Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T19:55:55.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Intersections of Physical Science and Western Religion in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries

from Part I - The Public Cultures of the Physical Sciences After 1800

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Mary Jo Nye
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Get access

Summary

When we consider issues in science and religion in the nineteenth century and even in subsequent years, we naturally think first of the evolutionary controversies that have commanded public attention. However, there are important ways in which developments in physical science continued to intersect with the interests of people of all religious beliefs. Indeed, the closer one approached the end of the twentieth century, the more the interaction between science and religion was dominated by topics involving the physical sciences, and the more they became as important to non-Christian religions as to various forms of Christianity. For the nineteenth century, most issues were new versions of debates that had been introduced long before. Because these reconsiderations were frequently prompted by new developments in physical science, forcing people of religious faith into a reactive mode, the impression grew that religion was increasingly being placed on the defensive. For a variety of reasons, this form of the relationship between the two fields changed greatly over the course of the twentieth century until, at the dawn of the third millennium of the common era, the intersection between science and religion is currently being informed both by new theological perspectives and by new developments in physical science.

Religion intersects with the physical sciences primarily in questions having to do with the origin, development, destiny, and meaning of matter and the material world. At the beginning of the period under review, the origin of matter itself was not regarded as a scientific question. The development of the cosmos, however, or how it had acquired its present contours and inhabitants, was a subject that had been informed by new telescopic observations and even more by the impressive achievements of Newtonian physical scientists of the eighteenth century. The Enlightenment had also produced fresh philosophical examinations of old religious questions and even of religious reasoning itself.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Badash, Lawrence, “The Completeness of Nineteenth-Century Science,” Isis, 63 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, John D. and Tipler, Frank J., The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah, The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas, ed. Hardy, Henry (New York: Knopf, 1991).Google Scholar
Brooke, John, Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), chap. 6.Google Scholar
Brush, Stephen, “The Prayer Test,” American Scientist, 62 (1974).Google Scholar
Burchfield, Joe D., Lord Kelvin and the Age of the Earth (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caneva, Kenneth, Robert Mayer and the Conservation of Energy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Cantor, Geoffrey, Michael Faraday: Sandemanian and Scientist: A Study of Science and Religion in the Nineteenth Century (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Karen L., The Banalization of Nihilism: Twentieth Century Responses to Meaninglessness (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Crowe, Michael J., The Extraterrestrial Life Debate, 1750–1900: The Idea of a Plurality of Worlds from Kant to Lowell (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
DeWitt, B. S. and Graham, N., eds., The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Dicke, Robert, “Dirac’s Cosmology and Mach’s Principle,” Nature, 192 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirac’s, original letter is entitled “The Cosmological Constants” and is found in Nature, 139 (1937).Google Scholar
Elliot, Hugh trans. Zoological Philosophy, (New York: Hafner, 1963).Google Scholar
Ferngren, Gary B., Larson, Edward J., and Amundsen, Darrell W. ed. The History of Science and Religion in the Western Tradition: An Encyclopedia, (New York: Garland, 2000).Google Scholar
Gardner, Martin, “WAP, SAP, PAP, & FAP,” New York Review of Books (3 May 1986).Google Scholar
Geison, Gerald L., The Private Science of Louis Pasteur(Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995), chap. 5.Google Scholar
Gilbert, James, Redeeming Culture: American Religion in an Age of Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilkey’s, article was “Cosmology, Ontology, and the Travail of Biblical Language,” Journal of Religion, 41 (1961).Google Scholar
Gregory, Frederick, Scientific Materialism in Nineteenth Century Germany (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Frederick, Nature Lost? Natural Science and the German Theological Traditions of the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992), chaps. 3–5.Google Scholar
Hasler, Ueli, Beherrschte Natur: Die Anpassung der Theologie an die bürgerliche Naturauffassung im 19. Jahrhundert (Bern: Peter Lang, 1982).Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H., “On the Interaction of Natural Forces,” Popular Scientific Lectures (New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1962).Google Scholar
Helmholtz’s, address is “On the Application of the Law of Conservation of Force to Organic Nature,” Proceedings of the Royal Institution, 3 (1858–62).Google Scholar
Hiebert, Erwin, “The Uses and Abuses of Thermodynamics in Religion,” Daedalus, 95 (1966).Google Scholar
Hollinger, David A., In the American Province: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ideas (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Jones, Richard Foster, Ancients and Moderns: A Study of the Rise of the Scientific Movement in Seventeenth Century England (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Kohak, Erazim, The Embers and the Stars: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Moral Sense of Nature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Larson, Edward J.and Whitman, Larry, “Scientists Are Still Keeping the Faith,” Nature, 386 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolson, Marjorie, “Thomas Paine, Edward Nares, and Mrs. Piozzi’s Marginalia,” Huntington Library Bulletin, 10 (1936).Google Scholar
Noble, David F., A World Without Women: The Christian Clerical Culture of Western Science (New York: Knopf, 1993), chap. 9.Google Scholar
Numbers, Ronald L., Creation by Natural Law: Laplace’s Nebular Hypothesis in American Thought (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Ord-Hume, Arthur W. J. G., Perpetual Motion: The History of an Obsession (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Paul, Harry, The Edge of Contingency: French Catholic Reaction to Scientific Change from Darwin to Duhem (Gainesville: University Presses of Florida, 1979).Google Scholar
Paul II’s, John address to a 1985 conference in Rome on “Evolution and Christian Thought,” along with the contributions of Catholic participants in the conference, is given in Evolutionismus und Christentum, ed. Spaemann, Robert, Löw, Reinhard, and Koslowski, Peter (Weinheim: Acta humaniora, VCH, 1986).Google Scholar
Poggi, S. and Bossi, M. ed. “‘Nature is an Organized Whole’: J. F. Fries’s Reformulation of Kant’s Philosophy of Organism,” in Romanticism in Science, (Amsterdam: Kluwer, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, John, The Faith of a Physicist: Reflections of a Bottom-Up Thinker (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, John D., “Science, Religion, and Psychical Research: The Monistic Thought of Oliver Lodge,” Harvard Theological Review, 71 (1978).Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Russell, Robert John, Stoeger, William R., and Coyne, George V.John Paul II on Science and Religion: Reflections on the New View from Rome, (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Russell, Robert John, “Introduction,” Quantum Cosmology and the Laws of Nature: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. Russell, R. J., Murphy, Nancey, and Isham, C. J. (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Sheehan, William, The Planet Mars: A History of Observation and Discovery (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Smith, Crosbie, “Natural Philosophy and Thermodynamics: William Thomson and the ‘Dynamical Theory of Heat,’British Journal for the History of Science, 9 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Crosbie and Wise, M. Norton, Energy and Empire: A Biographical Study of Lord Kelvin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Wertheim, Margaret, Pythagoras’s Trousers: God, Physics, and the Gender Wars (New York: Times Books, 1995), chap. 4.Google Scholar
Yandell, Keith, “Protestant Theology and Natural Science in the Twentieth Century,” in God and Nature, ed. Lindberg, David and Numbers, Ronald (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×