Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:43:18.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: what is strategy as practice?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

By
Damon Golsorkhi ,
Linda Rouleau ,
David Seidl  and
Eero Vaara
Edited by
Damon Golsorkhi ,
Linda Rouleau ,
David Seidl  and
Eero Vaara
Damon Golsorkhi
Affiliation:
Grenoble Ecole de Management, France
Linda Rouleau
Affiliation:
Department of Management of HEC Montréal
David Seidl
Affiliation:
University of Zurich
Eero Vaara
Affiliation:
Aalto University School of Business, Helsinki
Damon Golsorkhi
Affiliation:
Grenoble School of Management
Linda Rouleau
Affiliation:
HEC Montréal
David Seidl
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Eero Vaara
Affiliation:
Svenska Handelshögskolan, Helsinki
Get access

Summary

Strategy as practice as a research approach

Since early 2000 strategy as practice (SAP) has emerged as a distinctive approach for studying strategic management, strategic decision-making, strategizing, strategy-making and strategy work (Whittington 1996; Johnson, Melin and Whittington 2003; Jarzabkowski, Balogun and Seidl 2007). In recent years SAP research has confirmed its vitality and fulfilled its promise by being more lively than ever (Golsorkhi et al. 2010; Vaara and Whittington 2012; Balogun et al. 2014; Seidl and Whittington 2014). This second edition of the handbook confirms the strong enthusiasm for the generation of new ideas about the way practitioners are doing their strategy work. Strategy-as-practice research focuses on the micro-level social activities, processes and practices that characterize organizational strategy and strategizing. This provides not only an organizational perspective into strategic decision-making but also a strategic angle for examining the process of organizing, and thereby serves as a useful research programme and social movement for connecting contemporary strategic management research with practice-oriented organizational studies.

Strategy as practice can be regarded as an alternative to the mainstream strategy research via its attempt to shift attention away from a ‘mere’ focus on the effects of strategies on performance alone to a more comprehensive, in-depth analysis of what actually takes place in strategy formulation, planning and implementation and other activities that deal with the thinking and doing of strategy. In other words, SAP research is interested in the ‘black box’ of strategy work that once led the research agenda in strategic management research (Mintzberg 1973; Mintzberg and Waters 1985; Pettigrew 1973), but has thereafter been replaced by other issues, not least because of the increasing dominance of the micro-economic approach and a methodological preoccupation with statistical analysis. Because of its micro-level focus, studies following the strategy-as-practice agenda tend to draw on theories and apply methods that differ from the common practices of strategy scholars. In this way, SAP research can contribute to the evolution of strategic management as a discipline and body of knowledge with new theories and methodological choices.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 1 - 30
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C., and Burton-Taylor, S. (2007), ‘Inter-team coordination activities as a source of customer satisfaction’, Human Relations, 60/1: 59–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmuß, B., and Oshima, S. (2012), ‘Negotiation of entitlement in proposal sequences’, Discourse Studies, 14/1: 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., Huff, A. S., and Johnson, P. (2003), ‘Three responses to the methodological challenges of studying strategizing’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., Jacobs, C. D., Jarzabkowski, P., Mantere, S., and Vaara, E. (2014), ‘Placing strategy discourse in context: sociomateriality, sensemaking, and power’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., and Johnson, G. (2004), ‘Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal, 47/4: 523–49.Google Scholar
Balogun, J. (2005), ‘From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: the impact of change recipient sensemaking’, Organization Studies, 26/11: 1573–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, D., and Elmes, M. (1997), ‘Strategy retold: toward a narrative view of strategic discourse’, Academy of Management Review, 22/2: 429–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beech, N., and Johnson, P. (2005), ‘Discourses of disrupted identities in the practice of strategic change’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18/1: 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990), The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1994), Raisons pratiques: Sur la théorie de l'action. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Bourque, N., and Johnson, G. (2008), ‘Strategy workshops and “away-days” as ritual’, in Hodgkinson, G. P., and Starbuck, W. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Organizational Decision Making: 552–64. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P. (1991), ‘Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation’, Organization Science, 2/1: 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. D., and Thompson, E. R. (2013), ‘A narrative approach to strategy-as-practice’, Business History, 55/7: 1143–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundin, E., and Melin, L. (2006), ‘Unfolding the dynamics of emotions: how emotion drives or counteracts strategizing’, International Journal of Work Organization and Emotion, 1/3: 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundin, E., and Nordqvist, M. (2008), ‘Beyond facts and figures: the role of emotions in boardroom dynamics’, Corporate Governance, 16/4: 326–41.Google Scholar
