Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T14:39:45.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 47 - Physiological MR imaging of normal development and developmental delay

from Section 8 - Pediatrics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Jonathan H. Gillard
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Adam D. Waldman
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Peter B. Barker
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Imaging is a crucial tool in the evaluation of neonates and infants with neurological abnormalities: the encephalopathic neonate, the epileptic child, and the developmentally delayed infant.[1–5] Transfontanelle sonography was the non-invasive imaging tool to be used to evaluate the neonate and was extremely successful, providing a new window for the evaluation of the pathological processes in the preterm and term neonate. Ultrasound was valuable in the assessment of intracranial hemorrhage in premature neonates,[6] but less successful in the assessment of non-hemorrhagic parenchymal injury in both term and preterm infants,[3,7–9] and of little use after closure of the fontanelles. Therefore, computed tomography (CT) and anatomical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been investigated as imaging tools for neurological disease in infants. There has been some success with MRI in this regard,[8,10–13] and it has been shown to be clearly superior to sonography and CT in the assessment of developmental delay caused by structural and metabolic disorders.[14,15] Many children with neurodevelopmental disorders, however, have normal anatomical imaging. The ability to assess physiological and biochemical parameters through the use of MR, in particular diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and proton spectroscopy (MRS), has considerably broadened the potential use of MR in the assessment of neurologically impaired neonates and infants. This chapter discusses the normal developmental processes of the brain as assessed by these new techniques and then discusses the early application of these techniques in the evaluation of neurologically impaired and developmentally delayed neonates.

Technical aspects of neonatal/infant MRI

Transportation, sedation, and technical aspects

Obviously, no technique is useful if the patient cannot be transported to the MR suite and imaged safely, and high-quality images obtained. Transportation and sedation of neonates for MR is critical for obtaining high-quality images safely but is beyond the scope of this chapter. It is discussed in all major pediatric imaging textbooks and readers should become completely familiar with techniques for sedation and monitoring during routine neonatal and infant MRI before using the techniques discussed in this chapter. Although MR can sometimes be performed in premature infants without sedation, it is nearly impossible to obtain high-quality imaging data in term neonates and infants without sedation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical MR Neuroimaging
Physiological and Functional Techniques
, pp. 727 - 737
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kuzniecky, R, Jackson, G.Magnetic Resonance in Epilepsy. New York: Raven Press, 1995.Google ScholarPubMed
Barkovich, AJ. The encephalopathic neonate: choosing the proper imaging technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997; 18: 1816–1820.Google ScholarPubMed
Volpe, JJ.Neurology of the Newborn, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2000.Google Scholar
Shevell, M, Ashwal, S, Donley, D, et al. Practice parameter: evaluation of the child with global developmental delay: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and The Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology 2003; 60: 367–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ment, LR, Bada, HS, Barnes, P, et al. Practice parameter: neuroimaging of the neonate: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology 2002; 58: 1726–1738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papile, LA, Burstein, J, Burstein, R, Koffer, H.Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1500 gm. J Pediatr 1978; 92: 529–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, EG, Schellinger, D, Richardson, JD, Coffey, ML, Smirniotopoulous, JG.Echogenic periventricular halo: normal sonographic finding or neonatal cerebral hemorrhage?AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1983; 4: 43–46.Google Scholar
Schouman-Clays, E, Henry-Feugeas, M-C, Roset, F, et al. Periventricular leukomalacia: correlation between MR imaging and autopsy findings during the first 2 months of life. Radiology 1993; 189: 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, MA, Pennock, JM, Dubowitz, LMS.Cranial ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy: a comparison with outcome. Dev Med Child Neurol 1994; 36: 813–825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inder, T, Hüppi, P, Zientara, G, et al. Early detection of periventricular leukomalacia by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging techniques. J Pediatr 1999; 134: 631–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkovich, AJ, Hajnal, BL, Vigneron, D, et al. Prediction of neuromotor outcome in perinatal asphyxia: evaluation of MR scoring systems. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19: 143–150.Google ScholarPubMed
Rutherford, M, Pennock, J, Schwieso, JE, Cowan, FM, Dubowitz, LM.Hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy: early magnetic resonance imaging findings and their evolution. Neuropediatrics 1995; 26: 183–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutherford, M, Pennock, J, Schwieso, J, et al. Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: early and late magnetic resonance findings in relation to outcome. Arch Dis Child 1996; 75: 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, AA, Fish, DR, Sisodiya, SM, et al. Abnormalities of gyration, heterotopias, tuberous sclerosis, focal cortical dysplasia, microdysgenesis, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor and dysgenesis of the archicortex in epilepsy: clinical, EEG and neuroimaging features in 100 adult patients. Brain 1995; 118: 629–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Knaap, MS, Valk, J.Magnetic Resonance of Myelin, Myelination, and Myelin Disorders, 2nd edn. Berlin: Springer, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, ZJ, Zimmerman, RA.Proton MR spectroscopy of pediatric brain metabolic disorders. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 1998; 8: 781–807.Google ScholarPubMed
