Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T12:24:31.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2009

Gretchen Helmke
Affiliation:
University of Rochester, New York
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Courts under Constraints
Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina
, pp. 195 - 208
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abregú, Martín. 1992. “Cría Cuervos.” No Hay Derecho 3, no. 8 (December)Google Scholar
Abregú, Martín, and Christian Courtis. n.d. “Perspectivas y posibilidades del amicus curiae en el derecho argentino.” In Separata del Libro, La aplicación de los tratados sobre Derechos Humanos por los tribunales locales, pp. 387–402
Acuña, Carlos. 1995. “Algunas notas sobre los juegos, las gallinas y la lógica política de los pactos constitucionales (Reflexiones a partir del pacto constitutional en la Argentina).” In La Nueva Matriz Politica Argentina. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión
Acuña, Carlos, and Catalina Smulovitz. 1995. “How to Guard the Guardians: Feasibility, Risks, and Benefits of Judicial Punishment of Past Human Rights Violations in New Democracies (Some Lessons from the Argentine Experience).” In A. James McAdams, ed., Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press
Alfonsín, Raúl Ricardo. 1993. “The Function of Judicial Power during the Transition.” In Irwin P. Stotzky, ed., Transition to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary. Boulder, Colo.: Westview
Alt, James E. 1991. “Leaning into the Wind or Ducking Out of the Storm? U.S. Monetary Policy in the 1980s.” In Alberto Alesina and Geoffrey Carliner, eds., Politics and Economics in the Eighties. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Alvarez, Irma. 2000. “Suspendan 83 Jueces u Destituyen a 28.” El Universal, March 30, 2000. Cited in Michael Coppedge, “Popular Sovereignty versus Liberal Democracy in Venezuela.” In Jorge I. Domínguez and Michael Shifter, eds., Constructing Democratic Governance, 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003
Ames, Barry. 1999. “Approaches to the Study of Institutions in Latin American Politics.” Latin American Research Review 34: 1Google Scholar
Bacqué, Jorge A. 1995. “Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación: Cambio de Jurisprudencia en Materia de Derechos Individuals.” No Hay Derecho 6, no. 12: 9–17Google Scholar
Baglini, Raúl, and Andrés D'Ambrosio. 1993. Juicio a la Corte. Buenos Aires: n.p
Banks, William C., and Carrió, Alejandro D.. 1993. “Presidential Systems in Stress: Emergency Powers in Argentina and the United States.” Michigan Journal of International Law 15, 1 (fall)Google Scholar
Barros, Robert. 2002. Constitutionalism and Dictatorship: Pinochet, the Junta, and the 1980 Constitution. New York: Cambridge University Press
Bates, Robert H., et al. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
Baum, Lawrence. 1992. “Membership Change and Collective Voting in the United States Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 54: 3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 1999. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Michigan: University of Michigan Press
Baum, Lawrence. 2001. The Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press
Becker, David G. 1999. “Latin America: Beyond Democratic Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 10, no. 2 (April)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. [1962] 1986. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press
Bidart Campos, German J. 1980. “Hábeas corpus: Finalidad y prueba.” El Derecho, September 11. Cited in Adolpho R. Gabrielli, La Corte Suprema de Justicia y la opinion pública, 1976–1983, p. 319. Buenos Aires: Abeledo Perrot, 1986
Bidart Campos, German J. 1995. Tratado Elemental de Derecho Constitcional Argentino, vol. 6: La Reforma Constitucional. Buenos Aires: Sociedad Anomina Editora Comercial, Industrial y Financiera
Bombal González, Inés. 1991. “El diálogo político: La transición que no fue.” Documento CEDES/61. Buenos Aires: CEDES
Boylan, Delia. 1999. “Bureaucratic Reform in Developing Countries: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Rule.” Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Georgia, September 2–5
Boylan, Delia. 2001. Defusing Democracy: Central Bank Autonomy and the Transition from Authoritarian Rule. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Brinks, Daniel. 2003. “Democracy and the Rule of Law in Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay: The Courts and Democratic Citizenship in the 1990s.” Paper prepared for the XXIV International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Dallas, Texas, March 27–9
Brysk, Alison. 1994. The Politics of Human Rights in Argentina: Protest, Change, and Democratization. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and David Lalman. 1992. War and Reason. New Haven: Yale University Press
Burbank, Stephen, and Barry Friedman. 2002. Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage
Buscaglia, Edgardo, Maria Dakolias, and William Ratcliff. 1995. Judicial Reform in Latin America. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
Caldeira, Gregory A. 1987. “Public Opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court: FDR's Court Packing Plan.” American Political Science Review 81: 1139–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, C., Cover, A., and Segal, J.. 1990. “Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neoinstitutional Model.” American Political Science Review 84: 525–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice. 2003. “Bureaucratic Decisions and the Composition of Lower Courts.” American Journal of Political Science 47(2): 205–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carp, R. A., and Stidham, R. 2001. Judicial Process in American, 5th ed. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press
Carrió, Alejandro. 1996. La Corte Suprema y su independencia. Buenos Aires: Abeledo-Perrot
Carrió, Alejandro, and Alberto F. Garay. 1991. La jurisdiccion “per saltum” de la Corte Suprema: Su estudio a partir del caso Aerolineas Argentinas. Buenos Aires: Abeldo Perrot
Carruba, Clifford J. 2002. “On the Evolution of Adjudication and Monitoring Mechanisms.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia
Casper, Jonathan D. 1976. “The Supreme Court and National Policymaking.” American Political Science Review 70 (March): 50–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catterberg, Edgardo R. 1991. Argentina Confronts Politics. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner
Cavallo, Domingo F. 2002. “What Will Happen If the Supreme Court Pronounces in Favor of the Savers?” http://www.cavallo.com.ar/Weeklyopinion/court.html, accessed March 2003
Cavarozzi, Marcello. 1986. “Political Cycles in Argentina since 1955.” In Guillermo O'Donnell, Philippe C. Schmitter, and Laurence Whitehead, eds., Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Latin America. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press
Chavez, Bill, John A. Ferejohn, and Barry Weingast. 2003. “A Theory of an Independent Judiciary.” Paper presented at the Annual Political Science Association Meeting, Philadelphia, September 2003
Clinton, Robert Lowry. 1994. “Game Theory, Legal History, and the Origins of Judicial Review: A Revisionist Analysis of Marbury v. Madison.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 285–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, and Ruth Berins Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
CONADEP (Comisión Nacional sobre la Desaparición de Personas). 1997. Nunca Más, 3rd ed. Buenos Aires: Editorial Universitaria de Buenos Aires
Conant, Lisa. 2002. Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press
Cooter, Robert, and Ginsburg, Thomas. 1996. “Comparative Judicial Discretion: An Empirical Test of Economic Models.” International Review of Law and Economics 16: 245–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1994. Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidential Partyarchy and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
Coppedge, Michael. 2003. “Popular Sovereignty versus Liberal Democracy in Venezuela.” In Jorge I. Domínguez and Michael Shifter, eds., Constructing Democratic Governance, 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación Secretaria Letrada de Estadisticas. 1998. Expedientes ingresados en la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la nacion por año. Buenos Aires
