Acosta, J. C., & Ward, N. G. (2011). Achieving rapport with turn-by-turn, user-responsive emotional coloring. Speech Communication, 53, 1137–1148.Google Scholar

Aritz, J., & Walker, R. C. (2010). Cognitive organization and identity maintenance in multicultural teams. Journal of Business Communication, 47, 20–41.Google Scholar

Aune, R. K., & Kikuchi, T. (1993). Effects of language intensity similarity on perceptions of credibility, relational attributions, and persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 224–238.Google Scholar

Barker, V., Giles, H., Hajek, C., Ota, H., Noels, K., Lim, T., Somera, L. (2008). Police-civilian interaction, compliance, accommodation, and trust in an intergroup context: International data. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 1, 93–112.Google Scholar

Bayard, D. (1995). Kiwitalk: Sociolinguistics in New Zealand society. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore.Google Scholar

Beckner, C., Ràcz, P., Hay, J., Brandstetter, J., & Bartneck, C. (2016). Participants conform to humans but not to humanoid robots in an English past tense formation task. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35, 158–179.Google Scholar

Beebe, L. M., & Giles, H. (1984). Speech-accommodation theories: A discussion in terms of second-language acquisition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 5–32.Google Scholar

Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2008). Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 593–607.Google Scholar

Bigham, D. S. (2010). Mechanisms of accommodation among emerging adults in a university setting. Journal of English Linguistics, 38, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bilous, F. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1988). Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviors of same- and mixed-gender dyads. Language and Communication, 8, 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourhis, R. Y. (1984). Cross-cultural communication in Montreal: Two field studies since Bill 101. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 33–47.Google Scholar

Bourhis, R. Y., & Giles, H. (1977). The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In Giles, H. (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 119–135). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bourhis, R. Y., Giles, H., Leyens, J.-P., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Psycholinguistic distinctiveness: Language divergence in Belgium. In Giles, H. & Clair, R. N. St. (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 158–185). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bradac, J. J., Mulac, A., & House, A. (1988). Lexical diversity and magnitude of convergent versus divergent style-shifting: Perceptual and evaluative consequences. Language and Communication, 8, 213–228.Google Scholar

Brown, B. L., Giles, H., & Thakerar, J. N. (1985). Speaker evaluations as a function of speech rate, accent and context. Language and Communication, 5, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buller, D. B., LePoire, B. A., Aune, R. K., & Eloy, S. V. (1992). Social perceptions as mediators of the effect of speech rate similarity on compliance. Human Communication Research, 19, 286–311.Google Scholar

Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Coulston, R., Oviatt, S., & Darves, C. (2002). Amplitude convergence in children’s conversational speech with animated personas. In Hansen, J. & Pellom, B. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (Vol. 4, pp. 2689–2692). Denver, CO: Casual Prod. Ltd.Google Scholar

Coupland, N., Coupland, J., Giles, H., & Henwood, K. (1988). Accommodating the elderly: Invoking and extending a theory. Language in Society, 17, 1–41.Google Scholar

Crook, C. W., & Booth, R. (1997). Building rapport in electronic mail using accommodation theory. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 62, 4–13.Google Scholar

Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Gamon, M, & Dumais, S. (2011). Mark my words!: Linguistic style accommodation in social media. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 745–754). New York, NY: ACM Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darves, C., & Oviatt, S. (2002). Adaptation of users’ spoken dialogue patterns in a conversational interface. In Hansen, J. & Pellom, B. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (Vol. 1, pp. 561–564). Denver, CO: Casual Prod. Ltd.Google Scholar

Deprez, K., & Persoons, K. (1984). On the identity of Flemish high school students in Brussels. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 51, 945–959.Google Scholar

Dixon, J. A., & Mahoney, B. (2004). The effect of accent evaluation and evidence on a suspect’s perceived guilt and criminality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dixon, J. A., Mahoney, B., & Cocks, R. (2002). Accents of guilt? Effects of regional accent, race, and crime type on attributions of guilt. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 162–168.Google Scholar

