Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T04:42:23.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Similar Thoughts under Different Stars: Conceptions of Intelligence in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Lazar Stankov
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

To understand the development of psychology in Australia, one needs to be cognizant of the political and social history of this country. The most salient aspects relate to its geography and cultural links to the “old world.” It is usually assumed that Australia was discovered by Captain James Cook and first settled by the British upon the arrival of the First Fleet of eight ships in 1788. This fleet brought convicts from England, because the American War of Independence had signaled the need to seek a new penal colony for the Empire. To this day, some citizens of Australia think of themselves either as descendants of “convicts” or “squatters” (free settlers). The six colonies that were formed during the 1800s were united in 1901 despite “the tyranny of distance.” (The island-continent is approximately the size of Europe or the continental United States, and its total population today is comparable to that of California.) Independence did not diminish Australia's attachment to the “mother country England” and its king and, when World War I started, many young Australians enlisted to be sent to fight at Gallipoli in Turkey, and later on, to France. The early European inhabitants of Australia behaved in a way that was similar to those of other colonizing powers. For example, since the very beginning of settlement, the Aborigines were denied the right to ownership of land, and in fact, these native Australians were not given a democratic right to vote until a referendum that was held as recently as 1967.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, M. (1992). Intelligence and development. Oxford: Blackwell
Anstey, K. (1999). Construct overlap in resource theories of memory aging [commentary]. Gerontology, 45, 348–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, T. C., & Stough, C. (2000). Intelligence arguments and Australian psychology: A reply to Stankov and an alternative view. Australian Psychologist, 35, (1), 68–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongers, S. (2001, November). The Australian Basic Abilities Tests (AUSBAT). Paper presented at the 3rd International Spearman Seminar. Sydney, Australia
Birney, D. P. (2002). The measurement of task complexity and cognitive ability: Relational complexity in adult reasoning. Unpublished doctoral dessertation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Brody, N.(2001). Inspection time: Past, present, and future. Intelligence, 29, 537–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, P. V.(1998). Psychology as history, and the biological renaissance: A brief review of the science and politics of psychological determinism. Australian Psychologist, 33, (1), 40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, H., Mackinnon, A., Korten, A., Jorm, A. F., & Hofer, S. (2001, November). No common cause for the common cause factor. Paper presented at the 3rd International Spearman Seminar. Sydney, Australia
Connell, W. F. (1980). The Australian Council for Educational Research, 1930–1980. Hawthorn, Vic: Australian Council for Educational Research
Danthiir, V., Roberts, R. D., Pallier, G., & Stankov, L.(2001). What the nose knows: Olfaction and cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 29, 337–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M., Stankov, L., & Roberts, R.(1998). Emotional intelligence: In search of an elusive construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 989–1015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, G.(1998). In pursuit of social responsibility in psychology: A comment on Butler (1998). Australian Psychologist, 33, 47–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, W. T., & Flynn, J. R.(2001)Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: The IQ paradox resolved. Psychological Review, 108 (2), 346–369CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fogarty, G. J., & White, C.(1994). Differences between values of Australian Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 394–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grudnik, J. L., & Kranzler, J. H.(2001). Meta-analysis of the relationship between intelligence and inspection time. Intelligence, 29, 523–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S.(1998a). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 803–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S.(1998b). Relational complexity metric is effective when assessments are based on actual processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 848–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keats, D. M.(1979). Cross-cultural studies in cognitive development and language in Malaysia and Australia. Educational Research and Perspectives, 6, 46–63Google Scholar
Keats, J. A. (1951). A statistical theory of objective test scores. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research
Kleitman, S., & Stankov, L.(2001). Ecological and person-driven aspects of metacognitive processes in test-taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 321–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klich, L. Z. (1988). Aboriginal cognition and psychological nescience. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human abilities in cultural context (pp. 427–452). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E.(1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity?!Intelligence, 12, 389–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luciano, M., Smith, G. A., Wright, M. J., Geffen, G. M., Geffen, L. B., & Martin, N., (2001). On the heritability of inspection time and its correlation with IQ: Twin study. Intelligence, 29, 443–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2002). Emotional intelligence: Science and myth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
McDonald, R. P. (1964).Nonlinear factor analysis.(Psychometric Monograph, No. 15)
McDonald, R. P.(1978). A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 161–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElwain, D. W., & Kearney, G. (1970). The Queensland Test. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research
Nettelbeck, T.(2001). Correlation between inspection time and psychometric abilities: A personal interpretation. Intelligence, 29, 459–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nettelbeck, T., & Lally, M.(1976). Inspection time and measured intelligence. British Journal of Psychology, 67, 17–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Neil, W. M. (1987). A century of psychology in Australia. Sydney: Sydney University Press
Pallier, G., Roberts, R., & Stankov, L.(2000). Biological vs. Psychometric Intelligence: Halstead's (1947) distinction re-visited. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 15, (3), 205–226Google Scholar
Phillips, G. E. (1924). The measurement of of general ability.Sydney: Angus and Robertson
Porteus, S. D. (1965).Porteus Maze Tests: Fifty years of application. Palo Alto,CA: Pacific Books
Roberts, R. D. (2001).Omnibus Screening Protocol (OSP). Status report. Sydney: The RightPeople
Roberts, R. D., & Stankov, L.(1999)Individual differences in speed of mental processing and human cognitive abilities: Towards a taxonomic model. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, (1), 1–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. D., Stankov, L., Pallier, G., & Dolph, B.(1997). Charting the cognitive sphere: Tactile/kinesthetic performance within the structure of intelligence. Intelligence, 25, 111–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stankov, L.(1998). Intelligence arguments and Australian psychology. Australian Psychologist, 33, 53–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stankov, L.(1999). Complexity, metacognition, and fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 27, 1–23Google Scholar
Stankov, L.(2000). Intelligence debates & some Australian confusions. Australian Psychologist, 35, 73–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stankov, L., & Dolph, B. (2000). Some experiences with Stankov's Tests of Cognitive Abilities (STOCA). Paper presented at the Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference in Brisbane
Stankov, L., & Horn, J. L.(1980). Human abilities revealed through auditory tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72 19–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stankov, L., & Roberts, R. D.(1997). Mental speed is not the “basic” process of intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, (1), 69–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stankov, L., Seizova-Cajic, T., & Roberts, R. D., (2001). Tactile and kinesthetic perceptual processes within the taxonomy of human abilities. Intelligence, 29, 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stough, C., Thompson, J. C., Bates, T. C., & Nathan, P. J.(2001). Examining neurochemical determinants of inspection time: Development of a biological model. Intelligence, 29, 511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, D., Nettelbeck, T., & Wilson, R. J.(1972). Perceptual indices of performance: The measurement of “inspection time” and “noise” in the visual system. Perception, 1, 263–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×