Correa Sutil, Jorge. 1993. “The Judiciary and the Political System in Chile: The Dilemmas of Judicial Independence during the Transition to Democracy.” In Irwin P. Stotzky, ed., Transition to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary. Boulder, Colo.: Westview
Crisp, Brian F., Erika Moreno, and Matthew Soberg Shugart. 2003. “The Accountability Deficit in Latin America.” In Scott Mainwaring and Christopher Welna, eds., Democratic Accountability in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press
Dahl, Robert. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policymaker.” Journal of Public Law 6: 279–95Google Scholar
Dakolias, Maria. 1996. “A Strategy for Judicial Reform: The Experience in Latin America.” Virginia Journal of International Law 36 (l): 168–231Google Scholar
Demaris, Alfred. 1992. Logit Modeling Practical Applications. London: Sage
Diez, Francisco, et al. 1994. La Justicia La Argentina Informe. Buenos Aires
Domingo, Pilar. 1999. “Judicial Independence and Judicial Reform in Latin America.” In Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamond, and Marc F. Plattner, eds., The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner
Echegaray, Fabian, and Carlos Elordi. 2001. “Public Opinion, Presidential Popularity, and Economic Reform in Argentina, 1989–1996.” In Susan Stokes, ed., Public Support for Market Reforms in New Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” In Fred J. Greenstein and Nelson Polsby, eds., Handbook of Political Science, vol. 1: Political Science: Scope and Theory. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley
Epp, Charles. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and the Supreme Court in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 1996. “On the Struggle for Judicial Supremacy.” Law and Society Review 30(1): 87–120Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press
Epstein, Lee, and Jack, Knight. 2000. “Toward a Strategic Revolution in Judicial Politics: A Look Back, a Look Ahead.” Political Research Quarterly 53, no. 3 (Sept.): 625–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Jeffrey A. Segal, Harold J. Spaeth, and Thomas G. Walker. 1994. The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions, and Developments. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 1991. “Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game.” California Law Review 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallos de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación. Buenos Aires. Various years
Ferejohn, John A. 1999. “Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Explaining Judiciary Independence,” Southern California Law Review 72Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John, and Shipan, Charles. 1990. “Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6 (Special Issue): 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John A., and Weingast, Barry. 1992. “A Positive Theory of Statutory Interpretation.” International Review of Law and Economics 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira Rubio, Delia, and Matteo Goretti. 1998. “When the President Governs Alone: The Decretazo in Argentina, 1989–93.” In John M. Carey and Matthew Soberg Shugart, eds., Executive Decree Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Finkel, Jodi. 1998. “Judicial Reform in Latin America: Market Economies, Self-Interested Politicians, and Judicial Independence.” Paper presented at the Latin American Studies Association conference, Chicago, September 24–7
Fiss, Owen. 1993. “The Limits of Judicial Independence,” 25 University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 58Google Scholar
Fix-Fierro, H. 1998. “Judicial Reform and the Supreme Court of Mexico: The Trajectory of Three Years,” United States–Mexico Law Journal 6 (spring)Google Scholar
Florángel Gómez. 2003. “Esperemos colocar un puñado de buenos jueces en el sistema judicial,” El Universal Digital, http://politica.eud.com/ informespecial/corrupcion. Cited in Michael Coppedge, “Popular Sovereignty versus Liberal Democracy in Venezuela.” In Jorge I. Domínguez and Michael Shifter, eds., Constructing Democratic Governance, 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press
FORES (Foro de Estudios sobre la Administración de Justicia). 1988. Diagnostico de la Justicia Argentina
Funston, Richard. 1975. “The Supreme Court and Critical Elections.” American Political Science Review 69 (September): 795–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrielli, Adolpho R. 1986. La Corte Suprema de Justicia y la opinion pública, 1976–1983. Buenos Aires: Abeledo Perrot
Garay, Alberto F. 1997. “El precedente judicial en la Corte Suprema.” In Revista Jurídica de la Universidad de Palermo. Año 2, números 1 y 2 (April)
Gargarella, Roberto. 1996. La Justicia frente al gobierno: Sobre el carácter contramayoritario del poder judicial. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel, S.A.
Gargarella, Roberto. 1997a. “Después del diluvio: El perfeccionismo conservador en la nueva jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema (1990–1997).” Mimeograph, Di Tella University, Buenos Aires
Gargarella, Roberto. 1997b. “Recent Institutional Reforms in Latin America.” Working paper 1997 (1), Centre for Development and the Environment, University of Oslo
Garrido, Carlos Manuel. 1993. “Informe sobre Argentina.” In Jorgé Correa Sutil, ed., Situación y Políticas in América Latina. Chile: Escuela del Derecho Universidad Diego Portales
Garro, Alejandro M. 1983. “The Role of the Argentine Judiciary in Controlling Governmental Action under a State of Siege.” Human Rights Law Journal 4 (3): 311–37Google Scholar
Garro, Alejandro M., and Dahl, Henry. 1987. “Legal Accountability for Human Rights Violations in Argentina: One Step Forward and Two Steps Backward.” Human Rights Law Journal 8 (2–4): 283–344Google Scholar
Gibbons, Robert. 1992. Game Theory for Applied Economists. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
González Casanova, Pablo. 1970. Democracy in Mexico. Trans. Danielle Salti. New York: Oxford University Press
Groisman, Enrique I. 1983. Poder y Derecho en el “Proceso de Reorganización Nacional.” Buenos Aires: Centro de Investigaciones Sociales sobre el Estado y la Administración (CISEA)
Gunther, Richard, P. Nikiforos Diamandouros, and Hans-Jürgen Puhle, eds. 1995. The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press
Hamilton, Alexander. 1961 [1787]. The Federalist Papers. Ed. C. Rossiter. New York: Penguin
Hammergren, Linn Ann. 1998. The Politics of Justice and Justice Reform in Latin America: The Peruvian Case in Comparative Perspective. Boulder, Colo.: Westview
Helmke, Gretchen. 2002. “The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court-Executive Relations in Argentina under Dictatorship and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 96: 2 (June)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen. 2003. “Checks and Balances by Other Means: The Argentine Judiciary in the 1990s.” Comparative Politics 35: 2 (January)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, and Mitch Sanders. 2003. “Modeling Motivations: A Game Theoretic Approach to Court-Executive Relations in Argentina.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Political Science Association, Philadelphia, September 2003
Henisz, Wittold. 2000. “The Institutional Environment for Economic Growth.” Economics and Politics 12 (1): 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbink, Lisa. 1999. “Exploring the Links between Institutional Characteristics of the Judiciary and the Substance of Judicial Decision-Making.” Paper presented at the Conference on the Scientific Study of Judicial Politics, Texas A&M University, College Station, October 21–3
Holmes, Stephen. 1995. Passions and Constraints: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Iaryczower, Matías, Spiller, Pablo, and Tomassi, Mariano. 2002. “Judicial Decision-Making in Unstable Environments: Argentina 1935–1998.” American Journal of Political Science 46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Instituto de Gallup de la Argentina. 1994. Estudio de Opinión Acerca de la Justicia en Argentina 3. Cited in Maria Dakolias, “A Strategy for Judicial Reform: The Experience in Latin America,” Virginia Journal of International Law 36 (1): W168 n. 5