Dixon, J. A., Tredoux, C. G., Durrheim, , & Foster, D. H. (1994). The role of speech accommodation and crime type in attribution of guilt. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 465–473.Google Scholar

Dorjee, T., Giles, H., & Barker, V. (2011). Diasporic Communication: Cultural deviance and accommodation among Tibetan exiles in India. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 32, 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dragojevic, M., Gasiorek, J., & Giles, H. (2016). Communication accommodation theory. In Berger, C. R. & Roloff, M. E. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (Vol. 1, pp. 176–196). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Dragojevic, M., & Giles, H. (2014). Language and interpersonal communication: Their intergroup dynamics. In Berger, C. R. (Ed.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 29–51). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Dragojevic, M., Giles, H., & Watson, B. (2013). Language ideologies and attitudes: A dynamic foundational framework. In Giles, H. & Watson, B. M. (Eds.), The social meanings of accents and dialect: An international perspective on speech style (pp. 1–25). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Galinsky, A. D., Ku, G., & Wang, C. (2005). Perspective-taking: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallois, C., & Callan, V. J. (1991). Interethnic accommodation: The role of norms. In Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 245–269). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gallois, C., & Giles, H. (1998). Accommodating mutual influence. In Palmer, M. & Barnett, G.A. (Eds.), Mutual influence in interpersonal communication: Theory and research in cognition, affect, and behavior (pp. 135–162). New York, NY: Ablex.Google Scholar

Gallois, C., Ogay, T., & Giles, H. (2005). Communication accommodation theory: A look back and a look ahead. In Gudykunst, W. (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 121–148). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Gasiorek, J. (2013). “I was impolite to her because that’s how she was to me”: Perceptions of motive and young adults’ communicative responses to underaccommodation. Western Journal of Communication, 77, 604–624.Google Scholar

Gasiorek, J., & Giles, H. (2012). Effects of inferred motive on evaluations of nonaccommodative communication. Human Communication Research, 38, 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gasiorek, J., Van de Poels, K., & Blockmans, I. (2015). What do you do when you can’t accommodate? Managing and evaluating problematic interactions in a multilingual medical environment. Language and Communication, 41, 84–88.Google Scholar

Genesee, F., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1982) The social psychological significance of code- switching in cross-cultural communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1, 1–28.Google Scholar

Giles, H. (1980). Accommodation theory: Some new directions. In de Silva, S. (Ed.), Aspects of linguistic behavior (pp. 105–136). York, UK: York University Press.Google Scholar

Giles, H., Bourhis, R. Y., & Taylor, D. M. (1977). Toward a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In Giles, H. (Ed.), Language and intergroup relations (pp. 307–348). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation (pp. 1–68). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giles, H., & Edwards, J. R. (2010). Attitudes to language: Past, present and future. In Malmkjaer, K. (Ed.), The Routledge linguistics encyclopedia (3rd edn., pp. 35–40). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Giles, H., & Gasiorek, J. (2013). Parameters of non-accommodation: Refining and elaborating communication accommodation theory. In Forgas, J., László, J., & Orsolya Vincze, V. (Eds.), Social cognition and communication (pp. 155–172). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Giles, H., & Johnson, P. (1981). The role of language in ethnic group relations. In Turner, J. C. & Giles, H. (Eds.), Intergroup behavior (pp. 199–243). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Giles, H., & Johnson, P. (1987). Ethnolinguistic identity theory: A social psychological approach to language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 68, 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giles, H., & Marlow, M. (2011). Theorizing language attitudes: Past frameworks, an integrative model, and new directions. In Salmon, C. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 35 (pp. 161–197). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Giles, H., Ota, H., & Foley, M. (2013). Tourism: An intergroup communication model with Russian inflections. Russian Journal of Communication, 5, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giles, H., & Powesland, P. F. (1975). Speech style and social evaluation. London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Giles, H., Scherer, K. R., & Taylor, D. M. (1979). Speech markers in social interaction. In Scherer, K. R. & Giles, H. (Eds.), Social markers in speech (pp. 343–381). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Giles, H., & Smith, P. M. (1979). Accommodation theory: Optimal levels of convergence. In Giles, H. & St. Clair, R. N. (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 45–65). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Giles, H., & Wadleigh, P. M. (2008). Accommodating nonverbally. In Guerrero, L. K. & Hecht, M. L. (Eds.), The nonverbal communication reader: Classic and contemporary readings (3rd edn., pp. 425–436). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar

Giles, H., & Watson, B. (Eds.). (2013). The social meanings of language, dialect, and accent: International perspectives on speech styles. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Giles, H., Wilson, P., & Conway, T. (1981). Accent and lexical diversity as determinants of impression formation and perceived employment suitability. Language Sciences, 3, 91–103.Google Scholar

Grush, J. E., Clore, G. L., & Costin, F. (1975). Dissimilarity and attraction: When difference makes a difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 783–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gudykunst, W. B. (1995). Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory: Current status. In Wiseman, R. L. (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 8–58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. (1964). Linguistic and social interaction in two communities. American Anthropologist, 66, 137–154.Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. (1965). Language. Biennial Review of Anthropology, 4, 84–120.Google Scholar

Hajek, C., Giles, H., Barker, V., Lin, M. C., Zhang, Y. B., Hummert, M. L. (2008). Expressed trust and compliance in police-civilian encounters: The role of communication accommodation in Chinese and American settings. Chinese Journal of Communication, 1, 168–180.Google Scholar

Hewstone, M. (1990). The ultimate attribution error: A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 311–355.Google Scholar

Hewstone, M., & Jaspars, J. (1984). Social dimensions of attribution. In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 379–404). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604.Google Scholar

Hogg, M. A. (1985). Masculine and feminine speech in dyads and groups: A study of speech style and gender salience. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hogg, M. A., D’Agata, P., & Abrams, D. (1989). Ethnolinguistic betrayal and speaker evaluations across Italian Australians. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 115, 155–181.Google Scholar

Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16, 7–30.Google Scholar

Howard, J., & Rothbart, M. (1980). Social categorization and memory for in-group and out-group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huffaker, D. A., Swaab, R., & Diermeier, D. (2011). The language of coalition formation in online multiparty negotiations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30, 66–81.Google Scholar

Imamura, M., Zhang, Y. B., & Harwood, J. (2011). Japanese sojourners’ attitudes toward Americans: Exploring the influences of communication accommodation, linguistic competence, and relational solidarity in intergroup contact. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 21, 103–120.Google Scholar

Jain, P., & Krieger, J. L. (2011). Moving beyond the language barrier: The communication strategies used by international medical graduates in intercultural medical encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 84, 98–104.Google Scholar

Jones, E., Gallois, C., Barker, M., & Callan, V. (1994). Evaluations of interactions between students and academic staff: Influence of communication accommodation, ethnic group, and status. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 158–191.Google Scholar

Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 831–843.Google Scholar

Kuhl, P. K., & Iverson, P. (1995). Linguistic experience and the “perceptual magnet effect.” In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues in cross-language research (pp. 121–154). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar

Kulesza, W., Dolinski, D., Huisman, A., & Majewski, R. (2014). The echo effect: The power of verbal mimicry to influence prosocial behavior. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 183–201.Google Scholar

LaFrance, M. (1979). Nonverbal synchrony and rapport: Analysis by the cross-lag panel technique. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 66–70.Google Scholar

Lippi-Green, R. (1994). Accent, standard language ideology, and discriminatory pretext in the courts. Language in Society, 23, 163–198.Google Scholar

Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an accent (2nd edn.). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2005). Theories of human communication (8th edn.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Marlow, M. L., & Giles, H. (2010). “We won’t get ahead speaking like that!”: Expressing managing language criticism in Hawai’i. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 31, 237–251.Google Scholar