Scarabino, T, Popolizio, T, Bertolino, A, Salvolini, U.Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the brain in pediatric patients. Eur J Radiol 1999; 30: 142–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shevell, MI, Ashwal, S, Novotny, E.Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy: clinical applications in children with nervous system diseases. Semin Pediatr Neurol 1999; 6: 68–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, JV, Wang, ZJ.MR spectroscopy in pediatric neuroradiology. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2001; 9: 165–89, ix.Google ScholarPubMed
Cecil, KM, Jones, BV.Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the pediatric brain. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 12: 435–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azzopardi, D, Wyatt, JS, Cady, EB, et al. Prognosis of newborn infants with hypoxic–ischemic brain injury assessed by phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Pediatr Res 1989; 25: 445–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laptook, AR, Corbett, RJ, Uauy, R, et al. Use of 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy to characterize evolving brain damage after perinatal asphyxia. Neurology 1989; 39: 709–712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peden, CJ, Cowan, FM, Bryant, DJ, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy of the brain in infants. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990; 14: 886–894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hüppi, PS, Inder, TE.Magnetic resonance techniques in the evaluation of the perinatal brain: recent advances and future directions. Semin Neonatol 2001; 6: 195–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hüppi, PS, Posse, S, Lazeyras, F, et al. Magnetic resonance in preterm and term newborns: 1H-spectroscopy in developing human brain. Pediatr Res 1991; 30: 574–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kreis, R, Ernst, T, Ross, BD.Development of the human brain: in vivo quantification of metabolite and water content with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 1993; 30: 424–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kreis, R, Hofmann, L, Kuhlmann, B.Brain metabolite composition during early human brain development as measured by quantitative in vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 949–958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hüppi, PS.MR imaging and spectroscopy of brain development. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2001; 9: 1–17, vii.Google ScholarPubMed
Vigneron, DB, Barkovich, AJ, Noworolski, SM, et al. Three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging of premature and term neonates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 1424–1433.Google ScholarPubMed
Nomura, Y, Sakuma, H, Takeda, K, et al. Diffusional anisotropy of the human brain assessed with diffusion-weighted MR: relation with normal brain development and aging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15: 231–238.Google ScholarPubMed
Wimberger, DM, Roberts, TP, Barkovich, AJ, et al. Identification of “premyelination” by diffusion-weighted MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995; 19: 28–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prayer, D, Barkovich, AJ, Kirschner, DA, et al. Visualization of nonstructural changes in early white matter development on diffusion weighted MR images: evidence supporting premyelination anisotropy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 1572–1576.Google ScholarPubMed
Morriss, M, Zimmerman, R, Bilaniuk, L, Hunter, J, Haselgrove, J.Changes in brain water during childhood. Neuroradiology 1999; 41: 929–934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimony, JS, McKinstry, RC, Akbudak, E, et al. Quantitative diffusion-tensor anisotropy brain MR imaging: normative human data and anatomic analysis. Radiology 1999; 212: 770–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hüppi, P, Maier, S, Peled, S, et al. Microstructural development of human newborn cerebral white matter assessed in vivo by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Res 1998; 44: 584–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neil, JJ, Shiran, SI, McKinstry, RC, et al. Normal brain in human newborns: apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion anisotropy measured by using diffusion tensor MR imaging. Radiology 1998; 209: 57–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukherjee, P, Miller, JH, Shimony, JS, et al. Normal brain maturation during childhood: developmental trends characterized with diffusion-tensor MR imaging. Radiology 2001; 221: 349–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukherjee, P, Miller, JH, Shimony, JS, et al. Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of gray and white matter development during normal human brain maturation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 1445–1456.Google ScholarPubMed