International Commission of Jurists. 1990. “Argentina: Controversy Surrounding the Judiciary.” In Review of the International Commission of Jurists, no. 45
International Commission of Jurists. 1999. Attacks on Justice, vol. 9. Annual report of the Centre for the Independence of Judges and Lawyers. Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.icj.org/attacks/attacks.htm, retrieved July 15, 2000
Jones, Mark P. 1997. “Evaluating Argentina's Presidential Democracy: 1983–1995.” In Scott Mainwaring and Matthew Soberg Shugart, eds., Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
King, Gary, Robert Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
Kreps, David M. 1990. Game Theory and Economic Modeling. Oxford: Clarendon
Kritz, Neil. J. 1995. Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press
Landes, William M., and , Richard Posner A. 1975. “The Independent Judiciary in an Interest-Group Perspective,” Journal of Law and Economics 18 (3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkins, Christopher M. 1996. “Judicial Independence and Democratization: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis.” American Journal of Comparative Law 44 (4): 605–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkins, Christopher M. 1998. “The Judiciary and Delegative Democracy in Argentina.” Comparative Politics 30: 423–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven Robert. 1999. “From Laborism to Liberalism: Institutionalization and Labor-Based Party Adaptation in Argentina, 1983–1997.” Ph. D. diss., University of California at Berkeley
Levitsky, Steven Robert. 2000. “The ‘Normalization’ of Argentine Politics.” Journal of Democracy 11 (2): 56–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press
Linz, Juan J. 1990. “The Perils of Presidentialism.” Journal of Democracy 1 (1): 51–69Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, and Arianna Sánchez. 2001. “Empowering Courts as Constitutional Veto Players: Presidential Delegation and the New Mexican Supreme Court.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, September 2001
Mainwaring, Scott. 1990. “Presidentialism in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 25: 157–79Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Matthew Soberg Shugart, eds. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Mainwaring, Scott, Guillermo O'Donnell, and J. Samuel Valenzuela, eds. 1992. Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press
Malamud-Goti, Jaime. 1996. Game without End: State Terror and the Politics of Justice. Tulsa: University of Oklahoma Press
Maltzman, Forrest, James F. Spriggs II, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. New York: Cambridge University Press
Manin, Bernard. 1994. “Checks, Balances and Boundaries: The Separation of Powers in the Constitutional Debate of 1787.” In Biancamaria Fontana, ed., The Invention of the Modern Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Marks, Brian A. 1989. “A Model of Judicial Influence on Congressional Policymaking: Grove City College v. Bell.” Ph. D. diss., Washington University in St. Louis
McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
McCloskey, Robert G. [1960] 1994. The American Supreme Court, 2nd ed., revised by Sanford Levinson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
McCubbins, Matthew, and Schwartz, Thomas. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 165–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, James A. 1997. Peronism without Peron: Unions, Parties, and Democracy in Argentina. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
Mejia-Acosta, Andres. 2000. “Weak Coalitions and Policy Making in the Ecuadorian Congress (1979–1996).” Paper presented at the Latin American Studies Association meeting, Miami
Mendez, Juan E., Guillermo O'Donnell, and Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, eds. 1999. The (Un)Rule of Law and the Underprivileged in Latin America. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press
Merryman, John Henry. 1985. The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America, 2nd ed. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
Miller, Jonathan. 1989. “Control de constitucionalidad: El poder político del poder judicial y sus limites en una democracia.” El Derecho 120: 919–29Google Scholar
Miller, Jonathan. 1997. “Judicial Review and Constitutional Stability: A Sociology of the U.S. Model and Its Collapse in Argentina.” Paper presented at Di Tella University, Buenos Aires
Miller, Jonathan, María Angélica Gelli, and Susana Cayuso. 1995. Constitución y poder político jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema y técnicas para su interpretación. Buenos Aires: Astrea
Mishler, William, and Sheehan, Reginald S.. 1993. “The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 87: 87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry M., and Caldwell, Michael. 1994. “The Institutional Foundations of Democratic Government: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150: 171–95Google Scholar
Molinelli, N. Guillermo. 1999. “La Corte Suprema de Justicia de la nación frente a los poderes políticos, a través del control de constitucionalidad, 1983–98.” Presentado al IV Congreso Nacional de Ciencia Político (SAAO), Buenos Aires
Molinelli, N. Guillermo, M. Valeria Palanza, and Gisela Sin. 1999. Congreso, presidencia, y justicia en Argentina. Buenos Aires: CEDI
Moraski, B., and Shipan, C. 1992. “The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations: A Theory of Institutional Constraints and Choices,” American Journal of Political Science 43: 1069–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, S., and Nacif, B. 2002. Legislative Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press
Morrow, James D. 1994. Game Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
Munck, Gerardo L. 1998. Authoritarianism and Democratization: Soldiers and Workers in Argentina, 1976–1983. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press
Munger, Michael C. 2003. “The Stream That Rises above Its Source: Judicial Review and the Law.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia
Murphy, Walter F. 1964. The Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Nino, Carlos Santiago. 1991. “The Duty to Punish Past Abuses of Human Rights Put into Context: The Case of Argentina.” Yale Law JournalCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nino, Carlos Santiago. 1992. Fundamentos de Derecho Constitucional. Buenos Aires: Astrea
Nino, Carlos Santiago. 1993. “On the Exercise of Judicial Review in Argentina.” In Irwin P. Stotzky, ed., Transition to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary. Boulder, Colo.: Westview
Nino, Carlos Santiago. 1996. Radical Evil on Trial. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press
Norden, Deborah. 1996. Military Rebellion in Argentina: Between Coups and Consolidation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press
North, Douglass C., William Summerhill, and Barry Weingast. 2000. “Order, Disorder, and Economic Change: Latin America vs. North America.” In Bruce Bueno de Mesquita and Hilton Root, eds., Governing for Prosperity. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press
Octavio de Jesus, Marcelo, and Alejandra Ruscelli. 1998. “The Lasting Transition in the Judiciaries in South America: A Country Study.” Paper presented at the XⅪ International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Chicago
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1979. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1992. “Delegative Democracy.” Working paper no. 172, the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Ind
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1998. Horizontal Accountability and New Polyarchies. Working paper no. 253, the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Ind
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1999. Counterpoints: Selected Essays on Authoritarianism and Democratization. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Philippe C. Schmitter. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press
Organization of American States. 1980. Annual Report of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Washington, D.C.
