Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4): 441–464.Google Scholar

Adler, P. S. (2007). The future of critical management studies: A paleo-Marxist critique of labour process theory. Organization Studies, 28(9): 1313–1345.Google Scholar

Aktouf, O. (1992). Management and theories of organizations in the 1990s: Toward a critical radical humanism? Academy of Management Review, 17(3): 407–431.Google Scholar

Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., & Willmott, H. (2009). The Oxford handbook of critical management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antonacopoulou, E. P., & Méric, J. (2005). A critique of stake-holder theory: Management science or a sophisticated ideology of control? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5(2): 22–33.Google Scholar

Arvidsson, A. (2009). The ethical economy: Towards a post-capitalist theory of value. Capital & Class, 33(1): 13–29. doi: 10.1177/030981680909700102.Google Scholar

Arvidsson, A. (2010). Speaking out: The ethical economy: New forms of value in the information society? Organization, 17(5): 637–644. doi: 10.1177/1350508410372512.Google Scholar

Asher, C. C., Mahoney, J. M., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005). Towards a property rights foundation for a stakeholder theory of the firm. Journal of Management & Governance, 9(1): 5–32.Google Scholar

Australian Law Reform Commission. (1986). Recognition of Aboriginal Customary Laws at Common Law. www.alrc.gov.au/publications/report-31Google Scholar

Banerjee, S. B. (2000). Whose land is it anyway? National interest, indigenous stakeholders and colonial discourses: The case of the Jabiluka uranium mine. Organization & Environment, 13(1): 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banerjee, S. B., & Prasad, A. (2008). Introduction to the special issue on “Critical reflections on management and organizations: A postcolonial perspective.” Critical Perspectives on International Business, 4(2/3): 90–98.Google Scholar

Barnard, C. I. (1968). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar

Benhabib, S. (1985). The generalized and the concrete other: The Kohlberg-Gilligan controversy and feminist theory. Praxis International, 5(4): 402–424.Google Scholar

Berle, A. A., & Means, G. G. C. (1991). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Beck, C. (2016). Earth hour: Do we still need the lights-out protest? The Christian Science Monitor, March 19, A2.Google Scholar

Bevan, D., & Werhane, P. (2011). Stakeholder theory. In Painter-Morland, M. & ten Bos, R., eds., Business ethics and continental philosophy, pp. 37–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhabha, H. K. (2012). The location of culture. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boltanski, L. & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism, trans. Gregory Elliott. London: Verso.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boussebaa, M. (2015). Professional service firms, globalisation and the new imperialism. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(8): 1217–1233.Google Scholar

Bowen, H. W. (2005). The business of empire: The East India Company and imperial Britain, 1756–1833. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowen, H. R. (2013). Social responsibilities of the businessman. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyacigiller, N., & Adler, N. (1991). The parochial dinosaur: Organization science in a global context. Academy of Management Review, 16: 262–290.Google Scholar

Braverman, H. (1998). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Bridgman, T. (2007). Reconstituting relevance: Exploring possibilities for management educators’ critical engagement with the public. Management Learning, 38(4): 425–439.Google Scholar

Buchholz, R. A., & Rosenthal, S. B. (2005). Toward a contemporary conceptual framework for stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(3): 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budd, J. W., & Bhave, D. (2008). Values, ideologies, and frames of reference in industrial relations. In Bacon, N., Heery, E., Fiorito, J., & Blyton, P., eds., The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations, pp. 92–112. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies, 9(2): 221–235.Google Scholar

Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Calás, M. B., & Smircich, L. (1991). Voicing seduction to silence leadership. Organization Studies, 12(4): 567–601.Google Scholar

Calás, M. B., Smircich, L., & Holvino, E. (2014). Theorizing gender-and-organization: changing times … changing theories? In The Oxford handbook of gender and organizations, pp. 53–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York; Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Clegg, S. (2015). Foreword. In Prasad, A., Prasad, P., Mills, A. J., & Mills, J. H., eds., The Routledge companion to critical management studies, pp. xiii-xiv. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Crane, A., & Ruebottom, T. (2011). Stakeholder theory and social identity: Rethinking stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1): 77–87.Google Scholar

De Beauvoir, S. (1988). The second sex. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Delphy, C. (1984). Close to home: A materialist analysis of women’s oppression. London, Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.Google Scholar

Elms, H., Johnson-Cramer, M. E., & Berman, S. L. (2011). Bounding the world’s miseries: Corporate responsibility and Freeman’s stakeholder theory. In Stakeholder theory: Impact and prospects, 1–38. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Erlichman, H. J. (2010). Conquest, tribute, and trade: The quest for precious metals and the birth of globalization. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Ferguson, K. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Fox, A. (1974). Beyond contract: Work, power and trust relations. London: Faber.Google Scholar

