Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:21:31.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Walls and the Ancient Greek Ritual Experience

The Sanctuary of Demeter and Kore at Eleusis

from Part IV - Materiality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2022

By
Michael Scott
Edited by
Esther Eidinow ,
Armin W. Geertz  and
John North
Esther Eidinow
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Armin W. Geertz
Affiliation:
Aarhus Universitet, Denmark
John North
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

The shape and form of boundary walls around and within Greek sanctuaries, and the impact those boundaries had on the experience of the ritual happening within, have attracted little scholarly attention, especially in comparison to work on the powerful impacts of other elements of sanctuary architecture, and architecture more widely. This article, using the case study of the high temenos walls and those of the Telesterion temple structure of the sanctuary of Demeter and Kore at Eleusis, explores the active impact these walls had on particularly the sight- and sound-scapes engaged with by participants. As such it argues for the crucial importance of these walls at Eleusis in creating the intensity, emotion, power, and conviction of the ritual experience of the Mysteries for participants.

Keywords

temenossensesseeinghearingEleusismysterieswalls
Type
Chapter
Information
Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience , pp. 193 - 217
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, A. K. and Phelps, E. A.. 2000 ‘Perceiving Emotion: More than Meets the Eye’, Current Biology 10: 551–554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F. and Leary, M. R.. 1995 ‘The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments As a Fundamental Human Motivation’, Psychological Bulletin 117 (3): 497–529.Google Scholar
Bergquist, B. 1967. The Archaic Greek Temenos: A Study of Structure and Function. Lund.Google Scholar
Bowden, H. 2010. Mystery Cults of the Ancient World. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. 2014. Initiation in the Mysteries of the Ancient World. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, V., Green, P., and Georgesen, M.. 2003. Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology and Ecology. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1985. Greek Religion: Archaic and Classical. Oxford.Google Scholar
Camp, J. 2001. The Archaeology of Athens. Yale, CT.Google Scholar
Clinton, K. 1974. The Sacred Officials of the Eleusinian Mysteries. Philadelphia, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, K. 1992. The Iconography of the Eleusinian Mysteries. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Clinton, K. 1993. ‘The Sanctuary of Demeter and Kore at Eleusis’, in Marinatos, N. and Hägg, R., eds. Greek Sanctuaries: New Approaches, 110–124. London.Google Scholar
Clinton, K. 1994. ‘The Eleusinian Mysteries and Panhellenism in Democratic Athens’, in Coulson, W., Palagia, O., Shear, T. L. Jr, Shapiro, H., and Frost, F., eds. The Archaeology of Athens and Attica under the Democracy, 161–172. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clinton, K. 2005. ‘Stages of Initiation in the Eleusinian and Samothracian Mysteries’, in Cosmopoulos, M., ed. Greek Mysteries: The Archaeology and Ritual of Ancient Greek Secret Cults, 50–78. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cole, S. 2004. Landscape, Gender and Ritual Space: The Ancient Greek Experience. Berkeley, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, F., Giovanni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., and Anderson, N. D.. 1996. ‘The Effects of Divided Attention on Encoding and Retrieval Processes in Human Memory’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125: 159–180.Google Scholar
Cross, I. and Watson, A.. 2006. ‘Acoustics and the Human Experience of Socially-Organised Sound’, in Scarre, C. and Lawson, G., eds. Archaeoacoustics 107–116. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
de Polignac, F. 1995. Cults, Territory and the Origins of the Greek City-State (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Decety, J. and Grèzes, J., 2016. ‘The Power of Simulation: Imagining One’s Own and Other’s Behaviours’, Brain Research 1079: 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decety, J. and Jackson, P. L., 2004. ‘The Functional Architecture of Human Empathy’, Behavioural and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 3: 71–100.Google Scholar
