Book contents
- Decadence and Literature
- Cambridge Critical Concepts
- Decadence and Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Origins
- Chapter 1 Decadence in Ancient Rome
- Chapter 2 Decadence and Roman Historiography
- Chapter 3 Nineteenth-Century Literary and Artistic Responses to Roman Decadence
- Chapter 4 Decadence and the Enlightenment
- Chapter 5 Decadence and the Urban Sensibility
- Chapter 6 Decadence and the Critique of Modernity
- Chapter 7 Decadence and Aesthetics
- Part II Developments
- Part III Applications
- Select Bibliography
- Index
- References
Chapter 2 - Decadence and Roman Historiography
from Part I - Origins
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 August 2019
Book contents
- Decadence and Literature
- Cambridge Critical Concepts
- Decadence and Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Origins
- Chapter 1 Decadence in Ancient Rome
- Chapter 2 Decadence and Roman Historiography
- Chapter 3 Nineteenth-Century Literary and Artistic Responses to Roman Decadence
- Chapter 4 Decadence and the Enlightenment
- Chapter 5 Decadence and the Urban Sensibility
- Chapter 6 Decadence and the Critique of Modernity
- Chapter 7 Decadence and Aesthetics
- Part II Developments
- Part III Applications
- Select Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
Decadence was not a word used by the historians of ancient Rome during classical antiquity, but the concepts, anxieties, and fears encapsulated by it are without question present in their works. Ancient historians such as Livy, Sallust, Tacitus, and Appian describe an idealized past in order to draw a contrast with an immoral, inferior present. Spurred on by literary accounts from antiquity, Enlightenment authors such as Montesquieu, a political theorist, and Edward Gibbon, a historian and Member of Parliament, were particularly interested in studying Rome to learn the symptoms of imperial decline. Thus, this chapter explores the language of decadence in the early histories of the Roman Empire, up to the fall of Constantinople in 1453, including why later historians such as Niebuhr and Mommsen wished to challenge this language (present from antiquity) and disentwine decadence from Roman imperial history for good.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Decadence and Literature , pp. 30 - 46Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Marcellinus, Ammianus (1939). History, vol. III, J. C. Rolfe, trans., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anon. (1863). A History of the Romans Under the Empire by Charles Merivale. North American Review, 96(199), 503–58.Google Scholar
Augustine (1955). De Excidio Urbis Romae Sermo, M. V. O’Reilly, trans., Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1972). Concerning the City of God against the Pagans, H. Bettenson, trans., London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Augustine (1994). Sermons. Vol. VIII of The Works of Saint Augustine, Part III, E. Hill, trans., Brooklyn, NY: New City Press.Google Scholar
Bittner, Rüdiger (1998). Augustine’s Philosophy of History. In Matthews, Gareth B., ed., The Augustinian Tradition, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 345–60.Google Scholar
Black, Jeremy (1995). Empire and Enlightenment in Edward Gibbon’s Treatment of International Relations. International History Review, 17(3), 441–58.Google Scholar
Bury, J. B. (1896). The British and the Roman Empire. Saturday Review of Politics, Literature, Science and Art, 27 June, 645.Google Scholar
Bury, J. B. (1923). A History of the Later Roman Empire from the Death of Theodosius I to the Death of Justinian, 2 vols., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bury, J. B. (1930). The Science of History. In Temperley, H., ed., Selected Essays of J. B. Bury, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
Clark, Gillian (2014). Fragile Brilliance – Augustine, Decadence, and ‘Other Antiquity’. In Formisano, Marco and Fuhrer, Thérèse, eds., Décadence: ‘Decline and Fall’ or ‘Other Antiquity’?, Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag, pp. 35–52.Google Scholar
Courtney, Cecil P. (1988). Montesquieu and the Problem of ‘la diversité’. In Barber, Giles and Courtney, Cecil P., eds., Enlightenment Essays in Memory of Robert Shackleton, Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, pp. 61–81.Google Scholar
Demandt, Alexander (1995). Mommsen zum Niedergang Roms. Historische Zeitschrift, 261(1), 23–49.Google Scholar
Demandt, Alexander (1996). Introduction to Theodor Mommsen, A History of Rome under the Emperors, Wiedemann, Thomas, ed., Clare Krojzl, trans., London: Routledge, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
Dowling, Linda (1985). Roman Decadence and Victorian Historiography. Victorian Studies, 28(4), 579–607.Google Scholar
