Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T04:55:29.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Does R&D offshoring displace or strengthen knowledge production at home? Evidence from OECD countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2011

Lucia Piscitello
Affiliation:
DIG – Politecnico di Milano
Grazia D. Santangelo
Affiliation:
University of Catania
Farok J. Contractor
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Vikas Kumar
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Sumit K. Kundu
Affiliation:
Florida International University
Torben Pedersen
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter aims to investigate whether offshoring of R&D activity in fast-growing economies impacts on the knowledge creation of home investing countries. This research question goes back to the debate on whether these investments really strengthen home countries' knowledge production (Hemphill, 2005; Kotabe, 1990), or instead they hasten a possible hollowing out and/or a polarization of a home country's competences (Bardhan and Jaffee, 2005; Lieberman, 2004; Teece, 1987). Despite further research conducted on this issue (e.g., Egger et al., 2001; Falk and Wolfmayr, 2005; Feenstra and Hanson, 1999; Gersbach and Schmutzler, 2006; Hansson, 2005; Hsieh and Woo, 2005; Naghavi and Ottaviano, 2009), consensus on the net impact of offshoring on the home country is lacking and additional empirical evidence is needed.

Available statistics clearly document an increasing degree of R&D internationalization by multinational firms as well as a recent change in the location and nature of their overseas activities (Belderbos and Sleuwagen, 2007; UNCTAD, 2005). Specifically, both UNCTAD and OECD data show that Singapore, India, China, Korea, and, to a lesser extent, Brazil are increasingly attracting R&D by multinationals. In particular, UNCTAD estimates that of the 1,773 FDI projects involving R&D as a key business function during 2002–04, no fewer than 1,095 went to Eastern Europe and Asia, with India and China the most important destination countries (UNCTAD, 2005: xxvi).

Type
Chapter
Information
Global Outsourcing and Offshoring
An Integrated Approach to Theory and Corporate Strategy
, pp. 191 - 209
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida, P. 1996. “Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry,” Strategic Management Journal 17: 155–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambos, B. 2005. “Foreign direct investment in industrial research and development: A study of German MNCs,” Research Policy 34: 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, A. and Gambardella, A. 2001. Markets for Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Athreye, S. and Cantwell, J.A. 2007. “Creating competition?: Globalisation and the emergence of new technology producers,” Research Policy 36: 209–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardhan, A. and Jaffee, D. 2005. “Innovation, R&D and offshoring,” paper 1005. Berkeley: Fisher. Center for Real Estate & Urban Economics.
Belderbos, R. and Sleuwagen, L. 2007. “Intellectual assets and international investments: a stocktaking of the evidence,” OECD DAF/INV/WD 6.
Bunyaratavej, K., Hahn, E.D., and Doh, J.P. 2007. “International offshoring of services: a parity study,” Journal of International Management 13: 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantwell, J.A. 1989. Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J.A. 1995. “The globalisation of technology: what remains of the product cycle model?Cambridge Journal of Economics 19: 155–74.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J.A. and Mudambi, R. 2005. “MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates,” Strategic Management Journal 26: 1109– 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantwell, J.A. and Santangelo, G.D. 1999. “The frontier of international technology networks: sourcing abroad the most highly tacit capability,” Information Economics and Policy 11: 101–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantwell, J.A. and Santangelo, G.D. 2000. “Capitalism, profits and innovation in the new techno-economic paradigm,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 10: 131–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellani, D. and Zanfei, A. 2006. Multinational Firms, Innovation and Productivity. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesbrough, H.W. and Kusunoki, K. 2001. “The modularity trap: innovation, technology phase shifts and the resulting limits of virtual organizations,” in Nonaka, I. and Teece, D.J. (eds.), Managing Industrial Knowledge. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Chung, W. and Alcácer, J. 2002. “Knowledge seeking and location choice of foreign direct investment in the United States,” Management Science 48: 1534–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, W. and Levin, R. 1989. “Empirical studies of innovation and market structure,” in Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R.D. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. II. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1059– 107.Google Scholar
Conte, A. and Vivarelli, M. 2005. “One or many knowledge production functions? Mapping innovative activity using Microdata,” Discussion Paper Series, IZA DP no. 1878, Bonn.
