Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T00:21:39.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

33 - Expertise in Second Language Vocabulary

from Part V.II - Domains of Expertise: Arts, Sports, Games, and Other Skills

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2018

K. Anders Ericsson
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Robert R. Hoffman
Affiliation:
Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
Aaron Kozbelt
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
A. Mark Williams
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adolphs, S., & Durrow, V. (2004). Social-cultural integration and the development of formulaic sequences. In Schmitt, N. (ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and use (pp. 107126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Alali, F. A., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Teaching formulaic sequences: The same as or different from teaching single words? TESOL Journal, 3, 153180.Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In Guthrie, J. T. (ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Bahns, J., & Eldaw, M. (1993). Should we teach EFL students collocations? System, 21, 101114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barfield, P. A., & Gyllstad, D. H. (2009). Researching collocations in another language: Multiple interpretations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bonk, W. J. (2000). Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14, 1431.Google Scholar
Carter, J. (2012). Vocabulary: Applied linguistic perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cobb, T. (n.d.). Lextutor. www.lextutor.ca.Google Scholar
Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2012). The processing of formulaic language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 4561.Google Scholar
Cremer, M., Dingshoff, D., Beer, M., & Schoonen, R. (2010). Do word associations assess words knowledge? A comparison of L1 and L2, child and adult word associations. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 187204.Google Scholar
d’Ydewalle, G., & Pavakanun, U. (1995). Acquisition of a second/foreign language by viewing a television program. In Winterhoff-Spurk, P. (ed.), Psychology of media in Europe: The state of the art – perspectives for the future (pp. 5164). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Dagut, M., & Laufer, B. (1985). Avoidance of phrasal verbs: A case for contrastive analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 7379.Google Scholar
Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (eds.) (2007). Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., Durrow, V., & Zahran, K. (2004). Individual differences and their effects on formulaic sequence acquisition. In Schmitt, N. (ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and use (pp. 87106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 20, 2962.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T., & Munby, I. (2014). Knowledge of word associations. In Milton, J. & Fitzpatrick, T. (eds.), Dimensions of vocabulary knowledge (pp. 92105). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Garnier, M., & Schmitt, N. (2015). The PHaVE list: A pedagogical list of phrasal verbs and their most frequent meaning senses. Language Teaching Research, 19, 645666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnier, M., & Schmitt, N. (2016). Picking up polysemous phrasal verbs: How many do learners know and what facilitates this knowledge? System, 59, 2944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Fernández, B. (in preparation). Towards a theory of vocabulary acquisition: Relationships and order of acquisition of different types of word knowledge by L2 learners. PhD dissertation, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
González-Fernández, B., & Schmitt, N. (2015). How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have? The effects of frequency and amount of exposure. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 166, 94126.Google Scholar
Goulden, R., Nation, P., & Read, J. (1990). How large can a receptive vocabulary be? Applied Linguistics, 11, 341363.Google Scholar
Hirsh, D., & Nation, P. (1992). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? Reading in a Foreign Language, 8, 689696.Google Scholar
Hu, M., & Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13, 403430.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258286). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, J. (2002). Using DVD feature films in the EFL classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15, 509523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuiper, K. (2000). On the linguistic properties of formulaic speech. Oral Tradition, 15, 279305.Google Scholar
Kuiper, K., & Haggo, D. (1984). Livestock auctions, oral poetry, and ordinary language. Language in Society, 13, 205234.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399436.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 1530.Google Scholar
Li, M., & Kirby, J. R. (2015). The effects of vocabulary breadth and depth on English reading. Applied Linguistics, 36, 611634.Google Scholar
Lin, P. M. S. (2014). Investigating the validity of internet television as a resource for acquiring L2 formulaic sequences. System, 42, 164176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macis, M., & Schmitt, N. (2017). Not just ‘small potatoes’: Knowledge of the idiomatic meanings of collocations. Language Teaching Research, 21, 321340.Google Scholar
Martinez, R., & Schmitt, N. (2012). A phrasal expressions list. Applied Linguistics, 33, 299320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meara, P. (1996). The dimensions of lexical competence. In Brown, G., Malmkjær, K., & Williams, J. (eds.), Performance and competence in second language acquisition (pp. 3553). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meara, P., & Wolter, B. (2004). V_LINKS: Beyond vocabulary depth. In Albrechtsen, D., Haastrup, K., & Henriksen, B. (eds.), Angles on the English speaking world 4 (pp. 8596). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.Google Scholar
Millar, N. (2011). The processing of malformed formulaic language. Applied Linguistics, 32, 129148.Google Scholar
