Cited according to: Kant's gesammelte Schriften, which is commonly referred to as Akademie-Ausgabe (Academy Edition), the first volumes of which were edited by the Königlich Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften and later by other academies, Berlin: Reimer/de Gruyter (1902 et seq.).

“Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht” [“Idea of a Universal History in Cosmopolitan Design”] (1784), Academy Edition, vol. 8, pp. 15–31, cited: AA VIII (Idea), p., l.

Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten [Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals] (1785), Academy Edition, vol. 4, pp. 385–463, cited: AA IV (Groundwork), p., l.

“Mutmaßlicher Anfang der Menschengeschichte” [“Presumed Beginning of Human History”] (1786), Academy Edition, vol. 8, pp. 107–124, cited: AA VIII (Presumed Beginning), p., l.

Kritik der reinen Vernunft [Critique of Pure Reason] (B = 2nd edn. 1787), Academy Edition, vol. 3, cited: AA III, p., l. (B p.).

Kritik der praktischen Vernunft [Critique of Practical Reason] (1788), Academy Edition, vol. 5, cited: AA V (Practical Reason), p., l.

“Über den Gebrauch teleologischer Prinzipien in der Philosophie” [“On the Use of Teleological Principles in Philosophy”] (1788), Academy Edition, vol. 8, pp. 157–184, cited: AA VIII (Teleological Principles), p., l.

Kritik der Urteilskraft [Critique of Judgment] (1790), Academy Edition, vol. 5, cited: AA V (Judgment), p., l.

Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft [Religion within the Limits of Pure Reason] (1793), Academy Edition, vol. 6, pp. 1–202, cited: AA VI (Religion), p., l.

“Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis” [“On the Adage: That may be right in theory, but it is useless in practice”] (1793), Academy Edition, vol. 8, pp. 273–314, cited: AA VIII (T&P), p., l.

“Das Ende aller Dinge” [“The End of All Things”] (1794), Academy Edition, vol. 8, pp. 325–339, cited: AA VIII (End), p., l.

Zum ewigen Frieden [Perpetual Peace] (1795), Academy Edition, vol. 8, pp. 341–386, cited: AA VIII (PP), p., l.

Die Metaphysik der Sitten [The Metaphysics of Morals] (1797), Academy Edition, vol. 6, pp. 203–493, containing:

Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre, Ludwig, Bernd (ed.), (2nd edn. 1998), Hamburg: Meiner, cited: Ludwig (ed.), Rechtslehre, p.

“Über ein vermeintes Recht aus Menschenliebe zu lügen” [“On a supposed right to lie from philanthropy”] (1797), Academy Edition, vol. 8, pp. 425–430, cited: AA VIII (Right to Lie), p., l.

Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht [Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View] (1798), Academy Edition, vol. 7, cited: AA VII (Anthropology), p., l.

Der Streit der Fakultäten [Contest of the Faculties] (1798), Academy Edition, vol. 7, pp. 1–116, cited: AA VII (Faculties), p., l.

Immanuel Kants Logik [Immanuel Kant's Logic] (1800), Jäsche, Gottlob Benjamin (ed.), Academy Edition, vol. 9, pp. 1–150, cited: AA IX (Logic), section (§), p., l.

Erläuterungen, Zu G. Achenwalls Iuris naturalis pars posterior [Reflections on G. Achenwall's Iuris naturalis pars posterior], Academy Edition, vol. 19 (1934), pp. 321–613, cited: AA XIX, R., p., l.

Einleitung, Erste in die Kritik der Urteilskraft [First Introduction to the Critique of Judgment], Academy Edition, vol. 20 (1942), pp. 193–251, cited: AA XX (First Introduction), p., l.

Zu, VorarbeitenDie Metaphysik der Sitten, Erster Teil: Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre [Preparatory Work on the Metaphysics of Morals, First Part: Metaphysical Principles of the Doctrine of Right], Academy Edition, vol. 23 (1955), pp. 207–370, cited: AA XXIII (Preparatory DoR), p., l.Google Scholar

Zu, VorarbeitenZum Ewigen Frieden [Preparatory Work on Perpetual Peace], Academy Edition, vol. 23 (1955), pp. 153–192, cited: AA XXIII (Preparatory PP), p., l.

Feyerabend, Gottfried, Notes on Kant's Lectures on Natural Law according to Achenwall during the summer semester 1784, Academy Edition, vol. 27.2,2 (1979), pp. 1317–1394, cited: Feyerabend, AA XXVII.2,2, p., l.

Vigilantius, , Notes on Kant's Lectures on the Metaphysics of Morals during the winter semester 1793/94, Academy Edition, vol. 27.2,1 (1975), pp. 475–732, cited: Vigilantius, AA XXVII.2,1, p., l.

Powalski, Gottlieb, Notes on Kant's Lectures on Practical Philosophy (taken between 1777 and 1782), Academy Edition, vol. 27.1 (1974), pp. 91–235, cited: Powalski, AA XXVII.1, p., l.

Menzer, Paul (ed.), Eine Vorlesung Kants über Ethik, Berlin: Pan Verlag Rolf Heise (1924), cited: Menzer, p.

