Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction: The Modern Physical and Mathematical Sciences
- Part I The Public Cultures of the Physical Sciences After 1800
- Part II Discipline Building in the Sciences: Places, Instruments, Communication
- Part III Chemistry and Physics: Problems Through the Early 1900s
- Part IV Atomic and Molecular Sciences in the Twentieth Century
- 17 Quantum Theory and Atomic Structure, 1900–1927
- 18 Radioactiviy and Nuclerar Physics
- 19 Quantum Field Theory: From QED to the Standard Model
- 20 Chemical Physics and Quantum Chemistry in the Twentieth Century
- 21 Plasmas and Solid-State Science
- 22 Macromolecules: Their Structures and Functions
- Part V Mathematics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Since the Eighteenth Century
- Part VI Problems and Promises at the End of the Twentieth Century
- Index
- References
17 - Quantum Theory and Atomic Structure, 1900–1927
from Part IV - Atomic and Molecular Sciences in the Twentieth Century
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction: The Modern Physical and Mathematical Sciences
- Part I The Public Cultures of the Physical Sciences After 1800
- Part II Discipline Building in the Sciences: Places, Instruments, Communication
- Part III Chemistry and Physics: Problems Through the Early 1900s
- Part IV Atomic and Molecular Sciences in the Twentieth Century
- 17 Quantum Theory and Atomic Structure, 1900–1927
- 18 Radioactiviy and Nuclerar Physics
- 19 Quantum Field Theory: From QED to the Standard Model
- 20 Chemical Physics and Quantum Chemistry in the Twentieth Century
- 21 Plasmas and Solid-State Science
- 22 Macromolecules: Their Structures and Functions
- Part V Mathematics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Since the Eighteenth Century
- Part VI Problems and Promises at the End of the Twentieth Century
- Index
- References
Summary
Quantum mechanics is a most intriguing theory, the empirical success of which is as great as its departure from the basic intuitions of previous theories. Its history has attracted much attention. In the 1960s, three leading contributors to this history, Thomas Kuhn, Paul Forman, and John Heilbron, put together the Archive for the History of Quantum Physics (AHQP), which contains manuscripts, correspondence, and interviews of early quantum physicists. In the same period, Martin Klein wrote clear and penetrating essays on Planck, Einstein, and early quantum theory; and Max Jammer published The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, still the best available synthesis.
Since then, this subfield of the history of science has grown considerably, as demonstrated in accounts such as the five-volume compilation by Jagdish Mehra and Helmut Rechenberg; the philosophically sensitive studies by Edward MacKinnon, John Hendry, and Sandro Petruccioli; Bruce Wheaton’s work on the empirical roots of wave-particle dualism; my own book on the classical analogy in the history of quantum theory; and a number of biographies.
These sources nicely complement one another. There have been, however, a couple of bitter controversies. Historians notoriously disagree about the nature of Planck’s quantum work around 1900. Whereas Klein sees in it a sharp departure from classical electrodynamics, Kuhn denies that Planck introduced any quantum discontinuity before Einstein. Here I take Kuhn’s side, although it follows from Allan Needell’s insightful dissertation that neither Klein nor Kuhn fully identified Planck’s goals.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 329 - 349Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002
References
, Walther Nernst and the Transition to Modern Physical Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
, “The Witches’ Sabbath: The First International Solvay Congress in Physics,” Science in Context, 6 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Born’s Probabilistic Interpretation: A Case Study of‘Concepts in Flux,’” SHPS, 21 (1990)Google Scholar
, “Matrix Theory Before Schrödinger: Philosophy, Problems, Consequences,” Isis, 74 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Birth of Bohr’s Complementarity: The Context and the Dialogues,” SHPS, 23 (1992)Google Scholar
, Arnold Sommerfeld: Lehrer und Forscher an der Schwelle zur Atomzeitalter, 1868–1951 (Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, 1975)Google Scholar
, “On the Quantum Theory of Line Spectra, Part I: On the General Theory; Part II: On the Hydrogen Spectrum,” Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Matematisk-fysiske Meddelser, 4 (1918)Google Scholar
, “The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory,” Nature, 121 (1928)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules,” Philosophical Magazine(hereafter PM), 26 (1913)Google Scholar
, “Ondes et quanta,” Académie des Sciences, Comptes-rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances, 177 (1923)Google Scholar
, An Institute for an Empire: The Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt, 1871–1918 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), chap. 4Google Scholar
“Le dessin et la couleur,” introduction to Bohr, Physique atomique et connaissance humaine (Paris: Gallimard, 1991)Google Scholar
and , “Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac, 1902–1984,” Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 32 (1986)Google Scholar
, From c-numbers to q-numbers: The Classical Analogy in the History of Quantum Theory (hereafter CQ) (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992)Google Scholar
, “Schrödinger’s Statistical Physics and Some Related Themes,” in Erwin Schrödinger: Philosophy and the Birth of Quantum Mechanics, ed. and (Gif-sur-Yvette: Frontières, 1992)Google Scholar
, ”Statistics and Combinatorics in Early Quantum Theory, II: Early Symptoms of Indistinguishability and Holism,” HSPS, 21 (1991)Google Scholar
, “From the Chemical Constant to Quantum Statistics: A Thermodynamical Route to Quantum Mechanics,” Physis, 29 (1992)Google Scholar
, “The Fundamental Equations of Quantum Mechanics,” Royal Society of London, Series A, Proceedings (hereafter PRS), I 109 (1925)Google Scholar
, Die Atomphysiker: Eine Geschichte der Theoretischen Physik am Beispiel der Sommerfeldschen Schule (Brauchschweig: Wieweg, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Über eine die Erzeugung und die Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkts,” Annalen derPhysik (hereafter AP), 17 (1905)Google Scholar