Milton, J., Alexiou, T., & Mattheoudakis, M. (2014). Knowledge of spoken form. In Milton, J. & Fitzpatrick, T. (eds.), Dimensions of vocabulary knowledge (pp. 1329). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacmillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, J., & Fitzpatrick, T. (eds.) (2014). Dimensions of vocabulary knowledge. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 5981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd edn.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, N. (2000). The importance of recurrent sequences for non-native speaker fluency and cognition. In Riggenbach, H. (ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 220240). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Paquot, M., & Granger, S. (2012). Formulaic language in learner corpora. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 130149.Google Scholar
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. B. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. In Coady, J. & Huckin, T. (eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 174200). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. W. (eds.), Language communication (pp. 191226). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2017). Learning L2 collocations incidentally from reading. Language Teaching Research, 21, 381402.Google Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from an authentic novel: Do things fall apart? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 3155.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1998). Words and rules. Lingua, 106, 219242.Google Scholar
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reves, T., & Levine, A. (1988). The FL receptive skills: Same or different? System, 16, 327336.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 7789.Google Scholar
Rodgers, M. P. H., & Webb, S. (2011). Narrow viewing: The vocabulary in related television programs. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 689717.Google Scholar
Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (1998). Quantifying word association responses: What is native-like? System, 26, 389401.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64, 913951.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Cobb, T., Horst, M., & Schmitt, D. (2017). How much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of Van Zeeland & Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006), and Cobb (2007). Language Teaching, 50, 212226.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 95, 2643.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Marsden, R. (2006). Why is English like that? Historical answers to hard ELT questions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2014). A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching. Language Teaching, 47, 484503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18, 5588.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Zimmerman, C. B. (2002). Derivative word forms: What do learners know? TESOL Quarterly, 36, 145171.Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2015). On the ‘holistic’ nature of formulaic language. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11, 117.Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2011). Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research, 27, 251272.Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Martinez, R. (2015). The idiom principle revisited. Applied Linguistics, 36, 549569.Google Scholar
Sonbul, S. (2015). Fatal mistake, awful mistake, or extreme mistake? Frequency effects on off-line/on-line collocational processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 419437.Google Scholar
Sorhus, H. B. (1977). To hear ourselves: Implications for teaching English as a second language. English Language Teaching Journal, 31, 211221.Google Scholar
Stæhr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36, 139152.Google Scholar
van Zeeland, H. (2014). Second language vocabulary knowledge in and from listening. PhD Dissertation, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics, 34, 457479.Google Scholar
Vilkaitė, L. (2016). Formulaic language is not all the same: Comparing the frequency of idiomatic phrases, collocations, lexical bundles, and phrasal verbs. Taikomoji kalbotyra, 8. www.taikomojikalbotyra.lt.Google Scholar
Walters, J., & Bozkurt, N. (2009). The effect of keeping vocabulary notebooks on vocabulary acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 13(4), 403423.Google Scholar
Waring, R., & Takaki, M. (2003). At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader? Reading in a Foreign Language, 15, 127.Google Scholar
Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28, 4665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S. (2011). Selecting television programs for language learning: Investigating television programs from the same genre. International Journal of English Studies, 11, 117136.Google Scholar
Webb, S., & Kagimoto, E. (2009). The effects of vocabulary learning on collocation and meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 5577.Google Scholar
Webb, S., Newton, J., & Chang, A. (2013). Incidental learning of collocation. Language Learning, 63, 91120.Google Scholar
Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2009). The lexical coverage of movies. Applied Linguistics, 30, 407427.Google Scholar
Wolter, B. (2002). Assessing proficiency through word associations: Is there still hope? System, 30, 315329.Google Scholar
Wolter, B., & Gyllstad, H. (2011). Collocational links in the L2 mental lexicon and the influence of L1 intralexical knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 32, 430449.Google Scholar
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zechmeister, E. B., Chronis, A. M., Cull, W. L., D’Anna, C. A., & Healy, N. A. (1995). Growth of a functionally important lexicon. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27(2), 201212.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, K. J. (2004). The role of vocabulary size in assessing second language proficiency. MA Dissertation, Brigham Young University.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×