotti, P. & Luzzatti, C. (2010). Spelling impairment in Italian dyslexic children: Does the phenomenology change with age? Cortex, 46, 1299–1311.Google Scholar

Barbiero, C., Lonciari, I., Montico, M., Monasta, L., Penge, R., Vio, C., Tressoldi, P. E., Ferluga, V., Bigoni, A., Tullio, A., Carrozzi, M. & Ronfani, L. (2012). The submerged dyslexia iceberg: How many school children are not diagnosed? Results from an Italian study. PloS one, 7, e48082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barca, L., Burani, C., Di Filippo, G. & Zoccolotti, P. (2006). Italian developmental dyslexic and proficient readers: Where are the differences? Brain and Language, 98, 347–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barca, L., Ellis, A. W. & Burani, C. (2007). Context-sensitive rules and word naming in Italian children. Reading and Writing, 20, 495–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellocchi, S., Bonifacci, P. & Burani, C. (2013). Lexicality, frequency and stress assignment effects in bilingual children reading Italian as a second language. Ms. submitted for publication.Google Scholar

Bertinetto, P. M. & Loporcaro, M. (2005). The sound pattern of Standard Italian, as compared with the varietes spoken in Florence, Milan and Rome. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 35, 131–151.Google Scholar

Biffi, M. & Maraschio, N. (2008). Storia interna dell’italiano: Sistema fonico e grafico. In Ernst, G., Gleßgen, M.-D., Schmitt, C. & Schweickard, W. (Eds.), Romanische Sprachgeschichte (pp. 2810–2830). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bimonte, D. (2002). “La conigliera è un collare per conigli … ”: Morfologia derivazionale e acquisizione del vocabolario in bambini di scuola elementare. Unpublished thesis, University of Roma-La Sapienza.Google Scholar

Bimonte, D. & Burani, C. (2005). Studi sullo sviluppo della conoscenza della morfologia derivazionale. Età Evolutiva, 80, 101–115.Google Scholar

Bortolini, U. (1976). Tipologia sillabica dell’italiano: Studio statistico. In Simone, R., Vignuzzi, U. & Ruggiero, G. (Eds.), Studi di fonetica e fonologia (pp. 5–22). Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar

Brizzolara, D., Pecini, C., Chilosi, A., Cipriani, P., Gasperini, F., Mazzotti, S., Di Filippo, G. & Zoccolotti, P. (2006). Do phonological and rapid automatized naming deficits differentially affect dyslexic children with and without a history of language delay? A study on Italian dyslexic children. Cognitive and Behavioural Neurology, 19, 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burani, C. (2010). Word morphology enhances reading fluency in children with developmental dyslexia. Lingue e Linguaggio, 9, 177–198.Google Scholar

Burani, C. & Arduino, L. S. (2004). Stress regularity or consistency? Reading aloud Italian polysyllables with different stress patterns. Brain and Language, 90, 318–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burani, C., Barca, L. & Ellis, A. W. (2006). Orthographic complexity and word naming in Italian: Some words are more transparent than others. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 346–352.Google Scholar

Burani, C., Bimonte, D., Barca, L. & Vicari, S. (2006). Word morphology and lexical comprehension in Williams Syndrome. Brain and Language, 99, 112–113.Google Scholar

Burani, C., Marcolini, S., De Luca, M. & Zoccolotti, P. (2008). Morpheme-based reading aloud: Evidence from dyslexic and skilled Italian readers. Cognition, 108, 243–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burani, C., Marcolini, S. & Stella, G. (2002). How early does morpholexical reading develop in readers of a shallow orthography? Brain and Language, 81, 568–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burani, C., Paizi, D. & Sulpizio, S. (2013). Stress assignment in Italian: Friendship outweighs dominance. Memory & Cognition, 42, 662–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlisle, J. F. & Nomabody, D. M. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in first grades. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177–195.Google Scholar

Carretti, B., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R. & Romanò, M. (2005). Updating in working memory: A comparison of good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 45–66.Google Scholar

Carretti, B., Meneghetti, C. & De Beni, R. (2005). Evoluzione delle abilità di comprensione in studenti dalla 3a elementare alla 1a media [The evolution of reading comprehension abilities in students from third to sixth grade]. Età Evolutiva, 80, 5−16.Google Scholar