Entwurf zu einer Opponenten-Rede [Draft of an Opponent Position] (1777), Academy Edition, vol. 15.2 (1923), pp. 901–935, cited: AA XV.2 (Draft), p., l.

Rechtslehre, Bemerkungen zur [Comments on the Doctrine of Right], Academy Edition, vol. 20 (1942), pp. 441–467, cited: AA XX (Comments DoR), p., l.

Bemerkungen zu den Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen [Comments on Observations on the Sentiment of the Beautiful and Sublime], Academy Edition, vol. 20 (1942), pp. 1–192, cited: AA XX (Comments Beauty), p., l.

“Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht” [“Idea of a Universal History in Cosmopolitan Design”] (1784), Academy Edition, vol. 8, pp. 15–31, cited: AA VIII (Idea), p., l.

Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten [Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals] (1785), Academy Edition, vol. 4, pp. 385–463, cited: AA IV (Groundwork), p., l.

“Mutmaßlicher Anfang der Menschengeschichte” [“Presumed Beginning of Human History”] (1786), Academy Edition, vol. 8, pp. 107–124, cited: AA VIII (Presumed Beginning), p., l.

Kritik der reinen Vernunft [Critique of Pure Reason] (B = 2nd edn. 1787), Academy Edition, vol. 3, cited: AA III, p., l. (B p.).

Kritik der praktischen Vernunft [Critique of Practical Reason] (1788), Academy Edition, vol. 5, cited: AA V (Practical Reason), p., l.

“Über den Gebrauch teleologischer Prinzipien in der Philosophie” [“On the Use of Teleological Principles in Philosophy”] (1788), Academy Edition, vol. 8, pp. 157–184, cited: AA VIII (Teleological Principles), p., l.

Kritik der Urteilskraft [Critique of Judgment] (1790), Academy Edition, vol. 5, cited: AA V (Judgment), p., l.

Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft [Religion within the Limits of Pure Reason] (1793), Academy Edition, vol. 6, pp. 1–202, cited: AA VI (Religion), p., l.

“Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis” [“On the Adage: That may be right in theory, but it is useless in practice”] (1793), Academy Edition, vol. 8, pp. 273–314, cited: AA VIII (T&P), p., l.

“Das Ende aller Dinge” [“The End of All Things”] (1794), Academy Edition, vol. 8, pp. 325–339, cited: AA VIII (End), p., l.

Zum ewigen Frieden [Perpetual Peace] (1795), Academy Edition, vol. 8, pp. 341–386, cited: AA VIII (PP), p., l.

Die Metaphysik der Sitten [The Metaphysics of Morals] (1797), Academy Edition, vol. 6, pp. 203–493, containing:

Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre, Ludwig, Bernd (ed.), (2nd edn. 1998), Hamburg: Meiner, cited: Ludwig (ed.), Rechtslehre, p.

“Über ein vermeintes Recht aus Menschenliebe zu lügen” [“On a supposed right to lie from philanthropy”] (1797), Academy Edition, vol. 8, pp. 425–430, cited: AA VIII (Right to Lie), p., l.

Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht [Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View] (1798), Academy Edition, vol. 7, cited: AA VII (Anthropology), p., l.

Der Streit der Fakultäten [Contest of the Faculties] (1798), Academy Edition, vol. 7, pp. 1–116, cited: AA VII (Faculties), p., l.

Immanuel Kants Logik [Immanuel Kant's Logic] (1800), Jäsche, Gottlob Benjamin (ed.), Academy Edition, vol. 9, pp. 1–150, cited: AA IX (Logic), section (§), p., l.

Erläuterungen, Zu G. Achenwalls Iuris naturalis pars posterior [Reflections on G. Achenwall's Iuris naturalis pars posterior], Academy Edition, vol. 19 (1934), pp. 321–613, cited: AA XIX, R., p., l.

Einleitung, Erste in die Kritik der Urteilskraft [First Introduction to the Critique of Judgment], Academy Edition, vol. 20 (1942), pp. 193–251, cited: AA XX (First Introduction), p., l.

Zu, VorarbeitenDie Metaphysik der Sitten, Erster Teil: Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre [Preparatory Work on the Metaphysics of Morals, First Part: Metaphysical Principles of the Doctrine of Right], Academy Edition, vol. 23 (1955), pp. 207–370, cited: AA XXIII (Preparatory DoR), p., l.Google Scholar

Zu, VorarbeitenZum Ewigen Frieden [Preparatory Work on Perpetual Peace], Academy Edition, vol. 23 (1955), pp. 153–192, cited: AA XXIII (Preparatory PP), p., l.

Feyerabend, Gottfried, Notes on Kant's Lectures on Natural Law according to Achenwall during the summer semester 1784, Academy Edition, vol. 27.2,2 (1979), pp. 1317–1394, cited: Feyerabend, AA XXVII.2,2, p., l.

Vigilantius, , Notes on Kant's Lectures on the Metaphysics of Morals during the winter semester 1793/94, Academy Edition, vol. 27.2,1 (1975), pp. 475–732, cited: Vigilantius, AA XXVII.2,1, p., l.

