Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T10:16:48.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Robotics in thoracic surgery

from Section IV - Malignant conditions of the lung

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Marlies Keijzers
Affiliation:
Maastricht University Medical Center
Peyman Sardari Nia
Affiliation:
Maastricht University Medical Center
Jos G. Maessen
Affiliation:
Maastricht University Medical Center
Marco Scarci
Affiliation:
University College London Hospital
Aman Coonar
Affiliation:
Papworth Hospital
Tom Routledge
Affiliation:
Guy’s Hospital
Get access

Summary

Life is pretty simple: You do some stuff. Most fails. Some works. You do more of what works. If it works big, others quickly copy it. Then you do something else. The trick is the doing something else.

Leonardo da Vinci

Introduction

Minimally invasive thoracic surgery has been a hot topic in the past decades. With the development of robotic surgery, thoracic surgeons entered a newer and more exciting field. Much progress in minimally invasive surgery has been made, and robotic surgery is accepted as a potential diagnostic and treatment modality for thoracic diseases. In this chapter, we provide a comprehensive review of the history and the current data in robotic thoracic surgery.

History of minimally invasive thoracic surgery

The first thoracoscopic procedure was described 100 years ago. In 1910, Jacobeaus examined the pleural cavity with a cytoscope and was the first to perform a thoracoscopic procedure. In the late 1980s, minimally invasive surgical techniques were developed, and after the success of laparoscopic surgery, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) was established in the 1990s.

The first prospective randomized studies did not meet the high expectations and showed no significant benefit for the VATS approach compared with thoracotomy. More recent studies, however, show advantages such as reduced blood loss, less pain, lower inflammatory responses and an earlier return to work. Today, VATS plays a role in the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for benign and malignant tumours arising from the lung or adjacent organs. Although these studies show favourable results, there are still important limitations. The lack of three-dimensional vision, loss of wrist articulation and natural hand-eye coordination can reduce surgical precision.

Robotic surgical systems in the medical industry were developed to overcome these limitations. The first robotic system used for surgical procedures was the Puma 560. Kwoh et al. used the robot in 1985 to perform neurosurgical biopsies, and in 1988, Davies et al. performed a transurethral prostatectomy with the Puma 560. Robotic systems developed later, originated from telepresence machines that were developed for NASA.