Casalis, S. & Louis-Alexandre, M.-F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 12, 303–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cataldo, M. G. & Cornoldi, C. (1998). Self-monitoring in poor and good reading comprehenders and their use of strategy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chilosi, A. M., Brizzolara, D., Lami, L., Pizzoli, C., Gasperini, F., Pecini, C. & Zoccolotti, P. (2009). Reading and spelling disabilities in children with and without a history of early language delay: A neuropsychological and linguistic study. Child Neuropsychology, 15, 582–604.Google Scholar

Colombo, L. (1992). Lexical stress effect and its interaction with frequency in word pronunciation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 987–1003.Google Scholar

Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.Google Scholar

Consensus Conference (2006, September/2007, January). Disturbi evolutivi specifici di Apprendimento: Raccomandazioni per la pratica clinica definite con il metodo della Consensus Conference [Specific Developmental disturbances: Recommandations for clinical practice defined with the method of Consensus Conference]. 22–23 September 2006, Montecatini Terme (sentenza della giuria: 26 January 2007, Milan. Retrieved from http://hubmiur.pubblica.istruzione.it/alfresco/d/d/workspace/SpacesStore/a9cf25e3-2cd0-471a-9b44-f2d12d17e5a3/raccomandazionidsa2007.pdf.Google Scholar

Cossu, G., Gugliotta, M. & Marshall, J. C. (1995). Acquisition of reading and written spelling in a trasparent orthography: Two non parallel processes? Reading and Writing, 7, 9–22.Google Scholar

Cossu, G., Gugliotta, M., Villani, D., Cristante, F. & Emiliani, M. (1990). Consapevolezza fonemica e acquisizione della lettura [Phonemic awareness and reading acquisition]. Saggi, 16, 47–60.Google Scholar

Cossu, G. & Marshall, J. C. (1986). Theoretical implications of the hyperlexia syndrome: Two new Italian cases. Cortex, 22, 579–589.Google Scholar

Cossu, G. & Marshall, J. C. (1990). Are cognitive skills a prerequisite for learning to read and write? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cossu, G., Rossini, F. & Marshall, J. C. (1993). When reading is acquired but phonemic awareness is not: A study of literacy in Down’s Syndrome. Cognition, 4, 129–138.Google Scholar

Cossu, G., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y. & Gugliotta, M. (1995). Visual and phonological determinants of misreading in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing, 17, 247–256.Google Scholar

Cossu, G., Shankweiler, D. P., Liberman, I. Y., Katz, L. & Tola, G. (1988). Awareness of phonological segments and reading ability in Italian children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 1–16.Google Scholar

Cunningham, A. J. & Carroll, J. M. (2011). Reading-related skills in earlier- and later-schooled children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 244–266.Google Scholar

D’Achille, P. (2006). L’italiano contemporaneo. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar

D’Amico, A. (2000). Il ruolo della memoria fonologica e della consapevolezza fonemica nell’apprendimento della lettura: Ricerca longitudinale [The role of phonological memory in the learning of reading: A longitudinal study]. Psicologia Clinica Dello Sviluppo, 4, 125–144.Google Scholar

De Beni, R., Cornoldi, C., Carretti, B. & Meneghetti, C. (2003). Nuova guida alla comprensione del testo [A new guide to reading comprehension], Vol. I. Trento: Edizioni Erickson.Google Scholar

De Beni, R. & Palladino, P. (2000). Intrusion errors in working memory tasks: Are they related to reading comprehension ability? Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 131–143.Google Scholar

De Luca, M., Borrelli, M., Judica, A., Spinelli, D. & Zoccolotti, P. (2002). Reading words and pseudo-words: An eye movement study of developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 80, 617–626.Google Scholar

De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Judica, A., Spinelli, D. & Zoccolotti, P. (1999). Eye movement patterns in linguistic and non-linguistic tasks in developmental surface dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1407–1420.Google Scholar

De Mauro, T. (1989). Guida all’uso delle parole. Rome: Editori Riuniti.Google Scholar

De Mauro, T. (1999). Grande dizionario italiano dell’uso. Turin: UTET.Google Scholar

De Mauro, T., Mancini, F., Vedovelli, M. & Voghera, M. (1993). Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato. Milan: ETASLIBRI.Google Scholar

