Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:41:11.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1.5 - Personality

from Part I - Psychological Underpinnings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2021

By
Sean Hammond  and
Vincent Egan
Edited by
Jennifer M. Brown  and
Miranda A. H. Horvath
Jennifer M. Brown
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Miranda A. H. Horvath
Affiliation:
University of Suffolk
Get access

Summary

In conjunction with situational and circumstantial factors, personality is a common influence contributing to the tipping point at which an offence occurs. People without these traits in similar circumstances are better able to eschew risky situations. The ultimate cause of ostensibly antagonistic traits is in evolved behavioural mechanisms which continue to be useful in harsher socioecological niches. Antagonistic traits often function alongside more positive co-operative and empathic traits, both having contributed to human survival over millennia. A huge body of psychometric and multivariate work with offenders involving large samples and longitudinal samples indicates five-factor, HEXACO, Dark Triad and other trait description schemes corroborate one-another regarding the key trait influences on offending. These models map onto DSM and ICD-10 personality disorder models, suggesting personality disorders have a foundation in trait dispositions. Work is needed to identify better behavioural measures of these dispositions, and how they integrate into cognitive and desistance processes.

Keywords

PersonalityPersonality TraitsPersonality DisorderOffendersOffending
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology , pp. 88 - 108
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1994). The psychology of criminal conduct. Anderson.Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327–353.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement: how people do harm and live with themselves. Worth.Google Scholar
Bartol, C., & Bartol, A. (2007). Criminal behavior: a psychosocial approach. Pearson.Google Scholar
Blackburn, R. (1993). The psychology of criminal conduct. Wiley.Google Scholar
Blackburn, R. (1995). Criminality and the interpersonal circle in mentally disordered offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 155–176.Google Scholar
Blackburn, R., & Renwick, S. J. (1996). Rating scales for measuring the interpersonal circle in forensic psychiatric patients. Psychological Assessment, 8, 76–84.Google Scholar
Bulthelier, S., & Hicker, H. (1997). The Eysenck Personality Profiler – manual. SWETS Test Services.Google Scholar
Cale, E. M. (2006). A quantitative review of the relations between the “Big 3” higher order personality dimensions and antisocial behaviour. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 250–284.Google Scholar
Carrascoa, M., Barker, E. D., Tremblay, R. E., & Vitarob, F. (2006). Eysenck’s personality dimensions as predictors of male adolescent trajectories of physical aggression, theft and vandalism. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1309–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carton, H., & Egan, V. (2017). The dark triad and intimate partner violence. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 84–88.Google Scholar
Caruso, J. C., Witkiewitz, K., Belcourt-Dittloff, A., & Gottlieb, J. D. (2001). Reliability of scores from the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: A reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 675–689.Google Scholar
Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Silva, P. A., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Krueger, R. F., & Schmutte, P. S. (1994). Are some people crime-prone? Replications of the personality-crime relationship across countries, genders, races, and methods, Criminology, 32(2), 163–196.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1973). Personality and mood by questionnaire. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, M. (2011). Toward a theoretical integration of crime and delinquency. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 21, 312–322.Google Scholar
Chabrol, H., Van Leeuwen, N., Rodgers, R. F., & Séjourné, N. (2009). Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 734–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabrol, H., Bouvet, R., & Goutaudier, N. (2017). The dark tetrad and antisocial behavior in a community sample of college students. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 17, 295–304.Google Scholar
Claridge, G. (2018). Hans Eysenck’s contribution to our understanding of personality and psychological disorders. In Psychopathology and personality dimensions: the selected works of Gordon Claridge. Routledge.Google Scholar
Cloninger, C. R. (1986). A unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety states. Psychiatric Developments, 3, 167–226.Google Scholar
Coid, J., Yang, M., Tyrer, P., Roberts, A., & Ullrich, S. (2006). Prevalence and correlates of personality disorder in Great Britain. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, 423–431.Google Scholar
Colder, C. R., & O’Connor, R. M. (2004). Gray’s reinforcement sensitivity model and child psychopathology: laboratory and questionnaire assessment of the BAS and BIS. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 435–51.Google Scholar
Collison, K. L., Miller, J. D., Gaughan, E. T., Widiger, T. A., & Lynam, D. R. (2016). Development and validation of the super-short form of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 47,143–150.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., Fagan, P. J., Piedmont, R. L., Pontiacs, Y., & Wise, T. N. (1992). The Five-Factor Model of personality and sexual functioning in outpatient men and women. Psychiatric Medicine, 10(2), 199–215.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory: professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Solid ground on the wetlands of personality - a reply to Block. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 216–220.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & Widiger, T. A. (2003). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1996). Contemporary criminology. Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Edwards, B. G., Albertson, E., & Verona, E. (2017). Dark and vulnerable personality trait correlates of dimensions of criminal behavior among adult offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(7), 921–927.Google Scholar
Egan, V., Austin, E., Elliot, D., Patel, D., & Charlesworth, P. (2003). Personality traits, personality disorders and sensational interests in mentally disordered offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 8(1), 51–62.Google Scholar
Egan, V., Hughes, N., & Palmer, E. J. (2015). Moral disengagement, the dark triad, and unethical consumer attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 123–128.Google Scholar
Egan, V., McMurran, M., Richardson, C., & Blair, M. (2000). Criminal cognitions and personality: What does the PICTS really measure? Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 10, 170–184.Google Scholar
Egan, V. (2008). The ‘Big Five’: Neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness as an organisational scheme for thinking about aggression and violence. In McMurran, M. & Howard, R. (Eds.), Personality, personality disorder, and risk of violence: an evidence-based approach, John Wiley.Google Scholar
Egan, V. (2011). Individual differences and antisocial behavior. In Chamorro-Premuzic, T., von Stumm, S., & Furnham, A. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences (pp. 512–531). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Evans, I. M., & Wilson, N. (2016). Classical eyelid conditioning, psychopathy, and Hans Eysenck’s grand theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 82–90.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W. (1976). Extraversion, verbal learning, and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 83(1), 75–90.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1977). Crime and personality (3rd ed.). Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1992a). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667–673.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1992b). A reply to Costa and McCrae. P or A and C – The role of theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 867–868.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1996). Personality and Crime: Where do we stand. Psychology, Crime and Law, 2, 143–152.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1976). Psychoticism as a dimension of personality. Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: a natural science approach. PlenumGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Gudjonsson, G. (1989). The causes and cures of criminality. Plenum.Google Scholar
Eysenck, S. B. G., Rust, J., & Eysenck, H. J. (1977). Personality and the classification of adult offenders. British Journal of Criminology, 17, 169–179.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P., Biron, L., & LeBlanc, M. (1982). Personality and delinquency in London and Montreal. In Gunn, J. & Farrington, D.P. (Eds.), Abnormal offenders, delinquency and the criminal justice system. Wiley.Google Scholar
Fehrman, E., Egan, V., Gorban, A. N., Levesley, J., Mirkes, E. M., & Muhammad, A. K. (2019). Personality traits and drug consumption. Springer.Google Scholar
Flexon, J. L., Meldrum, R. C., Young, J. T., & Lehmann, P. S. (2016). Low self-control and the Dark Triad: Disentangling the predictive power of personality traits on young adult substance use, offending and victimization. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 159–169.Google Scholar
Fonseca, A. C., & Yule, W. (1995). Personality and antisocial behaviour in children and adolescents: An enquiry into Eysenck’s and Gray’s theories. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23, 767–781.Google Scholar
Foulkes, L. (2019). Sadism: Review of an elusive construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109500.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10-year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199–216.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative description of personality. The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.Google Scholar
Goma-i-Freixanet, M. (2001). Prosocial and antisocial aspects of personality in women: A replication. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1401–1411.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality. In Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), A model of personality. Springer.Google Scholar
Haigler, E. D., & Widiger, T. A. (2001). Experimental manipulation of NEO-PI-R items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 339–358.Google Scholar
Hammond, S. M., & O’Rourke, M. M. (1998). The RAMAS Anger Assessment Profile (RAAP) user’s manual. The RAMAS Foundation.Google Scholar
Hammond, S. M., & O’Rourke, M. M. (2004). Developing a psychometric model of risk. Issues in Forensic Psychology, 5, 100–114.Google Scholar
Hare, R. D. (1996). Psychopathy: A clinical construct whose time has come. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 23, 25–54.Google Scholar
Hare, R. D. (1997). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised. Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
Haskin, P. A. (2007). Reinforcement sensitivity, coping and delinquent behaviour in adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 739–749.Google Scholar
Herrero, Ó., & Colom, R. (2008). Distinguishing impulsive, unsocialized sensation seeking: A comparison between criminal offenders and the general population. Journal of Individual Differences, 29(4), 199–204.Google Scholar
Hodson, G., Book, A., Visser, B. A., Volk, A. A., Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2018). Is the Dark Triad common factor distinct from low Honesty-Humility? Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 123–129.Google Scholar
John, O. P. (1990). The “Big Five” factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In Pervin, L. A. (Ed.), Handbook of personality: theory and research (pp. 66–100). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, L. K., Plouffe, R. A., & Saklofske, D. H. (2019). Subclinical sadism and the dark triad: should there be a dark tetrad? Journal of Individual Differences, 40(3), 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalised self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 693–710.Google Scholar
Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime: moral and sensual attractions in doing evil. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Koscielska, R. W., Flowe, H. D., & Egan, V. (2019). The dark tetrad and mating effort’s influence on sexual coaxing and coercion across relationship types. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 1–11.Google Scholar
Larstone, R. M., Jang, K. L., Livesley, W. J., Vernon, P. A., & Wolf, H. (2002). The relationship between Eysenck’s PEN model of personality, the five-factor model of personality, and traits delineating personality dysfunction. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(1), 25–37.Google Scholar
Lau, K., & Marsee, M. (2013). Exploring narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism in Youth: examination of associations with antisocial behavior and aggression. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 22(3), 355–367.Google Scholar
Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (1991). The Sutherland-Glueck debate: on the sociology of criminological knowledge. American Journal of Sociology. 96, 1402–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leahy, R. L. (2007). Schematic mismatch in the therapeutic relationship: A social-cognitive model. In Gilbert, P. & Leahy, R. L. (Eds.), The therapeutic relationship in the cognitive behavioral psychotherapies (pp. 229–254). Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Loranger, A. W. (1999). International personality disorder examination. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
Lykken, D. (1995). The antisocial personalities. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lynam, D. R., Caspi, A., Moffit, T. E., Wikström, P.-O., Loeber, R., & Novak, S. (2000). The interaction between impulsivity and neighbourhood context on offending: The effects of impulsivity are stronger in poorer neighbourhoods. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 563–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynam, D. R., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Raine, A., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2005). Adolescent psychopathy and the Big Five: Results from two samples. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 431–443.Google Scholar
Matsueda, R. L. (2017). Toward an analytical criminology: The micro-macro problem, causal mechanisms, and public policy. Criminology, 55(3), 493–519.Google Scholar
McCall, G. S., & Shields, N. (2008). Examining the evidence from small-scale societies and early prehistory and implications for modern theories of aggression and violence. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 13, 1–9.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (2001). Five years of progress: A reply to Block. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 108–113.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1985). Comparison of EPI and psychoticism scales with measures of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 587–597.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587–596.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. (2002). Offender rehabilitation and treatment: effective programmes and policies to reduce re-offending. John Wiley.Google Scholar
McHoskey, J. W., Worzel, W., & Szyarto, C. (1998). Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 192–210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Međedović, J. (2017). The profile of a criminal offender depicted by HEXACO personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 107, 159–163Google Scholar
Meere, M., & Egan, V. (2017). Everyday sadism, the Dark Triad, personality, and disgust sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 112, 157–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. (2001). Structural models of personality and their relationship to antisocial behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Criminology, 4, 765–798.Google Scholar
Miller, J.D., Lynam, D., & Leukefeld, C. (2003). Examining antisocial behavior through the lens of the Five Factor Model of personality. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 497–514.Google Scholar
Millon, T., Simonsen, E., Birket-Smith, M., & Davis, R. D. (1998). Psychopathy: antisocial, criminal and violent behavior. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Moshagen, M., Zettler, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2020). Measuring the dark core of personality. Psychological Assessment, 32(2), 182–196.Google Scholar
Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H., & Meijer, E. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the Dark Triad (narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 183–204.Google Scholar
Neumann, C. S., Hare, R. D., & Pardini, D. A. (2015). Antisociality and the construct of psychopathy: Data from across the globe. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 678–692.Google Scholar
O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., Story, P. A., & White, C. D. (2015). A meta-analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the dark triad and five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83, 644–664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Meara, A., Davies, J., & Hammond, S. (2011). The psychometric properties and utility of the Short Sadistic Impulse Scale (SSIS). Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 523–531.Google Scholar