Criscuolo, C., Haskel, J.E., and Slaughter, M.J. 2005. “Global engagement and the innovation activities of firms,” NBER Working Paper 11479.CrossRef
Dernis, H. and Khan, M. 2004. “Triadic patent families methodology,” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doh, J. 2005. “Offshore outsourcing: implications for international business and strategic management theory and practice,” Journal of Management Studies 42: 695–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dossani, R. and Kenney, M. 2006. “Reflections upon sizing the emerging global labor market,” Academy of Management Perspectives 20: 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, J.H. 1977. “Trade location of economic activity and the multinational enterprise,” in Ohlin, B., Hesselborn, P.-O., and Wijkman, P.M. (eds.), The International Allocation of Economic Activity. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dunning, J.H. 1998. “Location and the multinational enterprise: a neglected factor?Journal of International Business Studies 28: 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egger, P., Pfaffermayr, M., and Wolfmayr-Schnitzer, Y. 2001. “The international fragmentation of Austrian manufacturing: the effects of outsourcing on productivity and wages,” North American Journal of Economics and Finances 12: 257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engardio, P. and Einhorn, B. 2005. “Outsourcing innovation,” Business Week, March 21, 2005.Google Scholar
Ernst, D. 2006. Innovation Offshoring – Asia's Emerging Role in Global Innovation Networks. East-West Center Special Report, no. 10.
Ernst, D. and Lim, L. 2002. “Global production networks, knowledge diffusion and local capability formation,” Research Policy 31: 1417–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, M. and Wolfmayr, Y. 2005. “Employment effects of outsourcing to low wage countries,” Wifo Working Paper No. 262.
Feenstra, R.C. and Hanson, G.H. 1999. “The impact of outsourcing and high-technology capital on wages: estimates for the United States,1979–1990,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 907–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, C. 1982. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. 2nd edn. London:Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Freeman, C. and Soete, L. 1987. Technical Change and Full Employment. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Freeman, C., Clark, J., and Soete, L. 1982. Unemployment and Technical Innovation. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Gersbach, H. and Schmutzler, A. 2006. “Foreign direct investment and R&D offshoring,” Working Paper. University of Zurich.
Griliches, Z. 1979. “Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth,” Bell Journal of Economics 10: 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z. 1990. “Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey,” Journal of Economic Literature 28: 1661–707.Google Scholar
Håkanson, L. and Nobel, R. 2001. “Organization characteristics and reverse technology transfer,” Management International Review 41 (Special Issue): 392–420.Google Scholar
Hansson, P. 2005. “Skill upgrading and production transfer within Swedish multinationals,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 107: 673–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatzichronoglou, T. 1997. “Revision of the high-technology sector and product classification,” STI Working Paper 2. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Hemphill, T. 2005. “US offshore outsourcing of R&D: accommodating firm and national competitiveness perspectives,” Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice 7: 351–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirshfeld, S. and Schmid, G. 2005. “Globalisation of R&D,” Technology Review 184, Tekes.Google Scholar
Hsieh, C.-T. and Woo, K. T. 2005. “The impact of outsourcing to China on Hong Kong's labor market,” American Economic Review 95: 1673–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A. 1986. “Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms' patents, profits and market value,” American Economic Review 76: 984–1001.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. 1989. “Real effects of academic research,” American Economic Review 79: 957–70.Google Scholar
Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.-E. 1990. “The mechanism of internationalization,” International Marketing Review 7(4): 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. 1992. “Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology,” Organization Science 3: 383–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotabe, M. 1989. “‘Hollowing-out’ of US multinationals and their global competitiveness: an intra-firm perspective,” Journal of Business Research 19: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotabe, M. 1990. “The relationship between offshore sourcing and innovativeness of US multinational firms: an empirical investigation,” Journal of International Business Studies 21: 623–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuemmerle, W. 1999. “The drivers of foreign direct investment into research and development and empirical investigation,” Journal of International Business Studies 30: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S. and Russell, R.R. 2002. “Technological change, technological catch-up, and capital deepening: relative contributions to growth and convergence,” American Economic Review 92: 527–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, A.Y. and Couto, V. 2006. “Next generation offshoring: the globalization of innovation,” Duke-Booz-Allen-Hamilton Offshoring Research Network Survey Report.
