Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T22:10:53.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - North American Approaches to Intelligence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Robert J. Sternberg
Edited by
Robert J. Sternberg
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Yale University
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

WHY THEORIES OF INTELLIGENCE MATTER TO SOCIETY

Underlying every measurement of intelligence is a theory. The theory may be transparently obvious, or it may be hidden. It may be a formal explicit theory or an informal implicit one. But there is always a theory of some kind lurking beneath the test. And in the United States, at least, tests seem to be everywhere.

The Pervasiveness of Intelligence-Related Measurements

Students who apply to competitive independent schools in many locations, notably New York City, must present an impressive array of credentials. Among these credentials, for many of these schools, is a set of scores on either the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence – Revised (WPPSI-R) or the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, 4th Ed. (Thorndike, Hagen, & Sattler, 1986). If the children are a bit older, they may take instead the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 3rd Ed. (WISC-III; Wechsler, 1991). The lower-level version of the Wechsler test is used only for very young children ages 3 to 7 ½ years. The higher-level version of the Wechsler test is used for somewhat older children, ages 6 to 16 years, 11 months, of age. The Stanford-Binet test is used across a wider range of ages, from 2 years through adult.

Children applying to independent schools in other locations are likely to take either these or similar tests. The names may be different, and the constructs they are identified as measuring may be different – “intelligence,” “intellectual abilities,” “mental abilities,” “scholastic aptitude,” and so forth.

Type
Chapter
Information
International Handbook of Intelligence , pp. 411 - 444
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, P. (1994). Intelligence, attention, and learning: Maximal and typical performance. In D. K. Detterman (Ed.), Current topics in human intelligence: Vol. 4. Theories of intelligence (pp. 1–27). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D.(1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, G. V., & Depinet, R. L.(1991). A reconsideration of testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist, 46, 1012–1024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in children. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. (Original work published 1905.)
Boring, E. G. (1923, June 6). Intelligence as the tests test it. New Republic, 35–37
Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1997). IQ similarity in twins reared apart: Findings and responses to critics. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 126–160). New York: Cambridge University Press
Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Lykken, D. T., McGue, M., Segal, N. L., & Tellegen, A. (1990). Sources of human psychological differences: The Minnesota study of twins reared apart. Science, 250, 223–228CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J.(1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A. L., & DeLoache, J. S. (1978). Skills, plans, and self-regulation. In R. Siegler (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Burt, C.(1949). Alternative methods of factor analysis and their relations to Pearson's method of “principal axis.”British Journal of Psychology, Statistical Section, 2, 98–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, C. M., Tomlinson, C. A., & Plucker, J., (1997). Project START using a multiple intelligences model in identifying and promoting talent in high-risk students. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut Technical Report
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press
Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Cattell, R. B., & Cattell, A. K. (1963). Test of g: Culture fair, scale 3. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing
Ceci, S. J.(1991). How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components? A reassessment of the evidence. Developmental Psychology, 27, 703–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceci, S. J. (1996). On intelligence … more or less (expanded ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Ceci, S. J., & Liker, J. (1986). Academic and nonacademic intelligence: An experimental separation. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner, (Eds.), Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world (pp. 119–142). New York: Cambridge University Press
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (1997). Schooling, intelligence, and income. American Psychologist, 52 (10), 1051–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J.(1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, M. H. (2000). Interpretation of intelligence test scores. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Das, J. P., Kirby, J. R., & Jarman, R. F. (1979). Simultaneous and successive cognitive processes. New York: Academic Press
Davies, M., Stankov, L., & Roberts, R. D.(1998). Emotional intelligence: In search of an elusive construct. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75, 989–1015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Detterman, D. K. (2002). General intelligence: Cognitive and biological explanations. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? (pp. 223–244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Donchin, E., Ritter, W., & McCallum, W. C. (1979). Cognitive psychophysiology: The endogenous components of the ERP. In E. Callaway, P. Teuting, & S. H. Koslow (Eds.), Event-related potentials in man (pp. 349–441). San Diego: Academic Press
