Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. (1998). An analysis of corporate donations: UK evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35(5): 641–654.Google Scholar

Agle, B. R., Donaldson, T., Freeman, E., Jensen, M., Mitchell, R. K., & Wood, D. J. (2008). Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2): 153–190.Google Scholar

Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 507–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahlstedt, L., & Jahnukainen, I. (1971). Yritysorganisaatio Yhteistoiminnan Ohjausjaerjestelmaenae. Helsinki: Weilin + Goeoes.Google Scholar

Alkhafaji, A. F. (1989). A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Governance: Managing in a Dynamic Environment, New York: Quorum Books.Google Scholar

Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Arthur, W. B. (1996). Increasing returns and the two worlds of business. Harvard Business Review, 74(4): 100–109Google Scholar

Bansal, P. (2003). From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14(5): 510–527.Google Scholar

Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 717–736.Google Scholar

Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (2001). Bringing work back in. Organization Science, 12(1): 76–95.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B. (2016). Why strategic management scholars must adopt a stakeholder perspective. Unpublished manuscript presented at the 2016 International Association for Business and Society Annual Meeting, Park City, UT, June 17, 2016. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Indian School of Business, the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, the 2016 BYU-University of Utah Winter Strategy Conference, the University of Tennessee, the University of Southern California, The University of California at Irvine, Baruch College, The Strategic Management Society’s 2015 “Stakeholder Theory at a Crossroads” conference held at Zion’s National Park, and at the 2015 Academy of Management Meetings.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B. (2018). Why resource-based theory must adopt a stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management Journal, forthcoming. Retrieved from https://sites.insead.edu/facultyresearch/research/file.cfm?fid=59440.Google Scholar

Barraquier, A. (2013). A group identity analysis of organizations and their stakeholders: Porosity of identity and mobility of attributes. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1): 45–62.Google Scholar

Black, J. A., & Boal, K. (1994). Strategic resources: Traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2): 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowen, H. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Bowie, N. (1988). The moral obligations of multinational corporations. In Luper-Foy, S., ed., Problems of International Justice, pp. 97–113. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Brammer, S., & Millington, A. I. (2003a). The effect of stakeholder preferences, organizational structure and industry type on corporate community involvement. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3): 213–226.Google Scholar

Brammer, S., & Millington, A. I. (2003b). The evolution of corporate charitable contributions in the UK between 1989 and 1999: Industry structure and stakeholder influences. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(3): 216–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenner, S. N. (1993). The stakeholder theory of the firm and organizational decision making: Some propositions and a model. In Pasquero, J. & Collins, D., eds., Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, pp. 205–210. San Diego: International Association for Business and Society.Google Scholar

Brenner, S. N. (1995). Stakeholder theory of the firm: Its consistency with current management techniques. In Näsi, J., ed., Understanding stakeholder thinking, pp. 19–31. Helsinki: LSR-Jukaisut Oy.Google Scholar

Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2014). Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 107–125.Google Scholar

Calton, J. M., & Lad, L. J. (1995). Social contracting as a trust-building process of network governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(2): 271–295.Google Scholar

Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32(5): 539–553.Google Scholar

Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.Google Scholar

Carroll, A. B (1989). Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. Cincinnati: South-Western.Google Scholar

Carroll, A. B. (1993). Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, 2nd edn. Cincinnati: South-Western.Google Scholar

Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2015). Business and Society: Ethics, Sustainability, and Stakeholder Management, 9th edn. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Carter, S. M. (2006). The interaction of top management group, stakeholder, and situational factors on certain corporate reputation management activities. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5): 1145–1176.Google Scholar

Clarkson, M. B. E. (1994). A risk based model of stakeholder theory. Proceedings of the Second Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory. Toronto: Centre for Corporate Social Performance & Ethics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar

Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 92–117.Google Scholar

Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management, 16(1): 5–14.Google Scholar

Cragg, W., & Greenbaum, A. (2002). Reasoning about responsibilities: Mining company managers on what stakeholders are owed. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3): 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daft, R. L., Sormunen, J., & Parks, D. (1988). Chief executive scamming, environmental characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2): 123–139.Google Scholar

Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 20–47.Google Scholar

Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2, 70–76.Google Scholar

Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1999). The environmental reporting expectations gap: Australian evidence, British Accounting Review, 31(3): 313–346.Google Scholar

