Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T19:19:48.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Orientations of Open Strategy: From Resistance to Transformation

from Part II - Practices of Open Strategy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2019

By
Stefan Haefliger
Edited by
David Seidl ,
Georg von Krogh  and
Richard Whittington
David Seidl
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Georg von Krogh
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal University (ETH), Zürich
Richard Whittington
Affiliation:
Saïd Business School, University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Strategy is a complex field and discipline undergoing a change process that leaves it precarious in structure (Whittington et al., 2011) but wealthy in purpose. Purpose refers to how thought, artifacts, and action are being perceived as strategic (Gond et al., 2018; Laasch, 2018) and to the alignment of the values at the core of the organization with the wider community (Moore, 2012: 309). It is this wider community that shares values, knowledge, and direction with the organization that is embedded and integrated not only in a market but also in multiple networks of practice, expertise, and preferences. Orientations are the strategic intentions manifest in choices of business model, technology, and regulation. With this chapter, I attempt to achieve the following: first, I derive orientations within Open Strategy that are not only transparent to but also inclusive of outsiders by building upon works in innovation studies that theorize about participation and Open Strategy avant la lettre.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Open Strategy , pp. 151 - 166
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afuah, A., & Tucci, C.L. (2002). Internet business models and strategies: Text and cases, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
Alexy, O., Henkel, J., & Wallin, M.W. (2013). From closed to open: Job role changes, individual predispositions, and the adoption of commercial open source software development. Research Policy, 42, 1325–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, N. (2003). Mouvement et dyschronies dans les organisations. L’Année sociologique, 53, 489–514.Google Scholar
Appleyard, M.M., & Chesbrough, H.W. (2017). The dynamics of open strategy: From adoption to reversion. Long Range Planning, Open Strategy: Transparency and Inclusion in Strategy Processes, 50, 310–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2001). Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 419–451.Google Scholar
Aten, K., & Thomas, G.F. (2016). Crowdsourcing strategizing: Communication technology affordances and the communicative constitution of organizational strategy. International Journal of Business Communication, 53, 148–180.Google Scholar
Aversa, P., Haefliger, S., Rossi, A., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2015). From business model to business modelling: Modularity and manipulation. In Business models and modelling: Advances in strategic management (pp. 151–185). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Baden-Fuller, C., & Haefliger, S. (2013). Business models and technological Innovation. Long Range Planning, 46, 419–426.Google Scholar
Baden-Fuller, C., & Mangematin, V. (2013). Business models: A challenging agenda. Strategic Organization, 11, 418–427.Google Scholar
Baden-Fuller, C., & Morgan, M.S. (2010). Business models as models. Long Range Planning, 43, 156–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, J., Wilson, A.D., Galliers, R.D., & Bynghall, S. (2017). Social media and the emergence of reflexiveness as a new capability for open strategy. Long Range Planning, Open Strategy: Transparency and Inclusion in Strategy Processes, 50, 322–336.Google Scholar
Bayus, B.L. (2013). Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community. Management Science , 59, 226–244.Google Scholar
Bogers, M., Zobel, A.-K., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., Frederiksen, L., Gawer, A., Gruber, M., Haefliger, S., Hagedoorn, J., Hilgers, D., Laursen, K., Magnusson, M.G., Majchrzak, A., McCarthy, I.P., Moeslein, K.M., Nambisan, S., Piller, F.T., Radziwon, A., Rossi-Lamastra, C., Sims, J., & Wal, A.L.J.T. (2017). The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24, 8–40.Google Scholar
Bonaccorsi, A., & Rossi, C. (2003). Why open source software can succeed. Research Policy, 32, 1243–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R.S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin‐off companies. Ind Corp Change, 11, 529–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H.W., & Appleyard, M.M. (2007). Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50, 57–76.Google Scholar
Dahlander, L., & Wallin, M.W. (2006). A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets. Research Policy, 35, 1243–1259.Google Scholar
de Vaujany, F.-X., Fomin, V., Haefliger, S., & Lyytinen, K. (2018). Rules, practices, and information technology: A trifecta of organizational regulation. Information Systems Research, 29, 755–773.Google Scholar
Edwards, M.R., & Clinton, M.E. (2018). A study exploring the impact of lecture capture availability and lecture capture usage on student attendance and attainment. Higher Education, 1–19.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning by expanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fauchart, E., & von Hippel, E. (2008). Norms-based intellectual property systems: The case of French chefs. Organization Science, 19, 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, N., & Piller, F. (2004). Value creation by toolkits for user innovation and design: The case of the watch market. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 401–415.Google Scholar
Franke, N., & von Hippel, E. (2003). Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: The case of Apache security software. Research Policy, 32, 1199–1215.Google Scholar
Frey, K., Lüthje, C., & Haag, S. (2011). Whom should firms attract to open innovation platforms? The role of knowledge diversity and motivation. Long Range Planning, Social Software: Strategy, Technology, and Community, 44, 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Füller, J., Matzler, K., & Hoppe, M. (2008). Brand community members as a source of innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 608–619.Google Scholar
Gegenhuber, T., & Dobusch, L. (2017). Making an impression through openness: How open strategy-making practices change in the evolution of new ventures. Long Range Planning, Open Strategy: Transparency and Inclusion in Strategy Processes, 50, 337–354.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gond, J.-P., Cabantous, L., & Krikorian, F. (2018). How do things become strategic? “Strategifying” corporate social responsibility. Strategic Organization, 16, 241–272.Google Scholar
Haefliger, S., Monteiro, E., Foray, D., & von Krogh, G. (2011). Social software and strategy. Long Range Planning, 44, 297–316.Google Scholar
Hautz, J., Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2017). Open strategy: Dimensions, dilemmas, dynamics. Long Range Planning, Open Strategy: Transparency and Inclusion in Strategy Processes, 50, 298–309.Google Scholar
Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Lang, K.R. (2011). Boundary management in online communities: Case studies of the Nine Inch Nails and ccMixter music remix sites. Long Range Planning, 44, 440–457.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25, 529–560.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., & Bednarek, R. (2017). Toward a social practice theory of relational competing. Strategic Management Journal, n/a-n/a.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., & Kaplan, S. (2015). Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 537–558.Google Scholar
Jones, M.R., & Karsten, H. (2008). Giddens’s structuration theory and information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 32, 127–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keinz, P., Hienerth, C., & Lettl, C. (2012). Designing the organization for user innovation. Journal of Organization Design, 1, 20–36.Google Scholar
Ketokivi, M., & Castañer, X. (2004). Strategic planning as an integrative device. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 337–365.Google Scholar
Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49, 583–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laasch, O. (2018). An actor-network perspective on business models: How “being responsible” led to incremental but pervasive change. Long Range Planning.Google Scholar
Lakhani, K.R., & von Hippel, E. (2003). How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Research Policy, 32, 923–943.Google Scholar
Lanzara, G.F., Vaujany, F.-X. de, Mitev, N., & Mukherjee, A. (2016). Materiality, rules and regulation: New trends in management and organization studies. Springer.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. (2017). The Crowdfunded Conservationist Who Wants to Save the World [WWW Document]. Outside Online. URL www.outsideonline.com/2146626/crowdfunded-conservationist-who-wants-save-world (accessed 13.1.18).Google Scholar
Luedicke, M.K., Husemann, K.C., Furnari, S., & Ladstaetter, F. (2017). Radically open strategizing: How the Premium Cola collective takes open strategy to the extreme. Long Range Planning, Open Strategy: Transparency and Inclusion in Strategy Processes, 50, 371–384.Google Scholar
MacCormack, A., Rusnak, J., & Baldwin, C.Y. (2006). Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Management Science, 52, 1015–1030.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1995). A short history of ethics: A history of moral philosophy from the Homeric Age to the twentieth century. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Mack, D.Z., & Szulanski, G. (2017). Opening up: How centralization affects participation and inclusion in strategy making. Long Range Planning, Open Strategy: Transparency and Inclusion in Strategy Processes, 50, 385–396.Google Scholar