Osiel, Mark. 1986. “The Making of Human Rights Policy in Argentina: The Impact of Ideas and Interests on a Legal Conflict.” Journal of Latin American Studies 18 (1): 135–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palermo, Vicente, and Marcos Novaro. 1996. Política y poder en el gobierno de Menem. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editorial Norma
Perry, H. W. 1991. Deciding to Decide: Agenda-Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Poder Cuidadano. 1997. Quien es quien en el poder judicial. Buenos Aires: Perfil Libros
Poder Judicial. 1996. Poder Judicial de la Nacion Corte Suprema de Justicia Estadtisticas. Argentina
Prillaman, William C. 2000. The Judiciary and Democratic Decay in Latin America: Declining Confidence in the Rule of Law. New York: Praeger Press
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Eric B. Rasmusen. 1996. “Judicial Independence in Civil Law Regimes: Econometrics from Japan.” Working paper no. 37, Law and Economics (2nd series), University of Chicago Law School, Chicago
Rios-Figueroa, Julio. 2003. “The Emergence of an Effective Judiciary: Fragmentation of Power and Judicial Decision-Making Evidence from the Mexican Supreme Court, 1994–2002.” Unpublished manuscript
Rock, David. 1985. Argentina, 1516–1982: From Spanish Colonization to the Falklands War. Berkeley: University of California Press
Rogers, James. 2001. “Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Judicial Legislative Interaction.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 84–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, James, and Georg Vanberg. 2003. “Affirming Lochner's Major Premise: The Superiority of Political Judges over Deferential Judges.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia
Rogers, William D., and Paolo Wright-Carozza. 1995. La Corte Suprema de Justicia y la seguridad jurídica. Buenos Aires: Editorial Ábaco de Rodolfo Depalma
Rohter, Larry. 1999. “Venezuelan Congress Moves to Defy Its Suspension by Rival Body.” New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/americas/082799venezuela-politics.html. Accessed May 20, 2004
Roniger, Luis, and Mario Sznajder. 1999. The Legacy of Human-Rights Violations in the Southern Cone: Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Rosberg, James. H. 1995. “Roads to the Rule of Law: The Emergence of an Independent Judiciary in Contemporary Egypt.” Ph. D. diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1992. “Judicial Independence and the Reality of Political Power.” Review of Politics 54 (3): 369–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenn, Keith. 1987. “Judicial Independence.” Inter-American Law Review 19 (1): 3–35Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas, Larry Diamond, and Marc F. Plattner. 1999. The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner
Schultz, David A., ed. 1998. Leveraging the Law: Using the Courts to Achieve Social Change. New York: Peter Lang
Schwarz, Carl. 1977. “Rights and Remedies in the Federal District Courts of Mexico and the United States.” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 4Google Scholar
Scott, Robert. 1964. Mexican Government in Transition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
Scribner, Druscilla. 2003. “Judicial Compliance and Defiance: Supreme Court Decision-Making on Challenges to Exceptional Authority in Chile and Argentina,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, September 2003
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1997. “Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts.” American Political Science Review 91: 28–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Shklar, Judith N. 1986. Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and John Carey. 1994. Presidents and Assemblies. New York: Cambridge University Press
Siavelis, Peter, M. 2000. The President and Congress in Postauthoritarian Chile: Institutional Constraints to Democratic Consolidation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press
Signorino, Curtis S. 1999. “Strategic Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of International Conflict,” American Political Science Review 93 (2): 279–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, William. 1991. “State, Market, and Neoliberalism in Post-Transition Argentina.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 33 (4): 45–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina. 1995. “Constitucíon y poder judicial en la nueva democracia Argentina: Las experiencia de las instituciones.” In Carlos Acuña et al., eds., La nueva matriz politica Argentina. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Visión
Snow, Peter G. 1975. “Judges and Generals: The Role of the Argentine Supreme Court during Periods of Military Government.” Jährbuch des Öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr
Snyder, Frederick E. 1984. “State of Siege and Rule of Law in Argentina.” Law of the Americas 15: 503–18Google Scholar
Spiller, Pablo T., and Gely, Rafael. 1990. “A Rational Choice Theory of Supreme Court Statutory Decisions with Applications to the State Farm and Grove City Cases.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6 (2): 263–300Google Scholar
Spiller, Pablo T., and Gely, Rafael. 1992. “Congressional Control or Judicial Independence: The Determinants of U.S. Supreme Court Labor-Relations Decisions, 1949–1988.” RAND Journal of Economics 23 (4): 463–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2002. “Judicial Activism and Public Authority Compliance: The Role of Public Support in the Mexican Separation of Powers System.” Ph. D. diss., Washington University in St. Louis
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2003. “It Can Happen in a Hurry: Rational Learning about Judicial Legitimacy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia
Stephenson, Matthew C. 2002. “Court of Public Opinion: Government Accountability and Judicial Independence.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, September 2002
Stokes, Susan C. 1999. “What Do Policy Switches Tell Us about Democracy?” In Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin, eds., Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Stotzky, Irwin P., ed. 1993. Transition to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary. Boulder, Colo.: Westview
Sunstein, Cass R. 1996a. “Constitutional Myth-Making: Lessons from the Dred Scott Case.” Occasional paper from the University of Chicago Law School no. 37, Chicago
Sunstein, Cass R. 1996b. “The Supreme Court, 1995 Term Forward: Leaving Things Unsaid.” Harvard Law Review 110 (1): 4–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, Neal C., Stacia L. Haynie, Reginald Sheehan, and Donald R. Songer. 2002. “Regime Support and Appellate Courts: A Comparative Analysis of Litigation Outcomes.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston
Timerman, Jacobo. 1981. Preso sin nombre, celda sin número, 2nd ed. Barcelona: El Cid
Toharia, José. 1975. “Judicial Independence in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Contemporary Spain.” Law and Society Review 9 (spring): 475–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1997. “Decision-Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism, and Multipartism.” British Journal of Political Science 25: 289–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation
Vanberg, Georg. 1999. “The Politics of Constitutional Review: Constitutional Court and Parliament in Germany.” Ph. D. diss., University of Rochester, N.Y
Vanberg, Georg. 2000. “Establishing Judicial Independence in Germany: The Impact of Opinion Leadership and the Separation of Powers.” Comparative Politics 10: 299–326Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. 2001. “Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game Theoretic Approach.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 346–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbitsky, Horacio. 1993. Hacer la corte: La creación de un poder sin control ni justicia. Buenos Aires: Planeta Espejo de Argentina
Verner, Joel G. 1984. “The Independence of Supreme Courts in Latin America: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Latin American Studies 16: 463–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Lazar, Arpad. 1971. Latin American Politics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Cited in Joel G. Verner, “The Independence of Supreme Courts in Latin America: A Review of the Literature,” Journal of Latin American Studies 16 (1989): 467