Formisano, Marco (2013). Grand Finale. Orosius’ Historiae adversus paganos Or the Subversion of History. In Harich-Schwarzbauer, Henriette and Pollmann, Karla, eds., Der Fall Roms und seine Wiederauferstehungen in Antike und Mittelalter, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 153–76.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Edward (1909–1914). The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Bury, J. B., ed., 7 vols., London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Goffart, Walter (2006). Barbarian Tides: The Migration Age and the Later Roman Empire, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Jerome (1893). The Principal Works of St. Jerome, W. H. Fremantle, trans., Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, Wolf (2003). Pagan Historiography and the Decline of the Roman Empire. In Marasco, Gabriele, ed., Greek and Roman Historiography in Late Antiquity: Fourth to Sixth Century A.D., Leiden: Brill, pp. 177–218.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. (1972). Imperial Expansion and Moral Decline in the Roman Republic. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, 21(4), 626–38.Google Scholar
Mattenklott, Gert (2005). Mommsens Prosa – Historiographie als Literatur. In Demandt, Alexander, Goltz, Andreas, and Schlange-Schöningen, Heinrich, eds., Theodor Mommsen: Wissenschaft und Politik im 19. Jahrhundert, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 163–180.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1954). Gibbon’s Contribution to Historical Method. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, 2(4), 450–63.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Theodor (1867). History of Rome, 5 vols., Dickson, William Purdie, trans., London: Richard Bentley.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Theodor (1996). A History of Rome under the Emperors, Krojzl, Clare, trans., Wiedemann, Thomas, ed., London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Montesquieu (1965). Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and their Decline, David Lowenthal, trans., New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Montesquieu (1989). The Spirit of the Laws, Cohler, Anne M., Miller, Basia Carolyn, and Stone, Harold Samuel, ed. and trans., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morley, Neville (2005). Decadence as a Theory of History. New Literary History (35), 573–85.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg, (1828). The History of Rome, vol. I, J. C. Hare and C. Thirlwall, trans., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orosius (2010). Seven Books of History against the Pagans, A. T. Fear, trans., Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (2000). Gibbon and the Primitive Church. In Collini, Stefan, Whatmore, Richard, and Young, Brian, eds., History, Religion, and Culture: British Intellectual History 1750–1950, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 48–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (2003). The First Decline and Fall. Vol. III of Barbarism and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rahe, Paul A. (2005). The Book That Never Was: Montesquieu’s Considerations on the Romans in Historical Context. History of Political Thought, 26(1), 43–89.Google Scholar
Rahe, Paul A. (2011). Montesquieu’s anti-Machiavellian Machiavellianism. History of European Ideas, 37(2), 128–36.Google Scholar
Sallust (2013). The War with Catiline and the War with Jugurtha, Ramsey, John T., ed., J. C. Rolfe, trans., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tacitus (1925). The Histories, vol. II, J. Jackson, trans., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tacitus (1931). The Annals, vol. III, J. Jackson, trans., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tacitus (1937). The Annals, vol. V, J. Jackson, trans., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van Nuffelen, Peter (2012). Orosius and the Rhetoric of History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Nuffelen, Peter (2015). Not Much Happened: 410 and All That. Journal of Roman Studies, 105, 322–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine (1985). Tacite et Montesquieu, Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine (2009). Voltaire and History. In Cronk, Nicholas, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Voltaire, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–52.Google Scholar
Voltaire (2009). Essai sur les mœurs et l’esprit des nations: avant-propos et chapitres 1–37. Vol. XXII of Œuvres complètes de Voltaire, Bernard, Bruno, Renwick, John, Cronk, Nicholas, and Godden, Janet, eds., Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Von Freising, Otto (1928). The Two Cities: A Chronicle of Universal History to the Year 1146 AD, Mierow, C. C., ed. and trans., New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ward-Perkins, Bryan (2005). The Fall of Rome and the End of Civilization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Womersley, David (1997). Gibbon and the ‘Watchmen of the Holy City’: Revision and Religion in the Decline and Fall. In McKitterick, Rosamond and Quinault, Roland, eds., Edward Gibbon and Empire, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 190–216.Google Scholar
Zosimus (1982). New History, R. T. Ridley, trans., Canberra: Australian Association for Byzantine Studies.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by