Burgelman, R. A. (1983), ‘A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28/2: 223–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Hunt, C. (2007), ‘Complexity in practice’, Human Relations, 60/1: 793–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, C. (2013), ‘The age of strategy: strategy, organizations and society’, Business History, 55/7: 1047–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, C., Clegg, S., and Kornberger, M. (2008), ‘Strategy as practice?’, Strategic Organization, 6/1: 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, C. (2010), ‘Re-framing strategy: power, politics and accounting’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23/5: 573–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, R., and Holt, R. (2006), ‘Strategy as practical coping: a Heideggerian perspective’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, R. (2009), Strategy without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, R., and MacKay, B. (2007), ‘Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: discovering strategy in the logic of practice’, Human Relations, 60/1: 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, I., Kwon, W., and Wodak, R. (2012), ‘A context-sensitive approach to analysing talk in strategy meetings’, British Journal of Management, 23/4: 455–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, S., Carter, C., and Kornberger, M. (2004), ‘Get up, I feel like being a strategy machine’, European Management Review, 1/1: 21–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Certeau, M. (1984), The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cornut, F., Giroux, H., and Langley, A. (2012), ‘The strategic plan as a genre’, Discourse and Communication, 6/1: 21–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daigle, P., and Rouleau, L. (2010), ‘Strategic plans in arts organizations: a compromising tool between artistic and managerial values’, International Journal of Arts Management, 12/3: 13–30.Google Scholar
Dameron, S., and Torset, C. (2014), ‘The discursive construction of strategists’ subjectivities: towards a paradox lens on strategy’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, J.-L., Dompierre, G., Langley, A., and Rouleau, L. (2011), ‘Escalating indecision: between reification and strategic ambiguity’, Organization Science, 22/1: 225–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., and Rouleau, L. (2007), ‘Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: rethinking theoretical frames’, Human Relations, 60/1: 179–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, P., and Collings, D. G. (2014), ‘Discipline and punish? Strategy discourse, senior manager subjectivity and contradictory power effects’, Human Relations, 67/12: 1513–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1938), Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (1991), Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time, Division 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. (1989), ‘Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments’, Academy of Management Journal, 32/3: 543–76.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., and Punamäki, R.-L. (eds.) (1999), Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzamel, M., and Willmott, H. (2008), ‘Strategy as discourse in a global retailer: a supplement to rationalist and interpretive accounts’, Organization Studies, 29/2: 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzamel, M. (2010), ‘Strategy and strategizing: a poststructuralist perspective’, in Baum, J. A. C., and Lampel, J. (eds.), Advances in Strategic Management, vol. XXVII, The Globalization of Strategy Research: 75–109. Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2003), Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fauré, B., and Rouleau, L. (2011), ‘The strategic competence of accountants and middle managers in budget making’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36/3: 167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S., and Orlikowski, W. J. (2011), ‘Theorizing practice and practicing theory’, Organization Science, 22/5: 1240–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenton, C., and Langley, A. (2011), ‘Strategy as practice and the narrative turn’, Organization Studies, 32/9: 1171–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, S., Cornelissen, J., Wright, M., and Delios, A. (2011), ‘Processes and practices of strategizing and organizing: review, development, and the role of bridging and umbrella constructs’, Journal of Management Studies, 48/5: 933–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. Gordon, C.New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Gioia, D. A., and Chittipeddi, K. (1991), ‘Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation’, Strategic Management Journal, 12/6: 433–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraudeau, M. (2008), ‘The drafts of strategy: opening up plans and their uses’, Long Range Planning, 41/3: 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds.) (2010), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guérard, S., Langley, A., and Seidl, D. (2013), ‘Rethinking the concept of performance in strategy research: towards a performativity perspective’, M@n@gement, 16/5: 566–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, C., and Thomas, R. (2014), ‘Strategy, discourse and practice: the intensification of power’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 320–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healey, M. P., Hodgkinson, G. P., Whittington, R., and Johnson, G. (forthcoming), ‘Off to plan or out to lunch? Relationships between design characteristics and outcomes of strategy workshops’, British Journal of Management.
