Abrams, J., O’Connor, J., & Giles, H. (2001). Identity and intergroup communication. In Gudykunst, W. B. & Mody, B. (Eds.), 3rd Handbook of intercultural communication (pp. 225–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

American Psychological Association. (2014). Guidelines for psychological practice with older adults. American Psychologist, 69, 34–65.Google Scholar

Barker, V., Giles, H., & Harwood, J. (2004). Inter- and intragroup perspectives on intergenerational communication. In Nussbaum, J. F. & Coupland, J. (Eds.), Handbook of communication and aging research (pp. 139–166). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bilous, F. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1988). Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviors of same- and mixed-gender dyads. Language and Communication, 8, 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boggs, C., & Giles, H. (1999). “The canary in the cage”: The nonaccommodation cycle in the gendered workplace. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22, 223–245.Google Scholar

Bourhis, R. Y. (1979). Language in ethnic interaction: A social psychological approach. In Giles, H. & Saint-Jacques, B. (Eds.), Language and ethnic relations (pp. 117–141). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Bourhis, R. Y. (1984). Cross-cultural communication in Montreal: Two field studies since Bill 101. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 33–47.Google Scholar

Bourhis, R. Y., & Giles, H. (1977). The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In Giles, H. (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 119–135). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bourhis, R. Y., Giles, H., Leyens, J.-P., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Psycholinguistic distinctiveness: Language divergence in Belgium. In Giles, H. and St. Clair, R. N. (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 158–185). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, D. O. (1990). From majority to minority: An analysis of cultural change from ablebodied to disabled. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 14, 465–483.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, D. O., & Eckstein, N. J. (2003). How people with disabilities communicatively manage assistance: Helping as instrumental social support. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 1–26.Google Scholar

Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255–343.Google Scholar

Burt, S. M. (1994). Code choice in intercultural conversation: Speech accommodation theory and pragmatics. Pragmatics, 4, 535–559.Google Scholar

Cai, D., Giles, H., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Elderly perceptions of communication with older and younger adults in China: Implications for mental health. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 32–51.Google Scholar

Cargile, A. C., & Giles, H. (1996). Intercultural communication training: Review, critique, and a new theoretical framework. In Burleson, B. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 19, 385–423.Google Scholar

Colaner, C. W., Soliz, J., & Nelson, L. R. (2014). Communicatively managing religious identity difference in parent-child relationships: The role of accommodative and nonaccommodative communication. Journal of Family Communication, 14, 310–327.Google Scholar

Coupland, J., Coupland, N. Giles, H., & Henwood, K. (1988). Accommodating the elderly: Invoking and extending a theory. Language in Society, 17, 1–41.Google Scholar

Coupland, N., Coupland, J., & Giles, H. (1991). Language, society, and the elderly. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Coupland, N., Wiemann, J. M., & Giles, H. (1991). Talk as “problem” and communication as “miscommunication”: An integrative analysis. In Coupland, N., Giles, H., & Wiemann, J. M. (Eds.), “Miscommunication” and problematic talk (pp. 1–17). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers’ warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 701–718.Google Scholar

Deprez, K., & Persoons, Y. (1984). On the ethnolinguistic identity of Flemish high school students in Bruseels. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 3, 273–296.Google Scholar

DiVerniero, R. A. (2013). Children of divorce and their nonresidential parent’s family: Examining perceptions of communication accommodation. Journal of Family Communication, 13, 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dragojevic, M., & Giles, H. (2014). Language and interpersonal communication: Their intergroup dynamics. In Berger, C. R. (Ed.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 29–51). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duggan, A. P., Robinson, J. D., & Thompson, T. L. (2012). Understanding disability as an intergroup encounter. In Giles, H. (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 250–263). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Eckes, T. (2002). Paternalistic and envious gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the stereotype content model. Sex Roles, 47, 99–114.Google Scholar