Lewin, A.Y., Massini, S., and Peeters, C. 2009. “Why are companies offshoring innovation? The emerging global race of talent,” Journal of International Business Studies 40(6): 901–25.
Lieberman, J. 2004. “Offshore outsourcing and America's competitive edge: losing out in the high technology R&D and services sectors,” White paper by Office of Senator, Washington, DC, 20510.Google Scholar
Manning, S., Lewin, A.Y., and Massini, S. 2008. “A dynamic perspective on next-generation offshoring: the global sourcing of science and engineering capabilities,” Academy of Management Perspectives 22: 35–54.Google Scholar
Mansfield, E. and Romeo, A. 1984. “Reverse transfers of technology from overseas subsidiaries to American firms,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 122–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maskell, P., Pedersen, T., Petersen, B., and Dick-Nielsen, J. 2006. “Learning paths to offshore outsourcing: from cost reduction to knowledge seeking,” CBS Center for Strategic Management and Globalization Working Paper, 13. Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
Mudambi, R. 2008. “Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries,” Journal of Economic Geography 8: 699–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naghavi, A. and Ottaviano, G.I.P. 2009. “Offshoring and product innovation,” Economic Theory 38: 517–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, K.L.R. and Vega, M. 1999. “Patterns of internationalisation of corporate technology: location vs. home country advantages,” Research Policy 28: 145–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavitt, K.L.R. 1985. “Patents statistics as indicators of innovative activities: possibilities and problems,” Scientometrics 7: 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavitt, K.L.R. 1988. “Uses and abuses of patent statistics,” in Raan, A.F.J. (ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Quinn, J.B. and Hilmer, F.G. 1994. “Strategic outsourcing,” MIT Sloan Management Review 35: 43–55.Google Scholar
Schmookler, J. 1950. “The interpretation of patent statistics,” Journal of the Patent Office Society 32: 123–46.Google Scholar
Schmookler, J. 1966. Inventions and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subramaniam, M. and Venkatraman, N. 2001. “Determinants of transnational new product development capability: testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overseas knowledge,” Strategic Management Journal 22: 359–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D. J. 1987. “Capturing value from technological innovation: integration, strategic partnering, and licensing decisions,” in Guile, B.R. and Brooks, H. (eds.), Technology and Global Industry. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 65–95.Google Scholar
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. 1997. “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal 18: 509–33.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trajtenberg, M. 1990. Economic Analysis of Product Innovation: The Case of CT Scanners. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
,UNCTAD. 2001. World Investment Report:Promoting Linkages. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
,UNCTAD 2004. World Investment Report: The Shift Towards Services. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
,UNCTAD 2005. World Investment Report: Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
Venkatraman, N.V. 2004. “Offshoring without guilt,” MIT Sloan Management Review 45: 14–16.Google Scholar
Vernon, R. 1966. “International investment and international trade in the product cycle,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 80(2): 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaheer, S. and Manrakhan, S. 2001. “Concentration and dispersion in global industries: remote electronic access and the location of economic activity,” Journal of International Business Studies 32: 667–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaheer, S. and Zaheer, A. 2001. “Market microstructure in a global B2B network,” Strategic Management Journal 22: 859–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×