McGraw, P, Liang, L, Provanzale, JM.Evaluation of normal age-related changes in anisotropy during infancy and childhood as shown by diffusion tensor imaging. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 1515–1522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klingberg, TC, Vaidya, J, Gabrieli, JDE, Moseley, ME, Hedehus, M.Myelination and organization of the frontal white matter in children: a diffusion tensor MRI study. Neuroreport 1999; 10: 2817–2821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmithorst, VJ, Wilke, M, Dardzinski, BJ, Holland, SK.Correlation of white matter diffusivity and anisotropy with age during childhood and adolescence: a cross-sectional diffusion tensor MR imaging study. Radiology 2002; 222: 212–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neil, JJ, Miller, JH, Mukherjee, P, Hüppi, P.Diffusion tensor imaging of normal and injured developing human brain: a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002; 15: 543–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulkern, RV, Vajapeyam, S, Robertson, RL, et al. Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficient parametrization in adult vs newborn brain. Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 19: 659–668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobbing, J, Sands, J.Quantitative growth and development of human brain. Arch Dis Child 1973; 48: 757–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mori, S, Crain, BJ, Chacko, VP, van Zijl, PCM.Three dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 1999; 45: 265–269.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conturo, TE, Lori, NF, Cull, TS, et al. Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 10422–10427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKinstry, RC, Mathur, A, Miller, JH, et al. Radial organization of developing preterm human cerebral cortex revealed by noninvasive water diffusion anisotropy MRI. Cerebral Cortex 2002; 12: 1237–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, P, Gill, KRS, Veeraraghavan, S, et al. Anisotropy loss during development of cerebral cortex in premature newborns is due to decreasing water diffusion perpendicular (but not parallel) to the cortical surface. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Toronto, 2003, abst 540.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, P, Gill, KRS, Veeraraghavan, S, et al. Region-specific maturation of cerebral cortex in premature newborns demonstrated with high-resolution diffusion tensor imaging. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Toronto, 2003, abst 2094.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, PR, Dabholkar, AS.Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. J Comp Neurol 1997; 387: 167–178.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leth, H, Toft, PB, Peitersen, B, Lou, HC, Henriksen, O.Use of brain lactate levels to predict outcome after perinatal asphyxia. Acta Paediatr 1996; 85: 859–864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penrice, J, Cady, EB, Lorek, A, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the brain in normal preterm and term infants and early changes after perinatal hypoxia–ischemia. Pediatr Res 1996; 40: 6–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanrahan, JD, Azzopardi, D, Cowan, FM, et al. Persistent increases in cerebral lactate concentration after birth asphyxia. Pediatr Res 1998; 44: 304–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanrahan, JD, Cox, IJ, Azzopardi, D, et al. Relation between proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy within 18 hours of birth asphyxia and neurodevelopment at 1 year of age. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999; 41: 76–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkovich, AJ, Baranski, K, Vigneron, D, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy in the evaluation of asphyxiated term neonates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 1399–1405.Google ScholarPubMed
Barkovich, AJ, Westmark, KD, Bedi, HS, et al. Proton spectroscopy and diffusion imaging on the first day of life after perinatal asphyxia: preliminary report. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 1786–1794.Google ScholarPubMed
Fernandez, F, Verdu, A, Quero, J, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid lactate levels in term infants with perinatal hypoxia. Pediatr Neurol 1986; 2: 39–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuinness, GA, Weisz, SC, Bell, WE.CSF lactate levels in neonates. Effects of asphyxia, gestational age, and postnatal age. Am J Dis Child 1983; 137: 48–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groenendaal, F, Veenhoven, EH, van der Grond, J, et al. Cerebral lactate and N-acetyl-aspartate/choline ratios in asphyxiated full-term neonates demonstrated in-vivo using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Pediatr Res 1994; 35: 148–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pu Y, Li Q-F, Zeng, C-M, et al. Increased detectability of alpha brain glutamate/glutamine in neonatal hypoxic–ischemic encephalpathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 203–212.Google Scholar
Amess, PN, Penrice, J, Wylezinska, M, et al. Early brain proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and neonatal neurology related to neurodevelopmental outcome at 1 year in term infants after presumed hypoxic–ischaemic brain injury. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999; 41: 436–445.Google ScholarPubMed
Barkovich, AJ, Westmark, KD, Ferriero, D, Sola, A, Partridge, C.Perinatal asphyxia: MR findings in the first 10 days. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16: 427–438.Google ScholarPubMed
Robertson, R, Ben-Sira, L, Barnes, P, et al. MR line scan diffusion weighted imaging of term neonates with perinatal brain ischemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 1658–1670.Google ScholarPubMed
Soul, JS, Robertson, RL, Tzika, AA, du Plessis, AJ, Volpe, JJ.Time course of changes in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in a case of neonatal encephalopathy with defined onset and duration of hypoxic–ischemic insult. Pediatrics 2001; 108: 1211–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, RL, Zimmerman, RA, Clancy, R, Haselgrove, JH.Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in term neonates for early detection of hypoxic–ischemic brain injury: initial experience. Radiology 2001; 218: 825–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKinstry, RC, Miller, JH, Snyder, AZ, et al. A prospective, longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study of brain injury in newborns. Neurology 2002; 59: 824–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkovich, AJ.Concepts of myelin and myelination in neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 1099–1109.Google ScholarPubMed
