Richard III

Anna Ilona Rajala; Timo Uotinen

doi:10.1017/9781009105347.017

Chapter 16 - Richard III

Fact, Myth, Fiction

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2022

Anna Ilona Rajala and

Edited by

Jeremy J. Smith and

Irma Taavitsainen: Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Turo Hiltunen: Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Jeremy J. Smith: Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Carla Suhr: Affiliation:
University of Helsinki

Book contents

Get access

Summary

In this chapter we study representations of the last Plantagenet king of England, Richard III, relating his myth and history to the discovery of his body in 2012 in a Leicester car park. Focusing on the body of Richard, we address the unique cross-genre nexus between historiography, Shakespeare’s drama, and modern medical writing, to evaluate the mythical, factual, fictitious, and scientific depictions of Richard. Our aim is to find out what role interpretation and truth play in the differing genres and what kind of implications interpretation and truth have for these genres regarding the body of Richard. We draw on literary studies, disability studies, health sciences, and especially the work of Horkheimer and Adorno to argue that, in the case of Richard, myth and science are modes of representation that seek to control truth and rely on interpretation and speculation to draw conclusions about uncertain and unknowable things. The post-excavation science does not oppose myth and fiction, but perpetuates the mythology surrounding Richard, whereas Shakespeare drama has ‘truth content’ in challenging conceptions of disability. Moreover, this cross-genre nexus demonstrates the inseparability of subjectivity from interpretation and that truth never appears unmediated. Thus, making subjectivity visible in analyses is indispensible for a higher fidelity to truth.

Keywords

Richard III body disability dialectic of enlightenment subjectivity Shakespeare

Type: Chapter
Information: Genre in English Medical Writing, 1500–1820
Sociocultural Contexts of Production and Use
, pp. 278 - 296

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009105347.017 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor W. 1997. Aesthetic theory. Robert Hullot-Kentor (trans.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Appleby, Jo, Mitchell, Piers D., Robinson, Claire, Brough, Alison, Rutty, Guy, Harris, Russell A., Thompson, David, & Morgan, Bruno. 2014. The scoliosis of Richard III, last Plantagenet king of England: Diagnosis and clinical significance. The Lancet 383(9932): 1944.Google Scholar

Ashdown-Hill, John. 2015. The mythology of Richard III. Stroud: Amberley Publishing.Google Scholar

Baldwin, David. 2015. Richard III, rev. ed. Stroud: Amberley Publishing.Google Scholar

Bruyneel, Anne-Violette, Chavet, Pascale, Bollini, Gérard, Allard, Paul, Berton, Eric, & Mesure, Serge. 2009. Dynamical asymmetries in idiopathic scoliosis during forward and lateral initiation step. European Spine Journal 18(2): 188–95.Google Scholar

Buckley, Richard, Morris, Mathew, Appleby, Jo, King, Turi, O’Sullivan, Deirdre, & Foxhall, Lin. 2013. ‘The king in the car park’: New light on the death and burial of Richard III in the Grey Friars Church, Leicester, in 1485. Antiquity 87(336): 519–38.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bullough, Geoffrey (ed.). 1975. Narrative and dramatic sources of Shakespeare, vol. III. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Carr, E. H. 1987. What is history? 2nd ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Carson, Annette. 2013. Richard III: The maligned king, updated ed. Stroud: History Press.Google Scholar

Charnes, Linda. 1993. Notorious identity: Materializing the subject in Shakespeare. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Comber, Abigail Elizabeth. 2010. A medieval king ‘disabled’ by an early modern construct. In Eyler, Joshua R. (ed.), Disability in the Middle Ages: Reconsiderations and reverberations, 183–96. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Davis, Lennard J. 2002. Bending over backwards: Disability, dismodernism, and other difficult positions. New York: New York University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Eyler, Joshua R. 2016. Introduction: Breaking boundaries, building bridges. In Eyler, Joshua R. (ed.), Disability in the Middle Ages: Reconsiderations and reverberations, 1–10. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Garber, Marjorie. 1987. Shakespeare’s ghost writers: Literature as uncanny causality. New York; London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, Christine M. 2018. ‘Unaccomodated man’: Dismodernism and disability justice in King Lear. Disability Studies Quarterly 38(4). https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/6079/5133 (accessed 15 June 2020).Google Scholar

