Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T21:46:35.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Suitable organization forms for knowledge management at various R&D functions in decentralized and cooperative R&D networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2011

Hsing Hung Chen
Affiliation:
Macau University of Science and Technology
Farok J. Contractor
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Vikas Kumar
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Sumit K. Kundu
Affiliation:
Florida International University
Torben Pedersen
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Companies engaged in Research and Development (R&D) in highly competitive global industries have to take into consideration numerous factors such as reduced delivery time, cost reduction, and increased demands for differentiated products with higher quality (Balbontin et al., 2000). Management issues, such as supply-chain management, alliance strategies, and outsourcing strategies, have been introduced to solve the aforementioned problems, and have become primary methods used by many companies (Boyle et al., 2006; Li et al., 2005). Stiff competition has forced companies to consider the relocation of R&D activities to foreign locations (“offshoring”) and/or to external service providers (“outsourcing”) in networks to develop new strategies, capacities, and capabilities. By tapping into external networks, the companies can make use of focused expertise and concentrated resources. They can also take advantage of diversified cutting-edge technologies by sharing risks and benefits with the participants inside the networks. The trend of R&D management structure is changing from being ethnocentric centralized to geocentric centralized, and then to polycentric decentralized. The current R&D management structure tends to be decentralized and cooperative. The primary manufacturing operation has become the mass customization system in industry. All of these are to meet the urgent demands for carrying out R&D in decentralized and cooperative R&D networks.

Even though carrying out cooperative R&D is important, only very few researchers have examined R&D in decentralized and cooperative R&D networks (Andersson et al., 2002; Belderbos et al., 2004; Helble and Li, 2004).