Dillon, M. 1997. Pilgrims and Pilgrimage in Ancient Greece. London.Google Scholar
Driver, J. 2001. ‘A Selective Review of Selective Attention Research from the Past Century’, British Journal of Psychology 92: 53–78. Google Scholar
Easterbrook, J. A. 1959. ‘The Effect of Emotion on Cue Utilisation and the Organisation of Behavior’, Psychological Review 66 (3): 183–201.Google Scholar
Eidinow, E. 2018. ‘A Feeling for the Future: Ancient Greek Divination and Embodied Cognition’, in Klostergaard Petersen, A., Gilhus, I. S., Martin, L. H., Sinding Jensen, J., and Sørenson, J., eds. Evolution, Cognition, and the History of Religion: New Synthesis. Festschrift in Honour of Armin W. Geertz, 447–460. Leiden.Google Scholar
Ekroth, G. In press. ‘A Room of One’s Own?’ Exploring the Temenos Concept As Divine Property’, in Wallenstein, J., Haysom, M., and Mili, M., eds. Stuff of the Gods: The Material Aspects of Religion in Ancient Greece. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Eliade, M. 1987. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Evans, N. 2002. ‘Sacrifices and the Eleusinian Mysteries’ Numen 49 (3): 227–254.Google Scholar
Foley, H. ed. 1994. The Homeric Hymn to Demeter. Yale, CT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, J., Liberman, N., and Kuschel, S.. 2008. ‘The Effect of Global Versus Local Processing Styles on Assimilation versus Contrast in Social Judgement’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94 (4): 579–599. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, J., Birsky, J., and Cavoukian, A.. 1980. ‘Environmental Determinants of Behavioural Contagion: Density and Number’, Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1 (2): 155–161.Google Scholar
Friston, K. 2010. ‘The Free-Energy Principle: A Unified Brain Theory?’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11 (2): 127–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friston, K. and Kiebel, S.. 2009. ‘Predictive Coding under the Free-Energy Principle’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 364 (1521): 1211–1221.Google Scholar
Frith, C. 2007. Making Up the Mind: How the Brain Creates Our Mental World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gerstel, S. ed. 2006. Thresholds of the Sacred: Architectural, Art Historical, Liturgical, and Theological Perspectives on Religious Screens. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Goette, H. 2001. Athens, Attica and the Megarid: An Archaeological Guide. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. 2013. Archaeology of the Senses: Human Experience, Memory and Affect. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E. J. Cacioppo, , and Rapson, R.. 1992. ‘Primitive Emotional Contagion’, in Clark, M. S., ed. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 14. Emotion and Social Behaviour, 151–177. Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J., and Rapson, R.. 1993. ‘Emotional Contagion’, Current Directions in Psychological Science 2 (3): 96–99.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J., and Rapson, R.. 1994. Emotional Contagion. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Helmer, M. and Chicoine, D.. 2013. ‘Soundscapes and Community Organisation in Ancient Peru: Plaza Architecture at the Early Horizon Centre of Caylan’, Antiquity 87: 92–107.Google Scholar
Hewitt, J. 1909. ‘The Major Restrictions on Access to Greek Temples’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 40: 83–91.Google Scholar
Hollinshead, M. 2012. ‘Monumental Steps and the Shaping of Ceremony’ in Wescoat, B. and Ousterhout, R., eds. Architecture of the Sacred: Space, Ritual and Experience from Classical Greece to Byzantium, 27–65. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Hollinshead, M. 2015. Shaping Ceremony: Monumental Steps and Greek Architecture. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Jameson, M. H. 2014. ‘The Spectacular and the Obscure in Athenian Religion’, in Jameson, M. H., Cults and Rites in Ancient Greece: Essays on Religion and Society, 270–290. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Jones, L. 2000. The Hermeneutics of Sacred Architecture (vols. 1 & 2). Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Knowlton, B. J. and Fanselow, M. S.. 1998. ‘The Hippocampus, Consolidation and On-Line Memory’, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 8 (2): 293–296.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Larson, J. 2016. Understanding Greek Religion: A Cognitive Approach. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavie, N. 1995. ‘Perceptual Load As a Necessary Condition for Selective Attention’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21: 451–468.Google ScholarPubMed
Lippolis, E. 2006. Mysteria: Archeologia e culto del santuario di Demetra a Eleusi. Milan.Google Scholar
Mallwitz, A. 1972. Olympia und seine Bauten. Munich.Google Scholar
Maran, J. 2006. ‘Mycenaean Citadels As Performative Spaces’, in Maran, J., Juwig, C., Schwengel, H., and Thaler, U., eds. Constructing Power: Architecture, Ideology and Social Practice, 75–92. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Mattern, T. 2006. ‘Architektur und Ritual. Architektur also funktionaler Rahmen antiker Kultpraxis’, in Mylonopoulos, J. and Roder, H., eds. Archäologie und Ritual auf der Suche nach der rituellen Handlung in den antiken Kulturen Aegyptens und Griechenlands, 167–183. Vienna.Google Scholar
Mikalson, J. 1983. Athenian Popular Religion. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Miles, M. 2012. ‘Entering Demeter’s Gateway: The Roman Propylon in the City Eleusinion’, in Wescoat, B. and Ousterhout, R., eds. Architecture of the Sacred: Space, Ritual and Experience from Classical Greece to Byzantium, 114–151. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Mylonas, G. 1961. Eleusis and the Eleusinian Mysteries. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Mylonopoulos, J. 2006. ‘Greek Sanctuaries As Places of Communication through Rituals: An Archaeological Perspective’ in Stavrianopoulou, E., ed. Ritual and Communication in the Graeco-Roman World, 69–110. Liège.Google Scholar
Mylonopoulos, J. 2008. ‘The Dynamics of Ritual Space in the Hellenistic and Roman East’, Kernos 21: 49–79.Google Scholar
Mylonopoulos, J. 2011. ‘Divine Images behind Bars: The Semantics of Barriers in Greek Temples’, in Haysom, M. and Wallensten, J., eds. Current Approaches to Religion in Ancient Greece, 269–292. Athens.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. and Harsch, N.. 1992. ‘Phantom Flashbulbs: False Recollections of Hearing News about the Challenger’, in Winograd, E. and Neisser, U., eds. Affect and Accuracy in Recall: Studies of ‘Flashbulb’ Memories, 9–31. London.Google Scholar
Parker, R. 2005. Polytheism and Society at Athens. Oxford.Google Scholar
Parker-Pearson, M. and Richards, C.. eds. 1994. Architecture and Order: Approaches to Social Space. Oxford.Google Scholar
Phelps, E. 2006. ‘Emotion and Cognition: Insights from Studies of the Human Amygdala’, Annual Review of Psychology 57: 27–53.Google Scholar
Pucci, M. 2006. ‘Enclosing Open Spaces: The Organisation of External Areas in Syro-Hittite Architecture’, in Maran, J., Juwig, C., Schwengel, H., and Thaler, U., eds. Constructing Power: Architecture, Ideology and Social Practice, 169–175. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Purves, D., Cabeza, R., Huettel, S., LaBar, K., Platt, M., and Woldroff, M.. 2013. Principles of Cognitive Neuroscience. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Rapoport, A. 1990. The Meaning of the Built Environment. A Nonverbal Communication Approach. Beverley Hills, CA.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. H. 1974. The Homeric Hymn to Demeter. Oxford.Google Scholar
Robertson, N. 1999. ‘The Sequence of Days at the Thesmophoria and at the Eleusinian Mysteries’, Classical Views 43 (18): 1–35.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, L. 2010. See What I’m Saying: The Extraordinary Powers of our Five Senses. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Roussel, P. 1930. ‘L’initiation prélable et le symbole Éleusinien’, Bulletin de correspondance hellénique 54: 51–74.Google Scholar
Ruck, C. 2006. Sacred Mushrooms of the Goddess. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Schjoedt, U. 2019. ‘Predictive Coding in the Study of Religion: A Believer’s Testimony’, in Petersen, A. K., Gilhus, I., Martin, L., Jensen, J., and Sørenson, J., eds. Evolution, Cognition, and the History of Religion: A New Synthesis, 364–379. Leiden.Google Scholar
