Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of boxes
- List of contributors
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Introduction: what is strategy as practice?
- Part I Ontological and Epistemological Questions
- Part II Theoretical Resources: Social Theory
- 8 Giddens, structuration theory and strategy as practice
- 9 An activity theory approach to strategy as practice
- 10 A Bourdieusian perspective on strategizing
- 11 An economies-of-worth perspective on strategy as practice: justification, valuation and critique in the practice of strategy
- 12 A Wittgensteinian perspective on strategizing
- 13 A Foucauldian perspective on strategic practice: strategy as the art of (un)folding
- 14 A narrative approach to strategy as practice: strategy-making from texts and narratives
- 15 Actor–network theory and strategy as practice
- Part III Theoretical Resources: Organization and Management Theories
- Part IV Methodological Resources
- Part V Substantive Topic Areas
- Index
- References
8 - Giddens, structuration theory and strategy as practice
from Part II - Theoretical Resources: Social Theory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2015
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of boxes
- List of contributors
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Introduction: what is strategy as practice?
- Part I Ontological and Epistemological Questions
- Part II Theoretical Resources: Social Theory
- 8 Giddens, structuration theory and strategy as practice
- 9 An activity theory approach to strategy as practice
- 10 A Bourdieusian perspective on strategizing
- 11 An economies-of-worth perspective on strategy as practice: justification, valuation and critique in the practice of strategy
- 12 A Wittgensteinian perspective on strategizing
- 13 A Foucauldian perspective on strategic practice: strategy as the art of (un)folding
- 14 A narrative approach to strategy as practice: strategy-making from texts and narratives
- 15 Actor–network theory and strategy as practice
- Part III Theoretical Resources: Organization and Management Theories
- Part IV Methodological Resources
- Part V Substantive Topic Areas
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
Anthony Giddens’ (1984) structuration theory has an obvious appeal for strategy-as-practice researchers. Of course, Giddens is a practice theorist himself; for him, understanding people's activity is the central purpose of social analysis. Giddens makes a direct appeal, therefore, offering concepts of agency, structure and structuration that have intrinsic importance to practice research. His conception of human agency affirms that people's activity matters: practice needs studying because it makes a difference to outcomes. At the same time, his notion of social structure allows for both constraint and enablement: to understand activity, we must attend to institutional embeddedness. And the concept of structuration brings together structure and agency to give them flow – continuity, but also the possibility of structural change.
All these features of structuration theory are attractive to SAP researchers in themselves. Giddens has an indirect appeal as well, however, for his central concepts can help connect strategy as practice to other streams of organizational research too. The structurationist sense of flow builds a bridge to the important process tradition in organization theory, which has long drawn on structuration theory to analyse change over time (Pettigrew 1985; Floyd et al. 2011; Langley 2009). The importance of people's activity complements the growing appreciation of the role of individuals in the emergent micro-foundations stream of strategy research (Powell, Lovallo and Fox 2011; Barney and Felin 2013). Finally, and constituting an important theme in this chapter, structuration theory's concern for institutional embeddedness offers an obvious platform for recent efforts to encourage strategy as practice and institutional theory to work together (Suddaby, Seidl and Lê 2013; Vaara and Whittington 2012).
My task in this chapter should be an easy one, therefore. In exploring the various ways in which Giddens’ structuration theory may contribute to strategy-as-practice research, I shall be pushing at many open doors. Structuration theory is not easy to apply empirically, however, and there are alternative approaches that can do more or less similar kinds of job. My advocacy of structuration theory will not be monomaniac.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 145 - 164Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
(1988), The System of the Professions: An Essay on the Expert Division of Labor. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
, and (2005), ‘From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: the impact of change recipient sensemaking’, Organization Studies, 26/11: 1573–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986), ‘Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31/1: 78–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2013), ‘What are microfoundations?’, Academy of Management Perspectives, 27/2:138–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2011), ‘Contacts and contracts: cross-level network dynamics in the development of an aircraft material’, Organization Science, 22/4: 940–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989), Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Realist Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
, and (2005), ‘Enacting integrated information technology: a human agency perspective’, Organization Science, 16/1: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2012), ‘Reclaiming agency, recovering change? An exploration of the practice theory of Theodore Schatzki’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 42/3: 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1962), Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
, and (2007), ‘Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: discovering strategy in the logic of practice’, Human Relations, 60/1: 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2007), ‘Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: rethinking theoretical frames’, Human Relations, 60/1: 179–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2011), ‘The strategic competence of accountants and middle managers in budget making’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36/3: 167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘Resources in emerging structures and processes of change’, Organization Science, 15/3: 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000), ‘Strategizing throughout the organization: management role conflict and strategic renewal’, Academy of Management Review, 25/1: 154–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2011), ‘Processes and practices of strategizing and organizing: review, development, and the role of bridging and umbrella constructs’, Journal of Management Studies, 48/5: 933–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Competition and business strategy in historical perspective’, Business History Review, 76/1: 37–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002), ‘Laughing with the gurus’, Business Strategy Review, 13/3: 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1980), ‘Managing our way to economic decline’, Harvard Business Review, 58/4: 67–77.Google Scholar