Foster, J. B., & Burkett, P. (2001). Marx and the dialectic of organic/inorganic relations: A rejoinder to Salleh and Clark. Organization & Environment, 14(4): 451–462.Google Scholar

Frenkel, M. (2008). The multinational corporation as a third space: Rethinking international management discourse on knowledge transfer through Homi Bhabha. Academy of Management Review, 33(4): 924–942.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., & Gilbert, D. R. (1992). Business, Ethics and Society: A Critical Agenda. Business & Society, 31(1): 9–17.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3): 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 191–205.Google Scholar

Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008) Diverse economies: Performative practices for “other worlds,” Progress in Human Geography 32(5): 613–32.Google Scholar

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Goodpaster, K. E. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1): 53–73.Google Scholar

Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4): 315–327.Google Scholar

Greenwood, M., & Anderson, E. (2009). “I used to be an employee but now I am a stakeholder” Implications of labelling employees as stakeholders. Asia Pacific Human Resource Journal, 47(2): 186–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenwood, M., & Freeman, R. E. (2011). Ethics and HRM: The contribution of stakeholder theory. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 30(3/4): 269–292.Google Scholar

Haigh, N., & Griffiths, A. (2009). The natural environment as a primary stakeholder: The case of climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(6): 347–371.Google Scholar

Heath, J., & Norman, W. (2004). Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management: What can the history of State-Run Enterprises teach us in the post-Enron era? Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3): 247–265. doi: 10.1023/B: BUSI.0000039418.75103.edCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingvaldsen, J. A. (2015). Organizational learning: Bringing the forces of production back in. Organization Studies, 36(4): 423–443.Google Scholar

Jack, G., Westwood, R., Srinivas, N., & Sardar, Z. (2011). Deepening, broadening and re-asserting a postcolonial interrogative space in organization studies. Organization 18(3): 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, C. L. R. (1983). Beyond a boundary. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2): 404–437.Google Scholar

Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Kazmi, B. A., Leca, B., & Naccache, P. (2016). Is corporate social responsibility a new spirit of capitalism? Organization, 23(5): 742–762.Google Scholar

Kenny, K. (2009). Heeding the stains: Lacan and organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(2): 214–228.Google Scholar

Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Koen, S. (1984). Feminist workplaces: Alternative models for the organization of work. PhD dissertation, Union for Experimenting Colleges, University of Michigan Dissertation Information Service.Google Scholar

Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar

McVea, J. F., & Freeman, R. E. (2005). A names-and-faces approach to stakeholder management: How focusing on stakeholders as individuals can bring ethics and entrepreneurial strategy together. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1): 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Kling, G. (2014). Pathways to power: Class, hyper-agency and the French corporate elite. Organization Studies, 35(6): 825–855.Google Scholar

Marens, R. (2016). Giving the devils their due: What Marxian historiography can contribute to management history. In Academy of Management Proceedings (vol. 2016, no. 1, p. 10142). Academy of Management.Google Scholar

Marquetti, A. A. (2003). Analyzing historical and regional patterns of technical change from a classical-Marxian perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52(2): 191–200.Google Scholar

McKenna, S. (2011). A critical analysis of North American business leaders’ neocolonial discourse: Global fears and local consequences, Organization, 18(3): 387–399.Google Scholar

McKinlay, A., Carter, C., Pezet, E., & Clegg, S. (2010). Using Foucault to make strategy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(8): 1012–1031.Google Scholar

Mennicken, A., & Miller, P. (2014). Michel Foucault and the administering of lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mir, R., Calás, M., & Smircich, L. (1999). Global technoscapes and silent voices: Challenges to theorizing global cooperation. In Cooperrider, D. & Dutton, J., eds., Organizational Dimensions of Global Change, pp. 270–290. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Mir, R. Marens, R., & Mir, A. (2008). The corporation and its fragments: Corporate citizenship and the legacies of imperialism. In Scherer, A. & Palazzo, G., eds., The handbook of corporate citizenship, pp. 819–852. London: Edward Elgar Press.Google Scholar

Mir, R & Mir, A. (2012). Organizational change as imperialism. In Boje, D., Burnes, B., & Hassard, J., eds., Routledge companion to organizational change, pp. 425–439. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mir, R., Mir, A., & Wong, D. (2006). Diversity: The cultural logic of global capital? In Konrad, A., Prasad, P., & Pringle, J., eds., Handbook of workplace diversity, pp.167–188. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853–886.Google Scholar

Mohanty, C. T. (1988). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review, (30): 61–88.Google Scholar

Moriceau, J.-L. (2005). Faceless figures: Is a socially responsible decision possible? In Bonnafous-Boucher, M. & Pesqueux, Y., eds., Stakeholder theory: A European perspective, (pp. 89–103). Basingstoke, UK: PalgraveCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moriarty, J. (2014). The connection between stakeholder theory and stakeholder democracy. Business & Society, 53(6): 820–852.Google Scholar