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Haywood, H. C., Hoffman, M., & Jensen, M. (1985). The learning potential assessment device (LPAD). Examiners' Manual. Hadassah – Wizo – Canada Research Institute, Jerusalem, Israel
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills (pp. 35–60). New York: Academic Press
Fraser, S. (Ed.). (1995). The bell curve wars: Race, intelligence and the future of America. New York: Basic Books
Galton, F. (1883). Inquiry into human faculty and its development. London: Macmillan
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books
Gardner, H. (1995). Leading minds. New York: Basic Books
Gardner, H.(1997). Six afterthoughts: Comments on “Varieties of intellectual talent.”Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 120–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, H. (1999a). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books
Gardner, H. (1999b) Multiple approaches to understanding. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed)., Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 69–89). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Gardner, H., Feldman, D., & Krechevsky, M. (Eds.). (1998). Project Zero frameworks for early childhood education. New York: Teachers College Press
Gardner, H., Krechevsky, M., Sternberg, R. J, & Okagaki, L. (1994). Intelligence in context: Enhancing students' practical intelligence for school. In K. McGilly, (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 105–127). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Goff, M., & Ackerman, P. L. (1992). Personality-intelligence relations: Assessment of typical intellectual engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 537–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). g: Highly general and highly practical. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? (pp 331–380). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton
Gould, S. J. (1995). Curveball. In S. Fraser (Ed.), The bell curve wars (pp. 11–22). New York: Basic Books
Grigorenko, E. L., Jarvin, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2002). School-based tests of the triarchic theory of intelligence: Three settings, three samples, three syllabi. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 167–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Dynamic testing. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 75–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill
Guilford, J. P.(1982). Is some creative thinking irrational?Journal of Creative Behavior, 16, 151–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P., & Hoepfner, R. (1971). The analysis of intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill
Gustafsson J. E. (1988). Hierarchical models of the structure of cognitive abilities. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 35–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Haier, R. J., Nuechterlein, K. H., Hazlett, E., Wu, J. C., Pack, J., Browning, H. L., & Buchsbaum, M. S. (1988). Cortical glucose metabolic rate correlates of abstract reasoning and attention studied with positron emission tomography. Intelligence, 12, 199–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haier, R. J., Siegel, B., Tang, C., Abel, L., & Buchsbaum, M. S. (1992). Intelligence and changes in regional cerebral glucose metabolic rate following learning. Intelligence, 16, 415–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halstead, W. C.(1951). Biological intelligence. Journal of Personality, 20, 118–130CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. New York: Wiley
Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. New York: Free Press
Horn, J. L. (1994). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The encyclopedia of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 443–451). New York: Macmillan
Horn, J. L., & Knapp, J. R. (1973). On the subjective character of the empirical base of Guilford's structure-of-intellect model. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, E. (1995). Will we be smart enough? A cognitive analysis of the coming workforce. New York: Russell Sage Foundation
Hunt, E. B., Frost, N., & Lunneborg, C. (1973). Individual differences in cognition: A new approach to intelligence. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 7, pp. 87–122). New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Hunt, E. B., Lunneborg, C., & Lewis, J. (1975). What does it mean to be high verbal?Cognitive Psychology, 7, 194–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F.(1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, J. E., Intelligence and its measurement: A symposium.(1921). Journal of Educational Psychology, 12, 123–147, 195–216, 271–275Google Scholar
Jacoby, R. & Galuberman, N. (Eds.). (1995). The bell curve debate. New York: Times Books
Jensen, A. R. (1970). Hierarchical theories of mental ability. In W. B. Dockrell (Ed.), On intelligence (pp. 119–90). Toronto: Ontario Institite for Studies in Education
Jensen, A. R. (1997). The puzzle of nongenetic variance. R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 42–88). New York: Cambridge University Press
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwoood
Jensen, A. R. (2002). Psychometric g: Definition and substantiation. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), General factor of intelligence: Fact or fiction (pp. 39–54). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Johnson, R. Jr.(1986). A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology, 23, 367–384CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, R., Jr. (1988). The amplitude of the P300 component of the vent-related potential: Review and synthesis. In P. K. Ackles, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology: A research manual (Vol. 3, pp. 69–138). Greenwich, CT: CAI Press
