Angell, Norman (1911). The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power in Nations to Their Economic and Social Advantage. London, Heinemann.Google Scholar

Arnull, Anthony (2006). The European Union and Its Court of Justice. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert M. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar

Azzalini, Marco and Sandei, Claudia (eds) (2008). La formazione del diritto europeo: Giornata di studio per Alberto Trabucchi nel centenario della nascita. Padua, CEDAM.Google Scholar

Bailleux, Julie (2013). “Michel Gaudet, a Law Entrepreneur: The Role of the Legal Service of the European Executives in the Invention of EC Law and the Birth of the Common Market Law Review”. Common Market Law Review 50: 359–368.Google Scholar

Barile, Giuseppe (1987). Costituzione e Rinvio Mobile a Diritto Straniero, Diritto Canonico, Diritto Comunitario, Diritto Internazionale. Padova, CEDAM.Google Scholar

Barton, John, Goldstein, Judith, Josling, Timothy and Steinberg, Richard (2006). The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and Economics of the GATT and the WTO. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bellanger, François (1968). “Contribution a L’Etude de la Nature Juridique des “Accords de Luxembourg” du 29 January 1966”. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Internationaal Recht 15: 179–196.Google Scholar

Bernier, Alexandre (2018). “La France et le droit communautaire 1958–1981: Histoire d’une réception et d’une coproduction“. PhD thesis, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Berri, Mario (1966). “Annotation on San Michele Decision of the Italian Constitutional Court”. Common Market Law Review 4: 238–242.Google Scholar

Besselink, Leonard F. M. (2007). A Composite European Constitution. Groningen, Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar

Boerger, Anne and Rasmussen, Morten (2017). “The Making of European Law: Exploring the Life and Work of Michel Gaudet”. American Journal of Legal History 57: 51–82.Google Scholar

Boulouis, Jean and Chevallier, R. M. (1978). Grands Arrêts de la Cour de Justice des Communautés européennes, vol. 1. Paris, Dalloz.Google Scholar

Bown, Chad P. (2009). Self-Enforcing Trade: Developing Countries and WTO Dispute Settlement. Washington, DC, Brookings.Google Scholar

Brewster, Rachel (2011). “The Remedy Gap: Institutional Design, Retaliation, and Trade Law Enforcement”. George Washington Law Review 80(1): 102–158.Google Scholar

Bribosia, Hervé (1997). “Report on Belgium”, in Slaughter, A-M., Stone Sweet, Alec and Weiler, J. H. H. (eds) The European Courts and National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence. Oxford, Hart: 3–39.Google Scholar

Byberg, Rebekka (2017). “The History of the Integration Through Law Project: Creating the Academic Expression of a Constitutional Legal Vision for Europe”. German Law Journal 18(6): 1531–1556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, David (1978). “The Expansion of the Public Economy”. American Political Science Review 72: 1243–1261.Google Scholar

Cameron, Maxwell A. and Tomlin, Brian W. (2000). The Making of NAFTA: How the Deal was Done. Ithaca, NY,” Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Cannizzaro, Enzo (1991). Trattati Internazionali e Guidizio di Costituzionalità. Milano, Guiffrè.Google Scholar

Carreau, Dominique (1978). “Droit Communautaire et Droits Nationaux: Concurrence ou Primauté: La Contribution de l’arrêt Simmenthal”. Revue trimestrielle de droit européen: 381–418.Google Scholar

Cassuto, Thomas (ed.) (2015). L’Europe du droit face aux entreprises planétaires: Exposés, débats et perspectives. Bruxelles, Bruylant.Google Scholar

Catalano, Nicola (1964). “Portée des Traités Instituant les Communautés Européennes et Limites des Pouvoirs Souverains des États Membres”. Le Droit et Les Affaires 49 (Document LXXXVI).Google Scholar

Chalmers, Damian, Davies, Gareth and Monti, Giorgio (2014). European Union Law: Text and Materials. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chase, Claude, Yanovich, Alan, Crawford, Jo-Ann and Ugaz, Pamela (2013). Mapping of Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in Regional Trade Agreements – Innovative or Variations on a Theme? WTO Working Paper ERSD-2013–07.Google Scholar

Claes, Monica (2006). The National Courts’ Mandate in the European Constitution. Oxford, Hart.Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas (2002). “A Theory of Direct Effect in Global Law”, in von Bogdandy, Armin, Mavroidis, Petros and Mény, Yves (eds) European Integration and International Co-ordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann. The Hague, Kluwer Law International: 99–123.Google Scholar

Craig, Paul (1992). “Once upon a Time in the West: Direct Effect and the Federalization of EEC Law”. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12(4): 453–479.Google Scholar

Craig, Paul (2009). “The Legal Effect of Directives: Policy, Rules, and Exceptions”. European Law Review 34(3): 349–377.Google Scholar