Powalski, Gottlieb, Notes on Kant's Lectures on Practical Philosophy (taken between 1777 and 1782), Academy Edition, vol. 27.1 (1974), pp. 91–235, cited: Powalski, AA XXVII.1, p., l.

Menzer, Paul (ed.), Eine Vorlesung Kants über Ethik, Berlin: Pan Verlag Rolf Heise (1924), cited: Menzer, p.

Entwurf zu einer Opponenten-Rede [Draft of an Opponent Position] (1777), Academy Edition, vol. 15.2 (1923), pp. 901–935, cited: AA XV.2 (Draft), p., l.

Rechtslehre, Bemerkungen zur [Comments on the Doctrine of Right], Academy Edition, vol. 20 (1942), pp. 441–467, cited: AA XX (Comments DoR), p., l.

Bemerkungen zu den Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen [Comments on Observations on the Sentiment of the Beautiful and Sublime], Academy Edition, vol. 20 (1942), pp. 1–192, cited: AA XX (Comments Beauty), p., l.

The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Practical Philosophy, Gregor, Mary J. (trans. and ed. 1996), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, cited: Gregor, Cambridge Edition, p. (pagination according to the Academy Edition, and for Gregor's Introduction and notes according to the Cambridge Edition).

The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Critique of Pure Reason, Wood, Allen W. and Guyer, Paul (trans. and ed. 1998), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, cited: Wood and Guyer, Cambridge Edition (Pure Reason), p. (pagination according to the Academy Edition).

Achenwall, Gottfried, Ius Naturae (3rd edn. 1755), Göttingen: Bossiegel, cited: I.N.I, (3rd edn. 1755), §, p.Google Scholar

Achenwall, Gottfried, Ius Naturae (5th edn. 1763), Göttingen: Bossiegel, cited: I.N.I, §, p.Google Scholar

Achenwall, Gottfried, Ius Naturae (6th edn. 1767), Göttingen: Bossiegel, cited: I.N.I, (6th edn. 1767), §, p.Google Scholar

Achenwall, Gottfried, Iuris Naturalis pars posterior (5th edn. 1763), Göttingen: Bossiegel, reprinted in the Academy Edition, vol. 19, pp. 325–442, cited: I.N.II, § (AA XIX, p., l.).Google Scholar

Achenwall, Gottfried, Prolegomena Iuris Naturalis (2nd edn. 1763), Göttingen: Bossiegel, cited: Prol., §, p.Google Scholar

Achenwall, Gottfried, Staatsverfassung der heutigen vornehmsten Europäischen Reiche (5th edn. 1768), Göttingen: Vandenhoeck, cited: Achenwall, Staatsverfassung, p.Google Scholar

Achenwall, Gottfried/Pütter, Stephan, Johann, Elementa Iuris Naturae (1750), in: Achenwall/Pütter, Anfangsgründe des Naturrechts, Jan Schröder (trans. and ed. 1995), Frankfurt: Insel, cited: Achenwall/Pütter, Elementa, p.Google Scholar

Aristoteles, Latinus, Nicomachean, Ethics, in: S. Thomae Aquinatis, In decem libros Ethicorum Aristotelis ad Nicomachum expositio (3rd edn. 1964), Spiazzi, R. M. (ed.), Marietti, cited: Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Bk., §, p.Google Scholar

Augustinus, Aurelius, Dei, Civitate, in: Opera (Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina, vol. 47), Turnholt (1955), cited: Augustinus, Lib., Cap., p.

Baumgarten, Alexander, Initia Philosophiae Practicae Primae (1760), reprinted in the Academy Edition, vol. 19, pp. 7–91, cited: Baumgarten, § (AA XIX, p., l.).

Beccaria, Cesare Marquis, Dei delitti e delle pene (1764); for the eighteenth-century German translation we used: Des Herren Marquis von Beccaria unsterbliches Werk von Verbrechen und Strafen, [K. F.] Hommel (trans. and ed.), Breslau: Korn (1778), cited: Beccaria, Cap., Hommel, p.Google Scholar

Boehmer, Johann Samuel Friedrich, Observationes Selectae (1759), Frankfurt: Varrentrapp, cited: Boehmer, obs., p.Google Scholar

Bouterwek, Friedrich [published anonymously], Review of the 1st edn. of Kant's Metaphysical Principles of the Doctrine of Right, Göttingsche Anzeigen, 28. Stück, den 18ten Februar 1797, Academy Edition, vol. 20, pp. 445–453, cited: AA XX (Bouterwek), p., l.