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1973) Sex differences on the McCarthy scales of children's abilities. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29(3), 362–3653.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1983). Kaufman assessment battery for children: Interpretive manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service
Kyllonen, P. C. (2002). g: Knowledge, speed, strategies, or working-memory capacity? A systems perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? (pp. 415–446). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & de la Roche, O. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lace (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 67–94). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Lemann, N. (1999). The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux
Loehlin, J. C.(1989). Partitioning environmental and genetic contributions to behavioral development. American Psychologist, 44, 1285–1292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loehlin, J. C., Horn, J. M., & Willerman, L. (1997). Heredity, environment, and IQ in the Texas adoption project. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 105–125). New York: Cambridge University Press
Lohman, D. F. (2000). Complex information processing and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 285–340). New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain. New York: Basic Books
Luria, A. R. (1980). Higher cortical functions in man (2nd ed., rev. & expanded). New York: Basic Books
Mayer, J. D., & Gehr, G. (1996). Emotional intelligence and the identification of emotion. Intelligence, 22, 89–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1993). The intelligence of emotional intelligence. Intelligence, 17, 433–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. (2000). Emotional intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 396–421). New York: Cambridge University Press
McClelland, D. C.(1973). Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence.”American Psychologist, 28, 1–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murtaugh, M.(1985). The practice of arithmetic by American grocery shoppers. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 16, 186–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P.(1990). Planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive cognitive processes as a model for intelligence. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 303–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997). Cognitive Assessment System. Itasca, IL: Riverside
Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (2001). Practical implications of general intelligence and PASS cognitive processes. In R. J. Sternberg, & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The general factor intelligence: How general is it? (pp. 55–86). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Perkins, D. N. (1995) Outsmarting IQ: The emerging science of learnable intelligence. New York: Free Press
Petrill, S. A. (2002). The case for general intelligence: A behavioral genetic perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), General factor of intelligence: Fact or fiction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., & Rutter, M. (1997). Behavioral genetics (3rd ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman
Plomin, R., McClearn, D. L., & Smith, D. L. (1994). DNA markers associated with high versus low IQ: The IQ QTL Project. Behavior Genetics, 24, 107–118CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plomin, R., McClearn, D. L., & Smith, D. L.(1995). Allelic associations between 100 DNA markers and high versus low IQ. Intelligence, 21, 31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomin, R., & Neiderhiser, J. M.(1992). Quantitative genetics, molecular genetics, and intelligence. Intelligence, 15, 369–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomin, R., & Petrill, S. A. (1997). Genetics and intelligence: What is new?Intelligence, 24, 53–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, M. I., & Mitchell, R. F. (1967). Chronometric analysis of classification. Psychological Review, 74, 392–409CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, T. E., & Jensen, A. R. (1992). Conduction velocity in a brain nerve pathway of normal adults correlates with intelligence level. Intelligence, 16, 259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, P. (1999). Standardized minds: The high price of America's testing culture and what we can do to change it. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, 185–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarr, S. (1997). Behavior-genetic and socialization theories of intelligence: Truce and reconciliation. In Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity and environment (pp. 3–41). New York: Cambridge University Press
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1981). Employment testing: Old theories and new research findings. American Psychologist, 36, 1128–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E.(1993). Tacit knowledge, practical intelligence, general mental ability, and job knowledge, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 8–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, F., & Hunter, J. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scribner, S. (1984). Studying working intelligence. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 9–40). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Scribner, S. (1986). Thinking in action: Some characteristics of practical thought. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world (pp. 13–30). New York: Cambridge University Press
Spearman, C.(1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. London: Macmillan
Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Sternberg, R. J.(1980). Sketch of a componential subtheory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 573–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.(1983). Components of human intelligence. Cognition, 15, 1–48CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R. J.(1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 269–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press
Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press
Sternberg, R. J.(1995). For whom the bell curve tolls: A review of The bell curve. Psychological Science, 6, 257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York: Plume
Sternberg, R. J. (1999a). Human intelligence: A case study of how more and more research can lead us to know less and less about a psychological phenomenon, until finally we know much less than we did before we started doing research. In E. Tulving (Ed.), Memory, consciousness, and the brain: The Tallinn conference (pp. 363–373). Philadelphia: Psychology Press
Sternberg, R. J.(1999b). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3, 83–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.(2000). The ability is not general, and neither are the conclusions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 697–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Conway, B. E., Ketron, J. L., & Bernstein, M. (1981). People's conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 37–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Detterman, D. K. (1986). What is intelligence? Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Sternberg, R. J., Ferrari, M., Clinkenbeard, P. R., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1996). Identification, instruction, and assessment of gifted children: A construct validation of a triarchic model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Forsythe, G. B., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J., Snook, S. Williams, W. M. Wagner, R. K., Grigorenko, E. L. (2000). Practical intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press
Sternberg, R. J., & Gardner, M. K. (1983). Unities in inductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 80–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.). (1997). Intelligence, heredity, and environment. New York: Cambridge University Press
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing. New York: Cambridge University Press
Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., Ferrari, M., & Clinkenbeard, P.(1999). A triarchic analysis of an aptitude-treatment interaction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2002). The creativity conundrum: A propulsion model of kinds of creative contributions. New York: Psychology Press
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I.(1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Okagaki, L., & Jackson, A. (1990). Practical intelligence for success in school. Educational Leadership, 48, 35–39Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Torff, B., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1998). Teaching triarchically improves school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1993). The g-ocentric view of intelligence and job performance is wrong. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., & Horvath, J. A.(1995). Testing common sense. American Psychologist, 50, 912–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1997). Does the Graduate Record Examination predict meaningful success in the graduate training of psychologists? A case study. American Psychologist, 52, 630–641CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, H. L.(1995). Effects of dynamic testing on the classification of learning disabilities: The predictive and discriminant validity of the Swanson Cognitive Processing Test. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1, 204–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). Technical manual for the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (4th ed.). Chicago: Riverside
Thurstone, L. L. (1924). The nature of intelligence. New York: Harcourt Brace
Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Vernon, P. A., & Mori, M. (1992). Intelligence, reaction times, and peripheral nerve conduction velocity. Intelligence, 8, 273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, P. A., Wickett, J. C., Bazana, P. G., & Stelmack, R. M. (2000). The neuropsychology and psycholophysiology of human intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 245–264). New York: Cambridge University Press
Vernon, P. E. (1971). The structure of human abilities. London: Methuen
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1934)CrossRef
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Wahlsten, D., & Gottlieb, G. (1997). The invalid separation of effects of nature and nurture: Lessons from animal experimentation. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 163–192). New York: Cambridge University Press
Wechsler, D. (1991). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children (3rd. ed.) (WISC-III). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation
Wickett, J. C., & Vernon, P. A. (1994). Peripheral nerve conduction velocity, reaction time, and intelligence: An attempt to replicate Vernon and Mori. Intelligence, 18, 127–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigdor, A. K., & Garner, W. R. (Eds.). (1982). Ability testing: Uses, consequences, and controversies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
Willerman, L., Schultz, R., Rutledge, J. N., & Bigler, E. D. (1991). In vivo brain size and intelligence. Intelligence, 15, 223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willerman, L., Schultz, R., Rutledge, J. N., Bigler, E. D. (1992). Hemisphere size asymmetry predicts relative verbal and nonverbal intelligence differently in the sexes: An MRI study of structure function relations. Intelligence, 16, 315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability (Rev.). Itasca, IL: Riverside
Zenderland, L. (1998). Measuring minds: Henry Goddard and the origins of American intelligence testing. New York: Cambridge University Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×