Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T11:59:35.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Human Mate Choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

By
David P. Schmitt
Edited by
Michael P. Muehlenbein
Michael P. Muehlenbein
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Get access

Summary

From an evolutionary perspective, animal mate choice depends in large part on the natural mating system of a species. The natural mating system of humans, however, seems at first glance to contain internal contradictions. On the one hand, humans show several signs of having a monogamous mating system. For example, humans are highly altricial – we have prolonged childhoods and rely heavily on extended families throughout our life spans (Alexander and Noonan, 1979). We also appear designed to form romantic pair bonds, having a dedicated neurochemistry of attachment associated with monogamy when comparisons are made across mammalian species (Fisher, 1998; Young, 2003).

On the other hand, humans seem to possess evolved design features associated with multimale/multifemale or “promiscuous” mating systems. For example, humans possess psychological and physiological adaptations to sperm competition (Baker and Bellis, 1995; Shackelford and LeBlanc, 2001), such as women's adaptive timing of extrapair copulations (Gangestad and Thornhill, 1998; Haselton and Miller, 2006), men's specialized expressions of sexual jealousy (Buss, 2000; Schützwohl, 2006), and the physical structure of the human penis serving as a semen displacement device (Gallup et al., 2003). Among men, causal sex with multiple partners is often viewed as desirable (Symons and Ellis, 1989; Oliver and Hyde, 1993), with most men agreeing to have sex with complete strangers when asked in field experiments (Clark and Hatfield, 1989). Adaptive patterns of premarital sex, extramarital sex, and mate poaching by both men and women have been documented across cultures (Broude and Greene, 1976; Schmitt et al., 2004a).

Type
Chapter
Information
Human Evolutionary Biology , pp. 295 - 308
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcock, J. (2001). Animal Behavior, 7th edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Alexander, G. M. and Sherwin, B. B. (1991). The association between testosterone, sexual arousal, and selective attention for erotic stimuli in men. Hormones and Behavior, 25, 367–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, R. D. and Noonan, K. M. (1979). Concealment of ovulation, parental care, and human social interaction. In Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: an Anthropological Perspective, Chagnon, N. A. and Irons, W. (eds). North Scituate, MA: Duxbury, pp. 436–453.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. D., Hoogland, J. L., Howard, R. D., et al. (1979). Sexual dimorphism and breeding systems in pinnipeds, ungulates, primates, and humans. In Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: an Anthropological Perspective, Chagnon, N. A. and Irons, W. (eds). North Scituate, MA: Duxbury, pp. 402–435.Google Scholar
Archer, J. and Lloyd, B. B. (2002). Sex and Gender, 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, J. M., Gaulin, S., Agyei, Y., et al. (1994). Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionary relevant aspects of human mating psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1081–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., et al. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 537–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, R. R. and Bellis, M. A. (1995). Human Sperm Competition. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Banfield, S. and McCabe, M. P. (2001). Extra relationship involvement among women: are they different from men?Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 119–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barash, D. P. and Lipton, J. E. (2001). The Myth of Monogamy. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Barber, N. (2000). On the relationship between country sex ratios and teen pregnancy rates: a replication. Cross-Cultural Research, 34, 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, N. (2003). Paternal investment prospects and cross-national differences in single parenthood. Cross-Cultural Research, 37, 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. and Tice, D. M. (2001). The Social Dimension of Sex. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Bateson, , P. (ed.) (1983). Mate Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Belsky, J. (1999). Modern evolutionary theory and patterns of attachment. In Handbook of Attachment, Cassidy, J. and Shaver, P. R. (eds). New York: Guilford, pp. 141–161.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L. and Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: an evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Betzig, L. (1986). Despotism and Differential Reproduction: a Darwinian View of History. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Betzig, L. (1989). Causes of conjugal dissolution: a cross-cultural study. Current Anthropology, 30, 654–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleske, A. L. and Shackelford, T. K. (2001). Poaching, promiscuity, and deceit: combating mating rivalry in same-sex friendships. Personal Relationships, 8, 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleske-Rechek, A. L. and Buss, D. M. (2001). Opposite-sex friendship: sex differences and similarities in initiation, selection, and dissolution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1310–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blurton Jones, N. (1986). Bushman birth spacing: a test for optimal interbirth intervals. Ethology and Sociobiology, 7, 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1987). Cultural and reproductive success: Kipsigis evidence. American Anthropologist, 89, 617–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1990). Kipsigis women's preferences for wealthy men: evidence for female choice in mammals. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27, 255–264.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss, vol. 1. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brase, G. L. (2006). Cues of parental investment as a factor in attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bröder, A. and Hohmann, N. (2003). Variations in risk taking over the menstrual cycle: an improved replication. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broude, G. J. and Greene, S. J. (1976). Cross-cultural codes on 20 sexual attitudes and practices. Ethnology, 15, 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. E. (1991). Human Universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Brown, D. E. and Hotra, D. (1988). Are prescriptively monogamous societies effectively monogamous? In Human Reproductive Behavior: a Darwinian Perceptive, Betzig, L., Mulder, M. Borgerhoff and Turke, P. (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–159.Google Scholar