Cicero, Marcus Tullius, De, Legibus, in: Staatstheoretische Schriften (3rd edn. 1984), Ziegler, K. (ed.), Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 211–327, cited: Cicero, De Legibus, Bk., §, p.Google Scholar

Cicero, Marcus Tullius, De, LegibusDe Officiis, Holden, H. A. (ed.), new edn. (1966), Amsterdam: Hakkert, cited: Cicero, De Officiis, Bk., §, p.Google Scholar

Cumberland, Richard, De Legibus Naturae Disquisitio Philosophica (1672), Lübeck/Frankfurt: Samuel Otto (2nd edn. 1683), cited: Cumberland, De Legibus, Cap., §, p.Google Scholar

Daries, Joachim Georg, Observationes Iuris Naturalis, Socialis et Gentium, vol. II (1754), Jena: Güth, cited: Daries, obs., §, p.Google Scholar

[Glossa Ordinaria] Corpus Iuris Civilis Iustinianei cum commentariis Accursii, Feh, Johann (ed.), tomus primus (1627), reprint Osnabrück: O. Zeller (1965), cited: Glossa, keyword on Digests no., col.

Grotius, Hugo, De Iure Belli ac Pacis (1625), Kanter-van, B. J. A.Tromp, Hettinga (ed.), Leiden: Brill (1939), cited: Grotius, Lib./Cap./§/p.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, De, Cive (1642), Molesworth, W. (ed.), Hobbes, Opera Philosophica II (1839), reprint Aalen: Scientia (1966), cited: Hobbes, De Cive, p.

Hobbes, Thomas, De, Cive (1668), Molesworth, W. (ed.), Hobbes, Opera Philosophica III (1841), reprint Aalen: Scientia (1966), cited: Hobbes, Leviathan, Cap., p.Google Scholar

Hume, David, Essays – Moral, Political, andLiterary, (1742), Part II: “XII. Of the Original Contract,” in: T. H. Green and T. H. Grose (eds.), David Hume – The Philosophical Works, vol. 3 (1882), pp. 443–460, reprint Aalen: Scientia (1964); for the eighteenth-century German translation we used: Moralische und politische Versuche, als dessen vermischter Schriften Vierter and letzter Theil, Hamburg/Leipzig: Grund and Holle (1756), pp. 351–375: “Fünfundzwanzigster Versuch. Von dem ursprünglichen Contracte” (“Twenty-Fifth Essay. Of the Original Contract”), cited: Hume, “Original Contract,” p. (of the English work).Google Scholar

Janiçon, François Michel, État Présent de la République des Provinces-Unies, Tome Premier, The Hague: van Duren (1729), cited: Janiçon, État, p.Google Scholar

Lactantius, L. Caelius Firmianus, Opera Omnia, Brandt, S. and Laubmann, G. (eds.), Pars I, Prague and Vienna: F. Tempsky; Leipzig: G. Freytag (1890), cited: Lactantius, Opera I, p.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Théodicée, Essais (1710), in: Die philosophischen Schriften, Gerhardt, C. E. (ed.), Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, vol. 6 (1885), cited: Leibniz, Théodicée, p.Google Scholar

Linnaeus, Carolus, Systema Naturae Tomus I (10th edn. 1760), Halle: Curt, cited: Linné, Systema Naturae, p.Google Scholar

Lisola, FrançoisBaron, Paul (published anonymously), Bouclier d'Estat et de Justice contre Le dessein manifestement découvert de la Monarchie Universelle, Sous le vain pretexte des pretentions de la Reyne de France (1667), cited: Lisola, Bouclier d'Estat.Google Scholar

Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government (1690) (5th edn. London 1728), cited: Locke, Two Treatises, Second Treatise, §, p.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat, Brède, Baronet de, De l'esprit des lois (1748), in: Oeuvres Complètes, vol. 2 (1951), Gallimard, pp. 225–995, cited: Montesquieu, Livre, Chap., p.Google Scholar

Moser, Johann Jacob, Anfangs-Gründe [der] Wissenschafft von der heutigen Staats-Verfassung von Europa Und dem unter denen Europäischen Potenzien üblichen Völcker – oder allgemeinen Staats-Recht, Erster Theil (1732), Tübingen: Pflicken, cited: Moser, Anfangs-Gründe.Google Scholar

Moser, Johann Jacob, Grund-Sätze des jetzt üblichen Europäischen Völcker-Rechts in Friedens-Zeiten (1763), Frankfurt: Raspe, cited: Moser, Grund-Sätze, p.Google Scholar

Müller, Friedrich August, Einleitung in die philosophischen Wissenschaften, 3 parts (2nd edn. 1733), Leipzig, cited: Müller, Einleitung, Part, p.Google Scholar

Oberhausen, Michael/Pozzo, Riccardo, (eds.), Vorlesungsverzeichnisse der Universität Königsberg (1720–1804), vol. 2, Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog (1999), cited: Oberhausen/Pozzo, Vorlesungsverzeichnisse, p.Google Scholar

Pausanias, , Beschreibung Griechenlands, Meyer, E. (trans. and ed.), 2 vols. (3rd edn. 1979), Nördlingen: Beck, cited: Pausanias, Bk., Chap., or for the translator's comments cited: Meyer, vol., p., margin no.Google Scholar

Phaedrus, , Liber Fabularum, Schönberger, O. (ed.), Stuttgart: Reclam (1975), cited: Phaedrus, Liber, Fabula no.Google Scholar

Publius (pseudonym for Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay), The Federalist Papers (1787/88), Rossiter, C. (ed.), New York: Penguin (1961), cited: Federalist Papers (author) No., p.