Schjoedt, U. and Jensen, J. S.. 2018. ‘Depletion and Deprivation: Social Functional Pathways to a Shared Metacognition’, in Proust, J. and Fortier, M., eds. Metacognitive Diversity: An Interdisciplinary Approach, 319–342. Oxford.Google Scholar
Schjoedt, U., Nielbo, K. L., Xygalatas, D., Mitkidis, P., and Bulbulia, J.. 2013a. ‘Cognitive Resource Depletion in Religious Interactions’, Religion, Brain & Behavior 3 (1): 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schjoedt, U., Nielbo, K. L., Xygalatas, D., Mitkidis, P., and Bulbulia, J.. 2013b. ‘The Resource Model and the Principle of Predictive Coding: A Framework for Analyzing Proximate Effects of Ritual’, Religion, Brain & Behavior 3 (1): 79–86. Google Scholar
Scott, M. 2010. Delphi and Olympia: The Spatial Politics of Panhellenism in the Archaic and Classical Periods. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Scott, M. 2012. Space and Society in the Greek and Roman Worlds. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Scott, M. 2015. ‘Temples and Sanctuaries’ in Eidinow, E. and Kindt, J., eds. Oxford Handbook to Ancient Greek Religion, 227–240. Oxford.Google Scholar
Smith, J. Z. 1987. To Take Place: Towards Theory in Ritual. Chicago.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A. M. 1986. ‘Interaction by Design: The Greek City-State’, in Renfrew, C. and Cherry, J. F., eds. Peer-Polity Interaction and Socio-Political Change, 47–58. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 2003. ‘Mysteries: Aspects of the Eleusinian Cult’, in Cosmopoulos, M., ed. Greek Mysteries: The Archaeology and Ritual of Ancient Greek Secret Cults, 25–49. Oxford.Google Scholar
Spawforth, A. 2006. The Complete Greek Temples. London.Google Scholar
Squire, L. R. and Zola-Morgan, S.. 1991. ‘The Medial Temporal Lobe Memory System’, Science 253 (5026): 1380–1386.Google Scholar
Steidle, A, Werth, L., and Hanke, E-V.. 2011. ‘You Can’t See Much in the Dark: Darkness Affects Construal Level and Psychological Distance’, Social Psychology 42 (3): 174–184. Google Scholar
Steidle, A. E-V. Hanke, , and Werth, L.. 2013. ‘In the Dark We Cooperate: The Situated Nature of Procedural Embodiment’, Social Cognition 31 (2): 275–300.Google Scholar
Talarico, J. M. and Rubin, D. C.. 2003. ‘Confidence, Not Consistency, Characterises Flashbulb Memories’, Psychological Science 14: 455–461. Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 2004. The Materiality of Stone: Explorations in the Landscape Phenomenology. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, R. 1976. Greek Sanctuaries. London.Google Scholar
Travlos, J. 1988. Bildlexicon zur Topographie des antiken Attika. Tubingen.Google Scholar
Treisman, A. 1988. ‘Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture’, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40A: 201–237.Google Scholar
Trope, Y. and Liberman, N.. 2010. ‘Construal-level Theory of Psychological Distance’, Psychological Review 117 (2): 440–463.Google Scholar
Watson, A. and Keating, D. 1999. ‘Architecture and Sound: An Acoustic Analysis of Megalithic Monuments in Prehistoric Britain’, Antiquity 73: 325–336. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wescoat, B. and Ousterhoust, R.. eds. 2012a. Architecture of the Sacred: Space, Ritual and Experience from Classical Greece to Byzantium. New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wescoat, B. and Ousterhoust, R.. 2012b. ‘Preface’ in Wescoat, B. and Ousterhout, R., eds. Architecture of the Sacred: Space, Ritual and Experience from Classical Greece to Byzantium, xxi–xxiv. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Whalen, P. J. 1998. ‘Fear, Vigilance and Ambiguity: Initial Neuroimaging Studies of the Human Amygdala’, Current Directions Psychological Science 7: 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W. and Kang, J.. 2005. ‘Acoustic Comfort Evaluation in Urban Open Public Spaces’, Applied Acoustics 66: 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, C-B., Bohns, V. K., and Gino, F.. 2010. ‘Good Lamps Are the Best Police: Darkness Increases Dishonesty and Self-Interested Behaviour’, Psychological Science 21 (3): 311–314.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×