Kupka, MS, Ferraretti, AP, de Mouzon, J et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHREdagger. Human Reproduction. 2014;29:2099–113.Google Scholar

Evans, J, Hannan, NJ, Edgell, TA et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence. Human Reproduction Update. 2014;20:808–21.Google Scholar

Calhaz-Jorge, C, de Geyter, C, Kupka, MS et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2012: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Human Reproduction. 2016;31:1638–52.Google ScholarPubMed

Noyes, RW, Hertig, AT, Rock, J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1975;122:262–3.Google Scholar

Devroey, P, Bourgain, C, Macklon, NS, Fauser, BC. Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and endometrial receptivity. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2004;15:84–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kyrou, D, Kolibianakis, EM, Venetis, CA et al. How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility. 2009;91:749–66.Google Scholar

Venetis, CA, Kolibianakis, EM, Bosdou, JK, Tarlatzis, BC. Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles. Human Reproduction Update. 2013;19:433–57.Google Scholar

Ubaldi, F, Bourgain, C, Tournaye, H et al. Endometrial evaluation by aspiration biopsy on the day of oocyte retrieval in the embryo transfer cycles in patients with serum progesterone rise during the follicular phase. Fertility and Sterility. 1997;67:521–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kolibianakis, EM, Devroey, P. The luteal phase after ovarian stimulation. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 2002;5 Suppl 1:26–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Van Vaerenbergh, I, Van Lommel, L, Ghislain, V et al. In GnRH antagonist/rec-FSH stimulated cycles, advanced endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte retrieval correlates with altered gene expression. Human Reproduction. 2009;24:1085–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Evans, J, Hannan, NJ, Hincks, C, Rombauts, LJ, Salamonsen, LA. Defective soil for a fertile seed? Altered endometrial development is detrimental to pregnancy success. PloS one. 2012;7e53098.Google Scholar

Labarta, E, Martinez-Conejero, JA, Alama, P et al. Endometrial receptivity is affected in women with high circulating progesterone levels at the end of the follicular phase: a functional genomics analysis. Human Reproduction. 2011;26:1813–25.Google Scholar

Macklon, NS, van der Gaast, MH, Hamilton, A, Fauser, BC, Giudice, LC. The impact of ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH in combination with GnRH antagonist on the endometrial transcriptome in the window of implantation. Reprod Sci. 2008;15:357–65.Google Scholar

Horcajadas, JA, Riesewijk, A, Polman, J et al. Effect of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF on endometrial gene expression profiles. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2005;11:195–205.Google Scholar

Luyet, BJ, Hodapp, EL. Revival of Frog’s Spermatozoa Vitrified in Liquid Air. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 1938;39:433–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rienzi, L, Gracia, C, Maggiulli, R et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Human Reproduction Update. 2017;23:139–55.Google Scholar

Cobo, A, Garrido, N, Crespo, J, Jose, R, Pellicer, A. Accumulation of oocytes: a new strategy for managing low-responder patients. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 2012;24:424–32.Google Scholar

Herrero, L, Pareja, S, Losada, C et al. Avoiding the use of human chorionic gonadotropin combined with oocyte vitrification and GnRH agonist triggering versus coasting: a new strategy to avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertility and Sterility. 2011;95:1137–40.Google Scholar

Chamayou, S, Sicali, M, Alecci, C et al. The accumulation of vitrified oocytes is a strategy to increase the number of euploid available blastocysts for transfer after preimplantation genetic testing. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2017. Epub 2017 January 9.Google Scholar

Chatzimeletiou, K, Morrison, EE, Panagiotidis, Y et al. Cytoskeletal analysis of human blastocysts by confocal laser scanning microscopy following vitrification. Human Reproduction. 2012;27:106–13.Google Scholar

Tachataki, M, Winston, RM, Taylor, DM. Quantitative RT-PCR reveals tuberous sclerosis gene, TSC2, mRNA degradation following cryopreservation in the human preimplantation embryo. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2003;9:593–601.Google Scholar

