Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T21:14:14.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Loop quantum gravity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Hanno Sahlmann
Affiliation:
Aria Pacific Center for Theoretical Physics Hogil Kim Memorial Bldg
Jeff Murugan
Affiliation:
University of Cape Town
Amanda Weltman
Affiliation:
University of Cape Town
George F. R. Ellis
Affiliation:
University of Cape Town
Get access

Summary

In this chapter we review the foundations and present status of loop quantum gravity. It is short and relatively non-technical, the emphasis is on the ideas, and the flavor of the techniques. In particular, we describe the kinematical quantization and the implementation of the Hamilton constraint, as well as the quantum theory of black hole horizons, semiclassical states, and matter propagation. Spin foam models and loop quantum cosmology are mentioned only in passing, as these will be covered in separate reviews to be published alongside this one.

Introduction

Loop quantum gravity is a non-perturbative approach to the quantum theory of gravity, in which no classical background metric is used. In particular, its starting point is not a linearized theory of gravity. As a consequence, while it still operates according to the rules of quantum field theory, the details are quite different from those for field theories that operate on a fixed classical background space-time. It has considerable successes to its credit, perhaps most notably a quantum theory of spatial geometry, in which quantities such as area and volume are quantized in units of the Planck length, and a calculation of black hole entropy for static and rotating, charged and neutral black holes. But there are also open questions, many of them surrounding the dynamics (“quantum Einstein equations”) of the theory.

