Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:12:18.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodule

from Section IV - Malignant conditions of the lung

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Dustin M. Walters
Affiliation:
University of Washington
David R. Jones
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Marco Scarci
Affiliation:
University College London Hospital
Aman Coonar
Affiliation:
Papworth Hospital
Tom Routledge
Affiliation:
Guy’s Hospital
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Holin, SM, Dwork, RE, Glaser, S, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules found in a community-wide chest roentgenographic survey; a five-year follow-up study. Am Rev Tuberc 1959; 79(4):427–39.Google Scholar
2 Swensen, SJ, Silverstein, MD, Edell, ES, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: clinical prediction model versus physicians. Mayo Clin Proc 1999; 74(4):319–29.Google Scholar
3 Alzahouri, K, Velten, M, Arveux, P, et al. Management of SPN in France: pathways for definitive diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodule: a multicentre study in 18 French districts. BMC Cancer 2008; 8:93.Google Scholar
4 Swensen, SJ, Silverstein, MD, Ilstrup, DM, et al. The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules: application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157(8):849–55.Google Scholar
5 Aberle, DR, Adams, AM, Berg, CD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011; 365(5):395–409.Google Scholar
6 Tuddenham, WJ. Glossary of terms for thoracic radiology: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984; 143(3):509–17.Google Scholar
7 Ost, D, Fein, AM, Feinsilver, SH. Clinical practice: the solitary pulmonary nodule. N Engl J Med 2003; 348(25):2535–42.Google Scholar
8 Kruger, S, Buck, AK, Blumstein, NM, et al. Use of integrated FDG PET/CT imaging in pulmonary carcinoid tumours. J Intern Med 2006; 260(6):545–50.Google Scholar
9 Hasegawa, M, Sone, S, Takashima, S, et al. Growth rate of small lung cancers detected on mass CT screening. Br J Radiol 2000, 73(876):1252–9.Google Scholar
10 Wahidi, MM, Govert, JA, Goudar, RK, et al. Evidence for the treatment of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer?: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 2007; 132(3 Suppl):94S–107S.Google Scholar
11 Webb, WR: Radiologic evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154(4):701–8.Google Scholar
12 Ost, DE, Gould, MK: Decision making in patients with pulmonary nodules. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 185(4):363–72.Google Scholar
13 Henschke, CI, Yankelevitz, DF, Naidich, DP, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans. Radiology 2004; 231(1):164–8.Google Scholar
14 Swensen, SJ, Jett, JR, Hartman, TE, et al. Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology 2003; 226(3):756–61.Google Scholar
15 Henschke, CI, McCauley, DI, Yankelevitz, DF, et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999; 354(9173):99–105.Google Scholar
16 MacMahon, H, Austin, JH, Gamsu, G, et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2005; 237(2):395–400.Google Scholar
17 Sonnenberg, E van, Casola, G, Ho, M, et al. Difficult thoracic lesions: CT-guided biopsy experience in 150 cases. Radiology 1988; 167(2):457–61.Google Scholar
18 Yankelevitz, DF, Henschke, CI, Koizumi, JH, et al. CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy of small solitary pulmonary nodules. Clin Imaging 1997; 21(2):107–10.Google Scholar
19 Yamagami, T, Iida, S, Kato, T, et al. Usefulness of new automated cutting needle for tissue-core biopsy of lung nodules under CT fluoroscopic guidance. Chest 2003; 124(1):147–54.Google Scholar
20 Poulou, LS, Tsagouli, P, Ziakas, PD, et al. Computed tomography-guided needle aspiration and biopsy of pulmonary lesions: a single-center experience in 1000 patients. Acta Radiol 2013.
21 Khan, KA, Zaidi, S, Swan, N, et al. The use of computerised tomography guided percutaneous fine needle aspiration in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules. Ir Med J 2012; 105(2):50–2.Google Scholar
22 Cao, JQ, Rodrigues, GB, Louie, AV, Zaric, GS: Systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of positron-emission tomography in staging of non–small-cell lung cancer and management of solitary pulmonary nodules. Clin Lung Cancer 2012; 13(3):161–70.Google Scholar
23 Gould, MK, Fletcher, J, Iannettoni, MD, et al. Evaluation of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer?: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 2007; 132(3 Suppl):108S–30S.Google Scholar
24 Yap, CS, Schiepers, C, Fishbein, MC, et al. FDG-PET imaging in lung cancer: how sensitive is it for bronchioloalveolar carcinoma? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002; 29(9):1166–73.Google Scholar
25 Kernstine, KH, Grannis, FW Jr, Rotter, AJ: Is there a role for PET in the evaluation of subcentimeter pulmonary nodules? Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 17(2):110–14.Google Scholar
26 Kozower, BD, Meyers, BF, Reed, CE, et al. Does positron emission tomography prevent nontherapeutic pulmonary resections for clinical stage IA lung cancer? Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85(4):1166–9; discussion 1169–70.Google Scholar
27 Seijo, LM, Torres, JP de, Lozano, MD, et al. Diagnostic yield of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy is highly dependent on the presence of a bronchus sign on CT imaging: results from a prospective study. Chest 2010; 138(6):1316–21.Google Scholar
28 Steinfort, DP, Khor, YH, Manser, RL, Irving, LB. Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 2011, 37(4):902–10.Google Scholar
29 Eberhardt, R, Morgan, RK, Ernst, A, et al. Comparison of suction catheter versus forceps biopsy for sampling of solitary pulmonary nodules guided by electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy. Respiration 2010; 79(1):54–60.Google Scholar
30 Gildea, TR, Mazzone, PJ, Karnak, D, et al. Electromagnetic navigation diagnostic bronchoscopy: a prospective study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174(9):982–9.Google Scholar
31 Makris, D, Scherpereel, A, Leroy, S, et al. Electromagnetic navigation diagnostic bronchoscopy for small peripheral lung lesions. Eur Respir J 2007; 29(6):1187–92.Google Scholar
32 Lamprecht, B, Porsch, P, Wegleitner, B, et al. Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB): increasing diagnostic yield. Respir Med 2012; 106(5):710–15.Google Scholar
33 Pearlstein, DP, Quinn, CC, Burtis, CC, et al. Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy performed by thoracic surgeons: one center's early success. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93(3):944–9; discussion 949–50.Google Scholar
34 Grogan, EL, Stukenborg, GJ, Nagji, AS, et al. Radiotracer-guided thoracoscopic resection is a cost-effective technique for the evaluation of subcentimeter pulmonary nodules. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86(3):934–40; discussion 934–40.Google Scholar
35 Grogan, EL, Jones, DR, Kozower, BD, et al. Identification of small lung nodules: technique of radiotracer-guided thoracoscopic biopsy. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85(2):S772–7.Google Scholar
36 Stiles, BM, Altes, TA, Jones, DR, et al. Clinical experience with radiotracer-guided thoracoscopic biopsy of small, indeterminate lung nodules. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82(4):1191–6; discussion 1196–7.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×