Burnham, T. C., Chapman, J. F., Gray, P. B., et al. (2003). Men in committed, romantic relationships have lower testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 44, 119–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 291–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2000). The Dangerous Passion. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. and Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M. and Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 346–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buunk, A. P., Dijkstra, P., Kenrick, D. T., et al. (2001). Age preferences for mates as related to gender, own age, and involvement level. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashdan, E. (1993). Attracting mates: effects of paternal investment on mate attraction strategies. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashdan, E. (1996). Women's mating strategies. Evolutionary Anthropology, 5, 134–143.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chagnon, N. A. (1988). Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science, 239, 985–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, J. S. (1996). The evolutionary ecology of attachment organization. Human Nature, 7, 1–38.Google ScholarPubMed
Clark, R. D. (1990). The impact of AIDS on gender differences in willingness to engage in casual sex. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 771–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. D. and Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 2, 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1991). The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cronk, L. (1991). Wealth, status, and reproductive success among the Mukogodo of Kenya. American Anthropologist, 93, 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, R., Barbee, A. P., et al. (1995). Their ideas of attractiveness are, on the whole, the same as ours: consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabbs, J. M. and Dabbs, M. G. (2000). Heroes, Rogues, and Lovers: Testosterone and Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Daly, M. and Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. R. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Dawson, B. L. and McIntosh, W. D. (2006). Sexual strategies theory and internet personal advertisements. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 9, 614–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunne, M. P., Martin, N. G., Statham, D. J., et al. (1997). Genetic and environmental contributions to variance in age at first intercourse. Psychological Science, 8, 211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, B. J. (1992). The evolution of sexual attraction: evaluative mechanisms in women. In The Adapted Mind, Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (eds). New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 267–288.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. J. and Garber, J. (2000). Psychosocial antecedents of variation in girl's pubertal timing: maternal depression, stepfather presence, and marital and family stress. Child Development, 71, 485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, B. J. and Symons, D. (1990). Sex differences in sexual fantasy: an evolutionary psychological approach. Journal of Sex Research, 27, 527–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: a test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, H. E. (1992). Anatomy of Love: the Natural History of Monogamy, Adultery, and Divorce. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. E. (1998). Lust, attraction, and attachment in mammalian reproduction. Human Nature, 9, 23–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flinn, M. V. (1985). Mate guarding in a Caribbean village. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frayser, S. (1985). Varieties of Sexual Experience: an Anthropological Perspective. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.Google Scholar
Frederick, D., Haselton, M. G., Buchanan, G. M., et al. (2003). Male muscularity as a good-genes indicator: Evidence from women's preferences for short-term and long-term mates. Paper presentation to the 15th Annual Meeting of Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
Gallup, G. G., Burch, R. L., Zappieri, M. L., et al. (2003). The human penis as a semen displacement device. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangestad, S. W. (2001). Adaptive design, selective history, and women's sexual motivations. In Evolutionary Psychology and Motivation, French, J. A., Kamil, A. C. and Leger, D. W. (eds). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 37–74.Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W. and Cousins, A. J. (2001). Adaptive design, female mate preferences, and shifts across the menstrual cycle. Annual Review of Sex Research, 12, 145–185.Google ScholarPubMed
Gangestad, S. W. and Simpson, J. A. (1990). Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. Special Issue: biological foundations of personality: evolution, behavioral genetics, and psychophysiology. Journal of Personality, 58, 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangestad, S. W. and Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gangestad, S. W. and Thornhill, R. (1997). The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: the role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangestad, S. W. and Thornhill, R. (1998). Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 265, 927–933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gangestad, S. W. and Thornhill, R. (2003). Facial masculinity and fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geary, D. C. (1998). Male, Female: the Evolution of Human Sex Differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grammer, K., Renninger, L. and Fischer, B. (2004). Disco clothing, female sexual motivation, and relationship status: is she dressed to impress?Journal of Sex Research, 41, 66–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, V. J. (1998). Maternal Personality, Evolution and the Sex Ratio. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gray, P. B., Kahlenberg, S. M., Barrett, E. S., et al. (2002). Marriage and fatherhood are associated with lower testosterone in males. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Todd, M., et al. (1997). Interpersonal attraction from an evolutionary perspective: women's reactions to dominant and prosocial men. In Evolutionary Social Psychology, Simpson, J. A. and Kenrick, D. T. (eds). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 141–167.Google Scholar
Greer, A. E. and Buss, D. M. (1994). Tactics for promoting sexual encounters. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiling, H. and Buss, D. M. (2000). Women's sexual strategies: the hidden dimension of short-term mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929–963.