Pufendorf, Samuel, De Jure Naturae et Gentium (1672), Böhling, F. (ed.), Berlin: Akademie Verlag (1998), cited: Pufendorf, De Jure, Lib./Cap./§/p.Google Scholar

Pufendorf, Samuel, De Officio Hominis et Civis (1673), Hartung, G. (ed.), Berlin: Akademie Verlag (1997), cited: Pufendorf, De Officio, Lib./Cap./§/p.Google Scholar

Pufendorf, Samuel, Elementa Jurisprudentiae Universalis (1660), Behme, T. (ed.), Berlin: Akademie Verlag (1999), cited: Pufendorf, Elementa, Lib., Def., §, p.Google Scholar

Reid, Thomas, Essays on the Active Powers of Man (1788), in: Hamilton, W. (ed.), The Works of Thomas Reid (5th edn.), Edinburgh: MacLachlan/Stewart (1858), cited: Reid, Active Powers, p.Google Scholar

Reid, Thomas, Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man (1785), in: Hamilton, W. (ed.), The Works of Thomas Reid (5th edn.), Edinburgh: MacLachlan/Stewart (1858), cited: Reid, Intellectual Powers, p.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jaques, Du contrat social (1762), in: Oeuvres complètes, Gagnebin, B. and Raymond, M. (eds.), Gallimard, vol. 3 (1964), pp. 347–470, cited: Rousseau, Du contrat social, Livre, Chap., p.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1st edn. 1776), R. H. Campbell and A. S. Skinner (eds.), 2 vols., reprint Oxford: Clarendon (1976), cited: Adam Smith, bk.chap.sect.para.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tacitus, Cornelius, De Vita et Moribus Julii Agricolae, Urlichs, C. L. (ed.), Würzburg: A. Stuber (1875), cited: Tacitus, De Vita, Cap., p.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Christian, Dissertatio de Praesumtione Bonitatis [Resp. Jakob Friedrich Ludovici], Halle (1700), cited: Thomasius, Dissertatio, §, p.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Christian, Fundamenta Juris Naturae et Gentium (1705) (4th edn. 1718), reprint Aalen: Scientia (1963), cited: Thomasius, Lib., Cap., §, p.Google Scholar

Turnbull, George, The Principles of Moral Philosophy, vol. 1 (1740), reprint Hildesheim: Olms (1976), cited: Turnbull, p.Google Scholar

Walch, Johann Georg, Philosophisches Lexicon (1726), Leipzig: Gleditsch, cited: Walch, col.Google Scholar

Walch, Johann Georg, Hennings, J. C. (eds.), Philosophisches Lexicon (4th edn. 1775), reprint Hildesheim: Olms (1968), cited: Walch/Hennings, vol., col.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian, Jus Naturae pars tertia (1743), reprint Hildesheim: Olms (1968), cited: Wolff, Jus Naturae III, Cap., §, p.

Wolff, Christian, Philosophia Practica Universalis pars prior (1738), reprint Hildesheim: Olms (1971), cited: Wolff, PhPrU, §, p.Google Scholar

Bendavid, Lazarus, Versuch einer Rechtslehre (1802), Berlin: Quien, cited: Bendavid, Versuch, p.Google Scholar

Feuerbach, Paul Johann Anselm, Lehrbuch des gemeinen in Deutschland geltenden Peinlichen Rechts (1st edn. 1801), Giessen: Heyer, cited: Feuerbach, Lehrbuch, §, p.Google Scholar

Feuerbach, Paul Johann Anselm, Revision der Grundsätze und Grundbegriffe des positiven peinlichen Rechts, Erster Teil (1799), Erfurt: Henningsche Buchhandlung, cited: Feuerbach, Revision, vol., p.Google Scholar

Hamberger, Georg Christoph/Meusel, Johann, Georg, Das gelehrte Deutschland, vol. 10 (5th edn. 1803), Lemgo: Meyersche Buchhandlung, cited: Hamberger/Meusel, p.Google Scholar

Hegel, GeorgFriedrich, Wilhelm, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (1821), in: Sämtliche Werke, Jubiläumsausgabe, Glockner, H. (ed.), 4th edn., vol. 7, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann (1961), cited: Hegel, Grundlinien, §, p.Google Scholar

Krug, Wilhelm Traugott, Allgemeines Handwörterbuch der philosophischen Wissenschaften, 5. Bd., 2. Abteilung (2nd edn. Leipzig 1838), reprint Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog (1969), Art. “Vertrag” [Contract], pp. 428–429, cited: Krug, “Vertrag.”Google Scholar

John Stuart, Mill, System der deductiven und inductiven Logik, Schiel, J. (trans.) (2nd edn. 1862/63), Braunschweig: Vieweg, cited: Schiel.Google Scholar

John Stuart, Mill, A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive (1843), Robson, J. M. (ed.) (1973), Toronto: Toronto University Press, cited: Mill, System of Logic, Bk.Google Scholar