Ehala, M. (2015). Ethnolinguistic vitality. In Tracy, K. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 553–559). New York, NY: Wiley/Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ehala, M., Giles, H., & Harwood, J. (2016). Conceptualizing the diversity of intergroup settings: The Web Model. In Giles, H. & Maass, A. (Eds.), Advances in intergroup communication (pp. 301–316). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Ehrlich, S., Meyerhoff, M., & Holmes, J. (2014). The handbook of language, gender and sexuality (2nd edn.). Chichester, UK: Wiley/Blackwell.Google Scholar

Emry, R., & Wiseman, R. L. (1987). An intercultural understanding of ablebodied and disabled person’s communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 11, 7–27.Google Scholar

Fowler, C. A., & Soliz, J. (2010). Responses of young adult grandchildren to grandparent’s painful self-disclosures. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 75–100.Google Scholar

Fox, S., & Giles, H. (1993). Accommodating intergenerational contact: A critique and theoretical model. Journal of Aging Studies, 7, 423–451.Google Scholar

Fox, S., & Giles, H. (1996a). “Let the wheelchair through!”: An intergroup approach to interability communication. In Robinson, W. P. (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 215–248). Oxford, UK: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Fox, S., & Giles, H. (1996b). Interability communication: Evaluating patronizing encounters. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, S., Giles, H., Orbe, M., & Bourhis, R. Y. (2000). Interability communication: Theoretical perspectives. In Braithwaite, D. & Thompson, T. (Eds.), Handbook of communication and disability (pp. 193–222). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gabriel, U., & Gygax, P. (2016). Gender and linguistic sexism. In Giles, H. & Maass, A. (Eds.), Advances in intergroup communication (pp. 177–192). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Gallois, C. (2003). Reconciliation through communication in intercultural encounters: Potential or peril? Journal of Communication, 53, 5–15.Google Scholar

Gallois, C., Franklyn-Stokes, A., Giles, H., & Coupland, N. (1988). Communication accommodation theory in intercultural encounters. In Kim, Y. Y. & Gudykunst, W. B. (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 157–185), Newbury Park, CA, Sage.Google Scholar

Gallois, C., & Giles, H. (1998). Accommodating mutual influence. In Palmer, M. & Barnett, G. A. (Eds.), Mutual influence in interpersonal communication: Theory and research in cognition, affect, and behavior (pp. 135–162). New York, NY: Ablex.Google Scholar

Gallois, C., Giles, H., Jones, E., Cargile, A., & Ota, H. (1995). Communication Accommodation Theory: Elaborations and extensions. In Wiseman, R. (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (Intercultural and international communication annual (pp. 115–147). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Gasiorek, J., Van de Poel, K., & Blockmans, I. (2015). What do you do when you can’t accommodate? Managing and evaluating problematic interactions in a multilingual medical environment. Language and Communication, 41, 84–88.Google Scholar

Giles, H. (Ed.). (1977). Language, ethnicity, and intergroup relations. London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Giles, H. (1978). Linguistic differentiation between ethnic groups. In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 361–393). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Giles, H. (Ed.). (2012). The handbook of intergroup communication. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Giles, H., Bonilla, D., & Speer, R. B. (2013). Acculturating intergroup vitalities, accommodation and contact. In Jackson, J. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of intercultural communication (pp. 244–259). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Giles, H., Bourhis, R. Y., & Taylor, D. M. (1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In Giles, H. (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations. London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Giles, H., & Byrne, J. L. (1982). An intergroup model of second language acquisition. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 3, 17–40.Google Scholar

Giles, H., Coupland, N., Coupland, J., Williams, A., & Nussbaum, J. F. (1991–1992). Intergenerational talk and communication with older people. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 34, 271–297.Google Scholar

