Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T11:50:31.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Interpersonal Grammar in Tagalog: Assessment Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2021

J. R. Martin
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Beatriz Quiroz
Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Giacomo Figueredo
Affiliation:
Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil
Get access

Summary

In this paper we extend work on the interpersonal grammar of Tagalog by focusing on ASSESSMENT resources realised through non-pronominal clitics. From a discourse semantic perspective (Martin & Rose, 2007; Martin & White, 2005), ASSESSMENT is centrally involved in the enactment of ENGAGEMENT, as interlocutors negotiate consensus around propositions and proposals, and the attitudes they inscribe or invoke. The meaning of each assessment clitic is characterised as the basis for the formalisation of this resource in system networks. In addition, the role of assessment clitics in discourse is illustrated through move-by-move analysis of two main texts. The paper concludes with some discussion of SFL’s hierarchy of realisation as far as the description of Tagalog ASSESSMENT resources are concerned.

Type
Chapter
Information
Interpersonal Grammar
Systemic Functional Linguistic Theory and Description
, pp. 130 - 159
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bautista, M. L. (1979). Patterns of Speaking in Filipino Radio Dramas: Sociolinguistic Analysis. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Bronckart, J.-P. & Bota, C. (2011). Bakhtine Démasqué: Histoire d’un Menteur, d’une Escroquerie et d’un Délire Collectif. Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
Buenaventura-Naylor, P. (1975). Topic, Focus and Emphasis in the Tagalog Verbal Clause. Oceanic Linguistics, 14, 1279.Google Scholar
Caffarel, A. (2006). A Systemic Functional Grammar of French: From Grammar to Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Figueredo, G. (2015). A Systemic Functional Description of Modal Particles in Brazilian Portuguese: The System of Assessment. Alfa, 59(2), 275302. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-5794-1504-3.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1984). Language as Code and Language as Behaviour: A Systemic Functional Interpretation of the Nature and Ontogenesis of Dialogue. In Fawcett, R., Halliday, M. A. K., Lamb, S. and Makkai, A., eds., The Semiotics of Culture and Language. Vol. 1 of Language as Social Semiotic. London: Frances Pinter, pp. 335.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1988). On the Ineffability of Grammatical Categories. In Benson, J. D., Cummings, M. J. and Greaves, W. S., eds., Linguistics in a Systemic Perspective, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 2751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed., London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Greaves, W. S. (2008). Intonation in the Grammar of English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing Experience Through Meaning: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kroeger, P. (1998). Clitics and Clause Structure in Tagalog. In Bautista, M. L., ed., Pagtanaw: Essays on Language in Honor of Teodoro A. Llamzon. Manila: Lingistic Society of the Philippines, pp. 5372.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1981). Conjunction and Continuity in Tagalog. In Halliday, M. A. K. and Martin, J. R., eds., Readings in Systemic Linguistics. London: Batsford, pp. 310–36.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1983). Participant Identification in English, Tagalog and Kâte. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 3(1),4574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07268608308599299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1988). Grammatical Conspiracies in Tagalog: Family, Face and Fate – with Regard to Benjamin Lee Whorf. In Benson, J. D., Cummings, M. J. and Greaves, W. S., eds., Linguistics in a Systemic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 243300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1990). Interpersonal Grammatization: Mood and Modality in Tagalog. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 21(1), 250.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1993). Clitics. In Gonzalez, A., ed., Philippine Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Quezon City: Philippine Social Science Council, pp. 237–40.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1995). Logical Meaning, Interdependency and the Linking Particle na/ng in Tagalog. Functions of Language, 2(2), 189228.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1996). Transitivity in Tagalog: A Functional Interpretation of Case. In Berry, M., Butler, C., Fawcett, R. and Huang, G., eds., Meaning and Form: Systemic Functional Interpretations. New Jersey: Ablex, pp. 229–96.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2004). Metafunctional Profile of the Grammar of Tagalog. In Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 255304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2010). Semantic Variation: Modelling Realization, Instantiation and Individuation in Social Semiosis. In Bednarek, M. and Martin, J. R., eds., New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. London: Continuum, pp. 134.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2018). Interpersonal Meaning: Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspectives. Functions of Language, 25(1), 219.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Cruz, P. (2018). Interpersonal Grammar of Tagalog: A Systemic Functional Perspective. Functions of Language, 25(1), 5496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Cruz, P. (2019). Relational Processes in Tagalog: A Systemic Functional Perspective. In Rajandran, K. and Manan, S. A., eds., Discourses of southeast Asia: A Social Semiotic Perspective. Singapore: Springer, pp. 225–251.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause, 2nd ed., London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., Wang, P. & Zhu, Y. (2013). Systemic Functional Grammar: A Next Step Into the Theory – Axial Relations. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & White, P. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). Descriptive Motifs and Generalizations. In Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 537664.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Halliday, M. A. K. (2009). Systemic Functional Grammar: A First Step into the Theory. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Mwinlaaru, I. N., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Akerejola, E. (2018). A System-Based Typology of mood in Niger-Congo Languages. In Agwuele, A. and Bodomo, A., eds., The Handbook of African Linguistics. London: Routledge, pp. 93117.Google Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2010). The Negotiation of Interpersonal Meanings Through the Spanish Verbal Group. Paper presented at the 37th International Systemic Functional Congress, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
Schachter, P. (1973). Constraints on Clitic Order in Tagalog. In Gonzalez, A., ed., Parangal kay Cecilio Lopez: Essays in Honor of Cecilio Lopez on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines, pp. 214–31.Google Scholar
Schachter, P. & Otanes, F. (1972). Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, J. & Sirens, T., eds., (2013). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Teruya, K., Akerejola, E., Andersen, T. H., Caffarel, A., Lavid, J., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Petersen, U. H., Patpong, P. & Smedegaard, F. (2007). Typology of mood: A Text-Based and System-Based Functional View. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. and Webster, J., eds., Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective, Vol. 2. London: Equinox, pp. 859920.Google Scholar
Ventola, E. (1987). The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Voloshinov, V. (1995). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
White, P. R. R. (2012). Exploring the Axiological Workings of ‘Reporter Voice’ News Stories – Attribution and Attitudinal Positioning. Discourse, Context and Media, 1, 5767.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×