Placidus (pseudonym for Petersen), Johann, Wilhelm, Litteratur der Staatslehre – Ein Versuch (1798), Strasburg, cited: Petersen, p.Google Scholar

Altenhain, Karsten, “Die Begründung der Strafe durch Kant und Feuerbach.” in: Strafrechtsprofessoren der Tübinger Juristenfakultät (eds.), Gedächtnisschrift für Rolf Keller (2003), Tübingen: Mohr, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

Bailey, S. H. and Gun, M. J., Smith and Bailey on the Modern English Legal System (2nd edn. 1991), London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Alyssa R., “Kant on Rights and Coercion in International Law: Implications for Humanitarian Military Intervention,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, vol. 16 (2008), pp. 57–99.Google Scholar

Brandt, Reinhard, “Das Erlaubnisgesetz, oder: Vernunft und Geschichte in Kants Rechtslehre,” in: Brandt, R. (ed.), Rechtsphilosophie der Aufklärung (1982), Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 233–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandt, Reinhard, “Das Problem der Erlaubnisgesetze im Spätwerk Kants.” in: Höffe, O. (ed.), Immanuel Kant. Zum ewigen Frieden (1995), Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 69–86.Google Scholar

Byrd, B. Sharon, “Intelligible Possession of Objects of Choice,” in: Denis, Lara (ed.), Kant's “Metaphysics of Morals”: A Critical Guide (2009), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Byrd, B. Sharon, “Kant's Theory of Punishment: Deterrence in its Threat, Retribution in its Execution,” Law and Philosophy, vol. 8 (1989), pp. 151–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byrd, B. Sharon, “The State as a ‘Moral Person,’” in: Robinson, Hoke (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress Memphis (1995), vol. I/1, pp. 171–189.Google Scholar

Byrd, B. Sharon, “Strafgerechtigkeit bei Kant,” in: Bottke, W. and Rauscher, A. (eds.), Gerechtigkeit als Aufgabe: Festgabe für Heinz Lampert (1990), EOS-Verlag: Erzabtei St. Ottilien, pp. 137–158.Google Scholar

Byrd, B. Sharon and Hruschka, Joachim, “The Natural Law Duty to Recognize Private Property Ownership. Kant's Theory of Property in his Doctrine of Right,” University of Toronto Law Journal, vol. 56 (2006), pp. 217–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cavallar, Georg, Kant and the Theory and Practice of International Right (1999), Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar

Cavallar, Georg, The Rights of Strangers (2002), Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Christiano, Thomas, “Two Conceptions of the Dignity of Persons,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, vol. 16 (2008), pp. 101–126.Google Scholar

Dukminier, Jesse and Krier, James E., Property (3rd edn. 1993), Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Ehlers, Dirk, “Die Unterscheidung von privatem und öffentlichem Recht,” Die Verwaltung, vol. 20 (1987), pp. 371–385.Google Scholar

Fischer, Hermann, Art. “Petersen,” Allgemeine deutsche Biographie, vol. 25 (1887), reprint Berlin: Duncker & Humblot (1970).Google Scholar

Flikschuh, Katrin, “Freedom and Constraint in Kant's Metaphysical Elements of Justice,” in: Hruschka, S. Byrd and J. (eds.), Kant and Law (2006), Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 87–108.Google Scholar

Flikschuh, Katrin, “Ist das rechtliche Postulat ein Postulat der reinen praktischen Vernunft? Zum Endzweck der Kantischen Rechtslehre,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, vol. 12 (2004), pp. 299–330.Google Scholar

Flikschuh, Katrin, Kant and Modern Political Philosophy (2000), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flikschuh, Katrin, “Reason, Right, and Revolution: Kant and Locke,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 36 (2008), pp. 375–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedrich, Rainer, Eigentum und Staatsbegründung in Kants Metaphysik der Sitten (2004), Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabriel, G., Art. “Solipsismus,” in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 9 (1995), cols. 1018–1023.Google Scholar

Gabriel, G. and Zantwijk, T., Art. “Urteil,” in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 11 (2001).Google Scholar

Goerke, Heinz, Carl von Linné (2nd edn. 1989), Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Gregor, Mary, “Kant's Theory of Property,” in: Hruschka, S. Byrd and J (eds.), Kant and Law (2006), Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 109–139.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul, “Kantian Foundations for Liberalism,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, vol. 5 (1997), pp. 121–140.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul, “Kant's Deductions of the Principles of Right,” in: Timmons, M. (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals (2002), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–64.Google Scholar

Hare, Richard Mervyn, Freedom and Reason (1963), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Herb, Karlfriedrich and Ludwig, Bernd, “Kants kritisches Staatsrecht,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, vol. 2 (1994), pp. 431–478.Google Scholar

Hill, Jr ., Thomas, E., Human Welfare and Moral Worth (2002), Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Jr ., Thomas, E., “Kant on Punishment: A Coherent Mix of Deterrence and Retribution?,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, vol. 5 (1997), pp. 291–314.Google Scholar

Hill, Jr ., Thomas, E., “Questions about Kant's Opposition to Revolution,” The Journal of Value Inquiry, vol. 36 (2002), pp. 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hruschka, Joachim, Das deontologische Sechseck bei Gottfried Achenwall – Zur Geschichte der deontischen Grundbegriffe in der Universaljurisprudenz zwischen Suarez und Kant (1986), Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Hruschka, Joachim, “Das deontologische Sechseck in der Jurisprudenz,” in: Krause, R.et al. (eds.), Recht der Wirtschaft und der Arbeit in Europa – Gedächtnisschrift für Wolfgang Blomeyer (2004), Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 775–788.Google Scholar

Hruschka, Joachim, “Die Notwehr im Zusammenhang von Kants Rechtslehre,” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, vol. 115 (2003), pp. 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hruschka, Joachim, “Die Person als Zweck an sich selbst,” JuristenZeitung (1990), pp. 1–15.