Goy-Blanquet, Dominique. 2002. Elizabethan historiography and Shakespeare’s sources. In Hattaway, Michael (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Shakespeare’s history plays, 57–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, Stephen, Cohen, Walter, Howard, Jean E., & Maus, Katherine Eisaman. 2008. The Norton Shakespeare: Essential plays, the sonnets. 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Haber, Cassandra Kay, & Sacco, Mark. 2015. Scoliosis: Lower limb asymmetries during the gait cycle. Archives of Physiotherapy 5(1): 4.Google Scholar

Hammond, Anthony. 1981. Introduction. In Hammond, Anthony (ed.), Shakespeare, William, King Richard III. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Hanham, Alison. 1975. Richard III and his early historians, 1483–1535. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hay, William. 1754. Deformity: An essay. London: R. & J. Dodsley.Google Scholar

Heller, Agnes. 2002. The time is out of joint: Shakespeare as philosopher of history. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Hicks, Michael. 2019. Richard III: The self-made king. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Hill, Thomas. 1571. The contemplation of mankinde contayning a singuler discourse after the art of phisiognomie. London: Henry Denham for William Seres.Google Scholar

Hobgood, Allison P. 2014. Teeth before eyes impairment and invisibility in Shakespeare’s Richard III. In Iyengar, Sujata (ed.), Disability, health, and happiness in the Shakespearean body, 3–40. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hobgood, Allison P., & Wood, David Houston. 2013. Recovering disability in early modern England. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

Holderness, Graham. 2000. Shakespeare: The histories. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Holinshed, Raphael. 1808. Holinshed’s chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland. London: for J. Johnson; F. C. and J. Rivington; T. Payne; Wilkie and Robinson; Longman, Hurst, Rees, and Orme; Cadell and Davies; and J. Mawman.Google Scholar

Hope, Jenny, & Zolfagharifard, Ellie. 2014. Richard III wasn’t a hunchback: Scans reveal monarch’s spinal curvature could have been concealed. Daily Mail 30 May. www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2643056/Richard-III-wasnt-hunchback-did-scoliosis-scans-reveal.html (accessed 15 June 2020).Google Scholar

Horkheimer, Max, & Adorno, Theodor W. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Edmund Jephcott (trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Horspool, David. 2015. Richard III: A ruler and his reputation. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Sujata. 2015. Introduction: Shakespeare’s ‘discourse of disability’. In Iyengar, Sujata (ed.), Disability, health, and happiness in the Shakespearean body, 1–20. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jacob, E. F. 1961. The Oxford history of England: The fifteenth century 1399–1485. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Jowett, John. 2000. Introduction. In Jowett, John (ed.), Shakespeare, William, Richard III, 1–132. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kendall, Paul Murray. 2002. Richard III. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

King, Turi E., Fortes, Gloria Gonzalez, Balaresque, Patricia, Thomas, Mark, Balding, David, Delser, Pierpaolo Maisano, Neumann, Rita, Parson, Walther, Knapp, Michael, Walsh, Susan, Tonasso, Laure, Holt, John, Kayser, Manfred, Appleby, Jo, Forster, Peter, Ekserdijian, David, Hofreiter, Michael, & Schürer, Kevin. 2014. Identification of the remains of King Richard III. Nature Communications 5(1): 5631.Google Scholar

Kostihova, Marcela. 2016. Digging for perfection: Discourse of deformity in Richard III’s excavation. Palgrave Communications 2(1). www.nature.com/articles/palcomms201646 (accessed 15 June 2020).Google Scholar