WOLA (Washington Office on Latin America). 2000. Deconstructing Democracy: Peru under Alberto Fujimori (Executive Summary), February. http://www.wola.org/perudeconstructingdemo.html, retrieved July 27, 2000. Journal of International Law 36 (1): 168 n. 5
Yamin, Alicia Eli, and Noriega, Ma. Pilar. 1999. “The Absence of the Rule of Law in Mexico: Diagnosis and Implications for a Mexican Transition to Democracy.” Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal 21, no. 3 (July)Google Scholar
Yates, Jeff. 2002. Popular Justice: Presidential Prestige and Executive Success in the Supreme Court. Albany: State University of New York Press
Abregú, Martín. 1992. “Cría Cuervos.” No Hay Derecho 3, no. 8 (December)Google Scholar
Abregú, Martín, and Christian Courtis. n.d. “Perspectivas y posibilidades del amicus curiae en el derecho argentino.” In Separata del Libro, La aplicación de los tratados sobre Derechos Humanos por los tribunales locales, pp. 387–402
Acuña, Carlos. 1995. “Algunas notas sobre los juegos, las gallinas y la lógica política de los pactos constitucionales (Reflexiones a partir del pacto constitutional en la Argentina).” In La Nueva Matriz Politica Argentina. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión
Acuña, Carlos, and Catalina Smulovitz. 1995. “How to Guard the Guardians: Feasibility, Risks, and Benefits of Judicial Punishment of Past Human Rights Violations in New Democracies (Some Lessons from the Argentine Experience).” In A. James McAdams, ed., Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press
Alfonsín, Raúl Ricardo. 1993. “The Function of Judicial Power during the Transition.” In Irwin P. Stotzky, ed., Transition to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary. Boulder, Colo.: Westview
Alt, James E. 1991. “Leaning into the Wind or Ducking Out of the Storm? U.S. Monetary Policy in the 1980s.” In Alberto Alesina and Geoffrey Carliner, eds., Politics and Economics in the Eighties. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Alvarez, Irma. 2000. “Suspendan 83 Jueces u Destituyen a 28.” El Universal, March 30, 2000. Cited in Michael Coppedge, “Popular Sovereignty versus Liberal Democracy in Venezuela.” In Jorge I. Domínguez and Michael Shifter, eds., Constructing Democratic Governance, 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003
Ames, Barry. 1999. “Approaches to the Study of Institutions in Latin American Politics.” Latin American Research Review 34: 1Google Scholar
Bacqué, Jorge A. 1995. “Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación: Cambio de Jurisprudencia en Materia de Derechos Individuals.” No Hay Derecho 6, no. 12: 9–17Google Scholar
Baglini, Raúl, and Andrés D'Ambrosio. 1993. Juicio a la Corte. Buenos Aires: n.p
Banks, William C., and Carrió, Alejandro D.. 1993. “Presidential Systems in Stress: Emergency Powers in Argentina and the United States.” Michigan Journal of International Law 15, 1 (fall)Google Scholar
Barros, Robert. 2002. Constitutionalism and Dictatorship: Pinochet, the Junta, and the 1980 Constitution. New York: Cambridge University Press
Bates, Robert H., et al. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
Baum, Lawrence. 1992. “Membership Change and Collective Voting in the United States Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 54: 3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 1999. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Michigan: University of Michigan Press
Baum, Lawrence. 2001. The Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press
Becker, David G. 1999. “Latin America: Beyond Democratic Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 10, no. 2 (April)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. [1962] 1986. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press
Bidart Campos, German J. 1980. “Hábeas corpus: Finalidad y prueba.” El Derecho, September 11. Cited in Adolpho R. Gabrielli, La Corte Suprema de Justicia y la opinion pública, 1976–1983, p. 319. Buenos Aires: Abeledo Perrot, 1986
Bidart Campos, German J. 1995. Tratado Elemental de Derecho Constitcional Argentino, vol. 6: La Reforma Constitucional. Buenos Aires: Sociedad Anomina Editora Comercial, Industrial y Financiera
Bombal González, Inés. 1991. “El diálogo político: La transición que no fue.” Documento CEDES/61. Buenos Aires: CEDES
Boylan, Delia. 1999. “Bureaucratic Reform in Developing Countries: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Rule.” Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Georgia, September 2–5
Boylan, Delia. 2001. Defusing Democracy: Central Bank Autonomy and the Transition from Authoritarian Rule. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Brinks, Daniel. 2003. “Democracy and the Rule of Law in Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay: The Courts and Democratic Citizenship in the 1990s.” Paper prepared for the XXIV International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Dallas, Texas, March 27–9
Brysk, Alison. 1994. The Politics of Human Rights in Argentina: Protest, Change, and Democratization. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and David Lalman. 1992. War and Reason. New Haven: Yale University Press
Burbank, Stephen, and Barry Friedman. 2002. Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage
Buscaglia, Edgardo, Maria Dakolias, and William Ratcliff. 1995. Judicial Reform in Latin America. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
Caldeira, Gregory A. 1987. “Public Opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court: FDR's Court Packing Plan.” American Political Science Review 81: 1139–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, C., Cover, A., and Segal, J.. 1990. “Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neoinstitutional Model.” American Political Science Review 84: 525–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice. 2003. “Bureaucratic Decisions and the Composition of Lower Courts.” American Journal of Political Science 47(2): 205–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carp, R. A., and Stidham, R. 2001. Judicial Process in American, 5th ed. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press
Carrió, Alejandro. 1996. La Corte Suprema y su independencia. Buenos Aires: Abeledo-Perrot
Carrió, Alejandro, and Alberto F. Garay. 1991. La jurisdiccion “per saltum” de la Corte Suprema: Su estudio a partir del caso Aerolineas Argentinas. Buenos Aires: Abeldo Perrot
Carruba, Clifford J. 2002. “On the Evolution of Adjudication and Monitoring Mechanisms.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia
Casper, Jonathan D. 1976. “The Supreme Court and National Policymaking.” American Political Science Review 70 (March): 50–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catterberg, Edgardo R. 1991. Argentina Confronts Politics. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner
Cavallo, Domingo F. 2002. “What Will Happen If the Supreme Court Pronounces in Favor of the Savers?” http://www.cavallo.com.ar/Weeklyopinion/court.html, accessed March 2003
Cavarozzi, Marcello. 1986. “Political Cycles in Argentina since 1955.” In Guillermo O'Donnell, Philippe C. Schmitter, and Laurence Whitehead, eds., Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Latin America. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press
Chavez, Bill, John A. Ferejohn, and Barry Weingast. 2003. “A Theory of an Independent Judiciary.” Paper presented at the Annual Political Science Association Meeting, Philadelphia, September 2003
Clinton, Robert Lowry. 1994. “Game Theory, Legal History, and the Origins of Judicial Review: A Revisionist Analysis of Marbury v. Madison.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 285–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, and Ruth Berins Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
CONADEP (Comisión Nacional sobre la Desaparición de Personas). 1997. Nunca Más, 3rd ed. Buenos Aires: Editorial Universitaria de Buenos Aires
Conant, Lisa. 2002. Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press
Cooter, Robert, and Ginsburg, Thomas. 1996. “Comparative Judicial Discretion: An Empirical Test of Economic Models.” International Review of Law and Economics 16: 245–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1994. Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidential Partyarchy and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