and ed. “Niels Bohr and the Atlantis of Kantianism,” in Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Philosophy of Niels Bohr: The Framework of Complementarity (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1985)Google Scholar
, “Weimar Culture, Causality, and Quantum Theory, 1918–1927: Adaptation by German Physicists and Mathematicians to a Hostile Intellectual Environment,” Historical Studies in the Physical (and Biological) Sciences (hereafter HSPS), 3 (1971)Google Scholar
, “The Coming of Age of Erwin Schrödinger: His Quantum Statistics of Ideal Gases,” AHES, 17 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “The Genesis”; Heilbron, “The KosselSommerfeld Theory and the Ring Atom,” Isis, 58 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Dilemmas of an Upright Man: Max Planck as Spokesman for German Science (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986)Google Scholar
, H. G. J. Moseley: The Life and Letters of an English Physicist, 1887–1915 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974)Google Scholar
, “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik un Mechanik,” ZP, 43 (1927)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Über die quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen,” Zeitschrift für Physik (hereafter ZP), 33 (1925)Google Scholar
, The Creation of Quantum Mechanics and the Bohr-Pauli Dialogue (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “On the Hesitant Rise of Quantum Physics Research in the United States,” in Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein, 2d ed. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
, “Franck and Hertz versus Townsend: A Study of Two Types of Experimental Error,” HSPS, 20 (1989)Google Scholar
, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics (hereafter CD) (New York: McGraw Hill, 1966), chap. 1.1Google Scholar
, “Über eine neue Begründung der Quantenmechanik,” ZP, 40 (1927), and 44 (1927)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Analysis of Information Ties Dynamics in Early Quantum Mechanics (1925–1927) (Moscow: Academia Nauk, 1987)Google Scholar
, “Max Planck and the Beginning of the Quantum Theory,” Archive for the History of Exact Sciences (hereafter AHES), 1 (1962)Google Scholar
, Paul Ehrenfest, vol. 1: The Making of a Theoretical Physicist (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1970)Google Scholar
, “Einstein and the Development of Quantum Physics,” in Einstein: A Centenary Volume, ed. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979)Google Scholar
, “Thermodynamics” and “Einstein and the Wave-Particle Duality,” Natural Philosopher, 3 (1964):Google Scholar
, “Kramers’ Negative Dispersion, the Virtual Oscillator Model, and the Correspondence Principle,” Centaurus, 36 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Historical Roots of Born’s Probability Interpretation,” Japanese Studies in History of Science, 17 (1978)Google Scholar
, “The Fine Structure of Hydrogen and the Gross Structure of the Physics Community, 1916–1926,” HSPS, 15 (1985)Google Scholar
, “Erwin Schrödinger and the Wave Equation: The Crucial Phase,” Centaurus, 26 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , Sources of Quantum Physics: An Inventory and Report (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1967)Google Scholar
, Black-body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894–1912 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1967)Google Scholar
, Scientific Explanation and Atomic Physics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982)Google Scholar
and ed. Les conseils Solvay et les débuts de la physique moderne, (Brussels: Université libre de Bruxelles, 1995)Google Scholar
and , The Historical Development of Quantum Theory, 5 vols. (hereafter HD) (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1982–7)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Korrespondenz, Individualität und Komplementarität: Eine Studie zur Geistgeschichte der Quantentheorie in den Beiträgen Niels Bohrs (Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner, 1965)Google Scholar
, Niels Bohr’s Philosophy of Physics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Formation of the Sommerfeld Quantum Theory of 1916,” Japanese Studies in the History of Science (JSHS), 12 (1973)Google Scholar
, “Aristocratic Culture and the Pursuit of Science: The de Broglies in Modern France,” Isis, 88 (1997)Google Scholar
, “Subtle is the Lord–”: The Science and Life of Albert Einstein (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
, Atoms, Metaphors and Paradoxes: Niels Bohr and the Construction of a New Physics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Über eine Verbesserung des Wienschen Spektralgleichung,” in , Verhandlungen (hereafter PGV), 2 (1900)Google Scholar
, “Fundamental Research at Bell Laboratories: The Discovery of Electron Diffraction,” HSPS, 12 (1981)Google Scholar
, “Zur Quantenhypothese,” Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Physikalischmathematische Klasse, Sitzungsberichte (hereafter BB) (1916)Google Scholar
, “Unmechanischer Zwang: Pauli, Heisenberg, and the Rejection of the Mechanical Atom,” HSPS, 8 (1977)Google Scholar
, “Experimental Constraints on Formal Quantum Mechanics: The Emergence of Born’s Quantum Theory of Collision Processes in Göttingen, 1924–1927,” AHES, 90 (1996)Google Scholar
, “Einstein and the Quantum: Fifty Years of Struggle,” in From Quarks to Quasars, ed. (Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1983)Google Scholar
, introduction to Bohr, Collected Works, ed. and , 10 vols. (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1972–99), vol. 5 (1984)Google Scholar
, The Compton Effect: Turning Point in Physics (Canton, Mass.: Science History Publications, 1975)Google Scholar
, “Exclusion Principle and Spin,” in Theoretical Physics in the Twentieth Centrury, ed. and (New York: Interscience, 1960)Google Scholar
ed. “Lectures on the History of Atomic Physics,” in History of Twentieth Century Physics, (New York: Academic Press, 1977)Google Scholar
, “Schrödinger’s Route to Wave-Mechanics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (SHPS), 10 (1979)Google Scholar
, The Tiger and the Shark: Empirical Roots of WaveParticle Dualism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “How Do Sums Count? On the Cultural Origins of Statistical Causality,” in The Probabilistic Revolution, ed. et al., vol. 1: Ideas in History (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987)Google Scholar