Decreto, N. 5669 (2011, July 12). Linee guida per il diritto allo studio degli alunni e degli studenti con dsa [Guidelines for the “right to study” of students with specific learning disabilities]. Rome: Il Ministro dell’Istruzione dell’ Università e della Ricerca.Google Scholar

Desimoni, M., Scalisi, T. G. & Orsolini, M. (2012). Predictive and concurrent relations between literacy skills in Grades 1 and 3: A longitudinal study of Italian children. Learning and Instruction, 22, 340–353.Google Scholar

Di Filippo, G., Brizzolara, D., Chilosi, A., De Luca, M., Judica, A., Pecini, C., Spinelli, D. & Zoccolotti, P. (2005). Rapid naming, but not cancellation speed or articulation rate, predicts reading in an orthographically regular language (Italian). Child Neuropsychology, 11, 349–361.Google Scholar

Dressler, W. U. & Thornton, A. M. (1991). Doppie basi e binarismo nella morfologia italiana. Rivista di Linguistica, 3, 3–22.Google Scholar

Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H. & Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freyd, P. & Baron, J. (1982). Individual differences in the acquisition of derivational morphology. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 21, 282–295.Google Scholar

Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263–329.Google Scholar

Goslin, J., Galluzzi, C. & Romani, C. (2014). PhonItalia: A phonological lexicon for Italian. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 872–886.Google Scholar

Grossmann, M. & Rainer, F. (Eds.) (2004). La formazione delle parole in italiano. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iacobini, C. & Adinolfi, A. (2008). La derivazione suffissale nel parlato dell’italiano messa a confronto con quella dello scritto. In Pettorino, M., Giannini, A., Vallone, M. & Savy, R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference ”La comunicazione parlata” (Spoken Communication) (pp. 494–512). Naples: Liguori.Google Scholar

Iacobini, C. & Thornton, A. M. (1992). Tendenze nella formazione delle parole nell’italiano del ventesimo secolo. In Moretti, B., Petrini, D. & Bianconi, S. (Eds.), Linee di tendenza dell’italiano contemporaneo (pp. 25–55). Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar

Invalsi (2009). Le competenze in lettura, matematica, e scienze degli studenti quindicenni Italiani. Rapporto Nazionale PISA 2009, Frascati: Author. Retrieved from www.invalsi.it/invalsi/ri/Pisa2009/documenti/RAPPORTO_PISA_2009.pdf.Google Scholar

ISTAT (2011). Italia in cifre 2011. Rome: Author. Retrieved from www.istat.it/it/files/2011/06/italiaincifre2011.pdf.Google Scholar

Istituto Superiore di Sanità (2010, December/2011, June). Consensus conference. Disturbi specifici dell’apprendimento [Specific learning disturbances], Published in June, 2011, Rome. Retrieved from www.snlg-iss.it/cms/files/Cc_Disturbi_Apprendimento_sito.pdf.Google Scholar

Judica, A., Baldoni, L., Chirri, L., Cucciaioni, C. & Del Vento, G. (2006). Parole in corso: Materiale per il recupero delle difficoltà di lettura [Running words: Materials for the recovery from reading difficulties]. Trento: Erickson.Google Scholar

Judica, A., De Luca, M., Spinelli, D. & Zoccolotti, P. (2002). Training of developmental surface dyslexia improves reading performance and shortens eye fixation duration in reading. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 12, 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law no. 170 (2010). Nuove norme in materia di disturbi specifici di apprendimento in ambito scolastico [New rules for learning disabilities at school]. In Gazzetta Ufficiale N. 24. October 18, 2010.Google Scholar

Lepschy, A. L. & Lepschy, G. C. (1991). The Italian language today. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lepschy, G. C. (1978). Note sulla fonematica italiana. In Lepschy, G. C., Saggi di linguistica italiana (pp. 63–75). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar

Lo Duca, M. G. (1987). I bambini e le parole: Su alcuni procedimenti di scoperta del significato. Quaderni di Semantica, 8, 69–93.Google Scholar

Lo Duca, M. G. (1990). Creatività e regole, studio sull’acquisizione della morfologia derivativa dell’italiano. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar

Maiden, M. (1992). Irregularity as a determinant of morphological change. Journal of Linguistics, 28, 285–312.Google Scholar

Mancini, F. & Voghera, M. (1994a). Lunghezza, tipi di sillabe e accento in italiano. In De Mauro, T. (Ed.), Come parlano gli italiani (pp. 217–245). Scandicci: La Nuova Italia Editrice.Google Scholar