Hruschka, Joachim, “Die Unschuldsvermutung in der Rechtsphilosophie der Aufklärung,” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, vol. 112 (2000), pp. 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hruschka, Joachim, “Kant on Human Dignity,” in: Hruschka, S. Byrd and J. (eds.), Kant and Law (2006), Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Hruschka, Joachim, “The Permissive Law of Practical Reason in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals,” Law and Philosophy, vol. 23 (2004), pp. 45–72.Google Scholar

Hüning, Dieter, “Kants Strafrechtstheorie und das jus talionis,” in: Hüning, D., Michel, K., and Thomas, A. (eds.), Aufklärung durch Kritik. Festschrift für Manfred Baum zum 65. Geburtstag (2004), Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 333–360.Google Scholar

Joerden, Jan C., Staatswesen und rechtsstaatlicher Anspruch (2008), Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Joerden, Jan C. “Wahlfachklausur Rechtsphilosophie – Das Notrecht,” Juristische Schulung, (1997), pp. 725–728.Google Scholar

Joerden, Jan C. “Zwei Formulae in Kants Zurechnungslehre,” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, vol. 77 (1991), pp. 525–538.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Matthias, “The Relation between Right and Coercion: Analytic or Synthetic?,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, vol. 5 (1997), pp. 73–84.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Matthias, “Was erlaubt das Erlaubnisgesetz und wozu braucht es Kant?,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, vol. 13 (2005), pp. 195–219.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Matthias, “What is New in the Theory of War in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals?,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, vol. 16 (2008), pp. 147–163.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Reine Rechtslehre (2nd edn. 1960), Vienna: Franz Deuticke.Google Scholar

Kersting, Wolfgang, Wohlgeordnete Freiheit (1984), Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kneale, William and Kneale, Martha, The Development of Logic (1978), Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Kulenkampff, Jens, “Über die Rolle des ursprünglichen Vertrages in Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, vol. 16 (2008), pp. 165–181.Google Scholar

Küper, Wilfried, Immanuel Kant und das Brett des Karneades (1999), Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.Google Scholar

Kuttner, Stephan, Kanonistische Schuldlehre von Gratian bis auf die Dekretalen Gregors IX. (1935). Città del Vaticano: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana.Google Scholar

Laby, Arthur, “Resolving Conflicts of Duty in Fiduciary Relationships,” American University Law Review, vol. 54 (2004), pp. 75–149.Google Scholar

Laufs, A., Art. “Moser, Johann Jakob,” in: Handwörterbuch zur deutschen Rechtsgeschichte, vol. 3 (1984), cols. 703–705.Google Scholar

Lackner, Karl and Kühl, Kristian, Strafgesetzbuch (24th edn. 2001), Munich: Beck.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Gerhard, “Einleitung,” Academy Edition, vol. 27.2,2, pp. 1037–1062.

Lenk, Hans, “Konträrbeziehungen und Operatorengleichungen im deontologischen Sechseck,” in: Hans, Lenk (ed.), Normenlogik (1974), Pullach: Dokumentation, pp. 198–206.Google Scholar

Liebs, Detlef, Lateinische Rechtsregeln und Rechtssprichwörter (3rd edn. 1983), Munich: Beck.Google Scholar

Löffler, Alexander, Die Schuldformen des Strafrechts (1895), Leipzig: Hirschfeld.Google Scholar

Mommsen, Theodor (ed.), Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum, Berlin: Reimer, vol. 9 (1883), vol. 12 (1888).

Mosbacher, Andreas, “Kants präventive Straftheorie,” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, vol. 90 (2004), pp. 210–225.Google Scholar

Müller, Michael, Ethik und Recht in der Lehre von der Verantwortlichkeit (1932), Regensburg: Josef Habbel.Google Scholar

Palandt, , Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (68th edn. 2009), Munich: Beck.Google Scholar

Pinzani, Alessandro, “Der systematische Stellenwert der pseudo-ulpianischen Regeln in Kants ‘Rechtslehre,’” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, vol. 59 (2005), pp. 71–94.Google Scholar

Ripstein, Arthur, “Hindering a Hindrance to Freedom,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, vol. 16 (2008), pp. 227–250.Google Scholar

Schnepf, Robert, “Systematisierung von rechtlichen Intuitionen? – Die drei Formeln Ulpians bei Leibniz und Kant,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, vol. 12 (2004), pp. 253–282.Google Scholar