Craig, Paul and de Búrca, Gráinne (eds) (2011). The Evolution of EU Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Craig, Paul and de Búrca, Gráinne (2015). EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cremona, Marise (2013). “The Judgment – Framing the Argument”, in Tizzano, Antonio, Kokott, Juliane and Prechal, Sacha (eds) 50th Anniversary of the Judgement in Van Gend en Loos 1963–2013. Luxembourg, Court of Justice of the European Union: 23–27.Google Scholar

Da Cruz Vilaça, José Luís (2014). “Are there Substantive Limits to the Amendment of the Treaties?”, in Luís Da Cruz Vilaça, José (ed.) EU Law and Integration: Twenty Years of Judicial Application of EU law. Oxford, Hart: 13–43.Google Scholar

Dani, Marco (2010). “Remedying European Legal Pluralism: The FIAMM and Fedon Litigation and the Judicial Protection of International Trade Bystanders”. European Journal of International Law 21(2): 303–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dashwood, Alan, Dougan, Michael, Rodger, Barry, Spaventa, Eleanor and Wyatt, Derrick (2011). Wyatt and Dashwood’s European Union Law. Oxford, Hart.Google Scholar

Däubler, Wolfgang (1968). “Die Klage der EWG-Kommission gegen einen Mitgliedstaat”. NJW(8): 325–331.Google Scholar

Davies, Bill (2012). Resisting the European Court of Justice: West Germany’s Confrontation with European Law, 1949–1979. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Davis, Christina (2012). Why Adjudicate? Enforcing Trade Rules in the WTO. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

de Búrca, Gráinne and Scott, Joanne (eds) (2006). Law and New Governance in the EU and the US. Oxford, Hart.Google Scholar

De Witte, Bruno (1986). “Retour à Costa – La primauté du droit communautaire à la lumière du droit international”, in Maihofer, Werner (ed.) Selected Working Papers of the European University Institute. Fiesole, European University Institute: 257–289.Google Scholar

De Witte, Bruno (1999). “Direct Effect, Supremacy, and the Nature of the Legal Order”, in Craig, Paul and de Búrca, Gráinne (eds) The Evolution of EU Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 177–213.Google Scholar

De Witte, Bruno (2011a). “Direct Effect, Primacy, and the Nature of the Legal Order”, in Craig, Paul and de Búrca, Gráinne (eds) The Evolution of EU Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 323–362.Google Scholar

De Witte, Bruno (2011b). “The European Union as an International Legal Experiment”, in de Búrca, Gráinne and Weiler, Joseph H. H. (eds) The Worlds of European Constitutionalism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 19–46.Google Scholar

De Witte, Bruno (2013). “The Impact of Van Gend en Loos on Judicial Protection at European and National Level: Three Types of Preliminary Questions”, in Tizzano, Antonio, Kokott, Juliane and Prechal, Sacha (eds) 50th Anniversary of the Judgement in Van Gend en Loos 1963–2013. Luxembourg, Court of Justice of the European Union: 93–101.Google Scholar

Dehousse, Renaud (1998). The European Court of Justice: The Politics of Judicial Integration. Basingstoke, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delvolve, Jean-Louis (1968). “Le Pouvoir Judiciaire et le Traité de Rome ou la diplomatie des juges”. Juris-Classeur Périodique I, 2184.Google Scholar

Department for Exiting the European Union (2017). Enforcement and Dispute Resolution: A Future Partnership Paper. London, HM Government.Google Scholar

Dero, Delphine (2006). La Réciprocité et le Droit des Communautés et de L’Union Européenne. Bruxelles, Bruylant.Google Scholar

Devereaux, Charan, Lawrence, Robert Z. and Watkins, Michael D. (2006). Case Studies in US Trade Negotiation, Vol. 2: Resolving Disputes. Washington, DC, Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar

Donner, Andreas (1968). The Role of the Lawyer in the European Communities. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Dougan, Michael (2007). “When Worlds Collide! Competing Visions of the Relationship Between Direct Effect and Supremacy”. Common Market Law Review 44: 931–963.Google Scholar

Douglas-Scott, Sionaidh (2002). Constitutional law of the European Union. Harlow, Longman.Google Scholar

Downs, George W. and Rocke, David M. (1995). Optimal Imperfection? Domestic Uncertainty and Institutions in International Relations. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Downs, George W., Rocke, David M. and Barsoom, Peter N. (1996). “Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?” International Organization (3): 379–406.Google Scholar

Doyle, Michael W. (1986). “Liberalism in World Politics”. American Political Science Review 80(4): 1151–1169.Google Scholar

Duranti, Marco (2017). The Conservative Human Rights Revolution: European Identity, Transnational Politics, and the Origins of the European Convention. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Easson, A. J. (1979). “The ‘Direct Effect’ of EEC Directives”. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 28(3): 319–353.Google Scholar

ECLR Editorial Comments (2014). “For History’s Sake: On Costa v. ENEL, André Donner and the Eternal Secret of the Court of Justice’s Deliberations”. European Constitutional Law Review 10(2): 191–198.Google Scholar

Edward, David (2001). “Lord Mackenzie-Stuart of Dean LLB, LLD”, in Yearbook of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Edinburgh, RSE Scotland Foundation: 180–182.Google Scholar