Mancini, F. & Voghera, M. (1994b). Lunghezza, tipi di sillabe e accento in italiano. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 79, 51–77.Google Scholar

Marcolini, S., Burani, C. & Colombo, L. (2009). Lexical effects on children’s pseudoword reading in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing, 22, 531–544.Google Scholar

Marcolini, S., Donato, T., Stella, G. & Burani, C. (2006). Lunghezza e morfologia della parola: Come interagiscono nella lettura dei bambini? Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 33, 649–659.Google Scholar

Marcolini, S., Traficante, D., Zoccolotti, C. & Burani, C. (2011). Word frequency modulates morpheme-based reading in poor and skilled Italian readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 513–532.Google Scholar

Marotta, G. (1991). The Italian diphthongs and the autosegmental framework. In Bertinetto, P. M. & Loporcaro, M. (Eds.), Certamen phonologicum (pp. 389–420). Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar

Martina, A. (2001). Studio sperimentale sull’acquisizione della morfologia derivazionale da parte di bambini italiani: Un approccio neurolinguistico. Unpublished thesis, University of Pisa.Google Scholar

Meneghetti, C., Carretti, B. & De Beni, R. (2006). Components of reading comprehension and scholastic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 291–301.Google Scholar

Menghini, D., Finzi, A., Benassi, M., Bolzani, R., Facoetti, A., Giovagnoli, S., Ruffino, M. & Vicari, S. (2010). Different underlying neurocognitive deficits in developmental dyslexia: A comparative study. Neuropsychologia, 48, 863–872.Google Scholar

Morais, J., Gary, L., Alegria, J. & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7, 323–331.Google Scholar

Mulatti, C., Peressotti, F. & Job, R. (2007). Zeading and reazing: Which is faster? The position of the diverging letter in a pseudoword determines reading time. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1005–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newell, A. & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In Anderson, J. R. (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1–55). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Notarnicola, A., Angelelli, P., Judica, A. & Zoccolotti, P. (2012). Development of spelling skills in a shallow orthography: The case of Italian language. Reading and Writing, 25, 1171–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

OECD (2011). Education at a glance 2011: OECD indicators. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/education/school/educationataglance2011oecdindicators.htm#Data.Google Scholar

Orsolini, M., Fanari, R., Serra, G., Cioce, R., Rotondi, A., Dassisti, A. & Maronato, C. (2003). Primi progressi nell’apprendimento della lettura: Una riconsiderazione del ruolo della consapevolezza fonologica [Initial progress in reading learning: A reconsideration of the role of phonological awareness]. Psicologia Clinica Dello Sviluppo, 7, 403–436.Google Scholar

Orsolini, M., Fanari, R., Tosi, V., De Nigris, B. & Carrieri, R. (2006). From phonological recoding to lexical reading: A longitudinal study on reading development in Italian. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 576–607.Google Scholar

Paizi, D., De Luca, M., Zoccolotti, P. & Burani, C. (2013). A comprehensive evaluation of lexical reading in Italian developmental dyslexics. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, 303–329.Google Scholar

Paizi, D., Zoccolotti, P. & Burani, C. (2011). Lexical stress assignment in Italian developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 24, 443–461.Google Scholar

Palladino, P., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R. & Pazzaglia, F. (2001). Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29, 344–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peressotti, F., Mulatti, C. & Job, R. (2010). The development of lexical representations: Evidence from the position of the diverging letter effect. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106, 177–183.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A., Beck, I., Bell, L. C. & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283–319.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A. & Harris, L. N. (2013). Universal reading processes are modulated by language and writing system. Language Learning and Development, 9, 296–316.Google Scholar

Pirrelli, V. & Battista, M. (2000). The paradigmatic dimension of stem allomorphy in Italian verb inflection. Rivista di linguistica, 12, 307–380.Google Scholar

Scalisi, T. G., Desimoni, M. & Di Vito Curmini, L. (2013). Age and schooling effects on the development of phonological awareness (PA) and rapid automatized naming (RAN) in Italian children aged 5–7 years. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata/Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 45–60.Google Scholar

Scalisi, T. G., Desimoni, M. & Pelagaggi, D. (2009). Validità delle prove PAC-SI nella previsione della lettura in prima e terza primaria [Validity of the PAC-SI tests in the prediction of reading in first and third grade]. Psicologia Dell’Educazione, 3, 255–280.Google Scholar

