Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T10:48:18.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

35 - Stress Prevention among German Teachers

from Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2017

Moshe Israelashvili
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
John L. Romano
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altrichter, H., & Eder, F. (2004). Das “Autonomie-Paritätsmuster” als Innovationsbarriere? [The autonomy-parity-principle as a barrier for innovations?] In Holtappels, H. G. (eds.), Schulprogramme – Instrumente der Schulentwicklung. Weinheim: Juventa, pp. 195221.Google Scholar
Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the Mystery of Health: How People Manage Stress and Stay Well. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Blase, J., Dedrick, C., & Strahe, M. (1986). Leadership behavior of school principals in relation to teacher stress, satisfaction, and performance. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development 24: 159–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossong, B. (1999). Stress und Handlungskontrolle. [Stress and Regulation of Action]. Motivationsforschung, Bd. 17. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Buchwald, P. (2002). Dyadisches Coping in mündlichen Prüfungen. [Dyadic Coping in Oral Exams]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Buchwald, P., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2004). Burnout aus ressourcentheoretischer Perspektive [Burnout within the framework of COR-theory]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht 51: 247–57.Google Scholar
Buchwald, P., Schorn, N., & Morgenroth, S. (2011). Resource gains and losses in teachers. In Buchwald, P., Moore, K. and Ringeisen, T. (eds.), Stress and Anxiety – Application to Education and Health. Berlin: Logos, pp. 7181.Google Scholar
Buchwald, P., Schwarzer, C., & Hobfoll, S. E. (eds.) (2004). Stress gemeinsam bewältigen – Ressourcenmanagement und multiaxiales Coping [Social Coping: Management of Resources and Multiaxial Coping Model]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Bundesbeamtengesetz [BBG; Federal Civil Service Act]. §44 Dienstunfähigkeit. www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/bbg_2009/gesamt.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bundestag (2015). Artikel 30 des Grundgesetzes von Deutschland. [Article 30 of the basic law of Germany]. www.bundestag.de/ bundestag/aufgaben/rechtsgrundlagen /grundgesetz/gg_02/245124Google Scholar
Burke, R. J., Greenglass, E. R., & Schwarzer, R. (1996). Predicting teacher burnout over time: effects of work stress, social support, and self-doubts on burnout and its consequences. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping 9: 261–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherniss, C. (1995). Beyond Burnout: Helping Teachers, Nurses, Therapists and Lawyers Recover from Stress and Disillusionment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
deStatis (Deutsches Statistisches Bundesamt) (2015a). Bevölkerungsentwicklung in Deutschland [Population development in Germany]. www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/Bevoelkerung/Bevoelkerung.htmlGoogle Scholar
deStatis (Deutsches Statistisches Bundesamt) (2015b). Anzahl der teil- und vollzeitbeschäftigten Lehrkräfte allgemeinbildender Schulen in Deutschland im Schuljahr 2013/ 2014 nach Bundesländern. [Number of teachers per state in Germany]. www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen /Thematisch/BildungForschungKultur/Schulen/ BroschuereSchulenBlick 0110018149004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.Google Scholar
Dolton, P., & Marcenaro-Gutierrez, S. (2013). Global Teacher Status Index 2013. www.varkeygemsfoundation.org/sites/default/files/documents/2013GlobalTeacherStatusIndex.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dückers-Klichowski, S. (2005). Burnout bei Lehramtsanwärtern im Primarbereich [Burnout of Trainee Teacher in Primary Schools]. Berlin: Logos-Verlag.Google Scholar
European Commission (2009). Key data on education in Europe 2009. eacea.ec. europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/key_data_series/105en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ezrahi, Y., & Shirom, A. (1986). Construct validation of burnout. Paper presented at the 21st Congress of the International Association of Applied Psychology, Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
Freudenberger, H. J. (1974). Staff burnout. Journal of Social Issues 30: 159–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenberger, H. J. (1983). Bumout: contemporary issues, trends, and concerns. In Farber, B. A. (eds.), Stress and Burnout. New York: Pergamon, pp. 23–8.Google Scholar
Fussangel, K. (2008). Subjektive Theorien von Lehrkräften zur Kooperation [Subjective theories of teachers in the context of teacher cooperation]. nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn=urn%3Anbn%3Ade%3Ahbz%3A 468-20080475Google Scholar
GEW (Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft Nordrhein-Westfalen) (2013). Inklusionsgesetz [law of inclusion]. www.gew-nrw.de/uploads/tx_files/Inklusionsgesetz.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gräsel, C. (2010). Stichwort: Transfer und Transferforschung im Bildungsbereich [Transfer and research on transfer in the field of education]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 13(1): 720.Google Scholar
Hillert, A. (2013). Psychische und psychosomatische Erkrankungen von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern [Psychological and psychosomatic illnesses of teachers]. In Rothland, M. (eds.), Belastung und Beanspruchung im Lehrerberuf. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 140–59.Google Scholar
Hillert, A., Lehr, D., Koch, S., Bracht, M., Ueing, S.. & Sosnowsky-Waschek, N. (2012). Lehrergesundheit. AGIL – das Präventionsprogramm für Arbeit und Gesundheit im Lehrerberuf [Teacher Health. AGIL – Prevention Program for Work and Health at School]. Stuttgart: Schattauer.Google Scholar
Hillert, A., Koch, S., & Lehr, S. (2013). Stressbewältigung am Arbeitsplatz. Trainerhandbuch [Coping at the Office: Trainer Handbook]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E. (1988). The Ecology of Stress. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist 44: 513–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobfoll, S. E. (1998). Stress, Culture, and Community: The Psychology and Philosophy of Stress. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review 50: 337421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E. (2011). Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 84(1): 116–22.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E. & Buchwald, P. (2004). Die Theorie der Ressourcenerhaltung und das multiaxiale Copingmodell [Conservation of theory and the multiaxial coping model]. In Buchwald, P., Schwarzer, C., & Hobfoll, S. E. (eds.), Stress gemeinsam bewältigen: Ressourcenmanagement und multiaxiales [Coping Collective coping: Resource Management and Multiaxial Coping]. Göttingen: Hogrefe, pp. 1126.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E., & Freedy, J. (1993). Conservation of resources: a general theory applied to burnout. In Schaufeli, W. B., Maslach, C., & Marek, T. (eds.), Professional Burnout: Recent Developments in Theory and Research. New York: Taylor & Francis, pp.115–35.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E., & Lilly, R. S. (1993). Resource conservation as a strategy for community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology 21: 128–48.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E., & Shirom, A. (2001). Conservation of resources theory: applications to stress and management in the workplace. In Golembiewski, R. T. (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 5780.Google Scholar
Huber, S. G., & Wolfgramm, C. (2011). Beanspruchung und Belastung von Schulleitenden. Ergebnisse aus der deutschsprachigen Schulleistungsstudie 2011. www.bildungsmanagement.net/html/projekte/pdf/Huber%20&%20Wolfgramm-TABS-DFGE.pdfGoogle Scholar
IT NRW (Information and Technique North-Rhine Westphalia) (2015). Primary schools in NRW. www.it.nrw.de/presse/ pressemitteilungen /2015 /pres_042_15.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ito, J. K., & Brotheridge, C. M. (2003). Resources, coping strategies, and emotional exhaustion: a conservation of resources perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior 63: 490509.Google Scholar
Jerusalem, M. (1990). Persönliche Ressourcen, Vulnerabilität und Streßerleben [Personal Resources, Vulnerability and Stress]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Käser, U., & Wasch, J. (2009). Burnout bei Lehrerinnen und Lehrern [Burnout of Teachers]. Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar
Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Die Entwicklung des Beanspruchungs-erlebens bei Lehrerinnen und Lehrern in Abhängigkeit beruflicher Verhaltensstile [Development of demands regarding to the professional behavior of teacher]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht 56: 200–12.Google Scholar
KMK (Kultusministerkonferenz) (2004). Standards für die Lehrerbildung: Bildungs-wissenschaften [Standard for teaching and teacher education]. www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2004/2004_12_16-Standards-Lehrerbildung.pdfGoogle Scholar
KMK (Kultusministerkonferenz) (2015). Responsibilities of KMK. www.kmk.org/wir-ueber-uns/aufgaben-der-kmk.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and Emotion: A New Synthesis. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S., & Launier, R. (1981). Stressbezogene Transaktion zwischen Person und Umwelt [Stress-related transaction between individual and environment]. In Nitsch, J. R. (ed.), Stress, Theorien, Untersuchungen, Maßnahmen [Stress, Theories, Analyses, Actions]. Bern: Huber, pp. 213–60.Google Scholar
Lee, R., & Ashforth, B. E. (1996). A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology 81: 123–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehr, D. (2011). Belastung und Beanspruchung im Lehrerberuf. Prävention und Intervention der personenbezogenen Forschung [Stress and demands at school. Prevention and intevention]. In Terhart, E., Bennewitz, H., & Rothland, M. (eds.), Handbuch der Forschung zum Lehrerberuf [Handbook of Research on the Teaching Profession]. Münster: Waxmann, pp. 774 –87.Google Scholar
Lehr, D., Schmitz, E., & Hillert, A. (2008). Bewältigungsmuster und psychische Gesundheit [Coping and health]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 52(1): 316.Google Scholar
Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher – a Sociological Study. Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behaviour 2: 99113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. (1996). Maslach Burnout Inventory. Mountain View, CA: CPP.Google Scholar
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The Truth about Burnout: How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and What to Do about It. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Morgenroth, S. (2015). Lehrerkooperation unter Innovationsstress [Teacher Cooperation and Innovation Stress]. Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenroth, S., & Buchwald, P. (2015). Burnout und Ressourcenerhaltung bei Lehrkräften [Burnout and conservation of resources of teachers]. Unterrichtswissenschaft 2: 136–49.Google Scholar
Morgenroth, S., Buchwald, P., & Möller, C. (2012). Innovationsstress bei Grundschul-lehrkräften – Welche Rolle spielt das Autonomieerleben? [Innovation stress among elementary teachers – which role plays autonomy?]. In Hellmich, F., Hoya, F., & Förster, S. (eds.), Bedingungen des Lehrens und Lernens in der Grundschule: Bilanz und Perspektiven [Conditions of Teaching and Learning in Primary School: Results and Perspectives]. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 161–4.Google Scholar
Morgenroth, S. & Grosche, M. (in the press). Inklusion durch interdisziplinäre Kooperation. Erweiterung des Modells “response-to-intervention” um Aspekte von Kokonstruktion und Co-Teaching. [Inclusion through interdisciplinary cooperation]. In S. Barsch, N. Glutsch & M. Massumi (Hrsg.), Blickwechsel Diversity. Internationale Perspektiven der LehrerInnenbildung. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Needle, R. H., Griffin, T., Svendsen, R., & Berney, C. (1980). Teacher stress: sources and consequences. Journal of School Health 50: 96–9.Google Scholar
Neuenschwander, M. P. (2003). Belastungen und Ressourcen bei Burnout von Lehrkräften der Sekundarstufe I und II [Demands and resources in the context of teachers burnout]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht 50: 210–19.Google Scholar
Neveu, J.-P. (2007). Jailed resources: conservation of resources theory as applied to burnout among prison guards. Journal of Organizational Behavior 28: 2142.Google Scholar
Perrez, M., & Reicherts, N. (1992). Stress, Coping and Health: A Situation-Behavior Approach: Theory, Methods, Applications. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
Peters, J. (2013). Arbeitsbezogene Verhaltens- und Erlebensmuster von Waldorflehrern im Zusammenhang mit Arbeitsbelastung und Berufszufriedenheit. Eine empirische Untersuchung. [Work-related Behavior and Patterns of Behavior of Waldorf Teachers in the Relation with Job Demands and Job Satisfaction: An Empirical Analysis]. Alfter: Alanus Hochschule. alanus.edu/publikationen/Google Scholar
Poschkamp, T. (2008). Lehrergesundheit. Belastungsmuster, Burnout und Social Support bei dienstunfähigen Lehrkräften (Band 1) [Teachers health, coping, burnout and social support of disabled teachers]. In Buchwald, P., & Ringeisen, T. (eds.), Angewandte Stress- und Bewältigungsforschung [Applied Research of Stress and Coping]. Berlin: Logos Verlag.Google Scholar
Punch, K. F., & Tuettemann, E. (1990). Correlates of psychological distress among secondary school teachers. British Educational Research Journal 16: 369–82.Google Scholar