Hendry, J. (2000), ‘Strategic decision making, discourse and strategy as social practice’, Journal of Management Studies, 37/7: 955–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, J., and Seidl, D. (2003), ‘The structure and significance of strategic episodes: social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 175–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, K. P., Kiel, G. C., and Nicholson, G. (2010), ‘How boards strategise: a strategy as practice view’, Long Range Planning, 43/1: 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heracleous, L., and Jacobs, C. D. (2008), ‘Understanding organizations through embodied metaphors’, Organizations Studies, 29/1: 45–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herepath, A. (2014), ‘In the loop: a realist approach to structure and agency in the practice of strategy’, Organization Studies, 35/6: 857–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P., and Clarke, I. (2007), ‘Conceptual note: exploring the cognitive significance of organizational strategizing: a dual-process framework and research agenda’, Human Relations, 60/1: 243–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P., Whittington, R., Johnson, G., and Schwarz, M. (2006), ‘The role of strategy workshops in strategy development processes: formality, communication, co-ordination and inclusion’, Long Range Planning, 39/5: 479–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoon, C. (2007), ‘Committees as strategic practice: the role of strategic conversation in a public administration’, Human Relations, 60/6: 921–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, A. S., Neyer, A.-K., and Möslein, K. (2010), ‘Broader methods to support new insights into strategizing’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 201–16. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hydle, K. (forthcoming), ‘Temporal and spatial dimensions of strategizing’, Organization Studies.
Jarzabkowski, P. (2003), ‘Strategic practices: an activity theory perspective on continuity and change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2004), ‘Strategy as practice: recursive, adaptive and practices-in-use’, Organization Studies, 25/4: 529–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2005), Strategy as Practice: An Activity-Based Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2008), ‘Shaping strategy as a structuration process’, Academy of Management Journal, 51/4: 621–50.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., and Balogun, J. (2009), ‘The practice and process of delivering integration through strategic planning’, Journal of Management Studies, 46/8: 1255–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., and Seidl, D. (2007), ‘Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., and Kaplan, S. (2015), ‘Strategy tools-in-use: a framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice’, Strategic Management Journal, 36/4: 537–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Matthiesen, J., and Van de Ven, A. H. (2009), ‘Doing which work? A practice approach to institutional pluralism’, in Lawrence, T., Leca, B., and Suddaby, R. (eds.), Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations: 284–316. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., and Seidl, D. (2008), ‘The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy’, Organization Studies, 29/11: 1391–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., and Spee, P. (2009), ‘Strategy-as-practice: a review and future directions for the field’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 11/1: 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Spee, P., and Smets, M. (2013), ‘Material artifacts: practices for doing strategy with “stuff”’, European Management Journal, 31/1: 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., and Wilson, D. C. (2002), ‘Top teams and strategy in a UK university’, Journal of Management Studies, 39/3: 355–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2006), ‘Actionable strategy knowledge: a practice perspective’, European Management Journal, 24/3: 348–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., and Huff, A. S. (1998), ‘Everyday innovation and everyday strategy’, in Hamel, G., Prahalad, C. K., Thomas, H., and O'Neal, D. (eds.), Strategic Flexibility: Managing in a Turbulent Environment: 3–27. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L., and Whittington, R. (2007), Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Melin, L., and Whittington, R. (2003), ‘Guest editors’ introduction: micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Prashantham, S., Floyd, S., and Bourque, N. (2010), ‘The ritualization of strategy workshops’, Organization Studies, 31/12: 1589–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, B., and Messner, M. (2010), ‘Accounting and strategising: a case study from new product development’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35/2: 184–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2008), ‘Framing contests: strategy making under uncertainty’, Organization Science, 19/5: 729–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2011), ‘Strategy and PowerPoint: an inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making’, Organization Science, 22/2: 320–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S., and Orlikowski, W. J. (2013), ‘Temporal work in strategy making’, Organization Science, 24/4: 965–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzberg, G. (2013), ‘Separation and reconnection: episodic organizational arenas in the strategic process’, Journal of Strategy and Management, 6/3: 212–28.Google Scholar