Eeckhout, Piet (2002). “Judicial Enforcement of WTO Law in the European Union – Some Further Reflections”. Journal of International Economic Law 5(1): 91–110.Google Scholar

Eeckhout, Piet (2011). EU External Relations Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Eisemann, Pierre Michel (ed.) (1996). The Integration of International and European Community Law into the National Legal Order: A Study of the Practice in Europe. The Hague, Boston, Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Elagab, Omer Yousif (1988). The Legality of Non-Forcible Counter-Measures in International Law. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Everson, Michelle (1995). “The Legacy of the Market Citizen”, in Shaw, J. and More, G. (eds) New Legal Dynamics of the European Union. Oxford, Clarendon Press: 73–89.Google Scholar

Fennelly, Nial (2010). “The European Court of Justice and the Doctrine of Supremacy: Van Gend en Loos; Costa v ENEL; Simmenthal”, in Poiares Maduro, Miguel and Azoulai, Loic (eds) The Past and Future of EU Law: The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty. Oxford, Hart: 39–46.Google Scholar

Fischer, Ronald D. and Prusa, Thomas J. (2003). “WTO Exceptions as Insurance”. Review of International Economics 11(5): 745–757.Google Scholar

Foster, Nigel (2016). EU Law Directions. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fritz, Vera (2018). Juges et avocats généraux de la Cour de Justice de l’Union européenne (1952–1972): une approche biographique de l’histoire d’une révolution juridique. Frankfurt, Klostermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Froese, Marc D. (2014). “Regional Trade Agreements and the Paradox of Dispute Settlement”. Manchester Journal of International Economic Law 11(3): 367–396.Google Scholar

Frowein, Jochen A. and Hahn, Michael J. (1991). “The Participation of Parliament in the Treaty Process in the Federal Republic of Germany”. Chicago-Kent Law Review 67: 361–389.Google Scholar

Frowein, Jochen A. and Oellers-Frahm, Karin (1996). “Allemagne Germany”, in Michel Eisemann, Pierre (ed.) The Integration of International and European Community Law into the National Legal Order: A Study of the Practice in Europe. The Hague, Boston, Kluwer Law International: 69–114.Google Scholar

Gaudet, Michel (1965). “Exposé de M. Michel Gaudet devant la Commission juridique en sa réunion du 18 février 1965”. Revue trimestrielle de droit européen.Google Scholar

Gianelli, Alessandra (2004). “Aspects of the Relationship between the Law of Treaties and the State Responsibility”. Studi di diritto internazionale in onore di Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz. Naples, Editoriale Scientifica 2: 757–805.Google Scholar

Gori, Paolo (1967). Les Clauses de Sauvegarde des Traités CECA et CEE. Heule, Belgium, Editions UGA.Google Scholar

Gori, Paolo (2013). “Souvenirs d’un survivant”, in Tizzano, Antonio, Kokott, Juliane and Prechal, Sacha (eds) 50th Anniversary of the Judgment in Van Gend en Loos, 1963–2013. Luxembourg, European Union: 29–35.Google Scholar

Gradoni, Lorenzo (2008). “Regime failure” nel diritto internazionale. Padova, CEDAM.Google Scholar

Gradoni, Lorenzo and Tanzi, Attila (2008). “Diritto comunitario: una lex specialis molto speciale”, in Serena Rossi, Lucia and Di Federico, Giacomo (eds) L’incidenza del Diritto dell’Unione Europea sullo Studio delle Discipline Giuridiche. Rome, Editoriale Scientifica: 37–70.Google Scholar

Grayson, George W. (1995). The North American Free Trade Agreement: Regional Community and the New World Order. Lanham, MD, University Press of America.Google Scholar

Griller, Stefan (2000). “Judicial Enforceability of WTO Law in the European Union: Annotation to Case C-149/96 Portugal v. Council”. Journal of International Economic Law 3: 441–472.Google Scholar

Gubin, Éliane (2008). Éliane Vogel-Polsky: A Woman of Conviction. Brussels, Institute for the Equality of Women and Men.Google Scholar

Hall, D. F. (1979). “’Plus ça change…’”. The Law Society’s Gazette 76(39): 1089.Google Scholar

Hartley, Trevor C. (2000). “International Law and the Law of the European Union – A Reassessment”. British Yearbook of International Law: 1–35.Google Scholar

Hartley, Trevor C. (2014). The Foundations of European Union Law: An Introduction to the Constitutional and Admnistrative Law of the European Union. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hilf, Meinhard (1996–1997). “The Role of National Courts in International Trade Relations”. Michigan Journal of International Law 18: 321–356.Google Scholar

Hockin, Thomas A. (2003). The American Nightmare: Politics and the Fragile World Trade Organization. Lanham, MD, Lexington.Google Scholar

Hogan, Gerard and Whelan, Anthony (1995). Ireland and the European Union: Constitutional and Statutory Texts and Commentary. London, Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar

Hübner, Denise Carolin (2016). “The ‘National Decisions’ database (Dec.Nat): Introducing a database on national courts’ interactions with European Law”. European Union Politics 17(2): 324–339.Google Scholar

Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Schott, Jeffrey J. and Wong, Yee (2003). NAFTA Dispute Settlement Systems. Institute for International Economics Working Paper.Google Scholar

Ipsen, Hans Peter (1964–1965). “The Relationship Between the Law of the European Communities and National Law”. Common Market Law Review 2: 379–402.Google Scholar

Ipsen, Hans Peter (1965). “Das Verhältnis des Rechts der europäischen Gemeinschaften zum nationalen Recht”, in Aktuelle Fragen des europäischen Gemeinschaftsrechts. Stuttgart, Ferdinand Enke: 1–27.Google Scholar

Isiksel, Turkuler (2016). Europe’s Functional Constitution: A Theory of Constitutionalism Beyond the State. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jacqué, J.-P. (2013). “Third Working Session – The Future Prospects – Introduction”, in Tizzano, Antonio, Kokott, Juliane and Prechal, Sacha (eds) 50th Anniversary of the Judgement in Van Gend en Loos, 1963–2013. Luxembourg, Court of Justice of the European Union: 129–134.Google Scholar

Jensen, Theresa (2011). “The Role of Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in the Constitutionalization of Regional Trade Agreements”. Master of Law thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar

Kaczorowska, Alina (2013). European Union Law. Abingdon, Routledge.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel (2003 [1795]). To Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. Indianapolis, Hackett.Google Scholar

Kapteyn, Paul Joan George (1964–1965). “EUROPA-RUBRIEK”. Ars Aequi: 238–244.Google Scholar

Kapteyn, Paul Joan George and VerLoren Van Themaat, Pieter (1973). Introduction to the Law of the European Communities: After the Accession of the New Member States. London, Deventer, Sweet & Maxwell, Kluwer.Google Scholar

Kapteyn, Paul Joan George (1989). Introduction to the Law of the European Communities: After the Coming into Force of the Single European Act. Deventer, Kluwer Law.Google Scholar

Kapteyn, Paul Joan George (1998). Introduction to the Law of the European Communities: From Maastricht to Amsterdam. London, Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Kapteyn, Paul Joan George, McDonnell, A. M., Mortelmans, K. J. M., Timmermans, Christian W. A. and Geelhoed, L. A. (2008). The Law of the European Union and the European Communites: With Reference to Changes To Be Made by the Lisbon Treaty. Alphen aan den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar

Kim, SooYeon (2010). Power and the Governance of Global Trade: From the GATT to the WTO Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Kischel, Uwe (2000). The State as a Non-Unitary Actor: The Role of the Judicial Branch in International Negotiations. Working Paper 23, Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung.Google Scholar

Kovar, Robert (1981). “Affaire 232/78”. Journal de Droit International: 108–110.Google Scholar

Kuilwijk, Kees J. (1996). The European Court of Justice and the GATT Dilemma. Beuningen, Nexed.Google Scholar

Le Beguec, Gilles (1989). “L’entrée au Palais Bourbon : les filières privilegiées d’accès à la fonction parlementaire (1919–1939)”. Doctoral thesis, Lille, Université de Paris X, Nanterre.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1931). Nature juridique de l’action en réintégrande: étude de la jurisprudence française Paris, A.-D.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1935). “Les J. D. P. presentent … La Route des Jeunes”. Route des Jeunes 1(May).Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1937). “La Politique est un devoir social”. L’Homme Réel. Revue Mensuelle du Syndicalisme et de l’humanisme 4(48): 28–34.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1963). “Role de la Cour de Justice Dans Le Développement de L’Europe”. Revue de Marché Commun (July–August): 273–275.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1964a). “Le rôle du droit dans l’unification européenne”. Gazette du Palais 1: 49–54.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1964b). “Le rôle du droit dans l’unification européenne”. Bulletin des juristes européens 17–18: 5–23.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1965). “La Dynamique Judiciaire dans l’Édification de l’Europe”. France-Forum 64(April–May): 20–22.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1966). “Diagnostic judiciaire de l’europe”. Le Monde (25 July).Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1967). “L’Heure des Juges dans Le Marché commun”. Le Monde (17 April).Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1968a). “Allocution prononcée par le président de la Cour, M. Robert Lecourt”. Dixième anniversaire 1958–1968. Luxembourg: 15–24.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1968b). “Barometre judiciaire de l’Europe”. Le Monde (15 January).Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1970). Le juge devant le Marché commun. Genève, Graduate Institute of International StudiesGoogle Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1973a). “Allocution Prononcée par Monsieur le President Robert LECOURT lors de l’audience solennelle du 9 Octobre 1973: Acceuil de Monsieur Reischl”, in Audiences Solennelles 1973. Luxembourg, Cour de Justice des Communautes Europeennes.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1973b). “[Speech at ‘Grand Night’]”. Graya 77: 171–173.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1974–1975). “Speech delivered by Mr R. Lecourt to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the Robert Schuman Declaration”, in Formal Hearings of the Court of Justice of the European Communities 1974–1975. Luxembourg, Court of Justice of the European Communities: 25–27.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1976a). L’Europe des juges. Bruxelles, Bruylant.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1976b). “Speech delivered by Mr R Lecourt, President, at the formal hearing on 7 October 1976 on the occasion of his departure”, in Formal Hearings of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. Luxembourg, Court of Justice of the European Communities: 49–53.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1976c). “Speech delivered by Mr R. Lecourt, President, at the formal hearing on 7 October 1976 on the occasion of the departure of Mr A. Trabucchi, Advocate-General”, in Formal Hearings of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. Luxembourg, Court of Justice of the European Communities: 27–30.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1979). “Interférences entre la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme et le Droit de la Communauté au regard du controle judiciaire communautaire et national”. Actes du Colloque sur la Convention européenne des Droits de l’homme par rapport à d’autres instruments internationaux pour la protection des droits de l’homme, Athens.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1981). “La Cour de Justice des Communautes europeennes vue de l’interieur”, in Europäische Gerichtsbarkeit und nationale Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit: Festschrift zum 70. Geburtstag von Hans Kutscher. Baden-Baden, Nomos: 261–272.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1984). “Le Role Unificateur du Juge dans La Communauté”, in Études de Droit des Communautés Européennes: Mélanges offerts à Pierre-Henri Teitgen. Paris, Pedone: 223–237.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1987). “Quelques souvenirs d’un passé anterieur”, in XXXV ANNI: 1952–1987. Luxembourg, CURIA.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert (1991). “Quel eut été le droit des Communautés sans les arrêts de 1963 et 1964?”, in Mélanges Jean Boulouis: l’Europe et le droit. Dalloz: 349–361.Google Scholar