Giles, H., & Gasiorek, J. (2011). Intergenerational communication practices. In Schaie, K. W. & Willis, S. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (7th edn., pp. 231–245). New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Giles, H., & Gasiorek, J. (2013). Parameters of nonaccommodation: Refining and elaborating communication accommodation theory. In Forgas, J., László, J., & Orsolya, V. (Eds.), Social cognition and communication (pp. 155–172). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Giles, H., & Giles, J. L. (2012). Ingroups and outgroups communicating. In Kurylo, A. (Ed.), Inter/cultural communication: Representation and construction of culture in everyday interaction (pp. 141–162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Giles, H., & Hewstone, M. (1982). Cognitive structures, speech and social situations. Language Sciences, 5, 187–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giles, H., & Johnson, P. (1981). The role of language in ethnic group relations. In Turner, J. C. and Giles, H. (Eds.), Intergroup behavior (pp. 199–243). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Giles, H., & Johnson, P. (1987). Ethnolinguistic identity theory: A social psychological approach to language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 68, 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giles, H., & Maass, A. (Eds.). (2016). Advances in intergroup communication. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Giles, H., Ota, H., & Foley, M. (2013). Tourism: An intergroup communication model with Russian inflections. Russian Journal of Communication, 5, 229–243.Google Scholar

Giles, H., & Rakić, T. (2014). Language attitudes: Social determinants and consequences of language variation. In Holtgraves, T. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 11–26). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Giles, H., Taylor, D. M., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1973). Towards a theory of interpersonal accommodation through speech: Some Canadian data. Language in Society, 2, 177–192.Google Scholar

Giles, H., & Watson, B. M. (Eds.). (2013). The social meanings of language, dialect and accent. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Gogonas, N., & Michail, D. (2015). Ethnolinguistic vitality, language use and social integration amongst Albanian immigrants in Greece. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36, 198–211.Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. J., & Hymes, D. H. (Eds.). (1986). Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hagestad, G. O., & Uhlenberg, P. (2005). The social separation of old and young: A root of ageism. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 343–60.Google Scholar

Hajek, C. (2015). Gay men in early midlife: Intergenerational accommodation for approval, reclaimed status, and distinctiveness. Language and Communication, 41, 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamers, J. F., & Blanc, M. H. A. (2000). Bilinguals and bilingualism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harwood, J., & Giles, H. (1996). Reactions to older people being patronized: The roles of response strategies and attributed thoughts. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harwood, J., Giles, H., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1994). The genesis of vitality theory: Historical patterns and discoursal dimensions. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 108, 168–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harwood, J., Giles, H., & Palomares, N. A. (2005). Intergroup theory and communication processes. In Harwood, J. & Giles, H. (Eds.), Intergroup communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 1–17). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Harwood, J., Giles, H., & Ryan, E. B. (1995). Aging, communication, and intergroup theory: Social identity and intergenerational communication. In Nussbaum, J. F. & Coupland, J. (Eds.), Handbook of communication and aging research (pp. 133–159). Erlbaum, NJ: Hillsdale.Google Scholar

Harwood, J., Hewstone, M., Paolini, S., & Voci, A. (2005). Grandparent-grandchild contact and attitudes towards older adults: Moderator and mediator effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 393–406.Google Scholar

Harwood, J., Raman, P., & Hewstone, M. (2006). Communicative predictors of group salience in the intergenerational setting. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 181–200.Google Scholar

Hehman, J. A., & Bugental, D. B. (2015). Responses to patronizing communication and factors that attenuate those responses. Psychology and Aging, 30, 552–560.Google Scholar

Hewstone, M., & Giles, H. (1986). Social groups and social stereotypes in intergroup communication: Review and model of intergroup communication breakdown. In Gudykunst, W. B. (Ed.), Intergroup communication (pp. 10–26). London, UK: Arnold.Google Scholar

Hogg, M. A. (1985). Masculine and feminine speech in dyads and groups: A study of speech style and gender salience. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4, 99–112.Google Scholar

Hummert, M. L. (2011). Age stereotypes and aging. In Schaie, K. W. & Willis, S. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (7th edn., pp. 249–262). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hummert, M. L. (2012). Challenges and opportunities for communication between age groups. In Giles, H. (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 223–236). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hummert, M. L., Garstka, T. A., Ryan, E. B., & Bonnesen, J. L. (2004). The role of age stereotypes in interpersonal communication. In Nussbaum, J. F. & Coupland, J. (Eds.), Handbook of communication and aging research (pp. 91–114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Jones, E., Gallois, C., Barker, M., & Callan, V. J. (1994). Evaluations of interactions between students and academic staff: Influence of communication accommodation, ethnic group, and status. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 158–191.Google Scholar