Coppedge, Michael. 2003. “Popular Sovereignty versus Liberal Democracy in Venezuela.” In Jorge I. Domínguez and Michael Shifter, eds., Constructing Democratic Governance, 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación Secretaria Letrada de Estadisticas. 1998. Expedientes ingresados en la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la nacion por año. Buenos Aires
Correa Sutil, Jorge. 1993. “The Judiciary and the Political System in Chile: The Dilemmas of Judicial Independence during the Transition to Democracy.” In Irwin P. Stotzky, ed., Transition to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary. Boulder, Colo.: Westview
Crisp, Brian F., Erika Moreno, and Matthew Soberg Shugart. 2003. “The Accountability Deficit in Latin America.” In Scott Mainwaring and Christopher Welna, eds., Democratic Accountability in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press
Dahl, Robert. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policymaker.” Journal of Public Law 6: 279–95Google Scholar
Dakolias, Maria. 1996. “A Strategy for Judicial Reform: The Experience in Latin America.” Virginia Journal of International Law 36 (l): 168–231Google Scholar
Demaris, Alfred. 1992. Logit Modeling Practical Applications. London: Sage
Diez, Francisco, et al. 1994. La Justicia La Argentina Informe. Buenos Aires
Domingo, Pilar. 1999. “Judicial Independence and Judicial Reform in Latin America.” In Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamond, and Marc F. Plattner, eds., The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner
Echegaray, Fabian, and Carlos Elordi. 2001. “Public Opinion, Presidential Popularity, and Economic Reform in Argentina, 1989–1996.” In Susan Stokes, ed., Public Support for Market Reforms in New Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” In Fred J. Greenstein and Nelson Polsby, eds., Handbook of Political Science, vol. 1: Political Science: Scope and Theory. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley
Epp, Charles. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and the Supreme Court in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 1996. “On the Struggle for Judicial Supremacy.” Law and Society Review 30(1): 87–120Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press
Epstein, Lee, and Jack, Knight. 2000. “Toward a Strategic Revolution in Judicial Politics: A Look Back, a Look Ahead.” Political Research Quarterly 53, no. 3 (Sept.): 625–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Jeffrey A. Segal, Harold J. Spaeth, and Thomas G. Walker. 1994. The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions, and Developments. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 1991. “Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game.” California Law Review 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallos de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación. Buenos Aires. Various years
Ferejohn, John A. 1999. “Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Explaining Judiciary Independence,” Southern California Law Review 72Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John, and Shipan, Charles. 1990. “Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6 (Special Issue): 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John A., and Weingast, Barry. 1992. “A Positive Theory of Statutory Interpretation.” International Review of Law and Economics 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira Rubio, Delia, and Matteo Goretti. 1998. “When the President Governs Alone: The Decretazo in Argentina, 1989–93.” In John M. Carey and Matthew Soberg Shugart, eds., Executive Decree Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Finkel, Jodi. 1998. “Judicial Reform in Latin America: Market Economies, Self-Interested Politicians, and Judicial Independence.” Paper presented at the Latin American Studies Association conference, Chicago, September 24–7
Fiss, Owen. 1993. “The Limits of Judicial Independence,” 25 University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 58Google Scholar
Fix-Fierro, H. 1998. “Judicial Reform and the Supreme Court of Mexico: The Trajectory of Three Years,” United States–Mexico Law Journal 6 (spring)Google Scholar
Florángel Gómez. 2003. “Esperemos colocar un puñado de buenos jueces en el sistema judicial,” El Universal Digital, http://politica.eud.com/ informespecial/corrupcion. Cited in Michael Coppedge, “Popular Sovereignty versus Liberal Democracy in Venezuela.” In Jorge I. Domínguez and Michael Shifter, eds., Constructing Democratic Governance, 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press
FORES (Foro de Estudios sobre la Administración de Justicia). 1988. Diagnostico de la Justicia Argentina
Funston, Richard. 1975. “The Supreme Court and Critical Elections.” American Political Science Review 69 (September): 795–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrielli, Adolpho R. 1986. La Corte Suprema de Justicia y la opinion pública, 1976–1983. Buenos Aires: Abeledo Perrot
Garay, Alberto F. 1997. “El precedente judicial en la Corte Suprema.” In Revista Jurídica de la Universidad de Palermo. Año 2, números 1 y 2 (April)
Gargarella, Roberto. 1996. La Justicia frente al gobierno: Sobre el carácter contramayoritario del poder judicial. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel, S.A.
Gargarella, Roberto. 1997a. “Después del diluvio: El perfeccionismo conservador en la nueva jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema (1990–1997).” Mimeograph, Di Tella University, Buenos Aires
Gargarella, Roberto. 1997b. “Recent Institutional Reforms in Latin America.” Working paper 1997 (1), Centre for Development and the Environment, University of Oslo
Garrido, Carlos Manuel. 1993. “Informe sobre Argentina.” In Jorgé Correa Sutil, ed., Situación y Políticas in América Latina. Chile: Escuela del Derecho Universidad Diego Portales
Garro, Alejandro M. 1983. “The Role of the Argentine Judiciary in Controlling Governmental Action under a State of Siege.” Human Rights Law Journal 4 (3): 311–37Google Scholar
Garro, Alejandro M., and Dahl, Henry. 1987. “Legal Accountability for Human Rights Violations in Argentina: One Step Forward and Two Steps Backward.” Human Rights Law Journal 8 (2–4): 283–344Google Scholar
Gibbons, Robert. 1992. Game Theory for Applied Economists. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
González Casanova, Pablo. 1970. Democracy in Mexico. Trans. Danielle Salti. New York: Oxford University Press
Groisman, Enrique I. 1983. Poder y Derecho en el “Proceso de Reorganización Nacional.” Buenos Aires: Centro de Investigaciones Sociales sobre el Estado y la Administración (CISEA)
Gunther, Richard, P. Nikiforos Diamandouros, and Hans-Jürgen Puhle, eds. 1995. The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press
Hamilton, Alexander. 1961 [1787]. The Federalist Papers. Ed. C. Rossiter. New York: Penguin
Hammergren, Linn Ann. 1998. The Politics of Justice and Justice Reform in Latin America: The Peruvian Case in Comparative Perspective. Boulder, Colo.: Westview
Helmke, Gretchen. 2002. “The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court-Executive Relations in Argentina under Dictatorship and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 96: 2 (June)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen. 2003. “Checks and Balances by Other Means: The Argentine Judiciary in the 1990s.” Comparative Politics 35: 2 (January)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, and Mitch Sanders. 2003. “Modeling Motivations: A Game Theoretic Approach to Court-Executive Relations in Argentina.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Political Science Association, Philadelphia, September 2003
Henisz, Wittold. 2000. “The Institutional Environment for Economic Growth.” Economics and Politics 12 (1): 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbink, Lisa. 1999. “Exploring the Links between Institutional Characteristics of the Judiciary and the Substance of Judicial Decision-Making.” Paper presented at the Conference on the Scientific Study of Judicial Politics, Texas A&M University, College Station, October 21–3
Holmes, Stephen. 1995. Passions and Constraints: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Iaryczower, Matías, Spiller, Pablo, and Tomassi, Mariano. 2002. “Judicial Decision-Making in Unstable Environments: Argentina 1935–1998.” American Journal of Political Science 46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Instituto de Gallup de la Argentina. 1994. Estudio de Opinión Acerca de la Justicia en Argentina 3. Cited in Maria Dakolias, “A Strategy for Judicial Reform: The Experience in Latin America,” Virginia Journal of International Law 36 (1): W168 n. 5