The rationale of developing a robotic system was to use it in the US Army in war areas by ‘bringing the surgeon to the wounded soldier through telepresence’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Al-Mufarrej, F, Margolis, M, Tempesta, B, et al. From Jacobeaus to the da Vinci: thoracoscopic applications of the robot. Surgi Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2010 Feb; 20(1):1–9. PubMed PMID: 20173612. Epub 2010/02/23.eng.Google Scholar
2 Giudicelli, R, Thomas, P, Lonjon, T, et al. Video-assisted minithoracotomy versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy for performing lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1994 Sep; 58(3):712–7; discussion 7–8. PubMed PMID: 7944693. Epub 1994/09/01.eng.Google Scholar
3 Kirby, TJ, Mack, MJ, Landreneau, RJ, Rice, TW. Lobectomy–video-assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy: a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995 May; 109(5):997–1001; discussion 2. PubMed PMID: 7739262. Epub 1995/05/01.eng.Google Scholar
4 McKenna, RJ Jr, Houck, W, Fuller, CB. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2006 Feb; 81(2):421–5; discussion 5–6. PubMed PMID: 16427825. Epub 2006/01/24.eng.Google Scholar
5 Jurado, J, Javidfar, J, Newmark, A, et al. Minimally invasive thymectomy and open thymectomy: outcome analysis of 263 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2012 Sep; 94(3):974–81; discussion 81-2. PubMed PMID: 22748641. Epub 2012/07/04.eng.Google Scholar
6 Diodato, MD Jr, Damiano, RJ Jr. Robotic cardiac surgery: overview. Surg Clin North Am 2003 Dec; 83(6):1351–67, ix. PubMed PMID: 14712871. Epub 2004/01/10.eng.Google Scholar
7 Lanfranco, AR, Castellanos, AE, Desai, JP, Meyers, WC. Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 2004 Jan; 239(1):14–21. PubMed PMID: 14685095. Pubmed Central PMCID: 1356187. Epub 2003/12/20.eng.Google Scholar
8 Satava, RM. Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: a personal historical perspective. Surg Laparosc, Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002 Feb; 12(1):6–16. PubMed PMID: 12008765. Epub 2002/05/15.eng.Google Scholar
9 Friedman, DC, Lendvay, TS, Hannaford, B. Instrument failures for the da Vinci Surgical System: a Food and Drug Administration MAUDE Database Study. Surg Endosc 2012 Dec 14. PubMed PMID: 23242487.Google Scholar
10 Siegel, R, Naishadham, D, Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA 2012 Jan–Feb; 62(1):10–29. PubMed PMID: 22237781. Epub 2012/01/13.eng.Google Scholar
11 Boffa, DJ, Allen, MS, Grab, JD, et al. Data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: the surgical management of primary lung tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008 Feb; 135(2):247–54. PubMed PMID: 18242243. Epub 2008/02/05.eng.Google Scholar
12 Gopaldas, RR, Bakaeen, FG, Dao, TK, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open thoracotomy lobectomy in a cohort of 13,619 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2010 May; 89(5):1563–70. PubMed PMID: 20417778. Epub 2010/04/27.eng.Google Scholar
13 Melfi, FM, Menconi, GF, Mariani, AM, Angeletti, CA. Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery. Euro jo Cardio-thorac Surg 2002 May; 21(5):864–8. PubMed PMID: 12062276. Epub 2002/06/14.eng.Google Scholar
14 Park, BJ, Flores, RM, Rusch, VW. Robotic assistance for video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy: technique and initial results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006 Jan; 131(1):54–9. PubMed PMID: 16399294.Google Scholar
15 Louie, BE, Farivar, AS, Aye, RW, Vallieres, E. Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2012 May; 93(5):1598–604; discussion 604–5. PubMed PMID: 22440364. Epub 2012/03/24.eng.Google Scholar
16 Veronesi, G, Agoglia, BG, Melfi, F, et al. Experience with robotic lobectomy for lung cancer. Innovations (Phila) 2011 Nov; 6(6):355–60. PubMed PMID: 22436769.Google Scholar
17 Park, BJ, Melfi, F, Mussi, A, et al. Robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): long-term oncologic results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012 Feb; 143(2):383–9. PubMed PMID: 22104677.Google Scholar
18 Flores, RM, Park, BJ, Dycoco, J, et al. Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009 Jul; 138(1):11–8. PubMed PMID: 19577048.Google Scholar
19 Park, BJ, Flores, RM. Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin. 2008 Aug; 18(3):297–300, vii. PubMed PMID: 18831506. Epub 2008/10/04.eng.Google Scholar
20 Meyer, M, Gharagozloo, F, Tempesta, B, et al. The learning curve of robotic lobectomy. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2012 Dec; 8(4):448–52. PubMed PMID: 22991294.Google Scholar
21 Melfi, F, Ambrogi, MC, Lucchi, M, Mussi, A. Video robotic lobectomy. Available from: http://mmcts.oxfordjournals.org/content/2005/0628/mmcts.2004.000448.full.pdf+html.
22 Melfi, FM, Mussi, A. Robotically assisted lobectomy: learning curve and complications. Thorac Surg Clin 2008 Aug; 18(3):289–95, vi-vii. PubMed PMID: 18831505.Google Scholar
23 Gharagozloo, F, Margolis, M, Tempesta, B, et al. Robot-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: report of 100 consecutive cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2009 Aug; 88(2):380–4. PubMed PMID: 19632377.Google Scholar
24 Veronesi, G, Galetta, D, Maisonneuve, P, et al. Four-arm robotic lobectomy for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 Jul; 140(1):19–25. PubMed PMID: 20038475.Google Scholar
25 Augustin, F, Bodner, J, Wykypiel, H, et al. Initial experience with robotic lung lobectomy: report of two different approaches. Surg Endosc 2011 Jan; 25(1):108–13. PubMed PMID: 20559664.Google Scholar
26 Dylewski, MR, Ohaeto, AC, Pereira, JF. Pulmonary resection using a total endoscopic robotic video-assisted approach. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011 Spring; 23(1):36–42. PubMed PMID: 21807297.Google Scholar