Schröder, Jan and Pielemeier, Ines, “Naturrecht als Lehrfach an den deutschen Universitäten des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts,” in: Dann and D. Klippel, O. (eds.), Naturrecht – Spätaufklärung – Revolution (1995), Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 255–269.Google Scholar

Singer, Joseph William, Introduction to Property (2001), New York: Aspen.Google Scholar

Stolleis, Michael, Art. “Rechtsstaat,” Handwörterbuch zur Deutschen Rechtsgeschichte, vol. 4 (1990), cols. 367–375.Google Scholar

Tafani, Daniela, “Kant und das Strafrecht,” Jahrbuch der juristischen Zeitgeschichte, vol. 6 (2004/05), pp. 261–284.Google Scholar

Thompson, Kevin, “Kant's Transcendental Deduction of Political Authority,” in: Hruschka, S. Byrd and J (eds.), Kant and Law (2006), Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 183–199.Google Scholar

Thompson, Kevin, “Sovereignty, Hospitality, and Commerce: Kant and Cosmopolitan Right,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, vol. 16 (2008), pp. 305–319.Google Scholar

Troje, H. E., Art. “Guter Glaube,” Handwörterbuch zur Rechtsgeschichte, vol. 1 (1971), cols. 1866–1871.Google Scholar

Unberath, Hannes, “Die Bindung an den Vertrag – Zur Bedeutung Kants für die neuere Diskussion um die Grundlagen des Privatrechts,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, vol. 13 (2005), pp. 719–748.Google Scholar

Unberath, Hannes, Die Vertragsverletzung (2007), Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar

Unberath, Hannes, “Freedom in the Kantian State,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, vol. 16 (2008), pp. 321–367.Google Scholar

Unruh, Peter, “Die vernunftrechtliche Eigentumsbegründung bei Kant,” in Ludwig, A. Eckl and B (eds.), Was ist Eigentum? – Philosophische Positionen von Platon bis Habermas (2005), Munich: Beck, pp. 133–147.Google Scholar

Vouillot, B., Art. “Janiçon,” in: Dictionnaire de Biographie Française, vol. 16 (1994), cols. 425–426.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, “Kant's Legal Positivism,” Harvard Law Review, vol. 109 (1996), pp. 1535–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westphal, Kenneth R., “Do Kant's Principles Justify Property or Usufruct?,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, vol. 5 (1997), pp. 141–194.Google Scholar

Westphal, Kenneth R., “Kant on the State, Law, and Obedience to Authority in the Alleged ‘Anti-Revolutionary’ Writings,” Journal of Philosophical Research, vol. 17 (1992), pp. 383–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmermann, Reinhard, The Law of Obligations (1990), Capetown: Juta.Google Scholar

Allgemeines Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (1811) = Austrian Civil Code, cited: ABGB.

Allgemeines Landrecht für die Preußischen Staaten (1794), reprint Berlin: Nauck (1835), cited: ALR part title §.

Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (1900/2009) = German Civil Code, cited: BGB, §.

Codex Theresianus (1766) = Draft of an Austrian Civil Code, von Harrasowsky (ed.), 3 vols. (1883–1884), Vienna: Gerold's Sohn, cited: Codex Theresianus, Part/Cap./§.

Constitution of the United States of America (1787) with the Bill of Rights (1791), cited: US Constitution, Preamble/Art./Amend.

Digesta, in: Corpus Iuris Civilis, vol. 1, Institutiones, Krüger, P. (ed.) / Digesta, T. Mommsen and P. Krüger (eds.), Hildesheim: Weidmann (25th edn. 1993), cited: Author (if available), Digests No. (composed of: Book, Title, Law, Section).

Grundgesetz (1949/2009) = German Constitution, cited: GG, Art.

Institutiones, (see Digesta), cited: Institutions No. (composed of: Book, Title, Law).

Model Penal Code (1962), Philadelphia: American Law Institute (1985), cited: MPC, §.

Restatement (Second) Torts (1965), Philadelphia: American Law Institute, cited: Restatement (Second) Torts, §.

Strafgesetzbuch (1871/2009) = German Criminal Code, cited: StGB, §.

Strafprozeßordnung (1879/2009) = German Code of Criminal Procedure, cited: StPO, §.

Zivilprozeßordnung (1879/2009) = German Code of Civil Procedure, cited: ZPO, §.

Georges, Karl Ernst and Georges, Heinrich, Ausführliches Lateinisch-Deutsches Handwörterbuch (13th edn. 1972), Hanover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung, cited: Georges, entry, col.Google Scholar

Grimm, Jacob and Grimm, Wilhelm, , Deutsches Wörterbuch, reprint of 1st edn. (1984), Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.

Langenscheidts Großes Schulwörterbuch. Deutsch-Englisch, Heinz, Messinger (ed.) (1992), Berlin: Langenscheidts.

Lewis, Charlton T. and Short, Charles, A Latin Dictionary (1st edn. 1879, impression of 1962).

Oxford Latin Dictionary (1968), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (1975 edn.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.