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Driscoll, K., & Starik, M. (2004). The primordial stakeholder: Advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1): 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunham, L. D., Freeman, R. E., & Liedtka, J. (2006). Enhanced stakeholder practice: A particularized exploration of community. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(1): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eesley, C., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8): 765–781.Google Scholar

Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In Beauchamp, T. L. & Bowie, N., eds., Ethical Theory and Business, pp. 75–84. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Etzioni, A. (1988). The Moral Dimensions. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Fassin, Y. (2009). The stakeholder model redefined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1): 113–135.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 1180–1198.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 409–421.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., & Evan, W. M. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19: 337–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, R. E., & Gilbert, D. R. (1987). Managing stakeholder relationship. In Sethi, S. P. & Falbe, C. M., eds., Business and society: Dimensions of Conflict and Cooperation, pp. 397–423. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Reputation, survival and success, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3): 93–94.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3): 364–369.Google Scholar

Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 191–205.Google Scholar

Frooman, J., & Murrell, A. J. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: The roles of structural and demographic determinants. Business & Society, 44(1): 3–31.Google Scholar

Galunic, D. C., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1994). Reviewing the strategy-structure-performance paradigm. Research in Organizational Behavior, 16: 215–255.Google Scholar

Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6): 781–795.Google Scholar

Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4): 777–798.Google Scholar

Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1): 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2014). Stakeholder theory, value and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1): 97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendry, J. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: An empirical exploration. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1): 79–99.Google Scholar

Heugens, P., van den Bosch, F., & van Riel, C. (2002). Stakeholder integration: Building mutually enforcing relationships. Business & Society, 41(1): 36–60Google Scholar

Hill, C. W., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2): 131–154.Google Scholar

Hosmer, L. T., & Kiewitz, C. K. (2005). Organizational justice: A behavioral science concept with critical implications for business ethics and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(1): 67–91.Google Scholar

Husted, B. W. (1998). Organizational justice and the management of stakeholder relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6): 643–651.Google Scholar

Ibarra, H., & Barbulescu, R. (2010). Identity as narrative: Prevalence, effectiveness, and consequences of narrative identity work in macro work role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 35(1): 135–154.Google Scholar

Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 235–256.Google Scholar

Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 564–576.Google Scholar

Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2): 404–437.Google Scholar

Kaler, J. (2002). Morality and strategy in stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1):91–100.Google Scholar

Kochan, T. A., & Rubinstein, S. A. (2000). Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: The Saturn partnership. Organization Science, 11(4): 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4): 704–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langtry, B. (1994). Stakeholders and the moral responsibilities of business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 431–443.Google Scholar

Lawrence, A. T., & Weber, J. (2016). Business and society: Stakeholders, ethics, public policy, 15th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar

Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 12: 1–47.Google Scholar

Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Nord, W. R., eds., Handbook of organization studies, 2nd edn., pp. 215–254. London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Lee, J. H. (2015). Stakeholder work and value creation stakeholder engagement: An integrative framework. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas.Google Scholar

Lee, J. H., & Mitchell, R. K. (2013). Stakeholder work and stakeholder research. Presented at the 2013 International Association for Business Society Annual Meeting, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar

Logsdon, J. M., & Wood, D. J. (2002). Business citizenship: From domestic to global level of analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 155–187.Google Scholar

Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27: 455–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marens, R., & Wicks, A. (1999). Getting real: Stakeholder theory, managerial practice, and the general irrelevance of fiduciary duties owed to shareholders. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(2): 273–293Google Scholar

Marin, A., Mitchell, R. K., & Lee, J. H. (2015). The vulnerability and strength duality in ethnic business: A model of stakeholder salience and social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2): 271–289.Google Scholar

Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 166–179.Google Scholar

Matty, D. (2011). Enterprise architecture shapes stakeholder salience influence on enterprise value-creation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6): 1175–1195.Google Scholar