Guttentag, M. and Secord, P. F. (1983). Too Many Women? The Sex Ratio Question. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G. and Miller, G. F. (2006). Women's fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence. Human Nature, 17, 50–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, K. M. and Hadley, C. (1998). Dichotomous male reproductive strategies in a polygynous human society: mating versus parental effort. Current Anthropology, 39, 369–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, L. R. and Paul, L. (1996). Human male mating strategies, I. Courtship tactics of the “quality” and “quantity” alternatives. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitsch, G. J., Hortacsu, A. and Ariely, D. (2006). What makes you click? Mate preferences and matching outcomes in online dating. MIT Sloan Research Paper, No. 4603–4606.CrossRef
Hrdy, S. B. (1981). The Woman That Never Evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, S. M. and Gallup, G. G. (2003). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior: shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, J. (2003). Sociosexuality and self-perceived mate value: A multidimensional approach. Poster presentation to the 15th Annual Meeting of Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Graziano, W. G. and West, S. G. (1995). Dominance, prosocial orientation, and female preferences: do nice guys really finish last?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 427–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, V., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., et al. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. (1995). Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny: cross-cultural evidence and implications. Current Anthropology, 36, 723–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. (1998). Sociosexuality and motivations for romantic involvement. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, H. S. and Gangestad, S. W. (2005). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, Buss, D. M. (ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 68–95.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. L. (1995). The Foraging Spectrum: Diversity in Hunter-Gatherer Lifeways. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T. and Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G., et al. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: qualifying the parental investment model. Special issue: biological foundations of personality: evolution, behavioral genetics, and psychophysiology. Journal of Personality, 58, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Zierk, K. L., et al. (1994). Evolution and social cognition: contrast effects as a function of sex, dominance, and physical attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 210–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1998). Evolution, pair-bonding, and reproductive strategies: a reconceptualization of adult attachment. In Attachment Theory and Close Relationships, Simpson, J. A. and Rholes, W. S. (eds). New York: Guilford, pp. 353–393.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, L. A., Waugh, C. E., Valencia, A., et al. (2002). The functional domain specificity of self-esteem and the differential prediction of aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 756–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klusmann, D. (2002). Sexual motivation and the duration of partnership. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 275–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knodel, J., Low, B., Saengtienchai, C., et al. (1997). An evolutionary perspective on Thai sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 292–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, D. J., Fisher, M. and Jobling, I. (2003). Proper and dark heroes as dads and cads: alternative mating strategies in British romantic literature. Human Nature, 14, 305–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lalumiere, M. L., Seto, M. C. and Quinsey, V. L. (1995). Self-perceived mating success and the mating choices of males and females. Unpublished manuscript. Queen's University at Kingston, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Lancaster, J. B. (1994). Human sexuality, life histories, and evolutionary ecology. In Sexuality across the Life Course, Rossi, A. S. (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 39–62.Google Scholar
Landolt, M. A., Lalumiere, M. L. and Quinsey, V. L. (1995). Sex differences in intra-sex variations in human mating tactics: an evolutionary approach. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, N. P. and Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, N. P., Bailey, M. J., Kenrick, D. T., et al. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947–955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, A. C. and Mannion, H. (2006). Viewing attractive or unattractive same-sex individuals changes self-rated attractiveness and face preferences in women. Animal Behavior, 72, 981–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, B. S. (1989). Cross-cultural patterns in the training of children: an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 103, 313–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, B. S. (1998). The evolution of human life histories. In Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, Crawford, C. and Krebs, D. L. (eds). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 131–161.Google Scholar