In contrast to other approaches such as string theory, loop quantum gravity is rather modest in its aims. It is not attempting a grand unification, and hence is not based on an overarching symmetry principle, or some deep reformulation of the rules of quantum field theory. Rather, the goal is to quantize Einstein gravity in four dimensions. While, as we will explain, a certain amount of unification of the description of matter and gravity is achieved, in fact, the question of whether matter fields must have special properties to be consistently coupled to gravity in the framework of loop quantum gravity is one of the important open questions in loop quantum gravity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Foundations of Space and Time
Reflections on Quantum Gravity
, pp. 185 - 210
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] I., Agullo, G. J. Fernando, Barbero, E. F., Borja, J., Diaz-Polo, and E. J. S., Villasenor. The combinatorics of the SU(2) black hole entropy in loop quantum gravity. Phys. Rev., D80: 084006, 2009.Google Scholar
[2] A., Ashtekar. New variables for classical and quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 57: 2244–2247, 1986.Google Scholar
[3] A., Ashtekar, J. C., Baez, and K., Krasnov. Quantum geometry of isolated horizons and black hole entropy. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 4: 1–94, 2000.Google Scholar
[4] A., Ashtekar, W., Kaminski, and J., Lewandowski. Quantum field theory on a cosmological, quantum space-time. Phys. Rev., D79: 064030, 2009.Google Scholar
[5] A., Ashtekar and J., Lewandowski. Differential geometry on the space of connections via graphs and projective limits. J. Geom. Phys., 17: 191–230, 1995.Google Scholar
[6] A., Ashtekar and J., Lewandowski. Quantum theory of geometry. I: Area operators. Class. Quant. Grav., 14: A55–A82, 1997.Google Scholar
[7] A., Ashtekar and J., Lewandowski. Quantum theory of geometry. II: Volume operators. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 1: 388–429, 1998.Google Scholar
[8] A., Ashtekar and Jerzy, Lewandowski. Background independent quantum gravity: A status report. Class. Quant. Grav., 21: R53, 2004.Google Scholar
[9] A., Ashtekar, J., Lewandowski, D., Marolf, J., Mourao, and T., Thiemann. Quantization of diffeomorphism invariant theories of connections with local degrees of freedom. J. Math. Phys., 36: 6456–93, 1995.Google Scholar
[10] A., Ashtekar, T., Pawlowski, and P., Singh. Quantum nature of the big bang. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96: 141301, 2006.Google Scholar
[11] G. J. Fernando, Barbero. Real Ashtekar variables for Lorentzian signature space times. Phys. Rev., D51: 5507–10, 1995.Google Scholar
[12] M., Bojowald. Quantization ambiguities in isotropic quantum geometry. Class. Quant. Grav., 19: 5113–230, 2002.Google Scholar
[13] M., Bojowald. Loop quantum cosmology. Living Rev. Rel., 11: 4, 2008.Google Scholar
[14] M., Bojowald, G. Mortuza, Hossain, M., Kagan, and S., Shankaranarayanan. Anomaly freedom in perturbative loop quantum gravity. Phys. Rev., D78: 063547, 2008.Google Scholar
[15] M., Bojowald, H.A., Morales-Tecotl, and H., Sahlmann. On loop quantum gravity phenomenology and the issue of Lorentz invariance. Phys. Rev., D71: 084012, 2005.Google Scholar
[16] J., Brunnemann and D., Rideout. Spectral analysis of the volume operator in loop quantum gravity. 2006.
[17] J., Brunnemann and D., Rideout. Properties of the volume operator in loop quantum gravity I: Results. Class. Quant. Grav., 25: 065001, 2008.Google Scholar
[18] Y., Ding and C., Rovelli. The volume operator in covariant quantum gravity. 2009.
[19] B., Dittrich. Partial and complete observables for canonical general relativity. Class. Quant. Grav., 23: 6155–84, 2006.Google Scholar
[20] B., Dittrich and J., Tambornino. Aperturbative approach to Dirac observables and their space-time algebra. Class. Quant. Grav., 24: 757–84, 2007.Google Scholar
[21] B., Dittrich and T., Thiemann. Testing the master constraint programme for loop quantum gravity. II: Finite dimensional systems. Class. Quant. Grav., 23: 1067–88, 2006.Google Scholar
[22] B., Dittrich and T., Thiemann. Testing the master constraint programme for loop quantum gravity. IV: Free field theories. Class. Quant. Grav., 23: 1121–42, 2006.Google Scholar
[23] B., Dittrich and T., Thiemann. Testing the master constraint programme for loop quantum gravity. V: Interacting field theories. Class. Quant. Grav., 23: 1143–62, 2006.Google Scholar
[24] B., Dittrich and T., Thiemann. Are the spectra of geometrical operators in loop quantum gravity really discrete?J. Math. Phys., 50: 012503, 2009.Google Scholar
[25] J., Engle, E., Livine, R., Pereira, and C., Rovelli. LQG vertex with finite Immirzi parameter. Nucl. Phys., B799: 136–49, 2008.Google Scholar