International Commission of Jurists. 1990. “Argentina: Controversy Surrounding the Judiciary.” In Review of the International Commission of Jurists, no. 45
International Commission of Jurists. 1999. Attacks on Justice, vol. 9. Annual report of the Centre for the Independence of Judges and Lawyers. Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.icj.org/attacks/attacks.htm, retrieved July 15, 2000
Jones, Mark P. 1997. “Evaluating Argentina's Presidential Democracy: 1983–1995.” In Scott Mainwaring and Matthew Soberg Shugart, eds., Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
King, Gary, Robert Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
Kreps, David M. 1990. Game Theory and Economic Modeling. Oxford: Clarendon
Kritz, Neil. J. 1995. Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press
Landes, William M., and , Richard Posner A. 1975. “The Independent Judiciary in an Interest-Group Perspective,” Journal of Law and Economics 18 (3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkins, Christopher M. 1996. “Judicial Independence and Democratization: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis.” American Journal of Comparative Law 44 (4): 605–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkins, Christopher M. 1998. “The Judiciary and Delegative Democracy in Argentina.” Comparative Politics 30: 423–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven Robert. 1999. “From Laborism to Liberalism: Institutionalization and Labor-Based Party Adaptation in Argentina, 1983–1997.” Ph. D. diss., University of California at Berkeley
Levitsky, Steven Robert. 2000. “The ‘Normalization’ of Argentine Politics.” Journal of Democracy 11 (2): 56–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press
Linz, Juan J. 1990. “The Perils of Presidentialism.” Journal of Democracy 1 (1): 51–69Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, and Arianna Sánchez. 2001. “Empowering Courts as Constitutional Veto Players: Presidential Delegation and the New Mexican Supreme Court.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, September 2001
Mainwaring, Scott. 1990. “Presidentialism in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 25: 157–79Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Matthew Soberg Shugart, eds. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Mainwaring, Scott, Guillermo O'Donnell, and J. Samuel Valenzuela, eds. 1992. Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press
Malamud-Goti, Jaime. 1996. Game without End: State Terror and the Politics of Justice. Tulsa: University of Oklahoma Press
Maltzman, Forrest, James F. Spriggs II, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. New York: Cambridge University Press
Manin, Bernard. 1994. “Checks, Balances and Boundaries: The Separation of Powers in the Constitutional Debate of 1787.” In Biancamaria Fontana, ed., The Invention of the Modern Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Marks, Brian A. 1989. “A Model of Judicial Influence on Congressional Policymaking: Grove City College v. Bell.” Ph. D. diss., Washington University in St. Louis
McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
McCloskey, Robert G. [1960] 1994. The American Supreme Court, 2nd ed., revised by Sanford Levinson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
McCubbins, Matthew, and Schwartz, Thomas. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 165–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, James A. 1997. Peronism without Peron: Unions, Parties, and Democracy in Argentina. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
Mejia-Acosta, Andres. 2000. “Weak Coalitions and Policy Making in the Ecuadorian Congress (1979–1996).” Paper presented at the Latin American Studies Association meeting, Miami
Mendez, Juan E., Guillermo O'Donnell, and Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, eds. 1999. The (Un)Rule of Law and the Underprivileged in Latin America. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press
Merryman, John Henry. 1985. The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America, 2nd ed. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
Miller, Jonathan. 1989. “Control de constitucionalidad: El poder político del poder judicial y sus limites en una democracia.” El Derecho 120: 919–29Google Scholar
Miller, Jonathan. 1997. “Judicial Review and Constitutional Stability: A Sociology of the U.S. Model and Its Collapse in Argentina.” Paper presented at Di Tella University, Buenos Aires
Miller, Jonathan, María Angélica Gelli, and Susana Cayuso. 1995. Constitución y poder político jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema y técnicas para su interpretación. Buenos Aires: Astrea
Mishler, William, and Sheehan, Reginald S.. 1993. “The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 87: 87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry M., and Caldwell, Michael. 1994. “The Institutional Foundations of Democratic Government: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150: 171–95Google Scholar
Molinelli, N. Guillermo. 1999. “La Corte Suprema de Justicia de la nación frente a los poderes políticos, a través del control de constitucionalidad, 1983–98.” Presentado al IV Congreso Nacional de Ciencia Político (SAAO), Buenos Aires
Molinelli, N. Guillermo, M. Valeria Palanza, and Gisela Sin. 1999. Congreso, presidencia, y justicia en Argentina. Buenos Aires: CEDI
Moraski, B., and Shipan, C. 1992. “The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations: A Theory of Institutional Constraints and Choices,” American Journal of Political Science 43: 1069–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, S., and Nacif, B. 2002. Legislative Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press
Morrow, James D. 1994. Game Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
Munck, Gerardo L. 1998. Authoritarianism and Democratization: Soldiers and Workers in Argentina, 1976–1983. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press
Munger, Michael C. 2003. “The Stream That Rises above Its Source: Judicial Review and the Law.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia
Murphy, Walter F. 1964. The Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Nino, Carlos Santiago. 1991. “The Duty to Punish Past Abuses of Human Rights Put into Context: The Case of Argentina.” Yale Law JournalCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nino, Carlos Santiago. 1992. Fundamentos de Derecho Constitucional. Buenos Aires: Astrea
Nino, Carlos Santiago. 1993. “On the Exercise of Judicial Review in Argentina.” In Irwin P. Stotzky, ed., Transition to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary. Boulder, Colo.: Westview
Nino, Carlos Santiago. 1996. Radical Evil on Trial. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press
Norden, Deborah. 1996. Military Rebellion in Argentina: Between Coups and Consolidation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press
North, Douglass C., William Summerhill, and Barry Weingast. 2000. “Order, Disorder, and Economic Change: Latin America vs. North America.” In Bruce Bueno de Mesquita and Hilton Root, eds., Governing for Prosperity. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press
Octavio de Jesus, Marcelo, and Alejandra Ruscelli. 1998. “The Lasting Transition in the Judiciaries in South America: A Country Study.” Paper presented at the XⅪ International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Chicago
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1979. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1992. “Delegative Democracy.” Working paper no. 172, the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Ind
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1998. Horizontal Accountability and New Polyarchies. Working paper no. 253, the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Ind
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1999. Counterpoints: Selected Essays on Authoritarianism and Democratization. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Philippe C. Schmitter. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press
Organization of American States. 1980. Annual Report of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Washington, D.C.