Lecourt, Robert and Chevallier, R. M. (1963). “Chances et malchances de l’harmonisation des législations européennes”. Recueil Dalloz: 273–283.Google Scholar

Lenaerts, Koen (1992). “Some Thoughts about the Interaction between Judges and Politicians”. University of Chcago Legal Forum 1992(1): 93–133.Google Scholar

Lenaerts, Koen and Van Nuffel, Piet (2005). Constitutional Law of the European Union. London, Thomson, Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar

Lindseth, Peter L. (2002). “The Contradictions of Supranationalism: European Integration and the Constitutional Settlement of Administrative Governance”. PhD thesis, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Lindseth, Peter L. (2010). Power and Legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lindseth, Peter L. (2016). “The Perils of ‘As If’ European Constitutionalism”. European Law Journal 22(5): 696–718.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin (1993). “Pacific Divide: American Exceptionalism –Japanese Uniqueness”. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 5(2): 121–166.Google Scholar

Louis, Jean-Victor (1966). “Troisième Colloque de Droit Européen, Paris, 25–27 novembre 1965”. Cahiers du Droit Europenne: 90–96.Google Scholar

Louis, Jean-Victor (2013). “Concluding Remarks”, in Tizzano, Antonio, Kokott, Juliane and Prechal, Sacha (eds) 50th Anniversary of the Judgement in Van Gend en Loos, 1963–2013. Luxembourg, Office des publications de l’Union européenne: 205–225.Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil (1999). Questioning Sovereignty? Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maduro, Miguel Poiares and Azoulai, Loic (2010). The Past and Future of EU Law: The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty. Oxford, Hart.Google Scholar

Maher, Imelda (1994). “National Courts as European Community Courts”. Legal Studies 14: 226–243.Google Scholar

Malenovský, Jiří (2013). “La contribution ambivalente de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne à la saga centenaire de la domestication du droit international public”, in Kronenberger, V., D’Alessio, M. T. and Placco, V. (eds) De Rome à Lisbonne: les juridictions de l’Union Europeenne à la croisée des chemins. Mélanges en l’honneur de Paolo Mengozzi. Brussels, Bruylant: 25–59.Google Scholar

Mayer, Frederick (1998). Interpreting NAFTA: The Science and Art of Political Analysis. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Mendez, Mario (2013). The Legal Effects of EU Agreements. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Michelet, Élisabeth (1973). La règle du non-cumul du posséssoire et du pétitoire. Paris, Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.Google Scholar

Milward, Alan S., Brennan, George and Romero, Federico (1992). The European Rescue of the Nation-State. London, Routledge.Google Scholar

Mongelli, Francesco Paolo, Dorrucci, Ettore and Agur, Itai (2005). What Does European Institutional Integration Tell Us about Trade Integration? ECB Occasional Paper Series 40, Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Moyn, Samuel (2015). Christian Human Rights. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Nicola, Fernanda and Davies, Bill (eds) (2017). EU Law Stories: Contextual and Critical Histories of European Jurisprudence. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nord, Philip (2010). France’s New Deal: From the Thirties to the Postwar Era. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Olson, Mancur (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Oppenheimer, Andrew (ed.) (1994). The Relationship between European Community Law and National Law: The cases, Volume 1. Cambridge, New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pappini, Roberto (1996). The Christian Democrat International. Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Pelc, Krzysztof (2016). Making and Bending International Rules: The Design of Exceptions and Escape Clauses in Trade Law. Cambridge, Cambridge Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pescatore, Pierre (1968). “Les Droits de l’Homme et L’Intégration Européenne”. Cahiers de Droit Européen: 629–673.Google Scholar