O’Riordan, C., & O’Connell, M. (2014). Predicting adult involvement in crime: Personality measures are significant, socio-economic measures are not. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 98–101.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, M., Hammond, S., Devonshire, P., & Taylor, J. (2009). Personality assessment in forensic practice. British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
Oshio, A., Taku, K., Hirano, M., & Saeed, G. (2018). Resilience and Big Five personality traits: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 54–60.Google Scholar
Pagel, M. (2016). Animal behaviour: Lethal violence deep in the human lineage. Nature.Google Scholar
Pailing, A., Boon, J., & Egan, V. (2014). Personality, the Dark Triad and violence. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 81–86.Google Scholar
Palmer, E. J. (2003). Offending behaviour: moral reasoning, criminal conduct and the rehabilitation of offenders. Willan.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Toward a taxonomy of dark personalities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 421–426.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: the decline of violence in history and its causes. Penguin.Google Scholar
Pratt, T. C. (2009). Reconsidering Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: linking the micro- and macro-level sources of self-control and criminal behavior over the life course. In Savage, J. (Ed.), The development of persistent criminality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931–964.Google Scholar
Quay, H. (1986). The behavioral reward and inhibition systems in childhood behaviour disorder. In Bloomingdale, L. M. (Ed.), Attention deficit disorder: research in treatment, psychopharmacology and attention (Vol. 3). Spectrum.Google Scholar
Rafter, N. H. (2006). H. J. Eysenck in Fagin’s kitchen: The return to biological theory in 20th century criminology. History of the Human Sciences, 19, 37–56.Google Scholar
Raine, A., Venables, P. H., & Williams, M. (1996). Better autonomic conditioning and faster electrodermal half-recovery time at age 15 years as possible protective factors against crime at 29 years. Developmental Psychology, 32, 624–630.Google Scholar
Rauthmann, J. F. (2011). Acquisitive or protective self-presentation of darkpersonalities? Associations among the Dark Triad and self-monitoring. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 502–508.Google Scholar
Rowe, D. C. (2002). Biology and crime. Roxbury.Google Scholar
Samuels, J., Bienvenu, J., Cullen, B., Costa, P. T., Eaton, W. W., & Nestadt, G. (2004). Personality dimensions and criminal arrest. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 45, 275–280.Google Scholar
Schneider, R. D. (2009). Commentary: evidence-based practice and forensic psychiatry. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 37(4), 503–508.Google Scholar
Skeem, J. L., Miller, J. D., Mulvey, E., Tiemann, J., & Monahan, J. (2005). Using a five-factor lens to explore the relation between personality traits and violence in psychiatric patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 454–465.Google Scholar
Sleep, C. E., Weiss, B., Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. (2019). An examination of the triarchic model of psychopathy’s nomological network: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 71, 1–26.Google Scholar
Syverson, K. L., & Romney, D. M. (1985). A further attempt to differentiate violent from nonviolent offenders by means of a battery of psychological tests. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 17(1), 87–92.Google Scholar
Staunton, C., & Hammond, S. M. (2011). An investigation of the Guilty Knowledge Test polygraph examination. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 1, 1–14.Google Scholar
Staunton, C., Hammond, S. M., Perkins, D., & Lambert, S. (2014). Biosignal measures of female sexual interest: their feasibility in a forensic context. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 4(1), 59–75.Google Scholar
Sutherland, E. H. (1949). White collar crime. Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Tellegen, A. (2003). Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Van Dam, C., De Bruyn, E., & Janssens, J. (2007). Personality, delinquency, and criminal recidivism. Adolescence, 42, 763–777.Google Scholar
Vize, C. E., Collison, K. L., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2019). The “core” of the dark triad: A test of competing hypotheses. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
Walters, G. D. (1995). The psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles. Part I: reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 22, 307–325.Google Scholar
Walters, G. D. (2018) Predicting short- and long-term desistance from crime with the NEO personality inventory-short form: Domain scores and interactions in high risk delinquent youth. Journal of Research in Personality, 75, 37–45.Google Scholar
Weibe, R. (2004). Delinquent behavior and the Five-Factor Model: hiding in the adaptive landscape? Individual Differences Research, 2(1), 38–62.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: the unity of knowledge. Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Woody, E., & Claridge, G. (1977). Psychoticism and thinking. British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 16(3), 241–248.Google Scholar
Wrangham, R. (2019). The goodness paradox: the strange relationship between virtue and violence in human evolution. Pantheon.Google Scholar
Wright, J. P., Morgan, M. A., Almeida, P.R. Almosaed, N. F., Moghrabi, S. S., & Bashatah, F. S. (2017). Malevolent forces: self-control, the dark triad, and crime. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 15(2), 191–215.Google Scholar
Zembrowski, D. (2011). Sociological theories of crime and delinquency. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 21, 240–254.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×