Osiel, Mark. 1986. “The Making of Human Rights Policy in Argentina: The Impact of Ideas and Interests on a Legal Conflict.” Journal of Latin American Studies 18 (1): 135–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palermo, Vicente, and Marcos Novaro. 1996. Política y poder en el gobierno de Menem. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editorial Norma
Perry, H. W. 1991. Deciding to Decide: Agenda-Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Poder Cuidadano. 1997. Quien es quien en el poder judicial. Buenos Aires: Perfil Libros
Poder Judicial. 1996. Poder Judicial de la Nacion Corte Suprema de Justicia Estadtisticas. Argentina
Prillaman, William C. 2000. The Judiciary and Democratic Decay in Latin America: Declining Confidence in the Rule of Law. New York: Praeger Press
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Eric B. Rasmusen. 1996. “Judicial Independence in Civil Law Regimes: Econometrics from Japan.” Working paper no. 37, Law and Economics (2nd series), University of Chicago Law School, Chicago
Rios-Figueroa, Julio. 2003. “The Emergence of an Effective Judiciary: Fragmentation of Power and Judicial Decision-Making Evidence from the Mexican Supreme Court, 1994–2002.” Unpublished manuscript
Rock, David. 1985. Argentina, 1516–1982: From Spanish Colonization to the Falklands War. Berkeley: University of California Press
Rogers, James. 2001. “Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Judicial Legislative Interaction.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 84–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, James, and Georg Vanberg. 2003. “Affirming Lochner's Major Premise: The Superiority of Political Judges over Deferential Judges.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia
Rogers, William D., and Paolo Wright-Carozza. 1995. La Corte Suprema de Justicia y la seguridad jurídica. Buenos Aires: Editorial Ábaco de Rodolfo Depalma
Rohter, Larry. 1999. “Venezuelan Congress Moves to Defy Its Suspension by Rival Body.” New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/americas/082799venezuela-politics.html. Accessed May 20, 2004
Roniger, Luis, and Mario Sznajder. 1999. The Legacy of Human-Rights Violations in the Southern Cone: Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Rosberg, James. H. 1995. “Roads to the Rule of Law: The Emergence of an Independent Judiciary in Contemporary Egypt.” Ph. D. diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1992. “Judicial Independence and the Reality of Political Power.” Review of Politics 54 (3): 369–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenn, Keith. 1987. “Judicial Independence.” Inter-American Law Review 19 (1): 3–35Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas, Larry Diamond, and Marc F. Plattner. 1999. The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner
Schultz, David A., ed. 1998. Leveraging the Law: Using the Courts to Achieve Social Change. New York: Peter Lang
Schwarz, Carl. 1977. “Rights and Remedies in the Federal District Courts of Mexico and the United States.” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 4Google Scholar
Scott, Robert. 1964. Mexican Government in Transition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
Scribner, Druscilla. 2003. “Judicial Compliance and Defiance: Supreme Court Decision-Making on Challenges to Exceptional Authority in Chile and Argentina,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, September 2003
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1997. “Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts.” American Political Science Review 91: 28–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Shklar, Judith N. 1986. Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and John Carey. 1994. Presidents and Assemblies. New York: Cambridge University Press
Siavelis, Peter, M. 2000. The President and Congress in Postauthoritarian Chile: Institutional Constraints to Democratic Consolidation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press
Signorino, Curtis S. 1999. “Strategic Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of International Conflict,” American Political Science Review 93 (2): 279–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, William. 1991. “State, Market, and Neoliberalism in Post-Transition Argentina.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 33 (4): 45–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina. 1995. “Constitucíon y poder judicial en la nueva democracia Argentina: Las experiencia de las instituciones.” In Carlos Acuña et al., eds., La nueva matriz politica Argentina. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Visión
Snow, Peter G. 1975. “Judges and Generals: The Role of the Argentine Supreme Court during Periods of Military Government.” Jährbuch des Öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr
Snyder, Frederick E. 1984. “State of Siege and Rule of Law in Argentina.” Law of the Americas 15: 503–18Google Scholar
Spiller, Pablo T., and Gely, Rafael. 1990. “A Rational Choice Theory of Supreme Court Statutory Decisions with Applications to the State Farm and Grove City Cases.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6 (2): 263–300Google Scholar
Spiller, Pablo T., and Gely, Rafael. 1992. “Congressional Control or Judicial Independence: The Determinants of U.S. Supreme Court Labor-Relations Decisions, 1949–1988.” RAND Journal of Economics 23 (4): 463–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2002. “Judicial Activism and Public Authority Compliance: The Role of Public Support in the Mexican Separation of Powers System.” Ph. D. diss., Washington University in St. Louis
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2003. “It Can Happen in a Hurry: Rational Learning about Judicial Legitimacy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia
Stephenson, Matthew C. 2002. “Court of Public Opinion: Government Accountability and Judicial Independence.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, September 2002
Stokes, Susan C. 1999. “What Do Policy Switches Tell Us about Democracy?” In Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin, eds., Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Stotzky, Irwin P., ed. 1993. Transition to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary. Boulder, Colo.: Westview
Sunstein, Cass R. 1996a. “Constitutional Myth-Making: Lessons from the Dred Scott Case.” Occasional paper from the University of Chicago Law School no. 37, Chicago
Sunstein, Cass R. 1996b. “The Supreme Court, 1995 Term Forward: Leaving Things Unsaid.” Harvard Law Review 110 (1): 4–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, Neal C., Stacia L. Haynie, Reginald Sheehan, and Donald R. Songer. 2002. “Regime Support and Appellate Courts: A Comparative Analysis of Litigation Outcomes.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston
Timerman, Jacobo. 1981. Preso sin nombre, celda sin número, 2nd ed. Barcelona: El Cid
Toharia, José. 1975. “Judicial Independence in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Contemporary Spain.” Law and Society Review 9 (spring): 475–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1997. “Decision-Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism, and Multipartism.” British Journal of Political Science 25: 289–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation
Vanberg, Georg. 1999. “The Politics of Constitutional Review: Constitutional Court and Parliament in Germany.” Ph. D. diss., University of Rochester, N.Y
Vanberg, Georg. 2000. “Establishing Judicial Independence in Germany: The Impact of Opinion Leadership and the Separation of Powers.” Comparative Politics 10: 299–326Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. 2001. “Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game Theoretic Approach.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 346–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbitsky, Horacio. 1993. Hacer la corte: La creación de un poder sin control ni justicia. Buenos Aires: Planeta Espejo de Argentina
Verner, Joel G. 1984. “The Independence of Supreme Courts in Latin America: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Latin American Studies 16: 463–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Lazar, Arpad. 1971. Latin American Politics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Cited in Joel G. Verner, “The Independence of Supreme Courts in Latin America: A Review of the Literature,” Journal of Latin American Studies 16 (1989): 467
WOLA (Washington Office on Latin America). 2000. Deconstructing Democracy: Peru under Alberto Fujimori (Executive Summary), February. http://www.wola.org/perudeconstructingdemo.html, retrieved July 27, 2000. Journal of International Law 36 (1): 168 n. 5
Yamin, Alicia Eli, and Noriega, Ma. Pilar. 1999. “The Absence of the Rule of Law in Mexico: Diagnosis and Implications for a Mexican Transition to Democracy.” Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal 21, no. 3 (July)Google Scholar
Yates, Jeff. 2002. Popular Justice: Presidential Prestige and Executive Success in the Supreme Court. Albany: State University of New York Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Gretchen Helmke, University of Rochester, New York
  • Book: Courts under Constraints
  • Online publication: 24 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510144.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Gretchen Helmke, University of Rochester, New York
  • Book: Courts under Constraints
  • Online publication: 24 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510144.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Gretchen Helmke, University of Rochester, New York
  • Book: Courts under Constraints
  • Online publication: 24 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510144.012
Available formats
×