Pescatore, Pierre (1981). “Aspects judiciaires de l’ ‘acquis communautaire’”. Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 17(4): 617–651.Google Scholar

Pescatore, Pierre (2005). “Robert Lecourt (1908–2004). Eloge funèbre prononcé par Pierre Pescatore ancien Juge de la Cour, à l’audience solennelle du 7 mars 2005”. Revue trimestrielle de droit européen (3): 589–596.Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (1983). “Application of GATT by the Court of Justice of the European Communities”. Common Market Law Review 20: 397ff.Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (1985). “International and European Foreign Trade Law: GATT Dispute Settlement Proceedings Against the EEC”. Common Market Law Review 22: 441ff.Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (1995). “Proposals for a New Constitution for the European Union: Building-Blocks for a Constitutional Theory and Constitutional Law of the EU”. Common Market Law Review 32: 1123–1175.Google Scholar

Phelan, William (2008). “Can Ireland Legislate Contrary to European Community Law?” European Law Review 33(4): 530–549.Google Scholar

Phelan, William (2010). “Political Self-Control and European Constitution: The Assumption of National Political Loyalty to European Obligations as the Solution to the Lex Posterior problem in the National Legal Orders”. European Law Journal 16(3): 253–272.Google Scholar

Phelan, William (2011a). “Open International Markets without Exclusion: Encompassing Domestic Political Institutions, International Organization, and Self-Contained Regimes”. International Theory 3(2): 286–306.Google Scholar

Phelan, William (2011b). “Why do the EU Member States Accept the Supremacy of European Law? Explaining Supremacy as an Alternative to Bilateral Reciprocity”. Journal of European Public Policy 18(5): 766–777.Google Scholar

Phelan, William (2012). “What is Sui Generis about the European Union? Costly International Cooperation in a Self-Contained Regime”. International Studies Review 14: 367–385.Google Scholar

Phelan, William (2013). “The European Union’s Next Nobel Peace Prize”. E-International Relations, from www.e-ir.info/2013/08/05/the-european-unions-next-nobel-peace-prize/.Google Scholar

Phelan, William (2014). “The Limited Practical Relevance of National Constitutional Rights as a Constraint on the National Application of European Law in the Early Decades of European Integration”. Irish Journal of European Law 17(1): 43–61.Google Scholar

Phelan, William (2015a). “Enforcement and Escape in the Andean Community: Why the Andean Community of Nations is not a Replica of the European Union”. Journal of Common Market Studies 53(4): 840–856.Google Scholar

Phelan, William (2015b). In Place of Inter-State Retaliation: The European Union’s Rejection of WTO-style Trade Sanctions and Trade Remedies. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Phelan, William (2015c). “The Troika: The Interlocking Roles of Commission v. Luxembourg and Belgium, Van Gend en Loos and Costa v. ENEL in the Creation of the European Legal Order”. European Law Journal 21(1): 116–135.Google Scholar

Phelan, William (2016a). Diagonal Enforcement in International Trade Politics. EUI Working Paper SPS 2016/1. Fiesole, EUI.Google Scholar

Phelan, William (2016b). “Safety Valves and Complete Exits in European Treaty Politics”. German Law Journal 17 (Brexit Supplement): 93–94.Google Scholar

Phelan, William (2016c). “Supremacy, Direct Effect, and Dairy Products in the Early History of European Law”. International Journal of Constitutional Law 14(1): 6–25.Google Scholar

Phelan, William (2017). “The Revolutionary Doctrines of European Law and the Legal Philosophy of Robert Lecourt”. European Journal of International Law 28(3): 935–957.Google Scholar

Phelan, William (2018). “European Legal Integration: Towards a More Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach”. Journal of Common Market Studies 56(7): 1562–1577.Google Scholar

Plender, Richard (1976). “An Incipient Form of European Citizenship”, in Jacobs, Francis (ed.) European Law and the Individual. Amsterdam, North Holland.Google Scholar

Plötner, Jens (1997). “Report on France”, in Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Stone Sweet, Alec and Weiler, J. H. H. (eds) The European Courts and National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence. Oxford, Hart: 43–75.Google Scholar

Prechal, Sacha (2005). Directives in EC Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Hjalte (1983). “The Court of Justice”, in Thirty Years of Community Law. Luxembourg, European Community Information Service.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Hjalte (1986). On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice: A Comparative Study in Judicial Policymaking. Dordrecht, M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Hjalte (2009). Legal Opinion about The European Court of Justice’s Competence Transgressions, Poor Reasonings and the Complete Non-transparency of Willensbildung. Unpublished Paper.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Morten (2008). “The Origins of a Legal Revolution – The Early History of the European Court of Justice”. Journal of European Integration History 14(2): 77–98.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Morten (2010). “Constructing and Deconstructing ‘Constitutional’ European Law: Some Reflections on how to Study the History of European Law”, in Koch, Henning, Hagel-Sørensen, Karsten, Haltern, Ulrich R. and Weiler, J. H. H. (eds) Europe: The New Legal Realism: Essays in Honour of Hjalte Rasmussen. Copenhagen, Djøf Publishing: 639–660.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Morten (2012). “Establishing a Constitutional Practice of European Law: The History of the Legal Service of the European Executive 1952–65”. Contemporary European History 21(3): 375–397.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Morten (2014). “Revolutionizing European Law: A History of the Van Gend en Loos judgment”. International Journal of Constitutional Law 12(1): 136–163.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Morten (2017). “How to Enforce European Law? A New History of the Battle over the Direct Effect of Directives, 1958–1987”. European Law Journal 23: 290–308.Google Scholar