Kuo, Fang-Chuan, Hong, Chang-Zern, Lai, Chung-Liang, & Tan, Shih-Hsin. 2011. Postural control strategies related to anticipatory perturbation and quick perturbation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 36(10): 810–16.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Legge, Alfred Owen. 1885. The unpopular king: The life and times of Richard III. In two volumes. London: Ward & Downey.Google Scholar

Lewis, Matthew. 2019. Richard III: Facts and fictions. Barnsley: Pen and Sword History.Google Scholar

Love, Genevieve. 2019. Early modern theatre and the figure of disability. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Mantel, Hilary. 2013. Royal bodies. London Review of Books 35(4). www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v35/n04/hilary-mantel/royal-bodies (accessed 15 June 2020).Google Scholar

Meikle, James. 2014. Richard III was no ‘bunch-backed toad’, research suggests. The Guardian 30 May. www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/may/30/richard-iii-no-bunch-backed-toad-hunchback-research-lancet (accessed 15 June 2020).Google Scholar

Metzler, Irina. 2006. Disability in medieval Europe: Thinking about physical impairment during the High Middle Ages, c. 1100–1400. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mitchell, David T., & Snyder, Sharon L.. 2000. Narrative prosthesis: Disability and the dependencies of discourse. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Modern Healthcare. 2014. Correcting the twisted facts on Richard III. Modern Healthcare 44(23): 36.Google Scholar

More, Thomas. 2005. The history of King Richard the Third: A reading edition. Logan, George M. (ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Muir, Kenneth. 1977. The sources of Shakespeare’s plays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Myers, A. R. 1968. Richard III and historical tradition. History 53(178): 181–202.Google Scholar

Negrini, Stefano, Donzelli, Sabrina, Aulisa, Angelo Gabriele, Czaprowski, Dariusz, Schreiber, Sanja, de Mauroy, Jean Claude, Diers, Helmut, et al. 2018. 2016 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders 13(1): 3.Google Scholar

Rous, John. (n.d.). The Rous Roll, c. 1483–1484. British Library Digitised Manuscripts. www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?ref=Add_MS_48976 (accessed 15 June 2020).Google Scholar

Schwyzer, Philip. 2013. Shakespeare and the remains of Richard III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, Tom. 2006. Disability rights and wrongs. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Skidmore, Chris. 2018. Richard III: England’s most controversial king. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Slotkin, Joel Elliot. 2007. Honeyed toads: Sinister aesthetics in Shakespeare’s ‘Richard III’. Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 7: 5–32.CrossRef Google Scholar

Syczewska, Malgorzata, Graff, Krzysztof, Kalinowska, Malgorzata, Szczerbik, Ewa, & Domaniecki, Janusz. 2012. Influence of the structural deformity of the spine on the gait pathology in scoliotic patients. Gait & Posture 35(2): 209–13.Google Scholar

Vergil, Polydore. 1846. Polydore Vergil’s English history. London: Camden Society.Google Scholar

Williams, Katherine Schaap. 2009. Enabling Richard: The rhetoric of disability in Richard III. Disability Studies Quarterly 29(4). https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/997/1181 (accessed 26 April 2022).Google Scholar

Williams, Katherine Schaap. 2013. Performing disability and theorizing deformity. English Studies: Shakespeare and Theory: Special Issue II 94(7): 757–72.Google Scholar

Wilson, Jeffrey R. 2017. The trouble with disability in Shakespeare studies. Disability Studies Quarterly 37(2). https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/5430/0 (accessed 15 June 2020).Google Scholar

Wilson, Jeffrey R. 2018. ‘Savage and deformed’: Stigma as drama in The Tempest. Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England 31: 146–77.Google Scholar

Wood, David Houston. 2013. New directions: ‘Some tardy cripple’: Timing disability in Richard III. In Connolly, Annaliese (ed.), Richard III: A Critical Reader, 129–57. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Yang, Jae Hyuk, Suh, Seung-Woo, Sung, Paul S., & Park, Woo-Hyung. 2013. Asymmetrical gait in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. European Spine Journal 22(11): 2407–13.Google Scholar

Book contents

Chapter 16 - Richard III

Summary

Keywords

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive