Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T06:50:28.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 7 - Crowdsourcing in Open Strategy: What Can Open Strategy Learn from Open Innovation?

from Part II - Practices of Open Strategy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2019

By
Arvind Malhotra  and
Ann Majchrzak
Edited by
David Seidl ,
Georg von Krogh  and
Richard Whittington
David Seidl
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Georg von Krogh
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal University (ETH), Zürich
Richard Whittington
Affiliation:
Saïd Business School, University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Organizational, economic, and technology forces are encouraging organizations to experiment with new ways to develop their strategic priorities (Chesbrough & Appleyard, 2007). One such new approach is Open Strategy (OS), an approach that increasingly relies on the use of online digital platforms. OS refers to the process by which an organization’s strategy for the future is developed in a planned or inadvertent manner with more transparency for all stakeholders and/or inclusion of different stakeholders compared to conventional strategy-making processes (Hautz et al., 2017; Mack & Szulanski, 2017; Whittington et al., 2011). Rather than limiting strategy to an exclusive group of “elite” strategy planners, OS engages a broader set of stakeholders in the process (Dobusch & Kapeller, 2013; Palmisano, 2004; Steiger et al., 2012). Among those included in OS are external stakeholders, defined as individuals not currently employed by the organization, including current or future potential customers, investors, general public, suppliers, universities, or other as-yet unaffiliated institutions and individuals.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Open Strategy , pp. 121 - 135
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, S. (2005). Stretching strategic thinking. Strategy & Leadership, 33(5), 5–12.Google Scholar
Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2012). Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 355–375.Google Scholar
Aten, K., & Thomas, G. F. (2016). Crowdsourcing strategizing: Communication technology affordances and the communicative constitution of organizational strategy. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(2), 148–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, C., & von Hippel, E. (2011). Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science, 22(6), 1399–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, J., Wilson, A. D., Galliers, R. D., & Bynghall, S. (2017). Social media and the emergence of reflexiveness as a new capability for open strategy. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 322–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartunek, J. M., Gordon, J. R., & Weathersby, R. P. (1983). Developing “complicated” understanding in administrators. Academy of Management Review, 8(2), 273–284.Google Scholar
Bayus, B. L. (2013). Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Science, 59(1), 226–244.Google Scholar
Bjelland, O. M., & Wood, R. C. (2008). An inside view of IBM’s “Innovation Jam.” MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(1), 32.Google Scholar
Boudreau, K. J., Lacetera, N., & Lakhani, K. R. (2011). Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 57(5), 843–863.Google Scholar
Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullinger, A. C., Neyer, A. K., Rass, M., & Moeslein, K. M. (2010). Community‐based innovation contests: Where competition meets cooperation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charalabidis, Y., Triantafillou, A., Karkaletsis, V., & Loukis, E. (2012, September). Public policy formulation through non moderated crowdsourcing in social media. In International Conference on Electronic Participation (pp. 156–169). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesbrough, H. W., & Appleyard, M. M. (2007). Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50(1), 57–76.Google Scholar
Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S., & Tinker, R. (2001). Effective strategies for moderators. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(4), 397–401.Google Scholar
Damian, D. E., & Zowghi, D. (2002, September). The impact of stakeholders’ geographical distribution on managing requirements in a multi-site organization. In Requirements Engineering, 2002. Proceedings. IEEE Joint International Conference on (pp. 319–328). IEEE.Google Scholar
DiPalantino, D., & Vojnovic, M. (2009, July). Crowdsourcing and all-pay auctions. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (pp. 119–128). ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doan, A., Ramakrishnan, R., & Halevy, A. Y. (2011). Crowdsourcing systems on the world-wide web. Communications of the ACM, 54(4), 86–96.Google Scholar
Dobusch, L., & Kapeller, J. (2013). Open strategy between crowd and community: Lessons from Wikimedia and Creative Commons. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2013, No. 1, p. 15831). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.Google Scholar
Dobusch, L., Dobusch, L., & Müller-Seitz, G. (2017). Closing for the benefit of openness? The case of Wikimedia’s open strategy process. Organization Studies, 1–28.Google Scholar
Ebner, W., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2009). Community engineering for innovations: The ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations. R&D Management, 39(4), 342–356.Google Scholar
Feller, J., Finnegan, P., Hayes, J., & O’Reilly, P. (2012). “Orchestrating” sustainable crowdsourcing: A characterisation of solver brokerages. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(3), 216–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, S. W., & Wooldridge, B. (2000). Building strategy from the middle: Reconceptualizing strategy process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Geiger, D., Seedorf, S., Schulze, T., Nickerson, R. C., & Schader, M. (2011). Managing the Crowd: Towards a Taxonomy of Crowdsourcing Processes. In AMCIS 2011 Proceedings – All Submissions. 430. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2011_submissions/430.Google Scholar
Hart, S., & Banbury, C. (1994). How strategy‐making processes can make a difference. Strategic Management Journal, 15(4), 251–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hautz, J., Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2017). Open strategy: Dimensions, dilemmas, dynamics. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 298–309.Google Scholar
Heracleous, L., Gößwein, J., & Beaudette, P. (2017). Open strategy-making at the Wikimedia Foundation: A dialogic perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54(1), 5–35.Google Scholar
Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine, 14(6), 1–4.Google Scholar
Huang, J., Baptista, J., & Galliers, R. D. (2013). Reconceptualizing rhetorical practices in organizations: The impact of social media on internal communications. Information & Management, 50(2–3), 112–124.Google Scholar
Huberman, B. A., Romero, D. M., & Wu, F. (2009). Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity. Journal of Information Science, 35(6), 758–765.Google Scholar
Huff, A. S., & Huff, J. O. (2001). Re‐focusing the business school agenda. British Journal of Management, 12(s1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutter, K., Hautz, J., Füller, J., Mueller, J., & Matzler, K. (2011). Communitition: The tension between competition and collaboration in community‐based design contests. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Majchrzak, A. (2016). Interactive self-regulatory theory for sharing and protecting in interorganizational collaborations. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 9–27.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, L. B., & Lakhani, K. R. (2010). Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organization Science, 21(5), 1016–1033.Google Scholar
Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., & Hornsby, J. S. (2001). Improving firm performance through entrepreneurial actions: Acordia’s corporate entrepreneurship strategy. The Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 60–71.Google Scholar
Lakhani, K. R., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., & Tushman, M. (2013). Open innovation and organizational boundaries: Task decomposition, knowledge distribution and the locus of innovation. In Grandori, A. (Ed.), Handbook of economic organization: Integrating economic and organization theory (pp. 355–382). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K., & Sparks, J. (1998). The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9(3), 285–305.Google Scholar
Lee, H. (2005). Behavioral strategies for dealing with flaming in an online forum. The Sociological Quarterly, 46(2), 385–403.Google Scholar
Leimeister, J. M., Huber, M., Bretschneider, U., & Krcmar, H. (2009). Leveraging crowdsourcing: Activation-supporting components for IT-based ideas competition. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 197–224.Google Scholar
Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438–458.Google Scholar
Liu, T. X., Yang, J., Adamic, L. A., & Chen, Y. (2014). Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions: A field experiment on Taskcn. Management Science, 60(8), 2020–2037.Google Scholar
Mack, D. Z., & Szulanski, G. (2017). Opening up: How centralization affects participation and inclusion in strategy making. Long Range Planning, 50(3),385–396.Google Scholar
Majchrzak, A., Cooper, L. P., & Neece, O. E. (2004). Knowledge reuse for innovation. Management Science, 50(2), 174–188.Google Scholar
Majchrzak, A., & Malhotra, A. (2013). Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 22(4), 257–268.Google Scholar
Majchrzak, A., & Malhotra, A. (2016). Effect of knowledge-sharing trajectories on innovative outcomes in temporary online crowds. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 685–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, A., & Majchrzak, A. (2014). Managing crowds in innovation challenges. California Management Review, 56(4), 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., Kesebi, L., & Looram, S. (2017). Developing innovative solutions through internal crowdsourcing. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(4), 73.Google Scholar
Marabelli, M., & Newell, S. (2012). Knowledge risks in organizational networks: The practice perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(1), 18–30.Google Scholar
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Nambisan, S. (2002). Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: Toward a theory. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 392–413.Google Scholar
O’Connor, G. C., & Rice, M. P. (2001). Opportunity recognition and breakthrough innovation in large established firms. California Management Review, 43(2), 95–116.Google Scholar
Palmisano, S. (2004). Leading change when business is good. Interview by Hemp, Paul and Stewart, Thomas A.. Harvard Business Review, 82, 60–70.Google Scholar
Poetz, M. K., & Schreier, M. (2012). The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 245–256.Google Scholar
Prpić, J., Shukla, P. P., Kietzmann, J. H., & McCarthy, I. P. (2015). How to work a crowd: Developing crowd capital through crowdsourcing. Business Horizons, 58(1), 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puranam, P., Alexy, O., & Reitzig, M. (2014). What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Academy of Management Review, 39(2), 162–180.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, F. M., Buchinger, W., Gassmann, O., & Obrist, M. (2012). Crowdsourcing: Leveraging innovation through online idea competitions. Research-Technology Management, 55(3), 32–38.Google Scholar
Seidl, D., & Werle, F. (2018). Inter‐organizational sensemaking in the face of strategic meta‐problems: Requisite variety and dynamics of participation. Strategic Management Journal, 39(3), 830–858.Google Scholar
Stieger, D., Matzler, K., Chatterjee, S., & Ladstaetter-Fussenegger, F. (2012). Democratizing strategy: How crowdsourcing can be used for strategy dialogues. California Management Review, 54(4), 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y., Wang, N., Yin, C., & Che, T. (2012). Investigating the Non-Linear Relationships in the Expectancy Theory: The Case of Crowdsourcing Marketplace (July 29, 2012), AMCIS 2012 Proceedings, Paper 6. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2012/proceedings/VirtualCommunities/6Google Scholar
Swan, J., Newell, S., Scarbrough, H., & Hislop, D. (1999). Knowledge management and innovation: Networks and networking. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(4), 262–275.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.Google Scholar
Terwiesch, C., & Xu, Y. (2008). Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Science, 54(9), 1529–1543.Google Scholar
Tsoukas, H. (2009). A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20(6), 941–957.Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L. (1997). Winning through innovation. Strategy & Leadership, 25(4), 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Krogh, G. (2012). How does social software change knowledge management? Toward a strategic research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(2), 154–164.Google Scholar
Wagner, E. B. (2011). Why prize? The surprising resurgence of prizes to stimulate innovation. Research-Technology Management, 54(6), 32–36.Google Scholar
Wallin, M. W., & von Krogh, G. (2010). Organizing for open innovation: Focus on the integration of knowledge. Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 145–154.Google Scholar
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R., Cailluet, L., & Yakis‐Douglas, B. (2011). Opening strategy: Evolution of a precarious profession. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 531–544.Google Scholar
Yamauchi, Y., Yokozawa, M., Shinohara, T., & Ishida, T. (2000, December). Collaboration with Lean Media: How open-source software succeeds. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 329–338). ACM.Google Scholar
Yang, J., Adamic, L. A., & Ackerman, M. S. (2008, July). Crowdsourcing and knowledge sharing: Strategic user behavior on taskcn. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×