Schmid, S. (1999). Fonetica e fonologia dell’italiano. Turin: Paravia.Google Scholar

Scuccimarra, G., Cutolo, L., Fiorillo, P., Lembo, C., Pirone, T. & Cossu, G. (2008). Is there a distinct form of developmental dyslexia in children with specific language impairment? Findings from an orthographically regular language. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 21, 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seymour, P. H. K. (1997). Foundations of orthographic development. In Perfetti, C., Rieben, L. & Fayol, M. (Eds.), Learning to Spell (pp. 319–337). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M. & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.Google Scholar

Spinelli, D., De Luca, M., Di Filippo, G., Mancini, M., Martelli, M. & Zoccolotti, P. (2005). Length effect in word naming latencies: Role of reading experience and reading deficit. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27, 217–235.Google Scholar

Stella, V. & Job, R. (2001). Le sillabe PD/DPSS: Una base di dati sulla frequenza sillabica dell’italiano scritto. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 28, 633–639.Google Scholar

Sulpizio, S., Boureux, M., Burani, C., Deguchi, C. & Colombo, L. (2012). Stress assignment in the development of reading aloud: Nonword priming effects on Italian children. In Miyake, N., Peebles, D. & Cooper, R. P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2369–2374). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Sulpizio, S. & Colombo, L. (2013). Lexical stress, frequency, and stress neighborhood effects in the early stages of Italian reading development. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2073–2084.Google Scholar

Swanson, H. L. & Berninger, V. (1995). The role of working memory in skilled and less skilled readers’ comprehension. Intelligence, 21, 83–108.Google Scholar

Tainturier, M. J. & Rapp, B. (2001). Spelling words. In Rapp, B. (Ed.), What deficits reveal about the human mind/brain: A handbook of cognitive neuropsychology (pp. 263–289). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Thornton, A. M., Iacobini, C. & Burani, C. (1997). BDVDB. Una base di dati per il vocabolario di base della lingua italiana, 2nd edn. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar

Traficante, D. (2012). From graphemes to morphemes: An alternative way to improve skills in children with dyslexia. Revista de investigación en Logopedia, 2, 163–185.Google Scholar

Traficante, D., Marcolini, S., Luci, A., Zoccolotti, P. & Burani, C. (2011). How do root and suffix influence reading of morphological pseudowords: A study of young Italian dyslexic children. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 777–793.Google Scholar

Tressoldi, P. E. (1989). Lo sviluppo della lettura e della scrittura: Segmentazione e fusione fonemica [Reading and writing development: Phonemic analysis and synthesis]. Età Evolutiva, 33, 53–58.Google Scholar

Tressoldi, P. E. (1996). L’evoluzione della lettura e della scrittura dalla 2a elementare alla 3a media: Dati per un modello di sviluppo e per la diagnosi dei disturbi specifici [The evolution of reading and spelling from 2nd elementary class to 3rd middle class: Data for a developmental model and for the diagnosis of specific disturbances]. Età evolutiva, 56, 43–55.Google Scholar

Tressoldi, P. E., Vio, C. & Maschietto, D. (1989). Valore predittivo della consapevolezza fonemica sul livello di lettura e scrittura nel primo anno di scuola elementare [Predictive value of phonemic awareness on reading and writing levels in the first class]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 16, 279–292.Google Scholar

Vincent, N. (1988). Italian. In Harris, M. & Vincent, N. (Eds.), The Romance languages (pp. 279–313). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ziegler, J. C. & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bullettin, 131, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Filippo, G., Judica, A. & Martelli, M. (2009). Reading development in an orthographically regular language: Effects of length, frequency, lexicality and global processing ability. Reading and Writing, 22, 1053–1079.Google Scholar

Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Judica, A., Orlandi, M. & Spinelli, D. (1999). Markers of developmental surface dyslexia in a language (Italian) with high grapheme–phoneme correspondence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 191–216.Google Scholar

Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Gasperini, F., Judica, A. & Spinelli, D. (2005). Word length effect in early reading and in developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 93, 369–373.Google Scholar

Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Judica, A. & Spinelli, D. (2008). Isolating global and specific factors in developmental dyslexia: A study based on the rate and amount model (RAM). Experimental Brain Research, 186, 551–560.Google Scholar