Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T17:27:19.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Radioactiviy and Nuclerar Physics

from Part IV - Atomic and Molecular Sciences in the Twentieth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Mary Jo Nye
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Get access

Summary

Few branches of the physical sciences have had more of an impact on the twentieth-century world than radioactivity and nuclear physics. From its origins in the last years of the nineteenth century, the science of radioactivity spawned the discovery of hitherto unsuspected properties of matter and of numerous new elements. Its practitioners charted a novel kind of understanding of the structure and properties of matter, their achievements gradually winning wide acceptance. With its emphasis on the internal electrical structure of matter and its explanation of atomic and molecular properties by subatomic particles and forces, radioactivity transformed both physics and chemistry. Its offspring, nuclear physics and cosmic ray physics, consolidated and extended the reductionist approach to matter, ultimately giving rise to high energy physics, the form of physical inquiry that became characteristic of late-twentieth-century science: large, expensive machines designed to produce ever smaller particles to support ever more complex and comprehensive theories of the fundamental structure of matter.

The significance of nuclear physics extends far beyond the laboratory and even science itself, however. Practiced in only a handful of places in the 1930s, nuclear physics boomed during World War II, when it provided the scientific basis for the development of nuclear weapons. During the Cold War, nuclear and thermonuclear weapons were the key elements in the precarious military standoff between the superpowers. At the same time, the development of the civil nuclear power industry, of nuclear medicine, and of many other applications brought nuclear phenomena to the attention of a large public. Nuclear physicists came to enjoy enormous prestige and to command enormous resources for their science in the context of the nuclear state.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaserud, F., Redirecting Science: Niels Bohr, Philanthropy and the Rise of Nuclear Physics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Badash, Lawrence, “Radioactivity Before the Curies,” American Journal of Physics, 33 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badash, L., Radioactivity in America: Growth and Decay of a Science (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Badash, L., Hodes, E., and Tiddens, A., “Nuclear Fission: Reaction to the Discovery in 1939,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 130 (1986)Google Scholar
Bethe, H. A. and Bacher, R. F., “Nuclear Physics: A. Stationary States of Nuclei,” Reviews of Modern Physics, 8 (1936)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethe, H. A., “Nuclear Physics: B. Nuclear Dynamics, Theoretical,” Reviews of Modern Physics, 9 (1937)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudia, S. and Roque, X., eds., Science, Medicine and Industry: The Curie and Joliot-Curie Laboratories, special issue of History and Technology, 13 (1997)
Brown, L. M. and Rechen-berg, H., The Origin of the Concept of Nuclear Forces (Bristol, England: Institute of Physics Publishing, 1996)Google Scholar
Brown, L. M. and Rechenberg, H., “Field Theories of Nuclear Forces in the 1930s: The Fermi Field Theory,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 25 (1994)Google Scholar
Burcham, W. E., “Nuclear Physics in the United Kingdom, 1911–1986,” Reports on Progress in Physics, 52 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. M., Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice (London: Sage, 1985)Google Scholar
Crawford, E., Nationalism and Internationalism in Science, 1880–1939: Four Studies of the Nobel Population (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feather, N., An Introduction to Nuclear Physics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1936)Google Scholar
Galison, P. and Hevly, B. eds., Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research (Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Galison, P., Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Golinski, J., Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Gowing, M., Britain and Atomic Energy, 1939–1945 (London: Macmillan, 1964)Google Scholar
Hampson, W., Radium Explained: A Popular Account of the Relations of Radium to the Natural World, to Scientific Thought, and to Human Life (London: T. C. & E. C. Jack, 1905)Google Scholar
Heilbron, J. L., “The Scattering of α and β Particles and Rutherford’s Atom,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 4 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilbron, J. L. and Seidel, R. W., Lawrence and His Laboratory: A History of the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratoryvol. 1 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Hermann, A., Krige, J., Mersits, U., and Pestre, D., History of CERN, vol. 1: Launching the European Organization for Nuclear Research (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1987), esp. p.Google Scholar