27 Cerfolio, RJ, Bryant, AS, Skylizard, L, Minnich, DJ. Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011 Oct; 142(4):740–6. PubMed PMID: 21840547.Google Scholar
28 Jang, HJ, Lee, HS, Park, SY, Zo, JI. Comparison of the early robot-assisted lobectomy experience to video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: a single-institution case series matching study. Innovations (Phila) 2011 Sep; 6(5):305–10. PubMed PMID: 22436706.Google Scholar
29 Papatestas, AE, Genkins, G, Kornfeld, P, et al. Effects of thymectomy in myasthenia gravis. Ann Surg 1987 Jul; 206(1):79–88. PubMed PMID: 3606235. Pubmed Central PMCID: 1492935. Epub 1987/07/01.eng.Google Scholar
30 Keesey, JC. A history of treatments for myasthenia gravis. Semin Neurol 2004 Mar; 24(1):5–16. PubMed PMID: 15229787. Epub 2004/07/02.eng.Google Scholar
31 Hohnfeld, R., Wekerle, H. Reflections on the “intrathymic pathogenesis” of myasthenia gravis. J Neuroimmunol 2008; 201–2(0):21–7. English.Google Scholar
32 Diaz-Manera, J, Rojas-Garcia, R, Illa, I. Treatment strategies for myasthenia gravis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2009 Jun; 10(8):1329–42. PubMed PMID: 19445561. Epub 2009/05/19.eng.Google Scholar
33 Blalock, A, Mason, MF, Morgan, HJ, Riven, SS. Myasthenia gravis and tumors of the thymic region: report of a case in which the tumor was removed. Ann Surg 1939 Oct; 110(4):544–61. PubMed PMID: 17857470. Pubmed Central PMCID: 1391425. Epub 1939/10/01.eng.Google Scholar
34 Granone, P, Margaritora, S, Cesario, A, Galetta, D. Thymectomy in myasthenia gravis via video-assisted infra-mammary cosmetic incision. Eur Jo Cardio-thorac Surg 1999 Jun;15(6):861–3. PubMed PMID: 10431871. Epub 1999/08/04.eng.Google Scholar
35 Zielinski, M, Kuzdzal, J, Szlubowski, A, Soja, J. Transcervical-subxiphoid-videothoracoscopic ‘maximal’ thymectomy–operative technique and early results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Aug; 78(2):404–9; discussion 9–10. PubMed PMID: 15276485. Epub 2004/07/28.eng.Google Scholar
36 Zahid, I, Sharif, S, Routledge, T, Scarci, M. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or transsternal thymectomy in the treatment of myasthenia gravis? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011 Jan; 12(1):40–6. PubMed PMID: 20943831.Google Scholar
37 Freeman, RK, Ascioti, AJ, Woerkom, JM Van, et al. Long-term follow-up after robotic thymectomy for nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis. Ann Thorac Surg 2011 Sep; 92(3):1018–22; discussion 22–3. PubMed PMID: 21871293.Google Scholar
38 Rea, F, Marulli, G, Bortolotti, L, et al. Experience with the ‘da Vinci’ robotic system for thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis: report of 33 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2006 Feb; 81(2):455–9. PubMed PMID: 16427830.Google Scholar
39 Cakar, F, Werner, P, Augustin, F, et al. A comparison of outcomes after robotic open extended thymectomy for myasthenia gravis. Euro J Cardio-thorac Surg 2007 Mar; 31(3):501–4; discussion 4–5. PubMed PMID: 17224274.Google Scholar
40 Ruckert, JC, Swierzy, M, Ismail, M. Comparison of robotic and nonrobotic thoracoscopic thymectomy: a cohort study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011 Mar; 141(3):673–7. PubMed PMID: 21335125.Google Scholar
41 Wilkins, KB, Sheikh, E, Green, R, et al. Clinical and pathologic predictors of survival in patients with thymoma. Ann Surg 1999 Oct; 230(4):562–72; discussion 72–4. PubMed PMID: 10522726. Pubmed Central PMCID: 1420905.Google Scholar
42 Odaka, M, Akiba, T, Yabe, M, et al. Unilateral thoracoscopic subtotal thymectomy for the treatment of stage I and II thymoma. Eur J Cardio-thora sur 2010 Apr; 37(4):824–6. PubMed PMID: 19913436.Google Scholar
43 Marulli, G, Rea, F, Melfi, F, et al. Robot-aided thoracoscopic thymectomy for early-stage thymoma: a multicenter European study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012 Nov; 144(5):1125–32. PubMed PMID: 22944082.Google Scholar
44 Mussi, A, Fanucchi, O, Davini, F, et al. Robotic extended thymectomy for early-stage thymomas. Euro J Cardio-thorac Surg 2012 Apr; 41(4):e43–6; discussion e7. PubMed PMID: 22368189.Google Scholar
45 Marulli, G, Rea, F, Melfi, F, et al. Robot-aided thoracoscopic thymectomy for early-stage thymoma: a multicenter European study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012 Nov; 144(5):1125–30. PubMed PMID: 22944082.Google Scholar
46 Keijzers, M, Dingemans, AM, Blaauwgeers, H, et al. Eight years’ experience with robotic thymectomy for thymomas. Surg Endosc 2014 Apr; 28(4):1202–8.Google Scholar
47 Schuchert, MJ, Luketich, JD, Landreneau, RJ, et al. Minimally invasive esophagomyotomy in 200 consecutive patients: factors influencing postoperative outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2008 May; 85(5):1729–34. PubMed PMID: 18442574.Google Scholar
48 Shaligram, A, Unnirevi, J, Simorov, A, et al. How does the robot affect outcomes? A retrospective review of open, laparoscopic, and robotic Heller myotomy for achalasia. Surg Endosc 2012 Apr; 26(4):1047–50. PubMed PMID: 22038167.Google Scholar
49 Portale, G, Hagen, JA, Peters, JH, et al. Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2006 Apr; 202(4):588–96; discussion 96–8. PubMed PMID: 16571425.Google Scholar
50 Kim, T, Grobmyer, SR, Smith, R, et al. Esophageal cancer–the five year survivors. J Surg Oncol 2011 Feb; 103(2):179–83. PubMed PMID: 21259254.Google Scholar
51 Dunn, DH, Johnson, EM, Morphew, JA, et al. Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience. Dis Esophagus 2012 Mar 6. PubMed PMID: 22394116.
52 Weksler, B, Sharma, P, Moudgill, N, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 2012 Jul; 25(5):403–9. PubMed PMID: 21899652.Google Scholar
53 Sluis, PC van der, Ruurda, JP, Horst, S van der, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial). Trials 2012 Nov 30; 13(1):230. PubMed PMID: 23199187.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×