Jones, E., Gallois, C., Callan, V. J., & Barker, M. (1999). Strategies of accommodation: Development of a coding system for conversational interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 123–152.Google Scholar

Keaton, S., McCann, R. M., & Giles, H. (in press). The role of communication perceptions in the mental health of older adults: Views from Thailand and the United States. Health communication.Google Scholar

Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media and Society, 4, 355–383.Google Scholar

Kite, M. E., Stockdale, G. D., Whitley, B. E., & Johnson, B. T. (2005). Attitudes toward younger and older adults: An updated meta-analytical review. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 241–266.Google Scholar

Maltz, D. J., & Borker, R. A. (1982). A cultural approach to male–female miscommunication. In Gumperz, J. J. (Ed.), Language and social identity (pp. 196–216). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McCann, R. M., Giles, H., & Ota, H. (in press). Aging and communication across cultures. In L. Chen (Ed.), The handbook of intercultural communication. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Mulac, A. (1989). Men’s and women’s talk in same-gender and mixed-gender dyads: Power or polemic? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 8, 249–270.Google Scholar

Mulac, A., Bradac, J. J., Palomares, N. A., Giles, H. (2009). Exploring subjectivity in the gender-linked language effect: A process model. In Maegaard, M., Gregersen, F., Quist, P., Jørgensen, J. N. (Eds.), Language attitudes, standardization and language change (pp. 89–103). Oslo, Norway: Novus.Google Scholar

Mulac, A., Giles, H., Bradac, J. J., & Palomares, N. A. (2013). The gender-linked language effect: An empirical test of a general process model. Language Sciences, 38, 22–31.Google Scholar

Mulac, A., Studley, L. B., Wiemann, J. M., & Bradac, J. J. (1987). Male/female gaze in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads gender-linked differences and mutual influence. Human Communication Research, 13, 323–343.Google Scholar

Mulac, A., Wiemann, J. M., Widenmann, S. J., & Gibson, T. W. (1988). Male/female language differences and effects in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads: The gender-linked language effect. Communication Monographs, 55, 315–335.Google Scholar

Noels, K. A., Giles, H., Cai, D., & Turay, L. (1999). Intergenerational communication and health in the United States and the People’s Republic of China. South Pacific Journal of Psychology, 10, 120–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noels, K. A., Giles, H., Gallois, C., & Ng, S. H. (2001). Intergenerational communication and health across the Pacific Rim. In Hummert, M. L. & Nussbaum, J. F. (Eds.), Communication, aging, and health: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 249–278). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Palomares, N. A. (2004). Gender schematicity, gender identity salience, and gender-linked language use. Human Communication Research, 30, 566–588.Google Scholar

Palomares, N. A. (2008). Explaining gender-based language use: Effects of gender identity salience on references to emotion and tentative language in intra- and intergroup contexts. Human Communication Research, 34, 263–286.Google Scholar

Palomares, N. A. (2009). Women are sort of more tentative than men, aren’t they? How men and women use tentative language differently, similarly, and counter-stereotypically as a function of gender salience. Communication Research, 36, 538–560.Google Scholar

Palomares, N. A. (2012). Gender and intergroup communication. In Giles, H. (Ed.). The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 197–210). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pitts, M. J., & Harwood, J. (2015). Communication accommodation competence: The nature and nurture of accommodation resources across the lifespan. Language and Communication, 41, 89–99.Google Scholar

Poulin-Dubois, D., Serbin, L. A., Kenyon, B., & Derbyshire, A. (1994). Infants’ intermodal knowledge about gender. Developmental Psychology, 30, 436–442.Google Scholar

Reid, S. A., Keerie, N., & Palomares, N. A. (2003). Language, gender salience, and social influence. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22, 210–233.Google Scholar