King, B. (2008), ‘Strategizing at leading venture capital firms: of planning, opportunism and deliberate emergence’, Long Range Planning, 41/3: 345–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, D., and Morgan, G. (1991), ‘Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: a critique’, Organization Studies, 12/2: 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, M., and Clegg, S. (2011), ‘Strategy as performative practice: the case of Sydney 2030’, Strategic Organization, 9/2: 136–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, W., Clarke, I., and Wodak, R. (2014), ‘Micro-level discursive strategies for constructing shared views around strategic issues in team meetings’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 265–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laine, P.-M., and Vaara, E. (2007), ‘Struggling over subjectivity: a discursive analysis of strategic development in an engineering group’, Human Relations, 60/1: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, A. (1989), ‘In search of rationality: the purposes behind the use of formal analysis in organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 34/4: 598–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, F., and Maitlis, S. (2014), ‘Emotional dynamics and strategizing processes: a study of strategic conversations in top team meetings’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 202–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, K., and Golden-Biddle, K. (1997), ‘Constructing opportunities for contribution: structuring intertextual coherence and “problematizing” in organizational studies’, Academy of Management Journal, 40/5: 1023–62.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M., and Crumley, E. (2007), ‘New practice creation: an institutional perspective on innovation’, Organization Studies, 28/7: 993–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntosh, R., MacLean, D., and Seidl, D. (2010), ‘Unpacking the effectivity paradox of strategy workshops: do strategy workshops produce strategic change?’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 291–309. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maitlis, S., and Lawrence, T. B. (2003), ‘Orchestral manoeuvres in the dark: understanding failure in organizational strategizing’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 109–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantere, S. (2005), ‘Strategic practices as enablers and disablers of championing activity’, Strategic Organization, 3/2: 157–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantere, S. (2008), ‘Role expectations and middle manager strategic agency’, Journal of Management Studies, 45/2: 294–316.Google Scholar
Mantere, S. (2013), ‘What is organizational strategy? A language-based view’, Journal of Management Studies, 50/8: 1408–26.Google Scholar
Mantere, S., and Vaara, E. (2008), ‘On the problem of participation in strategy: a critical discursive perspective’, Organization Science, 19/2: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, D. (2010), ‘Strategy-as-power: ambiguity, contradiction and the exercise of power in a UK building society’, Organization, 17/2: 151–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P. Y. (2003), ‘“Said and done” versus “saying and doing”: gendering practices, practicing gender at work’, Gender and Society, 17/3: 342–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1973), The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., and Théoret, A. (1976), ‘The structure of “unstructured” decision processes’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 21/2: 246–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H., and Waters, J. A. (1985), ‘Of strategies, deliberate and emergent’, Strategic Management Journal, 6/3: 257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirabeau, L., and Maguire, S. (2014), ‘From autonomous strategic behavior to emergent strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 35/8: 1202–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molloy, E., and Whittington, R. (2005), ‘Practices of organizing: inside and outside the processes of change’, in Szulanski, G., Porac, J., and Doz, Y. (eds.), Advances in Strategic Management, vol. XXII, Strategy Process: 491–515. Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
Mueller, F., Whittle, A., Gilchrist, A., and Lenney, P. (2013), ‘Politics and strategy practice: an ethnomethodologically-informed discourse analysis perspective’, Business History, 55/7: 1168–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolini, D. (2012), Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., and Yanow, D. (2003), Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach. Armonk, NY: M E Sharpe.Google Scholar