Reuter, Paul (1968). “La Cour de justice des Communautés européennes et le droit international”, in Recueil d’études de droit international en hommage à Paul Guggenheim. Geneva, Éditions de la Faculté de Droit de l’Université de Genève/Institut Universitaire de Hautes Études Internationales: 665–686.Google Scholar

Reuter, Paul (1969). “Le Droit International comme Source de Droit Communautaire”, in Ganshof van der Meersch, W. J. (ed.) Droit des Communautés européennes. Bruxelles, Larcier: 437–440.Google Scholar

Robert, Jean (1963).“Sur une Égalité de Droits devant La Communauté Économique Européenne Des Ressortissants Des États Membres Avec Ces États Eux-Mêmes”. Recueil Sirey (Mai): 29–33.Google Scholar

Roitinger, Alexander (2004). “The Institutional Design of Trade Policy Flexibility in the World Trading Order: Analysis and New Direction for Reform”. PhD thesis, St Gallen.Google Scholar

Rosendorff, B. Peter and Milner, Helen V. (2001). “The Optimal Design of International Trade Institutions: Uncertainty and Escape”. International Organization 55(4): 829–857.Google Scholar

Rossa Phelan, Diarmuid (1997). Revolt or Revolution: The Constitutional Boundaries of the European Community. Dublin, Round Hall Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar

Rudden, Bernard and Phelan, Diarmuid Rossa (1997). Basic Community Cases. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John (1982). “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order”. International Organization 36(2): 379–425.Google Scholar

Ruiz Fabri, Helene (2013). “Conjuguer justice et prudence: commentaire sur le développement de l’effet direct du droit international en droit de l’Union”, in Tizzano, Antonio, Kokott, Juliane and Prechal, Sacha (eds) 50th Anniversary of the Judgement in Van Gend en Loos 1963–2013. Luxembourg, Court of Justice of the European Union: 189–196.Google Scholar

Ruiz Fabri, Helene (2014). “Is There a Case – Legally and Politically – for Direct Effect of WTO Obligations?” European Journal of International Law 25: 151–173.Google Scholar

Rupp, Hans G. (1977). “Judicial Review of International Agreements: Federal Republic of Germany”. American Journal of Comparative Law 25(2): 286–302.Google Scholar

Savatier, René (1960). “Le Marché commun au regard du droit internationale privé”, in des facultés de droit, Colloque (ed.) Les Problèmes juridiques et économiques du Marché commun. Lille, Librairies techniques: 55–71.Google Scholar

Schermers, Henry G. (1975). “Community Law and International Law”. Common Market Law Review 12: 77–90.Google Scholar

Schermers, Henry G. (1977). “L’Europe des Juges by Robert Lecourt”. Common Market Law Review 14: 261–262.Google Scholar

Schütze, Robert (2016). European Constitutional Law. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scott, Joanne (1995). “GATT and Community Law: Rethinking the ‘Regulatory Gap’”, in Shaw, J. and More, G. (eds) New Legal Dynamics of the European Union. Oxford, Clarendon Press: 147–164.Google Scholar

Secretaría General (2006). Comunidad Andina: Avances y Perspectivas. Lima: Documento informativo SG/di 800.Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno (1985). “Self-Contained Regimes”. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 16: 111–136.Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno (1994). “Counter-Measures and Dispute Settlement: A Plea for a Different Balance”. European Journal of International Law 5: 102–105.Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno and Pulkowski, Dirk (2006). “Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law”. The European Journal of International Law 17(3): 483–529.Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno and Pulkowski, Dirk (2010). “Leges Speciales and Self-Contained Regimes”, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds) The Law of International Responsibility. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 138–163.Google Scholar

Simmonds, K. R. (1975). “Van Duyn v. The Home Office: The Direct Effectiveness of Directives”. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 24(3): 419–437.Google Scholar

Simon, Denys (2000). “The Sanction of Member States’ Serious Violations of Community Law”, in O’Keeffe, D. (ed.) Liber Amicorum in Honour of Lord Slynn of Hadley. The Hague, Kluwer 1: 275–286.Google Scholar

Slobodian, Quinn (2018). Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Somek, Alexander (2017). “Is Legality a Principle of EU Law?”, in Vogenauer, Stefan and Weatherill, Stephen (eds) General Principles of EU Law: European and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford, Hart: 53–75.Google Scholar