Ringeisen, T., Morgenroth, S., Buchwald, P., & Schümer, M. (2013). How does social support foster the development of teacher cooperation? Disentangling the differential relations over time. In Moore, K.A., Kaniasty, K., Buchwald, P., & Sesé, A. (eds.), Stress and Anxiety – Application to Health and Well-being, Work Stressors, and Anxiety Assessment. Berlin: Logos, pp. 103–15.Google Scholar
Rothland, M. (2007). Soziale Unterstützung bei Lehrkräften [Social support and teacher]. In Rothland, M. (ed.), Belastung und Beanspruchung im Lehrerberuf. Modelle, Befunde, Interventionen [Stress of Teachers: Models, Results and Intervention]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 249–66.Google Scholar
Rothland, M. (ed.) (2013). Belastung und Beanspruchung im Lehrerberuf [Stress and Demands among Teachers]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Schaarschmidt, U., & Fischer, A. (2003). AVEM – Arbeitsbezogenes Verhaltens- und Erlebensmuster [Patterns of Professional Behavior and Experience of Teachers]. Frankfurt: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., Enzmann, D., & Girault, N. (1993). Measurement of burnout: a review. In Schaufeli, W. B., Maslach, C., & Marek, T. (eds.), Professional Burnout: Recent Developments in Theory and Research. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, pp. 199215.Google Scholar
Schmid, A. C. (2003). Stress, Burnout und Coping [Stress, Burnout and Coping]. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.Google Scholar
Schmitz, G. S., & Schwarzer, R. (2000). Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung von Lehrern [Self-efficacy of teachers]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 14: 1225.Google Scholar
Schmitz, G. S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Individuelle und kollektive Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung von Lehrern [Individual and collective self-efficacy of teachers]. Beiheft: Selbstwirksamkeit und Motivationsprozesse in Bildungsinstitutionen [Self-efficacy and motivation in educational institutions]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 44: 192214.Google Scholar
Schumm, J. A., Stines, L. R., Hobfoll, S. E., & Jackson, A. P. (2005). The double-barreled burden of child abuse and current stressful circumstances on adult women. Journal of Traumatic Stress 18: 467–76.Google Scholar
Schwarzer, C. (1999). Kindergärten als lernende Organisationen. [Kindergarden as learning organization]. In Caritas, (eds.), Jahrbuch der Caritas: Berichte aus der Praxis [Annual Book of Caritas. Reports of the Practice]. Aachen: Caritas Verlag, pp. 271–4.Google Scholar
Schwarzer, R. (2000). Streß, Angst und Handlungsregulation [Stress, Anxiety and Regulation of Action]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Schwarzer, R., & Leppin, A. (1989). Sozialer Rückhalt und Gesundheit [Social Support and Health]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Simon, T., & Kruschel, R. (2013). Gesundheitsförderung mithilfe des Index für Inklusion? [Health promotion with the help of the index of the inclusion?] Zeitschrift für Inklusion 2. www.inklusion-online.net/index.php/inklusion-online/article/view/13/13Google Scholar
Soltau, A., Berthe, S., & Mienert, M. (2012). Das Autonomie-Paritäts-Muster [The autonomy-parity-principle]. In Huber, S., & Ahlgrimm, F. (eds.), Kooperation. New York: Waxmann, pp. 89102.Google Scholar
Stemmer Obrist, G. (2011). Schulleiterinnen und Schulleiter in der Aargauer Volksschule [School manager of the Aargauer school]. (Doctoral dissertation). University Zürich/Institut für Erziehungswissenschaft. Ms. Baden.Google Scholar
van Dick, R. (2006). Stress und Arbeitszufriedenheit bei Lehrerinnen und Lehrern [Stress and Job Satisfaction of Teachers]. Marburg: Tectum Verlag.Google Scholar
Warner, L. M., Ziegelmann, J. P., Schüz, B., Wurm, S., Tesch-Römer, C., & Schwarzer, R. (2011). Maintaining autonomy despite multimorbidity: self-efficacy and the two faces of social support. European Journal of Aging 8: 312.Google Scholar
Weiß, S., & Kiel, E. (2013). Lehrergesundheit – Belastung, Ressourcen und Prävention. [Teacher health – demands, resources and prevention]. In Marchwacka, M. A. (ed.), Gesundheitsförderung im Setting Schule [Health Promotion in the School Context]. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 347–63.Google Scholar
Wells, J. D., Hobfoll, S. E., & Lavin, J. (1997). Resource loss, resource gain, and communal coping during pregnancy among women with multiple roles. Psychology of Women Quarterly 21: 645–62.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×