Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T05:17:33.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Theoretical Perspectives on Interpersonal Adjustments in Language and Communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Howard Giles
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Communication Accommodation Theory
Negotiating Personal Relationships and Social Identities across Contexts
, pp. 13 - 35
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Argyle, M. (1969). Social interaction. London, UK: Methuen.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A. (2006). What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36 , 147168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54 , 462479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 , 230244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beebe, L. M. (1981). Social and situational factors affecting the communicative strategy of dialect code-switching. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 32 , 139149.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13 , 145204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A. (1991). Audience accommodation in the mass media. In Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation (pp. 69102). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, C. R., & Battista, P. D. (1993). Communication failure and plan adaptation: If at first you don’t succeed, say it louder and slower. Communication Monographs, 60 , 220238.Google Scholar
Berger, C. R. (1997). Planning strategic interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bullock, B. E., & Toribo, A. J. (2009). Themes in the study of code-switching. In Bullock, B. E. & Toribo, A. J., The Cambridge handbook of linguistic code-switching (pp. 117). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, J. K., & Ebesu Hubbard, A. S. (2005). Cross-cultural and intercultural applications of expectancy violations theory and interaction adaption theory. In Gudykunst, W. B. (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 149171). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Burgoon, J., Dunbar, N. E., & Giles, H. (in press). Interaction coordination and adaptation. In A. Vinciarelli, M. Pantic, N. Magnenat-Thalmann, & J. Burgoon (Eds.), Social signal processing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burgoon, J. K., Stern, L. A., & Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappella, J. N., & Greene, J. O. (1982). A discrepancy-arousal theory explanation of mutual influence in expressive behavior for adult and infant-adult interaction. Communication Monographs, 49 , 89114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappella, J. N., & Greene, J. O. (1984). The effects of distance and individual differences in arousability on nonverbal involvement: A test of discrepancy-arousal theory. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8 , 259286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartrand, T. L., & van Baaren, R. (2009). Human mimicry. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 219274). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (2006). Social actions, social commitments. In Enfield, N. J. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 126150). Oxford, UK: Berg.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. A. (1991). Grounding in communication. In Resnick, L.B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 6281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. A., & Delia, J. G. (1977). Cognitive complexity, social perspective-taking, and functional persuasive skills in second- to ninth-grade children. Human Communication Research, 3, 128134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. (2007). Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N., Coupland, J., Giles, H., & Henwood, K. (1988). Accommodating the elderly: Invoking and extending a theory. Language in Society, 17 , 141.Google Scholar
Delia, J. G. (1977). Constructivism and the study of human communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 63, 6683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, D. S., Kramer, M. W., Klatzke, S. R., & Rogers, T. K. (2009). Language convergence and meaning divergence: A meaning centered communication theory. Communication Monographs, 76, 2046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dragojevic, M., Gasiorek, J., & Giles, H. (2016). Communication accommodation theory. In Berger, C. R. & Roloff, M. L. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (Vol. 1, pp. 176196). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dragojevic, M., & Giles, H. (2014). Language and interpersonal communication: Their intergroup dynamics. In Berger, C. R. (Ed.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 2951). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dragojevic, M., Giles, H., & Watson, B. M. (2013). Language ideologies and language attitudes. In Giles, H. & Watson, B. M. (Eds.), The social meanings of language, dialect and accent: International perspectives on speech styles. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Elbaum, B. (2007). Effects of an oral testing accommodation on the mathematics performance of secondary students with and without learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 218229.Google Scholar
Enfied, N. J. (2006). Social consequences of common ground. In Enfield, N. J. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 399430). Oxford, UK: Berg.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2006). Introduction: Human sociality as a new interdisciplinary field. In Enfield, N. J. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 135). Oxford, UK: Berg.Google Scholar
Gallois, C., & Giles, H. (1998). Accommodating mutual influence in intergroup encounters. In Palmer, M. & Barnett, G. A. (Eds.), Mutual influence in interpersonal communication: Theory and research in cognition, affect, and behavior (pp. 135162). New York, NY: Ablex.Google Scholar
Gallois, C., Ogay, T., & Giles, H. (2005). Communication accommodation theory. In Gudykunst, W. B. (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 121148). Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gardner-Chloros, P. (2009a). Code-switching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner-Chloros, P. (2009b). Sociolinguistic factors in code-switching. In Bullock, B. E. & Toribo, A. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic code-switching (pp. 97113). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giles, H. (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15 , 87105.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19 , 283307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ireland, M. E., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language style matching in writing: Synchrony in essays, correspondence, and poetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 549571.Google Scholar
Maxwell, G. M., & Pringle, J. K. (1981). Towards the measurement of postural congruence in social interaction. New Zealand Psychologist, 10, 4554.Google Scholar
Niederhoffer, K.G. & Pennebaker, J.W. (2002). Linguistic style matching in social interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21 , 337360.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231259.Google Scholar
Páez, D., Rimé, B., Basabe, N., Wlodarczyk, A., & Zumeta, L. (2015). Psychosocial effects of perceived emotional synchrony in collective gatherings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108 , 711729.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. & Cooke, M. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (2001). Multilingual communication. In Robinson, W. P. & Giles, H. (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 407428). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In Psathas, G. (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 1522). New York, NY: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50 , 696735.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In Giglioli, P. P. (Ed.), Language and social context (pp. 95135). Middlesex, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In Fox, B. (Ed.), Studies in anaphora (pp. 437485). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Scotton, C. M., & Ury, W. (1977). Bilingual strategies: The social functions of code-switching. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 13, 520.Google Scholar
Soliz, J., & Giles, H. (2014). Relational and identity processes in communication: A contextual and meta-analytical review of Communication Accommodation Theory. In Cohen, E. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 38 (pp. 106143). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Street, R. L., & Giles, H. (1982). Speech accommodation theory: A social cognitive approach to language and speech behavior. In Roloff, M. E. & Berger, C. R. (Eds.), Social cognition and communication (pp. 3353). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Thakerar, J. N., Giles, H., & Cheshire, J. (1982). Psychological and linguistic parameters of speech accommodation theory. In Fraser, C. & Scherer, K. R. (Eds.), Advances in the social psychology of language (pp. 205255). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tognoli, J. (1969). Response matching in interpersonal information exchange. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8 , 116123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toma, C. L. (2014). Towards conceptual convergence: An examination of interpersonal adaptation. Communication Quarterly, 62 , 155178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, C. H. (2008). Expectancy violations theory and interaction adaptation theory. In Baxter, L. A. & Braithwaite, D. O. (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (pp. 189202). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Yabar, Y., Johnston, L., Miles, L., & Peace, V. (2006). Implicit behavioral mimicry: Investigating the impact of group membership. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30 , 97113.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×