Low, B. S. (2000). Why Sex Matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Malamuth, N. M. (1996). Sexually explicit media, gender differences, and evolutionary theory. Journal of Communication, 46, 8–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, J. T. (2002). Digit Ratio: a Pointer to Fertility, Behavior, and Health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Mazur, A. and Booth, A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 353–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuire, M. and Gruter, M. (2003). Prostitution: an evolutionary perspective. In Human Nature and Public Policy: an Evolutionary Approach, Somit, A. and Peterson, S. (eds). New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, M., Gangestad, S. W., Gray, P. B., et al. (2006). Romantic involvement often reduces men's testosterone levels – but not always: the moderating role of extrapair sexual interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 642–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mealey, L. (2000). Sex Differences: Developmental and Evolutionary Strategies. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Michalski, R. L. and Shackelford, T. K. (2002). Birth order and sexual strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 661–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikach, S. M. and Bailey, J. M. (1999). What distinguishes women with unusually high numbers of sex partners?Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. F. (2000). The Mating Mind. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Moffit, T. E., Caspi, A., Belsky, J., et al. (1992). Childhood experience and the onset of menarche: a test of a sociobiological model. Child Development, 63, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, U. and Mazur, A. (1998). Facial dominance in Homo sapiens as honest signaling of male quality. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 569–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munroe, R. L. and Munroe, R. H. (1997). A comparative anthropological perspective. In Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, vol. 1, Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H. and Pandey, J. (eds), 2nd edn. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 171–213.Google Scholar
Nettle, D. (2002). Height and reproductive success in a cohort of British men. Human Nature, 13, 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okami, P. and Shackelford, T. K. (2001). Human sex differences in sexual psychology and behavior. Annual Review of Sex Research, 12, 186–241.Google ScholarPubMed
Oliver, M. B. and Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasternak, B., Ember, C. and Ember, M. (1997). Sex, Gender, and Kinship: a Cross-Cultural Perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Pedersen, F. A. (1991). Secular trends in human sex ratios: their influence on individual and family behavior. Human Nature, 2, 271–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penton-Voak, I. S. and Chen, J. Y. (2004). High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penton-Voak, I. S., Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., et al. (2003). Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117, 264–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I. S., et al. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierce, C. A. (1996). Body height and romantic attraction: a meta-analytic test of the male-taller norm. Social Behavior and Personality, 24, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puts, D. A. (2006). Cyclic variation in women's preferences for masculine traits: potential hormonal causes. Human Nature, 17, 114–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinlan, R. J. (2003). Father absence, parental care, and female reproductive development. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 376–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, P. C. (1996). Rhythms of desire: the association between menstrual cycle phases and female sexual desire. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 5, 145–156.Google Scholar
Regan, P. C. (1998a). Minimum mate selection standards as a function of perceived mate value, relationship context, and gender. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 10, 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, P. C. (1998b). What if you can't get what you want? Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value, and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1294–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., et al. (2000). Partner preferences: what characteristics do men and women desire in their short-term and long-term romantic partners?Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 12, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridley, M. (2003). Nature via Nurture. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Rikowski, A. and Grammer, K. (1999). Human body odor, symmetry, and attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Academy of London. Series B, 266, 869–874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, D. C. (2002). On genetic variation in menarche and age at first intercourse: a critique of the Belsky–Draper hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, C. and Symons, D. (2001). Warrior Lovers: Erotic Fiction, Evolution, and Female Sexuality. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. (2002). A meta-analysis of sex differences in romantic attraction: do rating contexts affect tactic effectiveness judgments?British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. (2005a). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: a 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, D. P. (2005b). Is short-term mating the maladaptive result of insecure attachment? A test of competing evolutionary perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 747–768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, D. P. and Buss, D. M. (1996). Strategic self-enhancement and competitor derogation: sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1185–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. and Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 894–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. and Shackelford, T. K. (2003). Nifty ways to leave your lover: the tactics people use to entice and disguise the process of human mate poaching. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1018–1035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, D. P., Couden, A. and Baker, M. (2001). Sex, temporal context, and romantic desire: an experimental evaluation of Sexual Strategies Theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 833–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., Duntely, J., et al. (2002). Is there an early-30s peak in female sexual desire? Cross-sectional evidence from the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 11, 1–18.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allik, J., et al. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allik, J., et al. (2004a). Patterns and universals of mate poaching across 53 nations: the effects of sex, culture, and personality on romantically attracting another person's partner. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 560–584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allensworth, M., et al. (2004b). Patterns and universals of adult romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions: are models of self and other pancultural constructs?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 367–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schützwohl, A. (2006). Sex difference in jealousy: information search and cognitive preoccupation. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seal, D. W., Agostinelli, G. and Hannett, C. A. (1994). Extradyadic romantic involvement: moderating effects of sociosexuality and gender. Sex Roles, 31, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secord, P. F. (1983). Imbalanced sex ratios: the social consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 525–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackelford, T. K. and Larsen, R. J. (1999). Facial attractiveness and physical health. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackelford, T. K. and LeBlanc, G. J. (2001). Sperm competition in insects, birds, and humans: insights from a comparative evolutionary perspective. Evolution and Cognition, 7, 194–202.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A. and Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R. L. (1984). Human sperm competition. In Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, Smith, R. L. (ed.). New York: Academic Press, pp. 601–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soler, C., Nunez, M., Gutierrez, R., et al. (2003). Facial attractiveness in men provides clues to semen quality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecher, S., Sullivan, Q. and Hatfield, E. (1994). Mate selection preferences: gender differences examined in a national sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1074–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symons, D. (1979). The Evolution of Human Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Symons, D. and Ellis, B. J. (1989). Human male–female differences in sexual desire. In Sociobiology of Sexual and Reproductive Strategies, Rasa, A., Vogel, C. and Voland, E. (eds). London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 131–146.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R. and Gangestad, S. W. (1994). Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behavior. Psychological Science, 5, 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, R. and Gangestad, S. W. (1999). The scent of symmetry: a human sex pheromone that signals fitness?Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, R. and Palmer, C. T. (2000). A Natural History of Rape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W. and Comer, R. (1995). Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1601–1615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooke, W. and Camire, L. (1991). Patterns of deception in intersexual and intrasexual mating strategies. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, J. M. (1995). Sex without emotional involvement: an evolutionary interpretation of sex differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 24, 173–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Townsend, J. M. and Wasserman, T. (1998). Sexual attractiveness: sex differences in assessment and criteria. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man: 1871–1971, Campbell, B. (ed.). Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 136–179.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. (1985). Social Evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
Turke, P. and Betzig, L. (1985). Those who can do: wealth, status, and reproductive success on Ifaluk. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udry, J. R. and Campbell, B. C. (1994). Getting started on sexual behavior. In Sexuality over the Life Course, Rossi, A. S. (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 187–207.Google Scholar
Urbaniak, G. C. and Kilmann, P. R. (2003). Physical attractiveness and the “nice guy paradox”: do nice guys really finish last?Sex Roles, 49, 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, A. (1991). Self-esteem and sexual behavior: exploring gender differences. Sex Roles, 25, 441–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, A. (1997). The evolutionary psychology of mate selection in Morocco: a multivariate analysis. Human Nature, 8, 113–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walters, S. and Crawford, C. B. (1994). The importance of mate attraction for intrasexual competition in men and women. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiederman, M. W. (1993). Evolved gender differences in mate preferences: evidence from personal advertisements. Ethological and Sociobiology, 14, 331–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiederman, M. W. (1997). Extramarital sex: prevalence and correlates in a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, L. J. (2003). The neural basis of pair bonding in a monogamous species: a model for understanding the biological basis of human behavior. In Offspring: Human Fertility Behavior in Biodemographic Perspective, Wachter, K. W. and Bulatao, R. A. (eds). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, pp. 91–103.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×