Van den Abbeel, E, Camus, M, Van Waesberghe, L et al. Viability of partially damaged human embryos after cryopreservation. Human Reproduction. 1997;12:2006–10.Google ScholarPubMed

Neulen, J, Yan, Z, Raczek, S et al. Human chorionic gonadotropin-dependent expression of vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor in human granulosa cells: importance in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1995;80:1967–71.Google Scholar

Al-Inany, HG, Youssef, MA, Ayeleke, RO et al. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016;4:CD001750.Google ScholarPubMed

Shapiro, BS, Andersen, CY. Major drawbacks and additional benefits of agonist trigger–not ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome related. Fertility and Sterility. 2015;103:874–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Munne, S, Dailey, T, Sultan, KM, Grifo, J, Cohen, J. The use of first polar bodies for preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy. Human Reproduction. 1995;10:1014–20.Google Scholar

Hardy, K, Handyside, AH. Biopsy of cleavage stage human embryos and diagnosis of single gene defects by DNA amplification. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992;116:388–92.Google Scholar

McArthur, SJ, Leigh, D, Marshall, JT, de Boer, KA, Jansen, RP. Pregnancies and live births after trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing of human blastocysts. Fertility and Sterility. 2005;84:1628–36.Google Scholar

Helmerhorst, FM, Perquin, DA, Donker, D, Keirse, MJ. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2004;328:261.Google Scholar

Henningsen, AK, Pinborg, A, Lidegaard, O et al. Perinatal outcome of singleton siblings born after assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception: Danish national sibling-cohort study. Fertility and Sterility. 2011;95:959–63.Google Scholar

Pandey, S, Shetty, A, Hamilton, M, Bhattacharya, S, Maheshwari, A. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update. 2012;18:485–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Maheshwari, A, Pandey, S, Shetty, A, Hamilton, M, Bhattacharya, S. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility. 2012;98:368–77 e1–9.Google Scholar

Wennerholm, UB, Henningsen, AK, Romundstad, LB et al. Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group. Human Reproduction. 2013;28:2545–53.Google Scholar

Sazonova, A, Kallen, K, Thurin-Kjellberg, A, Wennerholm, UB, Bergh, C. Obstetric outcome in singletons after in vitro fertilization with cryopreserved/thawed embryos. Human Reproduction. 2012;27:1343–50.Google Scholar

Roy, TK, Bradley, CK, Bowman, MC, McArthur, SJ. Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers. Fertility and Sterility. 2014;101:1294–301.Google Scholar

Belva, F, Bonduelle, M, Roelants, M, Verheyen, G, Van Landuyt, L. Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072 children born after vitrified embryo transfer. Human Reproduction. 2016;31:1610–20.Google Scholar

Maheshwari, A, Raja, EA, Bhattacharya, S. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes after either fresh or thawed frozen embryo transfer: an analysis of 112,432 singleton pregnancies recorded in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority anonymized dataset. Fertility and Sterility. 2016;106:1703–8.Google Scholar

Chen, ZJ, Shi, Y, Sun, Y et al. Fresh versus Frozen Embryos for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. The New England journal of Medicine. 2016;375:523–33.Google Scholar

Shapiro, BS, Daneshmand, ST, Garner, FC et al. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertility and Sterility. 2011;96:344–8.Google Scholar

Shapiro, BS, Daneshmand, ST, Garner, FC et al. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers in high responders. Fertility and Sterility. 2011;96:516–18.Google ScholarPubMed

Harper, MJ. The implantation window. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;6:351–71.Google Scholar

Groenewoud, ER, Cantineau, AE, Kollen, BJ, Macklon, NS, Cohlen, BJ. What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update. 2017;23:255–61Google Scholar

Peeraer, K, Couck, I, Debrock, S et al. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer in a natural or mildly hormonally stimulated cycle in women with regular ovulatory cycles: a RCT. Human Reproduction. 2015;30:2552–62.Google Scholar

Groenewoud, ER, Cohlen, BJ, Al-Oraiby, A et al. A randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial of modified natural versus artificial cycle for cryo-thawed embryo transfer. Human Reproduction. 2016;31:1483–92.Google Scholar