Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T13:11:16.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Walter Bailey’s (1529–1593) Medical Genres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2022

Irma Taavitsainen
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Turo Hiltunen
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Jeremy J. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Carla Suhr
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Get access

Summary

This chapter provides a detailed assessment of Walter Bailey’s medical genres in the vernacular and how they reflect changing thought styles from scholasticism to empiricism. The ongoing process is demonstrated by first-hand evidence obtained by analysing both macrolevel structural compositions of genres and various text types within them. Language change is located on the discourse level by identifying stylistic varieties, showing the mechanism of change on the ideological level. Bailey belonged to the learned elite of his time and mastered a large repertoire of different genres and text types. He gives us convincing proof of the early transition period by employing old and creating new ways of writing. He developed the genre script of the scholastic commentary to unprecedented perfection in Peppers (1588), and innovated a new style of reporting on his experiments in Waters a year earlier. The passage anticipates the future way of doing and writing science, showing the author’s curiosity and inquisitiveness, qualities that are typically attributed to seventeenth-century Royal Society scientists. The new mode of knowing surfaces passim in his other texts too, where observation of nature is preferred to book wisdom.

Type
Chapter
Information
Genre in English Medical Writing, 1500–1820
Sociocultural Contexts of Production and Use
, pp. 167 - 186
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

de Acosta, Joseph. 1604. The naturall and morall historie of the East and West Indies. Translated into English by E. G. London. Retrieved from EEBO.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight. 1999. Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bailey, Walter. 1585. A discovrse of the medicine called Mithridatium. EMEMT.Google Scholar
Bailey, Walter. 1616 [1586]. A brief treatise touching the preservation of the eyesight. EMEMT.Google Scholar
Bailey [Baley], Walter. 1587. A brief discourse of certain bathes of medicinal waters. London: no publisher. Retrieved from EEBO.Google Scholar
Bailey, Walter. 1588. Account on the three kinds of pepper, a short discourse of the three kindes of peppers. EMEMT.Google Scholar
Bakewell, Sarah. 2004. Bayley, Walter (1529–1593). Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/1757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crombie, Alistair Cameron. 1994. Styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition. 3 vols. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 1996. Towards a ‘natural’ narratology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fowler, Alastair. 1982. Kinds of literature: An introduction to the theory of genres and modes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio. 2011. The development of specialized discourse in the Philosophical Transactions. In Taavitsainen, Irma & Pahta, Päivi (eds.), Medical writing in Early Modern English, 204–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., & Taavitsainen, Irma. 2013. English historical pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William, & Waletsky, Joshua. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In Helm, June (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the annual 1966 spring meeting of the American Ethnological Society, 1244. Seattle: American Ethnological Society. Rpt. in Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1–4): 338.Google Scholar
McConchie, Rod, & Curzan, Anne. 2011. Defining in Early Modern English medical texts. In Taavitsainen, Irma & Pahta, Päivi (eds.), Medical writing in Early Modern English, 7493. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Dan, & Busse, Beatrix. 2010. Language and style. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James. 1972. Linguistic variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Minnis, Alastair. 1979. Late medieval discussions of compilation and the role of the compilator. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache und Literatur 101: 385421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, Brian. 1997. Genre, frames and writing in research settings. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Porter, Roy. 2000. Enlightenment. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor, & Mervis, Carolyn B.. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7(4): 573605.Google Scholar
Shapin, Simon. 1996. The scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2000. Culturally speaking. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sprat, Thomas. 2003 [1667]. The history of the Royal Society of London, for the improving of natural knowledge. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001. Changing conventions of writing: The dynamics of genres, text types, and text traditions. European Journal of English Studies (special issue, ed. Lilo Moessner), 5(2): 139–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2002. Historical discourse analysis: Scientific language and changing thought-styles. In Fanego, Teresa, Méndez-Naya, Bélén, & Seone, Elena, Sounds, words, texts and change, 201–26. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2004. Transferring classical discourse conventions into the vernacular. In Taavitsainen, Irma & Pahta, Päivi (eds.), Medical and scientific writing in Late Medieval English, 3772. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2009. The pragmatics of knowledge and meaning: Corpus linguistic approaches to changing thought-styles in early modern medical discourse. In Jucker, Andreas H., Schreier, Danny, & Hundt, Marianne (eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and discourse, 3762. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2011. Narratives as literary commonplaces in late medieval and early modern medical writing. In Olson, Greta (ed.), Current trends in narratology, 254–73. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2018. Scholastic genre scripts in English medical writing 1375–1800. In Whitt, Richard J. (ed.), Diachronic corpora, genre, and language change, 95115. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2020. A medical debate of ‘heated pamphleteering’ in the early eighteenth century. In Jucker, Andreas H. & Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Manners, norms and transgressions in the history of English: Literary and linguistic approaches, 141–63. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, & Pahta, Päivi. 1998. Vernacularisation of medical writing in English: A corpus-based study of scholasticism. Early Science and Medicine 3(2): 157–85.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Pahta, Päivi, Hiltunen, Turo, Mäkinen, Martti, Marttila, Ville, Ratia, Maura, Suhr, Carla, & Tyrkkö, Jukka (eds.). Early Modern English Medical Texts 1500–1700 (EMEMT). 2010. CD-Rom. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Pahta, Päivi, & Mäkinen, Martti (eds.). Middle English Medical Texts 1375–1500 (MEMT). 2005. CD-Rom. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, & Schneider, Gerold. 2019. Scholastic argumentation in early English medical writing and its afterlife: New corpus evidence. In Suhr, Carla, Nevalainen, Terttu, & Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), From data to evidence in English language research, 191221. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Tavormina, M. Teresa (ed.). 2006. MS Trinity College Cambridge R.14.52: A medieval medical manuscript, its language and scribe. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
Toolan, Michael. 2001 [1988]. Narrative: A critical linguistic approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trevelyan, G. M. 1967 [1942]. English social history. Harmondsworth: Pelican.Google Scholar
Wear, Andrew. 2000. Knowledge and practice in English medicine, 1550–1680. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Werlich, Egon. 1976. A text grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle and Meyer.Google Scholar
Werlich, Egon. 1982. A text grammar of English. 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×