Morsing, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto‐communication: On the role of external stakeholders for member identification. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(2): 171–182.Google Scholar

Nelson, J. (2003). Once more, with feeling: Feminist economics and the ontological question. Feminist Economics, 9 (1): 109–118.Google Scholar

Noland, J., & Phillips, R. (2010). Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1): 39–49.Google Scholar

Nord, W. (1977). A Marxist critique of humanistic psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 17 (1): 75–83.Google Scholar

Parsons, R. (2008). We are all stakeholders now. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 4(2): 99–126.Google Scholar

Perrow, C. (1972). Complex organizations: A critical essay. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar

Phillips, R. (1997). Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1): 51–66.Google Scholar

Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4): 479–502.Google Scholar

Prasad, A. (1997a). The colonizing consciousness and representation of the Other: A postcolonial critique of the discourse of oil. In Prasad, P., Mills, A., Elmes, M., & Prasad, A., eds., Managing the organizational melting pot: Dilemmas of workplace diversity, pp. 285–311. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Prasad, A. (1997b). Provincializing Europe: Towards a post-colonial reconstruction: A critique of Baconian science as the last strand of imperialism. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies 3: 91–117.Google Scholar

Prasad, A., Prasad, P., Mills, A. J., & Mills, J. H. (2015). The Routledge companion to critical management studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Prashad, V. (2008). The darker nations: A people’s history of the Third World. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar

Radhakrishnan, R (1994). Postmodernism and the rest of the world. Organization, 1(2): 305–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radhakrishnan, R. (1996). The changing subject and the politics of theory. In Diasporic mediations: Between home and location, (pp. 68–92). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Roloff, J. (2008). A life cycle model of multi‐stakeholder networks. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(3): 311–325.Google Scholar

Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 887–910.Google Scholar

Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Sanders, R. L. (1997). If Marx had been a business process reengineer … Information Management, 31(2): 58–72.Google Scholar

Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 1096–1120.Google Scholar

Slinger, G. (1999). Spanning the gap: The theoretical principles that connect stakeholder policies to business performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7: 136–151.Google Scholar

Smith, C. & Willmott., H. (1991). The new middle class and the labour process. In Smith, C. R. & Willmott, H., eds., White-collar work: The non-manual labour process, pp. 13–34. London: Springer.Google Scholar

Spicer, A., & Banerjee, S. (2016). Governance: Changing conceptions of the corporation. In Mir, R., Willmott, H., & Greenwood, M., eds., The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies, (pp. 403–411). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Spivak, G. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In Nelson, C. & Grossberg, L., eds., Marxism and the interpretation of culture, pp. 271–313. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, E. (1997). The defects of stakeholder theory. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 5(1): 3–10.Google Scholar

Stinchcombe, A. L. (1995). Sugar island slavery in the age of Enlightenment: The political economy of the Caribbean world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Stone, K. (1974). The origins of job structures in the steel industry. Review of Radical Political Economics, 6(2): 113–73.Google Scholar

Stoney, C., & Winstanley, D. (2001). Stakeholding: Confusion or utopia? Mapping the conceptual terrain. The Journal of Management Studies, 38(5): 603–626.Google Scholar

Tadajewski, M., Maclaran, P., & Parsons, E. (Eds.). (2011). Key concepts in critical management studies. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Tatli, A. (2012). On the power and poverty of critical (self) reflection in critical management studies: A comment on Ford, Harding and Learmonth. British Journal of Management, 23(1): 22–30.Google Scholar

Valian, V. (1999). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Van Buren III, H. (2001). If fairness is the problem, is consent the solution? Integrating ISCT and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(3): 481–499.Google Scholar

Van Buren III, H. (2016). Capital as a neglected, yet essential, topic for organization studies. In Mir, R., Willmott, H., & Greenwood, M., eds., The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies, (pp. 293–300). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Van Buren III, H. & Greenwood, M. (2009). Stakeholder voice: A problem, a solution, and a challenge for managers and academics. Philosophy of Management, 8(3): 15–23.Google Scholar

Weitzner, D. (2007). Deconstruction revisited: Implications of theory over methodology. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(1): 43–54.Google Scholar

Wicks, A. C., Gilbert, J., Daniel, R., & Freeman, R. E. (1994). A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whyte, W. F., & Whyte, K. K. (1991). Making Mondragon: The growth and dynamics of the worker cooperative complex. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Wollstonecraft, M. (1999). A vindication of the rights of woman. Boston: Thomas and Andrews Press.Google Scholar

Yuthas, K., & Dillard, J. F. (1999). Ethical development of advanced technology: A postmodern stakeholder perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(1), 35–49.Google Scholar