[26] J., Engle, R., Pereira, and C., Rovelli. The loop-quantum-gravity vertex-amplitude. Phys. Rev. Lett., 99: 161301, 2007.Google Scholar
[27] J., Engle, A., Perez, and K., Noui. Black hole entropy and SU(2) Chern–Simons theory. 2009.
[28] C., Fleischhack. Representations of the Weyl algebra in quantum geometry. Commun. Math. Phys., 285: 67–140, 2009.Google Scholar
[29] R., Gambini, J., Lewandowski, D., Marolf, and J., Pullin. On the consistency of the constraint algebra in spin network quantum gravity. Int. J. Mod. Phys., D7: 97–109, 1998.Google Scholar
[30] K., Giesel, S., Hofmann, T., Thiemann, and O., Winkler. Manifestly gauge-invariant general relativistic perturbation theory: I. Foundations. 2007.
[31] G., Immirzi. Real and complex connections for canonical gravity. Class. Quant. Grav., 14: L177–L181, 1997.Google Scholar
[32] F. R., Klinkhamer and M., Schreck. New two-sided bound on the isotropic Lorentzviolating parameter of modified–Maxwell theory. Phys. Rev., D78: 085026, 2008.Google Scholar
[33] K., Krasnov and C., Rovelli. Black holes in full quantum gravity. Class. Quant. Grav., 26: 245009, 2009.Google Scholar
[34] J., Lewandowski and D., Marolf. Loop constraints: A habitat and their algebra. Int. J. Mod. Phys., D7: 299–330, 1998.Google Scholar
[35] J., Lewandowski, A., Okolow, H., Sahlmann, and T., Thiemann. Uniqueness of diffeomorphisminvariant states on holonomy-flux algebras. Commun. Math. Phys., 267: 703–33, 2006.Google Scholar
[36] A., Perez. On the regularization ambiguities in loop quantum gravity. Phys. Rev., D73: 044007, 2006.Google Scholar
[37] A., Perez and C., Rovelli. Physical effects of the Immirzi parameter. Phys. Rev., D73: 044013, 2006.Google Scholar
[38] M. P., Reisenberger and C., Rovelli. *Sumover surfaces* form of loop quantum gravity. Phys. Rev., D56: 3490–508, 1997.Google Scholar
[39] D. Jimenez, Rezende and A., Perez. 4d Lorentzian Holst action with topological terms. Phys. Rev., D79: 064026, 2009.Google Scholar
[40] C., Rovelli. Area is the length of Ashtekar's triad field. Phys. Rev., D47: 1703–05, 1993.Google Scholar
[41] C., Rovelli. Comment on ‘Are the spectra of geometrical operators in loop quantum gravity really discrete?’ by B., Dittrich and T., Thiemann. 2007.
[42] C., Rovelli. Loop quantum gravity. Living Rev. Rel., 11: 5, 2008.Google Scholar
[43] C., Rovelli and L., Smolin. Loop space representation of quantum general relativity. Nucl. Phys., B331: 80, 1990.Google Scholar
[44] C., Rovelli and L., Smolin. Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity. Nucl. Phys., B442: 593–622, 1995.Google Scholar
[45] C., Rovelli and L., Smolin. Spin networks and quantum gravity. Phys. Rev., D52: 5743–59, 1995.Google Scholar
[46] H., Sahlmann, T., Thiemann, and O., Winkler. Coherent states for canonical quantum general relativity and the infinite tensor product extension. Nucl. Phys., B606: 401–40, 2001.Google Scholar
[47] H., Sahlmann. Wave propagation on a random lattice. 2009.
[48] H., Sahlmann and T., Thiemann. Towards the QFT on curved spacetime limit of QGR. I: A general scheme. Class. Quant. Grav., 23: 867–908, 2006.Google Scholar
[49] H., Sahlmann and T., Thiemann. Towards the QFT on curved spacetime limit of QGR. II: A concrete implementation. Class. Quant. Grav., 23: 909–54, 2006.Google Scholar
[50] T., Thiemann. Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories. Class. Quant. Grav., 15: 1487–512, 1998.Google Scholar
[51] T., Thiemann. QSD III: Quantum constraint algebra and physical scalar product in quantum general relativity. Class. Quant. Grav., 15: 1207–47, 1998.Google Scholar
[52] T., Thiemann. QSD IV: 2+1 Euclidean quantum gravity as a model to test 3+1 Lorentzian quantum gravity. Class. Quant. Grav., 15: 1249–80, 1998.Google Scholar
[53] T., Thiemann. QSD V: Quantum gravity as the natural regulator of matter quantum field theories. Class. Quant. Grav., 15: 1281–314, 1998.Google Scholar
[54] T., Thiemann. Quantum spin dynamics (QSD). Class. Quant. Grav., 15: 839–73, 1998.Google Scholar
[55] T., Thiemann. Quantum spin dynamics (QSD) II. Class. Quant. Grav., 15: 875–905, 1998.Google Scholar
[56] T., Thiemann and O., Winkler. Gauge field theory coherent states (GCS). II: Peakedness properties. Class. Quant. Grav., 18: 2561–636, 2001.Google Scholar
[57] T., Thiemann and O., Winkler. Gauge field theory coherent states (GCS) III: Ehrenfest theorems. Class. Quant. Grav., 18: 4629–82, 2001.Google Scholar
[58] T., Thiemann. Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (2007) 819 pp.
[59] T., Thiemann. Gauge field theory coherent states (GCS). I: General properties. Class. Quant. Grav., 18: 2025–64, 2001.Google Scholar
[60] T., Thiemann. The Phoenix project: Master constraint programme for loop quantum gravity. Class. Quant. Grav., 23: 2211–48, 2006.Google Scholar
[61] R.M., Wald. The thermodynamics of black holes. Living Rev. Rel., 4: 6, 2001.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×