Grodd, W, Krageloh-Mann, I, Klose, U, Sauter, R.Metabolic and destructive brain disorders in children: findings with localized proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology 1991; 181: 173–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filippi, CG, Ulug, AM, Deck, MDF, Zimmerman, RD, Heier, LA.Developmental delay in children: assessment with proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 882–888.Google ScholarPubMed
Bruhn, H, Kruse, B, Korenke, GC, et al. Proton NMR spectroscopy of cerebral metabolic alterations in infantile peroxisomal disorders. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16: 335–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tzika, A, Ball, W, Vigneron, D, et al. Childhood adrenoleukodystrophy: assessment with proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology 1993; 189: 467–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pietz, J, Kreis, R, Schmidt, H, et al. Phenylketonuria: findings at MR imaging and localized in vivo H-1 MR spectroscopy of the brain in patients with early treatment. Radiology 1996; 201: 413–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felber, SR, Sperl, W, Chemelli, A, Murr, C, Wendel, U.Maple syrup urine disease: metabolic decompensation monitored by proton magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Ann Neurol 1993; 33: 396–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viola, A, Chabrol, B, Nicoli, F, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of glycine pathways in nonketotic hyperglycinemia. Pediatr Res 2002; 52: 292–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mano, T, Ono, J, Kaminga, T, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy of Sjögren–Larsson’s syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 1671–1673.Google ScholarPubMed
van der Knaap, MS, Verhoeven, NM, MaaswinkeMooij, P, et al. Mental retardation and behavioral problems as presenting signs of a creatine synthesis defect. Ann Neurol 2000; 47: 540–543.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stöckler, S, Hanefeld, F, Frahm, J.Creatine replacement in guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency, a novel inborn error of metabolism. Lancet 1996; 348: 789–790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulze, A, Hess, T, Wevers, R, et al. Creatine deficiency syndrome caused by guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency: diagnostic tools for a new inborn error of metabolism. J Pediatr 1997; 131: 616–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganesan, V, Johnson, A, Connelly, A, Eckhardt, S, Surtees, RA.Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency: new clinical features. Pediatr Neurol 1997; 17: 155–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bianchi, MC, Tosetti, M, Fornai, F, et al. Reversible brain creatine deficiency in two sisters with normal blood creatine level. Ann Neurol 2000; 47: 511–513.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
deGrauw, TJ, Salomons, GS, Cecil, KM, et al. Congenital creatine transporter deficiency. Neuropediatrics 2002; 33: 232–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Item, CB, Stockler-Ipsiroglu, S, Stromberger, C, et al. Arginine:glycine amidinotransferase deficiency: the third inborn error of creatine metabolism in humans. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 69: 1127–1133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salomons, GS, van Dooren, SJ, Verhoeven, NM, et al. X-linked creatine-transporter gene (SLC6A8) defect: a new creatine-deficiency syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 68: 1497–1500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahler, SG, Fahey, MC.Metabolic disorders and mental retardation. Am J Med Genet 2003; 117C: 31–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hüppi, PS, Murphy, B, Maier, SE, et al. Microstructural brain development after perinatal cerebral white matter injury assessed by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 455–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, SP, Vigneron, DB, Henry, RG, et al. Serial quantitative diffusion tensor MRI of the premature brain: development in newborns with and without injury. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16: 621–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klingberg, TC, Hedehus, M, Temple, E, et al. Microstructure of temporo-parietal white matter as a basis for reading ability: evidence from diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Neuron 2000; 25: 493–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berman, JI, Glenn, OA, Vigneron, DB, Barkovich, AJ, Henry, RG.Towards quantitative DTI tractography evaluating congenital hemiplegia in corticospinal tracts. In Proceedings of the10th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Mag Reson Med, Honolulu, 2002, p. 1124.Google Scholar
Hoon Jr, AH, Lawrie, WT, Melham, ER, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of periventricular leukomalacia shows affected sensory cortex white matter pathways. Neurology 2002; 59: 752–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calamante, F, Ganesan, V, Kirkham, FJ, et al. MR perfusion imaging in Moyamoya syndrome: potential implications for clinical evaluation of occlusive cerebrovascular disease. Stroke 2001; 32: 2810–2816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkham, FJ, Calamante, F, Bynevelt, M, et al. Perfusion magnetic resonance abnormalities in patients with sickle cell disease. Ann Neurol 2001; 49: 477–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×