Matarazzo, J. D., Weins, A. N., Matarazzo, R. G., & Saslow, G. (1968). Speech and silence behavior in clinical psychotherapy and its laboratory correlates. In Schlier, J., Hung, H., Matarazzo, J. D., & Savage, C. (Eds.), Research in psychotherapy (Vol. 3, pp. 347–394). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

McGlone, M. S., & Giles, H. (2011). Language and interpersonal communication. In Knapp, M. L. & Daly, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (4th edn., pp. 201–237). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Montepare, J. M., & Vega, C. (1988). Women’s vocal reactions to intimate and casual male friends. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 103–112.Google Scholar

Myers, P., Giles, H., Reid, S.A., & Nabi, R. (2008). Law enforcement encounters: The effects of officer accommodativeness and crime severity on interpersonal attributions are mediated by intergroup sensitivity. Communication Studies, 59, 291–305.Google Scholar

Namy, L. L., Nygaard, L. C., & Saureteig, D. (2002). Gender differences in vocal accommodation: The role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 422–432.Google Scholar

Natalé, M. (1975). Convergence of mean vocal intensity in dyadic communications as a function of social desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 790–804.Google Scholar

Nelson, S., Dickson, D., & Hargie, O. (2003). Learning together, living apart: The experiences of university students in Northern Ireland. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 777–795.Google Scholar

Nilsson, J. (2015). Dialect accommodation in interaction: Explaining dialect change and stability. Language and Communication, 41, 6–16.Google Scholar

Pardo, J. S., Gibbons, R., Suppes, A., & Krauss, R. M. (2012). Phonetic convergence in college roommates. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 190–197.Google Scholar

Preston, D. R. (1981). The ethnography of TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 105–116.Google Scholar

Purnell, T., Isdardi, W., & Baugh, , (1999). Perceptual and phonetic experiments on American English dialect identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 10–30.Google Scholar

Putnam, W., & Street, R. (1984). The conception and perception of noncontent speech performance: Implications for speech accommodation theory. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 97–11.Google Scholar

Reysen, S., Lloyd, J. D., Katzarska-Miller, I., Lemker, B. M., & Foss, R. L. (2010). Intragroup status and social presence in online fan groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1314–1317.Google Scholar

Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (2000). The impact of supervisor and subordinate immediacy on relational and organizational outcomes. Communication Monographs, 67, 85–95.Google Scholar

Riordan, M. A., Markman, K. M., & Stewart, C. O. (2013). Communication accommodation in instant messaging: An examination of temporal convergence. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 84–95.Google Scholar

Rogerson, A. M. (2015). Accommodating demographic differences in managerial face-to-face conversations in Australian workplaces (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wollongong, Australia.Google Scholar

Romero, D. M., Swaab, R. I., Uzzi, B., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Mimicry is Presidential: Linguistic style matching in Presidential debates and improved polling numbers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1311–1319.Google Scholar

Ros, M., & Giles, H. (1979). The language situation in Valencia: An accommodation framework. I.T.L.: Review of Applied Linguistics, 44, 3–24.Google Scholar

Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. M. (1990). Japanese foreigner talk: Convergence or divergence? Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 1, 135–145.Google Scholar

Rubin, D. (1992). Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 33, 511–531.Google Scholar

Run, E. C., & Fah, C. S. (2006). Language use in packaging: The reaction of Malay and Chinese consumers in Malaysia. Sunway Academic Journal, 3, 133–145.Google Scholar

Ryan, E. B., Hewstone, M., & Giles, H. (1984). Language and intergroup attitudes. In Eiser, J. R. (Ed.), Attitudinal judgments (pp. 135–160). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Sancier, M. L., & Fowler, C. A. (1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 421–436.Google Scholar

Sandilands, M. L., & Fleury, N. C. (1979). Unilinguals in des milieux bilingues: Une analyse of attributions. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 11, 164–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scissors, L. E., Gill, A. J., Geraghty, K., & Gergle, D. (2009). In CMC we trust: The role of similarity. In CHI 09: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 527–536). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar

Simard, L., Taylor, D. M., & Giles, H. (1976). Attribution processes and interpersonal accommodation in a bilingual setting. Language and Speech, 19, 374–387.Google Scholar

Soliz, J., & Giles, H. (2014). Relational and identity processes in communication: A contextual and meta-analytic review of communication accommodation theory. In Cohen, E. L. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 38 (pp. 107–144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Sprecher, S. (2014). Effects of actual (manipulated) and perceived similarity on liking in get-acquainted interactions: The role of communication. Communication Monographs, 81, 4–27.Google Scholar

Street, R. L. Jr. (1982). Evaluation of noncontent speech accommodation. Language and Communication, 2, 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Street, R. L. Jr., Brady, R. M., & Putnam, W. B. (1983). The influence of speech rate stereotypes and rate similarity on listeners’ evaluations of speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2, 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Street, R. L. Jr., & Giles, H. (1982). Speech accommodation theory: A social cognitive model of speech behavior. In Roloff, M. E. & Berger, C. R. (Eds.), Social cognition and communication (pp. 193–226). Beverly Hills, Sage.Google Scholar

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S. & Austin, W. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar

Tamburrini, N., Cinnirella, M., Janse, V. A. A., & Bryden, J. (2015). Twitter users change word usage according to conversation-partner social identity. Social Networks, 40, 84–89.Google Scholar

Taylor, P. J., & Thomas, S. (2008). Linguistic style matching and negotiation outcome. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 1, 263–281.Google Scholar

Thakerar, J. N., Giles, H., & Cheshire, J. (1982). Psychological and linguistic parameters of speech accommodation theory. In Fraser, C. & Scherer, K. R. (Eds.), Advances in the social psychology of language (pp. 205–255). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Triandis, H. C. (1960). Cognitive similarity and communication in dyad. Human Relations, 13, 175–183.Google Scholar

Trudgill, P. (1981). Linguistic accommodation: Sociolinguistic observations on a socio-psychological theory. In Masek, C., Hendrick, R. A., & Miller, M. F. (Eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society: Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior (pp. 218–237). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialects in contact. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

van den Berg, M. E. (1986). Language planning and language use in Taiwan: A study of language choice behavior in public settings. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.Google Scholar

Vincze, L., & Henning-Lindblom, A. (in press). Swedish, Finish and bilingual? Multiple ethnolinguistic identities in relation to ethnolinguistic vitality in Finland. International Journal of Bilingualism.Google Scholar

Wang, H.-C., & Fussell, S. R. (2010). Groups in groups: Conversational similarity in online multicultural multiparty brainstorming. In CSCW 2010: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 351–360). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Watson, B. M., Angus, D., Gore, L., & Farmer, J. (2015). Communication in open disclosure conversation about adverse events in hospitals. Language and Communication, 41, 57–70.Google Scholar

Weary, G., & Arkin, R. M. (1981). Attributional self-presentation. In Harvey, J. H., Ickes, M. J., & Kidd, R. (Eds.), New directions in attribution theory and research (Vol. 3, pp. 223–246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Willemyns, M., Gallois, C., Callan, V. J., & Pittam, J. (1997). Accent accommodation in the job interview: Impact of interviewer accent and gender. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16, 3–22.Google Scholar

Williams, A., Giles, H., Coupland, N., Dalby, M., & Manasse, H. (1990). The communicative contexts of elderly social support and health: A theoretical model. Health Communication, 2, 123–143Google Scholar

Woolard, K. A. (1989). Double talk: Bilingualism and the politics of ethnicity in Catalonia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Zilles, A. M. S., & King, K. (2005). Self-presentation in sociolinguistic interviews: Identities and language variation in Panambi, Brazil. Journal of Multicultural and Multilingual Development, 9, 74–94.Google Scholar