Hoch, P. K., “The Reception of Central European Refugee Physicists of the 1930s: U.S.S.R., U.K., U.S.A.,” Annals of Science, 40 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoddeson, L., Henriksen, P. W., Meade, R. A., and Westfall, C., Critical Assembly: A Technical History of Los Alamos during the Oppenheimer Years, 1943–1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, D., Stalin and the Bomb: The Soviet Union and Atomic Energy, 1939–1956 (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Hughes, J.,“The French Connection: The Joliot-Curies and Nuclear Research in Paris, 1925–1933,” History and Technology, 13 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, J., “Plasticine and Valves: Industry, Instrumentation and the Emergence of Nuclear Physics,” in The Invisible Industrialist: Manufactures and the Construction of Scientific Knowledge, ed. Gaudillere, J. P. and Lowy, I. (London: Macmillan, 1998)Google Scholar
Hughes, J., “1932: Une ‘annus mirabilis’ pour la physique nucleaire?La Recherche, 309 (May 1998)Google Scholar
Hughes, , “‘Modernists With a Vengeance’: Changing Cultures of Theory in Nuclear Science, 1920–1930,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 29 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, C., A History of the Beta Spectrum and its Interpretation, 1911–1934 (Basel: Birkhäuser, 2000)Google Scholar
Kevles, D., The Physicists: The History ofa Scientific Community in Modern America, 2d ed. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Livingston, M. S. and Bethe, H. A., “Nuclear Physics: C. Nuclear Dynamics, Experimental,” Reviews of Modern Physics, 9 (1937)Google Scholar
Makower, W. and Geiger, Hans, Practical Measurements in Radioactivity (London: Longmans, Green, 1912)Google Scholar
Mehra, J., TheSolvayConferences on Physics: Aspects oftheDevelopmentofPhysics since1911 (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1975)Google Scholar
Mladjenovic, M., The History of Early Nuclear Physics (1896–1931) (Singapore: World Scientific, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pflaum, R., Grand Obsession: Marie Curie and Her World (New York: Doubleday, 1989)Google Scholar
Rasetti, F., Elements of Nuclear Physics (London: Blackie, 1937)Google Scholar
Rayner-Canham, M. F. and Rayner-Canham, W., eds., A Devotion to Their Science: Pioneer Women of Radioactivity (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Rutherford, E., The Newer Alchemy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1937)Google Scholar
Schweber, S. S., “From ‘Elementary’ to ‘Fundamental’ Particles,” in Science in the Twentieth Century, ed. Krige, J. and Pestre, D. (Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1998), atGoogle Scholar
Shea, W. R., ed., Otto Hahn and the Rise of Nuclear Physics (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Six, J., La découverte du neutron (1920–1936) (Paris: Editions du CNRS, 1987)Google Scholar
Stuewer, R. H., “Rutherford’s Satellite Model of the Nucleus,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 16 (1986)Google Scholar
Stuewer, R. H., “Artificial Disintegration and the Cambridge-Vienna Controversy,” in Observation, Experiment and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science, ed. Achinstein, P. and Hannaway, O. (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Stuewer, R. H., “Gamow’s Theory of Alpha Decay,” in The Kaleidoscope of Science, ed. Ullmann-Margalit, E. (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1986)Google Scholar
Stuewer, R. H., “Mass-Energy and the Neutron in the Early Thirties,” Science in Context, 6 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuewer, R. H., “The Nuclear Electron Hypothesis,” in Otto Hahn and the Rise of Nuclear Physics, ed. Shea, W. R. (Amsterdam: Reidel, 1983)Google Scholar
Stuewer, R. H., “The Origin of the Liquid-Drop Model and the Interpretation of Nuclear Fission,” Perspectives on Science, 2 (1994)Google Scholar
Trenn, T. J., The Self-Splitting Atom: A History of the Rutherford-Soddy Collaboration (London: Taylor and Francis, 1977)Google Scholar
Trenn, T. J., “The Justification of Transmutation: Speculations of Ramsay and Experiments of Rutherford,” Ambix, 21 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenn, T. J., “The Geiger-Müller Counter of 1928,” Annals of Science, 43 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viol, C. H. and Kammer, G. D., “The Application of Radium in Warfare,” Transactions of the American Electrochemical Society, 32 (1917)Google Scholar
Walker, M., German National Socialism and the Quest for Nuclear Power, 1939–1949 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, R., “Before and After the Bomb: Some Literary Speculations on the Use of the Atomic Bomb,” Ambix, 44 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weart, S., Nuclear Fear: A History of Images (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Weiner, C., “Institutional Settings for Scientific Change: Episodes from the History of Nuclear Physics,” in Science and Values: Patterns of Tradition and Change, ed. Thackray, A. and Mendelsohn, E. (New York: Humanities Press, 1974)Google Scholar
Weiner, C., ed., Exploring the History of Nuclear Physics (New York: American Institute of Physics, 1972)Google Scholar
Willis, K., “The Origins of British Nuclear Culture, 1895–1939,” Journal of British Studies, 34 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., Rutherford: Simple Genius (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1983)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×