Markus, M. (2007). The governance of free/open source software projects: Monolithic, multidimensional, or configurational? Journal of Management and Governance, 11, 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J.D., & Zald, M.N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. (2017). Virtue at work: Ethics for individuals, managers, and organizations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G. (2012). The virtue of governance, the governance of virtue. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 293–318.Google Scholar
Morgan, M.S. (2012). The world in the model: How economists work and think. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neeley, T.B., & Leonardi, P.M. (2018). Enacting knowledge strategy through social media: Passable trust and the paradox of nonwork interactions. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 922–946.Google Scholar
O’Mahony, S. (2003). Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work. Research Policy, 32, 1179–1198.Google Scholar
O’Mahony, S., & Bechky, B. (2008). Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 422–459.Google Scholar
O’Mahony, S., & Ferraro, F. (2007). The emergence of governance in an open source community. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1079–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgett, J.F., & Powell, W.W. (2012). The emergence of organizations and markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Piller, F.T., & Walcher, D. (2006). Toolkits for idea competitions: A novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Management, 36, 307–318.Google Scholar
Poetz, M.K., & Prügl, R. (2010). Crossing domain-specific boundaries in search of innovation: Exploring the potential of pyramiding*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 897–914.Google Scholar
Quick, K.S., & Feldman, M.S. (2011). Distinguishing participation and inclusion. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31, 272–290.Google Scholar
Raymond, E. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 12, 23–49.Google Scholar
Reynaud, J.-D. (1979). Conflit et régulation sociale: Esquisse d’une théorie de la régulation conjointe. Revue Française de Sociologie, 20, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynaud, J.-D. (1988). Les régulations dans les organisations: Régulation de contrôle et régulation autonome. Revue Française de Sociologie, 31, 5–18.Google Scholar
Roberts, J., Hann, I., & Slaughter, S. (2006). Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management Science, 52, 984–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rullani, F., & Haefliger, S. (2013). The periphery on stage: The intra-organizational dynamics in online communities of creation. Research Policy, 42, 941–953.Google Scholar
Santos, F.M., & Eisenhardt, K.M. (2009). Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 643–671.Google Scholar
Shah, S. (2006). Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science, 52, 1000–1014.Google Scholar
Spinosa, C., Flores, F., & Dreyfus, H.L. (1997). Disclosing new worlds: Entrepreneurship, democratic action, and the cultivation of solidarity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sutanto, J., Tan, C.-H., Battistini, B., & Phang, C.W. (2011). Emergent leadership in virtual collaboration settings: A social network analysis approach. Long Range Planning, Social Software: Strategy, Technology, and Community, 44, 421–439.Google Scholar
Tsoukas, H. (2018). Strategy and virtue: Developing strategy-as-practice through virtue ethics. Strategic Organization, 16, 323–351.Google Scholar
von Hippel, E. (1978). Successful industrial products from customer ideas. Journal of Marketing, 42, 39–49.Google Scholar
von Hippel, E. (1976). The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Research Policy, 5, 212–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G.F. (2003). Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14, 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Krogh, G., & Haefliger, S. (2010). Opening up design science: The challenge of designing for reuse and joint development. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19, 232–241.Google Scholar
von Krogh, G.F., Spaeth, S., & Lakhani, K.R. (2003). Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Research Policy, 32, 1217–1241.Google Scholar
West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open innovation: The next decade. Research Policy, Open Innovation: New Insights and Evidence, 43, 805–811.Google Scholar
Whittington, R. (1996). Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning, 29, 731–735.Google Scholar
Whittington, R., Cailluet, L., & Yakis-Douglas, B. (2011). Opening strategy: Evolution of a precarious profession. British Journal of Management, 22, 531–544.Google Scholar
Yamauchi, Y., Yokozawa, M., Shinohara, T., & Ishida, T. (2000). Collaboration with Lean Media: How open-source software succeeds. In: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, pp. 329–338.Google Scholar
Yunus, M. (2007). Banker to the poor. Penguin Books India.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×