Rittenour, C. E., & Soliz, J. (2009). Communicative and relational dimensions of shared family identity and relational intentions in mother-in-law/daughter-in-law relationships: Developing a conceptual model for mother-in-law/daughter-in-law research. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 67–90.Google Scholar

Ryan, E. B., Bajorek, S., Beaman, A., & Anas, A. P. (2005). “I just want you to know that ‘them’ is me”: Intergroup perspectives on communication and disability. In Harwood, J. & Giles, H. (Eds.), Intergroup communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 117–39). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Ryan, E. B., Boich, L. H., & Klemenchuk-Politeski, L. (1984, May). Patronizing behavior in health care: Is ignoring the older accented speaker excusable. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Communication, Aging, and Health, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar

Ryan, E. B., Giles, H., Bartolucci, G., & Henwood, K. (1986). Psycholinguistics and social psychological components of communication be and with the elderly. Language and Communication, 6, 1–24.Google Scholar

Ryan, E. B., Meredith, S. D., MacLean, M. J., & Orange, J. B. (1995). Changing the way we talk with elders: Promoting health using the communication enhancement model. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 41, 89–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sachdev, I., Giles, H., Pauwels, A. (2012). Bilingual speech accommodation. In Bhatia, T. K. (Ed.), Handbook of bilingualism. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sandilands, M. L., & Fleury, N. C. (1979). Unilinguals in des milieu bilingues: An analysis of attributions. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 11, 164–168.Google Scholar

Shepard, C., Giles, H., & Le Poire, B. A. (2001). Communication accommodation theory. In Robinson, W. P. & Giles, H. (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 33–56). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Simard, L., Taylor, D. M., & Giles, H. (1976). Attribution processes and interpersonal accommodation in a bilingual setting. Language and Speech, 19, 374–387.Google Scholar

Soliz, J., & Harwood, J. (2006). Shared family identity, age salience, and intergroup contact: Investigation of the grandparent-grandchild relationship. Communication Monographs, 73, 87–107.Google Scholar

Soliz, J., & Lin, M.-C. (2013). Friends and allies: Communication in grandparent-grandchild relationships. In Floyd, K. & Mormon, M. (Eds.) Widening the family circle: New research on family communication (2nd edn., pp. 35–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Soliz, J., Ribarsky, E., Harrigan, M. M., & Tye-Williams, S. (2010). Family communication with gay and lesbian family members: Implications for relational satisfaction and outgroup attitudes. Communication Quarterly, 58, 77–95.Google Scholar

Soliz, J., & Rittenour, C. E. (2012). Family as an intergroup arena. In Giles, H. (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 331–343). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Soliz, J., Thorson, A., & Rittenour, C. E. (2009). Communicative correlates of satisfaction, family identity, and group salience in multiracial/ethnic families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 819–832.Google Scholar

Speer, R. B., Giles, H., & Denes, A. (2013). Investigating stepparent-stepchild interactions: The role of communication accommodation. Journal of Family Communication, 13, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steffens, M. C., & Viladot, M. A. (2015). Gender at work: A social-psychological perspective. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96–102.Google Scholar

Thomson, R., Murachver, T., & Green, J. (2001). Where is gender in gendered language? Psychological Science, 12, 171–175.Google Scholar

Williams, A., & Coupland, N. (1998). Epilogue: The socio‐political framing of aging and communication research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 139–154.Google Scholar

Williams, A., & Giles, H. (1996). Intergenerational conversations young adults’ retrospective accounts. Human Communication Research, 23, 220–250.Google Scholar

Williams, J. A., & Giles, H. (1978). The changing status of women in society: An intergroup perspective. In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 431–436). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Ye, Z., & Palomares, N. A. (2013). Effects of conversation partners’ gender-language consistency on references to emotion, tentative language, and gender salience. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 433–451.Google Scholar

Ytsma, J., & Giles, H. (1997). Reactions to patronizing talk: Some Dutch data. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 1, 259–268.Google Scholar

Zell, E., Krizan, Z., & Teeter, S. R. (2015). Evaluating gender similarities and differences using metasynthesis. American Psychologist, 70, 10–20.Google Scholar