(2000), ‘Strategic decision making, discourse and strategy as social practice’, Journal of Management Studies, 37/7: 955–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2013), ‘The employment of structuration theory in organizational discourse: exploring methodological challenges’, Management Communication Quarterly, 27/4: 599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2001), ‘Organizational change as discourse: communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation’, Academy of Management Journal, 44/4: 755–78.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘Developing issue-selling effectiveness over time: issue selling as resourcing’, Organization Science, 18/4: 560–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008), ‘Shaping strategy as a structuration process’. Academy of Management Journal, 51/4: 621–50.Google Scholar
, and (2002), ‘Top teams and strategy in a UK university’, Journal of Management Studies, 39/3: 355–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2007), Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008), ‘Framing contests: strategy making under uncertainty’, Organization Science, 19/5: 729–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2011), ‘Strategy and PowerPoint: an inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making’, Organization Science, 22/2: 320–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2010), ‘The odd couple: Margaret Archer, Anthony Giddens and British social theory’, British Journal of Sociology, 61/S1: 253–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1991), ‘Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: a critique’, Organization Studies, 12/2: 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2009), ‘Studying processes in and around organizations’, in , and (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods: 409–29. London: Sage.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Strategic practices as enablers and disablers of championing activity’, Strategic Organization, 3/2: 157–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008), ‘Role expectations and middle manager strategic agency’, Journal of Management Studies, 45/2: 294–316.Google Scholar
, and (2008), ‘On the problem of participation in strategy: a critical discursive perspective’, Organization Science, 19/2: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2012), Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, , and (1998), ‘Business planning as pedagogy: language and control in a changing institutional field’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43/2: 257–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2013), ‘Reproducing the social structure: a Marxist critique of Anthony Giddens's structuration methodology’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37/5: 1019–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), ‘Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations’, Organization Science, 11/4: 404–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2013), ‘Discourse revisited: dimensions and employment of first-order strategy discourse during institutional adoption’, Strategic Management Journal, 34/8: 935–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2007), ‘Strategizing in the multi-business firm: strategy teams at multiple levels and over time’, Human Relations, 60/1: 99–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990), Managing on the Edge: How Successful Companies Use Conflict to Stay Ahead. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
, and (2007), ‘Narrative networks: patterns of technology and organization’, Organization Science, 18/5: 781–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985), The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in Imperial Chemical Industries. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘The influence of a structurationist view on strategic management research’, Journal of Management Studies, 41/2: 247–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2011), ‘Behavioral strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 32/13: 1369–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1980), ‘The structuring of organizational structures’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 25/1: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing’, European Journal of Social Theory, 5/2: 243–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘Reflections on the realist “turn” in organization and management studies’, Journal of Management Studies, 42/8: 1621–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: how middle managers interpret and sell change every day’, Journal of Management Studies, 42/7: 1413–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘The role of micro-strategies in the engineering of firm evolution’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘Strategizing as lived experience and strategists’ everyday efforts to shape strategic direction’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), ‘Introduction: practice theory’, in , , and (eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory: 1–14. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
, , and (2006), ‘Guess who's coming to dinner? Structures and the use of liminality in strategic management consultancy’, Human Relations, 59/7: 929–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2013), ‘Strategy-as-practice meets neo-institutional theory’, Strategic Organization, 11/3: 329–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2012), ‘People, practice, and technology: restoring Giddens’ broader philosophy to the study of information systems’, Information and Organization, 22/3: 188–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Jack: What I've Learned Leading a Great Company and Great People. London: Headline.Google Scholar
(1989), Corporate Strategies in Recession and Recovery: Social Structures and Strategic Choice. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
(1992), ‘Putting Giddens into action: social systems and managerial agency’, Journal of Management Studies, 29/6: 693–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 26/4: 613–34.Google Scholar
, , and (2011), ‘Opening strategy: evolution of a precarious profession’, British Journal of Management, 22/3: 531–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , and (2003), ‘Taking strategy seriously: responsibility and reform for an important social practice’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 12/4: 396–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28
- Cited by