Type
Chapter
Information
Global Outsourcing and Offshoring
An Integrated Approach to Theory and Corporate Strategy
, pp. 239 - 264
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., and Holm, A. 2002. “The strategic impact of external networks: subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation,” Strategic Management Journal 23(11): 979–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armbrecht, F.M.R., Chapas, R.B.., Chappelow, C.C., and Farris, G.F. 2001. “Knowledge management in research and development,” Research Technology Management 44(4): 28–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balbontin, A., Yazdani, B.B., Cooper, R., and Souder, W.E. 2000. “New product development practices in American and British firms,” Technovation 20: 257–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banker, R.D., Chang, H., Janakiraman, S.N., and Konstans, C. 2004. “A balanced scorecard analysis of performance metrics,” European Journal of Operational Research 154: 423–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., and Lokshin, B. 2004. “Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies,” International Journal of Industrial Organization 22: 1237–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, T., Kumar, V., and Kumar, U. 2006. “Determinants of integrated product development diffusion,” R&D Management 36(1): 37–54.Google Scholar
Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. 2000. “Knowledge and organization: a social practice perspective,” Organization Science 12(2): 198–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrera, D. and Mayorga, R. 2008. “Supply chain management: modular fuzzy inference system approach in supplier selection for new product development,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 19: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S.L. and Wang, S.Y. 2006. “Applying fuzzy linguistic quantifier to select supply chain partners at different phases of product life cycle,” International Journal of Production Economics 100: 348–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, T.Y. and Hartley, J.L. 1996. “An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain,” Journal of Operations Management 14(4): 333–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choy, K.L., Lee, W.B., Lau, H.C.W., and Choy, L. 2005. “A knowledge-based supplier intelligence retrieval system for outsource manufacturing,” Knowledge-Based Systems 18: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.G., Edgett, S.J., and Kleinschmidt, E.J. 2002. “Optimizing the stage-gate process: what best-practice companies Do-I,” Research Technology Management 45(5): 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toni, A. and Nassimbeni, G. 2001. “A method for the evaluation of suppliers' co-design effort,” International Journal of Production Economics 72: 169–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, G.W. 1966. “An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions,” Journal of Purchasing 2(1): 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodgson, M. 1993. “Organizational learning: a review of some literature,” Organization Studies 14(3): 375–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulmin, R. and Mininno, V. 2003. “Supplier selection using a multi-criteria decision aid method,” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 9: 177–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emden, Z., Calantone, R.J., and Droge, C. 2006. “Collaborating for new product development: selecting the partner with maximum potential to create value,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 23: 330–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitor, M.V. 2001. “Towards a university agenda on engineering policy and the management of technology,” International Journal of Technology Policy and Management 1(2): 195–227.Google Scholar
Helble, Y., and Li, C.C. 2004. “The importance of internal and external R&D network linkages for R&D organizations,” R&D Management 34(5): 605–12.Google Scholar
Hoegl, M. and Schulze, A. 2005. “How to support knowledge creation in new product development: an investigation of knowledge management methods,” European Management Journal 23(3): 263–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, H.Y. and Lee, A.H.I. 2007. “Priority mix planning for semiconductor fabrication by fuzzy AHP ranking,” Expert Systems with Applications 32(2): 560–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karsak, E.E., Sozer, S., and Alptekin, S.E. 2002. “Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach,” Computers and Industrial Engineering 44: 171–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kash, D.E. and Rycoft, R.W. 2000. “Patterns of innovating complex technologies: a framework for adaptive network strategies,” Research Policy 29: 819–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuvaas, B. 2008. “An exploration of how the employee-organization relationship affects the linkage between perceptions of developmental human resources practices and employee outcomes,” Journal of Management Studies 45: 1–25.Google Scholar
Lee, A.H.I., Kang, H.Y., and Wang, W.P. 2006. “Analysis of priority mix planning for semiconductor fabrication under uncertainty,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 28: 351–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S., Rao, S.S., Ragu-Nathan, T.S., and Ragu-Nathan, B. 2005. “Development and validation of a measurement instrument for studying supply chain management practices,” Journal of Operations Management 23: 618–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundvall, B.A. 2004. The Economics of Knowledge and Learning: Knowledge Management in the Learning Economy. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maffin, D. and Braiden, P. 2001. “Manufacturing and supplier roles in product development,” International Journal of Production Economics 69: 205–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalska, J. 2005. “The usage of the balanced scorecard for the estimation of the enterprise's effectiveness,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 16(2): 751–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, R.P., Agarwal, R., Choudhury, A.K., and Tiwari, A.K. 2005. “A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R&D project selection: a case study,” International Journal of Production Research 43(24): 5199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muralidharan, C., Anantharaman, N., and Deshmukh, S.G. 2002. “A multi-criteria group decision making model for supplier rating,” Journal of Supply Chain Management 38(4): 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murtaza, M.B. 2003. “Fuzzy-AHP application to country risk assessment,” American Business Review 21(2): 109–16.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I. 1994. “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation,” Organization Science 5(1): 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olhager, J. and Selldin, E. 2004. “Supply chain management survey of Swedish manufacturing firms,” International Journal of Production Economics 89(3): 353–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozman, M. 2006. “Knowledge integration and network formation,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73: 1121–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro, P. 2002. “Innovation science and technology commercialization strategies at 3M,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 19: 25–38.Google Scholar
Quinn, J.B., Anderson, P., and Finkelstein, S. 1996. “Managing professional intellect: making the most of the best,” Harvard Business Review 74(2): 71–78.Google Scholar
Saaty, T.L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Saaty, T.L. 1994. “How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process,” Interfaces 24(6): 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soderquist, K.E. 2006. “Organizing knowledge management and dissemination in new product development,” Long Range Planning 39: 497–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, M., Bij, H.V.D., and Weggeman, M. 2006. “Factors for improving the level of knowledge generation in new product development,” R&D Management 36(2): 173–87.Google Scholar
Talluri, S. and Narasimhan, R. 2004. “A methodology for strategic sourcing,” European Journal of Operational Research 154: 236–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verma, R. and Pullman, M.E. 1998. “An analysis of the supplier selection process,” Omega 26(6): 739–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vonderembse, M.A. and Tracey, M. 1999. “The impact of supplier selection criteria and supplier involvement on manufacturing performance,” Journal of Supply Chain Management 35(3): 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, C.A. and Desai, A. 1996. “Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: a negotiation tool for buyers,” European Journal of Operational Research 90: 142–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, C.S. 2002. “A GP-AHP method for solving group decision-making fuzzy AHP Problem,” Computer and Operation Research 29: 1969–2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zsidisin, G.A. 2003. “A grounded definition of supply risk,” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 9: 217–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×