Nordqvist, M., and Melin, L. (2008), ‘Strategic planning champions: social craftspersons, artful interpreters and known strangers’, Long Range Planning, 41/3: 326–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakes, L. S., Townley, B., and Cooper, D. J. (1998), ‘Business planning as pedagogy: language and control in a changing institutional field’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43/2: 257–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000), ‘Using technology and constituting structures’, Organization Science, 11/4: 404–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortner, S. B. (2006), Anthropology and Social Theory: Culture, Power and the Acting Subject. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pälli, P., Vaara, E., and Sorsa, V. (2009), ‘Strategy as text and discursive practice: a genre-based approach to strategizing in city administration’, Discourse and Communication, 3/3: 303–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paroutis, S., and Heracleous, L. (2013), ‘Discourse revisited: dimensions and employment of first-order strategy discourse during institutional adoption’, Strategic Management Journal, 34/8: 935–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paroutis, S., and Pettigrew, A. M. (2007), ‘Strategizing in the multi-business firm: strategy teams at multiple levels and over time’, Human Relations, 60/1: 99–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, A. M. (1973), The Politics of Organizational Decision-Making. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Phillips, N., Sewell, G., and Jaynes, S. (2008), ‘Applying critical discourse analysis in strategic management research’, Organizational Research Methods, 11/4: 770–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasche, A., and Chia, R. (2009), ‘Researching strategy practices: a genealogical social theory perspective’, Organization Studies, 30/7: 713–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reckwitz, A. (2002), ‘Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing’, European Journal of Social Theory, 5/2: 243–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnér, P. (2003), ‘Strategy creation in the periphery: inductive versus deductive strategy making’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnér, P. (2008), ‘Strategy-as-practice and dynamic capabilities: steps towards a dynamic view of strategy’, Human Relations, 61/4: 565–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2003), ‘Micro-strategy as gendered practice: resisting strategic change through the family metaphor’, paper presented at the nineteenth European Group for Organizational Studies colloquium, Copenhagen, 5 July.
Rouleau, L. (2005), ‘Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: how middle managers interpret and sell change every day’, Journal of Management Studies, 42/7: 1414–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2013), ‘Strategy-as-practice research at a crossroads’, M@n@gement, 16/5: 547–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L., and Balogun, J. (2011). ‘Middle managers, strategic sensemaking, and discursive competence’, Journal of Management Studies, 48/5: 953–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2003), ‘Strategizing as lived experience and strategists’ everyday efforts to shape strategic direction’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2004), ‘Understanding the production of “strategy” and “organization” through talk amongst managerial elites’, Culture and Organization, 10/2: 125–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2005), ‘Strategic practice, “discourse” and the everyday interactional constitution of “power effects”’, Organization, 12/6: 803–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2002), The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., and von Savigny, E. (eds.) (2001), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schwarz, M. (2004), ‘Knowing in practice: how consultants work with clients to create, share and apply knowledge?’, Academy of Management Proceedings, Supplement: D1–D6.
Seidl, D. (2007), ‘General strategy concepts and the ecology of strategy discourses: a systemic-discursive perspective’, Organization Studies, 28/2: 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, D., and Whittington, R. (2014), ‘Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: towards taller and flatter ontologies’, Organization Studies, 35/10: 1407–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillince, J., and Mueller, F. (2007), ‘Switching strategic perspective: the reframing of accounts of responsibility’, Organization Studies, 28/2: 155–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillince, J., Jarzabkowski, P., and Shaw, D. (2012), ‘Shaping strategic action through the rhetorical construction and exploitation of ambiguity’, Organization Science, 23/3: 630–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, P., and Oliver, D. (2013), ‘Building trust in multi-stakeholder partnerships: critical emotional incidents and practices of engagement’, Organization Studies, 34/12: 1835–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sminia, H. (2005), ‘Strategy formation as layered discussion’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21/3: 267–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spee, P., and Jarzabkowski, P. (2009), ‘Strategy tools as boundary objects’, Strategic Organization, 7/2: 223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spee, P. (2011),‘Strategic planning as communicative process’, Organizational Studies, 32/9: 1217–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stensaker, I., and Falkenberg, J. (2007), ‘Making sense of different responses to corporate change’, Human Relations, 60/1: 137–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suddaby, R., Seidl, D., and Lê, J. (2013), ‘Strategy-as-practice meets neo-institutional theory’, Strategic Organization, 11/3: 329–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sztompka, P. (1991), Society in Action: The Theory of Social Becoming. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Teulier, R., and Rouleau, L. (2013), ‘Middle managers’ sensemaking and interorganizational change initiation: translation spaces and editing practices’, Journal of Change Management, 13/3: 308–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R., Sargent, L. D., and Hardy, C. (2011), ‘Managing organizational change: negotiating meaning and power–resistance relations’, Organization Science, 22/1: 22–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomela, R. (2005), The Philosophy of Social Practices: A Collective Acceptance View. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, S. (1994), The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge, and Presuppositions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vaara, E. (2010), ‘Taking the linguistic turn seriously: strategy as multifaceted and interdiscursive phenomenon’, in Baum, J. A. C., and Lampel, J. (eds.), Advances in Strategic Management, vol. XXVII, The Globalization of Strategy Research: 29–50. Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
Vaara, E., Kleymann, B., and Seristö, H. (2004), ‘Strategies as discursive constructions: the case of airline alliances’, Journal of Management Studies, 41/1: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., and Reff Pedersen, A. (2013), ‘Strategy and chronotopes: a Bakhtinian perspective on the construction of strategy narratives’, M@n@gement, 16/5: 593–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., Sorsa, V., and Pälli, P. (2010), ‘On the force potential of strategy texts: a critical discourse analysis of a strategic plans and its power effects in a city organization’, Organization, 17/6: 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Aaken, D., Koob, C., Rost, K., and Seidl, D. (2013), ‘Ausgestaltung und Erfolg von Strategieworkshops: eine empirische Analyse’, Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 65/7: 588–616.Google Scholar
Venkateswaran, R., and Prabhu, G. N. (2010), ‘Taking stock of research methods in strategy as practice’, Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8/2: 156–62.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1978), Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Werle, F., and Seidl, D. (forthcoming), ‘The layered materiality of strategizing: epistemic objects and the interplay between material artefacts in the exploration of strategic topics’, British Journal of Management.
Whittington, R. (1992), ‘Putting Giddens into action: social systems and managerial agency’, Journal of Management Studies, 29/6: 693–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (1996), ‘Strategy as practice’, Long Range Planning, 29/5: 731–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2007), ‘Strategy practice and strategy process: family differences and the sociological eye’, Organization Studies, 28/10: 1575–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2011), ‘The practice turn in organization research: a disciplined transdisciplinarity’, Accounting, Organization and Society, 36/3: 183–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2014), ‘Information systems strategy and strategy-as-practice: a joint agenda’, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23/1: 87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R., and Cailluet, L. (2008), ‘The crafts of strategy: special issue introduction by the guest editors’, Long Range Planning, 41/3: 241–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R., Cailluet, L., and Yakis-Douglas, B. (2011), ‘Opening strategy: evolution of a precarious profession’, British Journal of Management, 22/3: 531–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R., Jarzabkowski, P., Mayer, M., Mounoud, E., Nahapiet, J., and Rouleau, L. (2003), ‘Taking strategy seriously: responsibility and reform for an important social practice’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 12/4: 396–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R., Molloy, E., Mayer, M., and Smith, A. (2006), ‘Practices of strategising/organising: broadening strategy work and skills’, Long Range Planning, 39/6: 615–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A., Housley, W., Gilchrist, A., Mueller, F., and Lenney, P. (2014), ‘Power, politics and organizational communication: an ethnomethodological perspective’, in Cooren, F., Vaara, E., Langley, A., and Tsoukas, H. (eds.), Language and Communication at Work: Discourse, Narrativity, and Organizing: 71–94. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953 [1951]), Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., Kwon, W., and Clarke, I. (2011), ‘“Getting people on board”: discursive leadership for consensus building in team meetings’, Discourse and Society, 22/5: 592–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, R. P., Paroutis, S., and Blettner, D. P. (2013), ‘How useful are the strategic tools we teach in business schools?’, Journal of Management Studies, 50/1: 92–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×