Miller, D. (1986). Configurations of strategy and structure: A synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 7(3): 233–249.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. (1980). Structures in 5’s: A synthesis of the research on organization design. Management Science, 26(3): 322–341.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K. (2002). Entrepreneurship and stakeholder theory. The Ruffin Series of the Business Ethics Quarterly, 3: 175–196.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K. (2003). Assessing stakeholder interests in prosperity and cultural well-being – Appendix A. In Nyce, C., ed., Masters in Our Own House: The Path to Prosperity and Cultural Well-being, pp. 163–182. Terrace, BC: Skeena Native Development Society.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., Chrisman, J. J., & Spence, L. J. (2011). Toward a theory of stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2): 235–255.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853–886.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Lee, J. H., & Agle, B. R. (2017). Stakeholder prioritization work: The role of stakeholder salience in stakeholder research. In Weber, J. & Wasieleski, D., eds., Business and Society 360 Book Series on Stakeholder Management, vol. 1, pp. 123–157. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Robinson, R. E., Marin, A., Lee, J. H., & Randolph, A. F. (2013). Spiritual identity, stakeholder attributes, and family business workplace spirituality stakeholder salience. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 10(3): 215–252.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Van Buren, H. J. III, Greenwood, M., Freeman, R. E. (2015). Stakeholder inclusion and accounting for stakeholders. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7): 851–877.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Weaver, G. R., Agle, B. R., Bailey, A. D., & Carlson, J. (2016). Stakeholder agency and social welfare: Pluralism and decision making in the multi-objective corporation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 252–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Näsi, J. (1995). What is stakeholder thinking? A snapshot of a social theory of the firm. In Näsi, J., ed., Understanding Stakeholder Thinking, pp. 19–32. Helsinki: LSR-Julkaisut Oy.Google Scholar

Neubaum, D. O., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. Journal of Management, 32(1): 108–131.Google Scholar

Pajunen, K. (2006). Stakeholder influences in organizational survival. Journal of Management Studies, 43(6): 1261–1288.Google Scholar

Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. B. (2012). The turn to work in organization and management theory: Some implications for strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 10(3): 223–230.Google Scholar

Phillips, R. A. (2003). Stakeholder legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1): 51–66.Google Scholar

Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5): 1933–1949.Google Scholar

Rhenman, E. (1964). Foeretagsdemokrati och Foeretagsorganisation, Stockholm: Thule.Google Scholar

Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rumelt, R. P. (1987). Theory, strategy, and entrepreneurship. In Teece, D., ed., The competitive challenge, pp. 137–158. Boston: Ballinger.Google Scholar

Savage, G. T., Nix, T. H., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2): 61–75.Google Scholar

Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4): 899–931.Google Scholar

Schwartz, M. S. (2006). God as a managerial stakeholder? Journal of Business Ethics, 66(2–3): 291–306.Google Scholar

Scott, S. G., & Lane, V. R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 43–62.Google Scholar

Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. 2005. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest services industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2): 159–180.Google Scholar

Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Slack, T., & Parent, M. M. (2006). Understanding sport organizations: The application of organization theory, 2nd edn. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar

Snider, J., Hill, R. P., & Martin, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world’s most successful firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2): 175–187.Google Scholar

Snow, D. A., & Anderson, L. (1987). Identity work among the homeless: The verbal construction and avowal of personal identities. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6): 1336–1371.Google Scholar

Stanford memo. (1963). Stanford Research Institute (SRI) internal memorandum as cited in Freeman and Reed (1983) and Freeman (1984, pp. 31–33).Google Scholar

Starik, M. (1994). Essay by Mark Starik. pp. 89–95 of the Toronto conference: Reflections on stakeholder theory. Business & Society, 33(1): 82–131.Google Scholar

Tantalo, C., & Priem, R. L. (2016). Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2): 314–329.Google Scholar

Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper and Bros.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. K., Wartick, S. L., & Smith, H. L. (1991). Integrating corporate social performance and stakeholder management: Implications for a research agenda in small business. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12(1): 207–230.Google Scholar

Ulmer, R. R., & Sellnow, T. L. (2000). Consistent questions of ambiguity in organizational crisis communication: Jack in the box as a case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(2): 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Venkataraman, S. (2002). Stakeholder value equilibration and the entrepreneurial process. The Ruffin Series of the Society of Business Ethics Quarterly, 3: 45–58.Google Scholar

Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Weitzner, D., & Deutsch, Y. (2015). Understanding motivation and social influence in stakeholder prioritization. Organization Studies, 36(10): 1337–1360.Google Scholar

Wicks, A. C., Gilbert, D. R. Jr., & Freeman, R. E. (1994). Toward a substantive definition of the corporate issue construct: A review and synthesis of the literature. Business and Society, 33(3): 293–311.Google Scholar

Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4): 691–718.Google Scholar