Stein, Eric (1965). “Toward Supremacy of Treaty – Constitution by Judicial Fiat in the European Economic Community”. Rivista di Diritto Internazionale 48: 3–28.Google Scholar

Stein, Eric (1981). “Lawyers, Judges and the Making of a Transnational Constitution”. American Journal of International Law 75(1): 1–27.Google Scholar

Tancredi, Antonello (2004). “EC Practice in the WTO: How Wide is the ‘Scope for Manoeuvre’?” European Journal of International Law 15(5): 933–961.Google Scholar

Teh, Robert, Prusa, Thomas J. and Budetta, Michele (2007). Trade Remedy Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements. WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2007–03.Google Scholar

Temple Lang, John (1997). “The Duties of National Courts under Community Constitutional Law”. European Law Review 22: 3–18.Google Scholar

Thies, Anne (2013). International Trade Disputes and EU Liability. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, Dennis (1962). “The Bosch Case”. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 11(3): 721–741.Google Scholar

Tizzano, Antonio, Kokott, Juliane and Prechal, Sacha (2013). 50th Anniversary of the Judgement in Van Gend en Loos, 1963–2013. Luxembourg, Court of Justice of the European Union.Google Scholar

Torrelli, Maurice (1968). “La Cour Constitutionnelle Fédérale Allemande et le Droit Communautaire: Note de Jurisprudence”. Revue de Marché Commun: 719–723.Google Scholar

Trebilcock, M., Howse, R. and Eliason, A. (2013). The Regulation of International Trade. London and New York, Routledge.Google Scholar

Tumlir, Jan (1983a). “International Economic Order and Democratic Constitutionalism”. ORDO 34: 71–83.Google Scholar

Tumlir, Jan (1983b). “Need for an Open Multilateral Trading System”. The World Economy: 393–408.Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, Karin (2012). “On Democratic Concerns and Legal Traditions: The Dutch 1953 and 1956 Constitutional Reforms ‘Towards’ Europe”. Contemporary European History 21(3): 357–374.Google Scholar

Vauchez, Antoine (2010). “The Transnational Politics of Judicialization, Van Gend en Loos and the Making of EU Polity”. European Law Journal 16(1): 1–28.Google Scholar

Vauchez, Antoine (2015). Brokering Europe: Euro-Lawyers and the Making of a Transnational Polity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vinuesa, Raúl Emilio (2005). “Enforcement of Mercosur Arbitration Awards within the Domestic Legal Orders of Member States”. Texas International Law Journal 40: 425–442.Google Scholar

Voon, Tania (2010). “Eliminating Trade Remedies from the WTO: Lessons from Regional Trade Agreements”. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 59: 625–667.Google Scholar

Waelbroeck, Michel (1967). “The Application of EEC Law by National Courts”. Stanford Law Review 19(6): 1248–1276.Google Scholar

Waelbroeck, Michel (1969). Traités internation »aux et juridictions interns dans les pays du Marché commun. Bruxelles, CIDC.Google Scholar

Waelbroeck, Michel (1974). “Effect of GATT within the Legal Order of the EEC”. Journal of World Trade Law 8: 614–623.Google Scholar

Walker, Neil (ed.) (2003). Sovereignty in Transition. Oxford and Portland, OR, Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Weatherill, Stephen (2014). Cases and Materials on EU Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H. (1986). “Eurocracy and Distrust: Some Questions concerning the Role of the European Court of Justice in the Protection of Fundamental Human Rights within the Legal Order of the European Communities”. Washington Law Review 61: 1103–1142.Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H. (1991). “The Transformation of Europe”. Yale Law Journal 100: 2403–2483.Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H. (1996). The Jurisprudence of Human Rights in the European Union: Integration and Disintegration, Values and Processes. Jean Monnet Chair Working Papers 2/96. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H. (1999). The Constitution of Europe: “Do the New Clothes have an Emperor?” and Other Essays on European Integration. New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H. (2003). “Rewriting Van Gend en Loos: Towards a Normative Theory of ECJ Hermeneutics” in Wiklund, Ola (ed.) Judicial Discretion in European Perspective. The Hague, Kluwer Law International: 150–164.Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H. (2014). “Van Gend en Loos: The Individual as Subject and Object and the Dilemma of European Legitimacy”. International Journal of Constitutional Law 12(1): 94–103.Google Scholar

Wenner, Wolfgang (1962). “Zur Auslegung des EWG-Vertrages”. Aussenwirtschaftsdienst des Betreibs-Beraters (4): 110–112.Google Scholar

Woods, Lorna and Watson, Philippa (2014). Steiner & Woods EU Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wyatt, Derrick (1975). “Directly Applicable Provisions of EEC Law”. New Law Journal: 458–460; 575–578; 669–672; 793, 794.Google Scholar

Zeitler, Franz-Christoph (1973). Verfassungsgericht und völkerrechtlicher Vertrag. Berlin, Dunkler & Humblot.Google Scholar

Zoller, Elisabeth (1984). Peacetime Unilateral Remedies: An Analysis of Countermeasures. Dobbs Ferry, NY, Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar