Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance
- The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction and Perspectives
- Part II Overview of Approaches to the Study of Expertise: Brief Historical Accounts of Theories and Methods
- Part III Methods for Studying the Structure of Expertise
- Part IV Methods for Studying the Acquisition and Maintenance of Expertise
- Part V.I Domains of Expertise: Professions
- Part V.II Domains of Expertise: Arts, Sports, Games, and Other Skills
- Part VI Generalizable Mechanisms Mediating Types of Expertise
- Part VII General Issues and Theoretical Frameworks
- Index of Subjects
- References
Part IV - Methods for Studying the Acquisition and Maintenance of Expertise
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance
- The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction and Perspectives
- Part II Overview of Approaches to the Study of Expertise: Brief Historical Accounts of Theories and Methods
- Part III Methods for Studying the Structure of Expertise
- Part IV Methods for Studying the Acquisition and Maintenance of Expertise
- Part V.I Domains of Expertise: Professions
- Part V.II Domains of Expertise: Arts, Sports, Games, and Other Skills
- Part VI Generalizable Mechanisms Mediating Types of Expertise
- Part VII General Issues and Theoretical Frameworks
- Index of Subjects
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance , pp. 255 - 328Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
References
Adair, J. G. (1984). The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 334–345.Google Scholar
Araujo, D., Silva, P., & Davids, K. (2015). Capturing group tactical behaviors in expert team players. In Baker, J. & Farrow, D. (eds.), Routledge handbook of sport expertise (pp. 209–220). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 248–261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Baker, J., Côté, J., & Abernethy, B. (2003a). Learning from the experts: Practice activities of expert decision-makers in sport. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 342–347.Google Scholar
Baker, J., Côté, J., & Abernethy, B. (2003b). Sport-specific practice and the development of expert decision-making in team ball sports. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 15, 12–25.Google Scholar
Baker, J., Côté, J., & Deakin, J. (2005). Expertise in ultra-endurance triathletes: Early sport involvement, training structure, and the theory of deliberate practice. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17, 64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J., Abernethy, B., & Côté, J. (2008). The contribution of structure activity and deliberate play to the development of expert perceptual and decision-making skill. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 685–708.Google Scholar
Bruce, L., Farrow, D., & Raynor, A. (2013). Performance milestones in the development of expertise: Are they critical? Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25, 281–297.Google Scholar
Bruner, M. W., Munroe-Chandler, K. J., & Spink, K. S. (2008). Entry into elite sport: A preliminary investigation into the transition experiences of rookie athletes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 20, 236–252.Google Scholar
Bryant, F. B. (2000). Assessing the validity of measurement. In Grimm, L. G. & Yarnold, P. R. (eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 99–146). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Campitelli, G., & Gobet, F. (2008). The role of practice in chess: A longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 446–458.Google Scholar
Carling, C., & Bloomfield, J. (2013). Time-motion analysis. In McGarry, T., O’Donoghue, P., & Sampaio, J. (eds.), Routledge handbook of sports performance analysis (pp. 283–296). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carlson, R. C. (1988). The socialization of elite tennis players in Sweden: An analysis of the players’ backgrounds and development. Sociology of Sport Journal, 5, 241–256.Google Scholar
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, D., Macnamara, A., & McCarthy, N. (2015). Super champions, champions and almosts: Important differences and commonalities on the rocky road. Frontiers in Psychology: Movement Science and Sport Psychology, 6, 02009.Google ScholarPubMed
Côté, J. (1999). The influence of the family in the development of talent in sport. Sport Psychologist, 13, 395–417.Google Scholar
Côté, J., Ericsson, K. A., & Law, M. (2005). Tracing the development of athletes using retrospective interview methods: A proposed interview and validation procedure for reported information. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17, 1–19.Google Scholar
Coughlan, E. K., Williams, A. M., McRobert, A. P., & Ford, P. R. (2014). How experts practice: A novel test of deliberate practice theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 449–458.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deakin, J. M., & Cobley, C. (2003). A search for deliberate practice: An examination of the practice environments in figure skating and volleyball. In Starkes, J. L. and Ericsson, K. A. (eds.), Expert performance in sports: Advances in research on sport expertise (pp. 115–136). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Deakin, J., Côté, J., & Harvey, A. S. (2006). Time budgets, diaries, and analyses of concurrent practice activities. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 303–318). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Durand-Bush, N., & Salmela, J. H. (2002). The development and maintenance of expert athletic performance: Perceptions of world and Olympic champions. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14, 154–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgecomb, S. J., & Norton, K. I. (2006). Comparison of global positioning and computer-based tracking systems for measuring player movement distance during Australian football. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 9, 25–32.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firestone, W. A. (1987). Meaning in method: The rhetoric of quantitative and qualitative research: Educational Researcher, 16, 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, P. R., Ward, P., Hodges, N. J., & Williams, A. M. (2009). The role of deliberate practice and play in career progression in sport: The early engagement hypothesis. High Ability Studies, 20, 65–75.Google Scholar
Gibbons, T., Hill, R., McConnell, A., Forster, T., & Moore, J. (2002). The path to excellence: A comprehensive view of development of U.S. Olympians who competed from 1984–1998. Colorado Springs, CO: United States Olympic Committee.Google Scholar
Gulbin, J., & Weissensteiner, J. (2013). Functional sport expertise systems. In Farrow, D., Baker, J., & MacMahon, C. (eds.), Developing sport expertise: Researchers and coaches put theory into practice (2nd edn.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Helsen, W. F., Starkes, J. L., & Hodges, N. J. (1998). Team sports and the theory of deliberate practice. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 20, 12–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, D. T., Crocker, P. R. E., & Hodges, N. J. (2014). Practice and play as determinants of self-determined motivation in youth soccer players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 32, 1091–1099.Google Scholar
Hendry, D. T., & Hodges, N. J. (2015). Developmental soccer experiences and self-determined motivation: A follow-up study of elite youth players. Journal of Exercise, Movement and Sport, 47 (online abstract).Google Scholar
Hendry, D. T., & Hodges, N. J. (2018). The early (majority) engagement pathway best defines successful transitions in UK elite youth soccer: A three time point prospective study. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
Hodges, N. J., Augaitis, L., & Crocker, P. R. E. (2015). Sport commitment and deliberate practice among male and female triathletes. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 46, 175–188.Google Scholar
Hodges, N. J., Edwards, C., Luttin, S., & Bowcock, A. (2011). Learning from the experts: Gaining insights into best practice during the acquisition of three novel motor skills. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82, 178–188.Google Scholar
Hodges, N. J., Kerr, T., Starkes, J. L., & Nananidou, A. (2004). Predicting performance times from deliberate practice hours for triathletes and swimmers: What, when, and where is practice important? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 219–237.Google Scholar
Hodges, N. J., & Starkes, J. L. (1996). Wrestling with the nature of expertise: A sport specific test of Ericsson, Krampe and Tesch-Römer’s (1993) theory of “deliberate practice.” International Journal of Sport Psychology, 27, 400–424.Google Scholar
Hopwood, M. J. (2015). Issues in the collection of athlete training histories. In Baker, J. & Farrow, D. (eds.), Routledge handbook of sport expertise (pp. 156–165). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Horton, S., Baker, J., & Deakin, J. (2005). Experts in action: A systematic observation of 5 national team coaches. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 36, 299–319.Google Scholar
Howard, R. W. (2012). Longitudinal effects of different types of practice on the development of chess expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 359–369.Google Scholar
Hüttermann, S., Memmert, D., & Baker, J. (2014). Understanding the microstructure of practice: Training differences between various age classes, expertise and sports. Talent Development and Excellence, 6, 17–29.Google Scholar
Jabusch, H.-C., Alpers, H., Kopiez, R., Vauth, H., & Altenmüller, E. (2009). The influence of practice on the development of motor skills in pianists: A longitudinal study in a selected motor task. Human Movement Science, 28, 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamp, R. J., Dolmans, D. H., van Berkel, H. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2012). The relationship between students’ small group activities, time spent on self-study, and achievement. Higher Education, 64, 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, M. P., Côté, J., & Ericsson, K. A. (2007). Characteristics of expert development in rhythmic gymnastics: A retrospective study. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5, 82–103.Google Scholar
Loyens, S. M. M., Gijbels, D., Coertjens, L., & Côté, D. J. (2013). Students’ approaches to learning in problem-based learning: Taking into account professional behavior in the tutorial groups, self-study time, and different assessment aspects. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39, 23–32.Google Scholar
Mann, D. T. Y., Williams, A. M., Ward, P., & Janelle, C. M. (2007). Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 457–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Memmert, D., Baker, J., & Bertsch, C. (2010). Play and practice in the development of sport-specific creativity in team ball sports. High Ability Studies, 21, 3–18.Google Scholar
Moesch, K., Elbe, A. M., Hauge, M. L., & Wikman, J. M. (2011). Late specialization: The key to success in centimeters, grams, or seconds (cgs) sports. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 21, e282–e290.Google Scholar
More, K. G., & Cameron, E. (2014). Notational analysis of coaching behaviour. In Hughes, M. & Franks, I. M. (eds.), Essentials of performance analysis in sport (2nd edn.) (pp. 350–362). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
More, K. G., & Franks, I. M. (1996). Analysis and modification of verbal coaching behaviour: The usefulness of a data driven intervention strategy. Journal of Sports Sciences, 14, 523–543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
More, K. G., & Franks, I. M. (2004). Measuring coaching effectiveness. In Hughes, M. & Franks, I. M. (eds.), Notational analysis in sport: Systems for better coaching and performance (2nd edn.) (pp. 242–256). London: Spon.Google Scholar
Oldenziel, K., Gagné, F., & Gulbin, J. (2003). How do elite athletes develop? A look through the ‘rear-view mirror’: A preliminary report from the National Athlete Development Survey (NADS). Canberra: Australian Sports Commission.Google Scholar
Phillips, E., Davids, K. W., Renshaw, I., & Portus, M. (2010). The development of fast bowling experts in Australian cricket. Talent Development and Excellence, 2, 137–148.Google Scholar
Soberlak, P., & Côté, J. (2003). The developmental activities of elite ice hockey players. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 15, 41–49.Google Scholar
Starkes, J. L., Deakin, J. M., Allard, F., Hodges, N. J., & Hayes, A. (1996). Deliberate practice in sports: What is it anyway? In Ericsson, K. A. (ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games (pp. 81–106). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Strube, M. J. (2000). Reliability and generalizability theory. In Grimm, L. G. & Yarnold, P. R. (eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 23–66). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
van de Wiel, M. W., Van den Bossche, P., Janssen, S., & Jossberger, H. (2011). Exploring deliberate practice in medicine: How do physicians learn in the workplace? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16, 81–95.Google Scholar
Vink, K., Raudsepp, L., & Kais, K. (2015). Intrinsic motivation and individual deliberate practice are reciprocally related: Evidence from a longitudinal study of adolescent team sport athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 1–6.Google Scholar
Ward, P., Hodges, N. J., Starkes, J. L., & Williams, A. M. (2007). The road to excellence in soccer: A developmental look at deliberate practice. High Ability Studies, 18, 119–153.Google Scholar
Wayne, D. B., Butler, J., Siddall, V. J., Fudala, M. J., Wade, L. D., Feinglass, J., & McGaghie, W. C. (2006). Master learning of advanced cardiac life support skills by internal medicine residents using simulation technology and deliberate practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 251–256.Google Scholar
Weissensteiner, J., Abernethy, B., & Farrow, D. (2009). Towards the development of a conceptual model of expertise in cricket batting: A grounded theory approach. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21, 276–292.Google Scholar
Young, B. W., & Salmela, J. H. (2010). Examination of practice activities related to the acquisition of elite performance in Canadian middle distance running. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 41, 73–90.Google Scholar
Young, B. W., & Starkes, J. L. (2006). Measuring outcomes of swimmers’ non-regulation during practice: Relationships between self-report, coaches’ judgments, and video-observation. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 1, 131–148.Google Scholar
References
Ackland, T., Elliott, B., & Richards, J. (2003). Growth in body size affects rotational performance in women’s gymnastics. Sports Biomechanics, 2, 163–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alker, H. R. (1969). A typology of ecological fallacies. In Dogan, M. and Rokkan, S. (eds.), Quantitative ecological analysis in the social sciences (pp. 69–86). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Allen, S. V., & Hopkins, W. G. (2015). Age of peak competitive performance of elite athletes: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 45, 1431–1441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, S. V., Vandenbogaerde, T. J., & Hopkins, W. G. (2014). Career performance trajectories of Olympic swimmers: Benchmarks for talent development. European Journal of Sport Science, 14, 643–651.Google Scholar
Baker, J., Koz, D., Kungl, A.-M., Fraser-Thomas, J., & Schorer, J. (2013). Staying at the top: Playing position and performance affect career length in professional sport. High Ability Studies, 24, 63–76.Google Scholar
Bidaurrazaga-Letona, I., Carvalho, H. M., Lekue, J. A., Santos-Concejero, J., Figueiredo, A. J., & Gil, S. M. (2015). Longitudinal field test assessment in a Basque soccer youth academy: A multilevel modeling framework to partition effects of maturation. International Journal of Sports and Medicine, 36, 234–240.Google Scholar
Bush, M., Barnes, C., Archer, D. T., Hogg, B., & Bradley, P. S. (2015). Evolution of match performance parameters for various playing positions in the English Premier League. Human Movement Science, 39, 1–11.Google Scholar
Carvalho, H. M., Coelho-e-Silva, M. J., Gonçalves, C. E., Philippaerts, R. M., Castagna, C., & Malina, R. M. (2011). Age-related variation of anaerobic power after controlling for size and maturation in adolescent basketball players. Annals of Human Biology, 38, 721–727.Google Scholar
Cobley, S. P., Till, K., O’Hare, J., Cooke, C., & Chapman, C. (2014). Variable and changing trajectories in youth athlete development: Further verification in advocating a long-term inclusive tracking approach. Journal of Strength and Conditioning, 28, 1959–1970.Google Scholar
Crotin, R. L., Forsythe, C. M., Karakolis, T., & Bhan, S. (2014). Physical size associations to offensive performance among major league leaders. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28, 2391–2396.Google Scholar
Deprez, D., Buchheit, M., Fransen, J., Pion, J., Lenoir, M., Philippaerts, R. M., & Vaeyens, R. (2015a). A longitudinal study investigating the stability of anthropometry and soccer-specific endurance in pubertal high-level youth soccer players. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 14, 418–426.Google Scholar
Deprez, D., Fransen, J., Lenoir, M., Philippaerts, R. M., & Vaeyens, R. (2015b). A retrospective study on anthropometrical, physical fitness, and motor coordination characteristics that influence dropout, contract status, and first-team playing time in high-level soccer players aged eight to eighteen years. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 29, 1692–1704.Google Scholar
Deprez, D., Valente-dos-Santos, J., Coelho-e-Silva, M., Lenoir, M., Philippaerts, R. M., & Vaeyens, R. (2014). Modeling developmental changes in the yo-yo intermittent recovery test level 1 in elite pubertal soccer players. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 9, 1006–1012.Google Scholar
Deprez, D., Valente-dos-Santos, J., Coelho-e-Silva, M. J., Lenoir, M., Philippaerts, R., & Vaeyens, R. (2015c). Longitudinal development of explosive leg power from childhood to adulthood in soccer players. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 36, 672–679.Google Scholar
Díaz, V., Peinado, A. B., Vleck, V. E., Alvarez-Sánchez, M., Benito, P. J., Alves, F. B., … & Zapico, A. G. (2012). Longitudinal changes in response to a cycle-run field test of young male national ‘talent identification’ and senior elite triathlon squads. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 26, 2209–2219.Google Scholar
Elferink-Gemser, M. T., De Roos, I., Torenbeek, M., Fokkema, T., Jonker, L., & Visscher, C. (2015). The importance of psychological constructs for training volume and performance improvement: A structural equation model for youth speed skaters. International Journal of Sports Psychology, 46, 726–744.Google Scholar
Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Huijgen, B. C. H., Lemmink, K. A. P. M., & Visscher, C. (2012). The changing characteristics of talented soccer players: A decade of Groningen work. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30, 1581–1591.Google Scholar
Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Jordet, G., Coelho-e-Silva, M. J., & Visscher, C. (2011). The marvels of elite sports: How to get there? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 45, 683–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Kannekens, R., Lyons, J., Tromp, Y., & Visscher, C. (2010). Knowing what to do and doing it: Differences in self-assessed tactical skills of regional, sub-elite, and elite youth field hockey players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 521–528.Google Scholar
Elferink-Gemser, M. T., & Visscher, C. (2012). Who are the superstars of tomorrow? Talent development in Dutch soccer. In Baker, J., Schorer, J., & Cobley, S. (eds.), Talent identification and development in sport: International perspectives (pp. 95–105). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Visscher, C., Lemmink, K., & Mulder, T. (2004). Relation between multidimensional performance characteristics and level of performance in talented youth field hockey players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 22, 1053–1063.Google Scholar
Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Visscher, C., Lemmink, K. A. P. M., & Mulder, T. (2007). Multidimensional performance characteristics and performance level in talented youth field hockey players: A longitudinal study. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 481–489.Google Scholar
Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Visscher, C., van Duijn, M. A. J., & Lemmink, K. A. P. M. (2006). Development of the interval endurance capacity in elite and sub-elite youth field hockey players. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 40, 340–345.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.Google Scholar
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24, 1–24.Google Scholar
Feichtinger, P., & Höner, O. (2015). Talented football players’ development of achievement motives, volitional components, and self-referential cognitions: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Sport Science, 15. DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2015.1051134.Google Scholar
Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd edn.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Fischer, L., Baker, J., Rienhoff, R., Strauß, B., Tirp, J., Büsch, D., & Schorer, J. (2016). Perceptual-cognitive expertise of handball coaches in their young and middle adult years. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34, 1637–1642.Google Scholar
Fischer, L., Rienhoff, R., Tirp, J., Baker, J., Strauß, B., & Schorer, J. (2015). Retention of quiet eye in older skilled basketball players. Journal of Motor Behavior, 47, 407–414.Google Scholar
Gagné, F. (2010). Motivation within the DMGT 2.0 framework. High Ability Studies, 21, 81–99.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H., Rasbash, J., Plewis, I., et al. (1998). A user’s guide to MLwiN. London: Multilevel Models Project, Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
Gonaus, C., & Müller, E. (2012). Using physiological data to predict future career progression in 14- to 17-year-old Austrian soccer academy players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30, 1673–1682.Google Scholar
Güllich, A., & Emrich, E. (2014). Considering long-term sustainability in the development of world class success. European Journal of Sport Science, 14, s383–s397.Google Scholar
Hancock, D. J., Young, B. W., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2011). Effects of a rule change that eliminates body-checking on the relative age effect in Ontario minor ice hockey. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29, 1399–1406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellard, P., Avalos, M., Hausswirth, C., Pyne, D., Toussaint, J., & Mujika, I. (2013). Identifying optimal overload and taper in elite swimmers over time. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 12, 668–678.Google ScholarPubMed
Huijgen, B. C. H., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Ali, A., & Visscher, C. (2013). Soccer skill development in talented players. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 34, 720–726.Google Scholar
Huijgen, B. C. H., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Lemmink, K. A. P. M., & Visscher, C. (2014). Multidimensional performance characteristics in selected and deselected talented soccer players. European Journal of Sport Science, 14, 2–10.Google Scholar
Huijgen, B. C. H., Leemhuis, S., Kok, N. M., Verburgh, L., Oosterlaan, J., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., & Visscher, C. (2015). Cognitive functions in elite and sub-elite youth soccer players aged 13 to 17 years. PloS ONE, 10. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144580.Google Scholar
Ivarsson, A., Stenling, A., Fallb, J., Johnson, U., Borg, E., & Johansson, G. (2015). The predictive ability of the talent development environment on youth elite football players’ well being: A person-centered approach. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 15–23.Google Scholar
Jonker, L., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Toering, T. T., Lyons, J., & Visscher, C. (2010). Academic performance and self regulatory skills in elite youth soccer players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 1605–1614.Google Scholar
Jonker, L., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Tromp, E. J. Y., Baker, J., & Visscher, C. (2015). Psychological characteristics and the developing athlete: The importance of self regulation. In Baker, J. & Farrow, D. (eds.), Routledge handbook of sport expertise (pp. 317–328). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kannekens, R., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., & Visscher, C. (2011). Positioning and deciding: Key factors for talent development in soccer. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 21, 846–852.Google Scholar
Lepers, R., Rüst, C. A., Stapley, P. J., & Knechtle, B. (2013). Relative improvements in endurance performance with age: Evidence from 25 years of Hawaii Ironman racing. Age, 35, 953–962.Google Scholar
Maas, C. J. M., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2003). The multilevel approach to repeated measures for complete and incomplete data. Quality & Quantity, 37, 71–89.Google Scholar
Malina, R. M. (2003). Growth and maturity status of young soccer (football) players. In Reilly, T. and Williams, M. (eds.), Science and soccer (2nd edn.) (pp. 287–306). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matthys, S. P. J., Vaeyens, R., Fransen, J., Deprez, D., Pion, J., Vandendriessche, J., … & Philippaerts, R. (2013). A longitudinal study of multidimensional performance characteristics related to physical capacities in youth handball, Journal of Sports Sciences, 31, 325–334.Google Scholar
Moreira, P. V. S., Crozara, L. F., Goethel, M. F., de Paula, L. V., & Vieira, F. (2014). Talent detection in taekwondo: Which factors are associated with longitudinal competitive success? Archives of Budo, 10, 317–323.Google Scholar
Nota, L., Soresi, S., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation and academic achievement and resilience: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 198–215.Google Scholar
Nybo, L., Schmidt, J. F., Fritzdorf, S., & Nordsborg, N. B. (2014). Physiological characteristics of an aging Olympic athlete. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 46, 2132–2138.Google Scholar
Phillips, E., Davids, K., Renshaw, I., & Portus, M. (2014). Acquisition of expertise in cricket fast bowling: Perceptions of expert players and coaches. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 17, 85–90.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351–357.Google Scholar
Roescher, C. R., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Huijgen, B. C., & Visscher, C. (2010). Soccer endurance development in professionals. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 31, 174–179.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. (2012). Consequences of age-related cognitive declines. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 201–226.Google Scholar
Saward, C., Morris, J. G., Nevill, M. E., & Sunderland, C. (2015). Longitudinal development of match-running performance in elite male youth soccer players. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 26, 933–942.Google Scholar
Schorer, J., & Baker, J. (2009). An exploratory study of aging and perceptual-motor expertise in handball goalkeepers. Experimental Aging Research, 35, 1–19.Google Scholar
Schulz, R., & Curnow, C. (1988). Peak performance and age among superathletes: Track and field, swimming, baseball, tennis, and golf. Journal of Gerontology, 43, 113–120.Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2000). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sokolovas, G. (2006). Analysis of USA swimming’s all-time top 100 times. In Vilas-Boas, J. P., Alves, F., & Marques, A. (eds.), Biomechanics and medicine in swimming (pp. 315–317). Porto: Portuguese Journal of Sport Science.Google Scholar
Spamer, E. J., & Hare, E. (2001). A longitudinal study of talented youth rugby players with special reference to skill, growth and development. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 41, 39–57.Google Scholar
Starkes, J. L. (1993). Motor experts: Opening thoughts. In Starkes, J. L. & Allard, F. (eds.), Cognitive issues in motor expertise (pp. 3–16). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Steingröver, C., Baker, J., Wattie, N., & Schorer, J. (2016). Relative age affects career length in North American professional sports. Sports Medicine Online, 2, 1–7.Google Scholar
te Wierike, S. C. M., de Jong, M. C., Tromp, E. J. Y., Vuijk, P. J., Lemmink, K. A. P. M., Malina, R. M., … & Visscher, C. (2014). Development of repeated sprint ability in talented youth basketball players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28, 928–934.Google Scholar
Tibbert, S. J., Andersen, M. B., & Morris, T. (2015). What a difference a ‘mentally toughening’ year makes: The acculturation of a rookie. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 17, 68–78.Google Scholar
Till, K., Cobley, S., O’Hara, J., Chapman, C., & Cooke, C. (2013a). A longitudinal evaluation of anthropometric and fitness characteristics in junior rugby league players considering playing position and selection level. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 16, 438–443.Google Scholar
Till, K., Cobley, S., O’Hara, J., Chapman, C., & Cooke, C. (2013b). An individualized longitudinal approach to monitoring the dynamics of growth and fitness development in adolescent athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 27, 1313–1321.Google Scholar
Till, K., Cobley, K., O’Hara, J., Cooke, C., & Chapman, C. (2014). Considering maturation status and relative age in the longitudinal evaluation of junior rugby league players. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 24, 569–576.Google Scholar
Till, K., Jones, B., & Geeson-Brown, T. (2016). Do physical qualities influence the attainment of professional status within elite 16–19 year old rugby league players? Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 19, 585–589.Google Scholar
Toering, T. T., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Jonker, L., Van Heuvelen, M. J. G., & Visscher, C. (2012). Measuring self-regulation in a learning context: Reliability and validity of the Self-Regulation Scale (SRS). International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 24–38.Google Scholar
Toering, T. T., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Jordet, G., Jorna, C., Pepping, G., & Visscher, C. (2011). Self-regulation of practice behavior among elite youth soccer players: An exploratory observation study. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 23, 110–128.Google Scholar
Toering, T. T., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Jordet, G., & Visscher, C. (2009). Self-regulation and performance level of elite and non-elite youth soccer players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27, 1509–1517.Google Scholar
Vaeyens, R., Lenoir, M., Williams, A. M., & Philippaerts, R. M. (2008). Talent identification and development programmes in sport: Current models and future directions. Sports Medicine, 38, 703–714.Google Scholar
Valente-dos-Santos, J., Coelho-e-Silva, M. J., Vaz, V., Figueiredo, A. J., Capranica, L., Sherar, L. B., … & Malina, R. M. (2014). Maturity-associated variation in change of direction and dribbling speed in early pubertal years and 5-year developmental changes in young soccer players. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 54, 307–316.Google Scholar
Van der Sluis, A., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Brink, M. S., & Visscher, C. (2015). Importance of peak height velocity timing in terms of injuries in talented soccer players. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 36, 327–332.Google Scholar
Van der Sluis, A., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Coelho-e-Silva, M. J., Nijboer, J. A., Brink, M. S., & Visscher, C. (2014). Sport injuries aligned to peak height velocity in talented pubertal soccer players. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 35, 351–355.Google Scholar
Vink, K., Raudsepp, L., & Kais, K. (2015). Intrinsic motivation and individual deliberate practice are reciprocally related: Evidence from a longitudinal study of adolescent team sport athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 1–6.Google Scholar
Williams, C. A., Oliver, J. L., & Faulkner, J. (2011). Seasonal monitoring of sprint and jump performance in a soccer youth academy. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 6, 264–275.Google Scholar
Wolfrum, M., Knechtle, B., Rüst, C. A., Rosemann, T., & Lepers, R. (2013). Sex-related differences and age of peak performance in breaststroke versus freestyle swimming. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 5, 29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaryski, C., & Smith, D. J. (2005). Training principles and issues for ultra-endurance athletes. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 4, 165–170.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 307–313.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339.Google Scholar
Zuber, C., & Conzelmann, A. (2014). The impact of the achievement motive on athletic performance in adolescent football players. European Journal of Sport Science, 14, 475–483.Google Scholar
References
Barrett, J. D., Vessey, W. B., Griffith, J. A., Mracek, D., & Mumford, M. D. (2014). Predicting scientific creativity: The role of adversity, collaborations, and work strategies. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 39–52.Google Scholar
Baughman, W. A., & Mumford, M. D. (1995). Process-analytic models of creative capacities: Operations influencing the combination-and-reorganization process. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 37–62.Google Scholar
Bedell-Avers, K., Hunter, S. T., Angie, A. D., Eubanks, D. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders: An examination of leader–leader interactions. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 299–315.Google Scholar
Bedell-Avers, K., Hunter, S. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2008). Conditions of problem-solving and the performance of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders: A comparative experimental study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 89–106.Google Scholar
Bligh, M. C., & Hess, G. D. (2007). The power of leading subtly: Alan Greenspan, rhetorical leadership, and monetary policy. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 87–104.Google Scholar
Byrne, C. L., Shipman, A. S., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). The effects of forecasting on creative problem-solving: An experimental study. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 119–138.Google Scholar
Carlson, W. B., & Gorman, M. E. (1992). A cognitive framework to understand technological creativity: Bell, Edison, and the telephone. In Weber, R. J. & Perkins, D. N. (eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 48–79). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Charness, N., Tuffiash, M., Krampe, R., Reingold, E., & Vasyukova, E. (2005). The role of deliberate practice in chess expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 151–165.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.Google Scholar
Crouch, T. D. (1992). Why Wilbur and Orville? Some thoughts on the Wright brothers and the process of innovation. In Weber, R. J. & Perkins, D. N. (eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 80–97). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dailey, L., & Mumford, M. D. (2006). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Errors in appraising the implications of new ideas. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 367–384.Google Scholar
de Groot, A. (1978). Thought and choice in chess (2nd edn.). The Hague: Mouton. (Original work published 1946)Google Scholar
Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 36–62.Google Scholar
Dörner, D., & Schaub, H. (1994). Errors in planning and decision-making and the nature of human information processing. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 43, 433–453.Google Scholar
Dougherty, D., & Hardy, C. (1996). Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1120–1153.Google Scholar
Dunbar, K. (1995). How do scientists really reason? Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. E. (eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365–396). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eubanks, D. L., Antes, A. L., Friedrich, T. L., Caughron, J. J., Blackwell, L. V., Bedell-Avers, K., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Criticism and outstanding leadership: An evaluation of leader reactions and critical outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 365–388.Google Scholar
Friedrich, T. L., Vessey, W. B., Schuelke, M. J., Mumford, M. D., Yammarino, F. J., & Ruark, G. A. (2014). Collectivistic leadership and George C. Marshall: A historiometric analysis of career events. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 449–467.Google Scholar
Friedrich, T. L., Vessey, W. B., Schuelke, M. J., Ruark, G. A., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). A framework for understanding collective leadership: The selective utilization of leader and team expertise within networks. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 933–958.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. J., Josselson, R., & Freeman, M. (2015). The promises of qualitative inquiry. American Psychologist, 70, 1–9.Google Scholar
Haun, L., Laurence, V., & Snyder, T. (2002). Habitat for humanity: How to build a house. Newton, CT: Taunton Press.Google Scholar
Hershey, D. A., Walsh, D. A., Read, S. J., & Chulef, A. S. (1990). The effects of expertise on financial problem solving: Evidence for goal-directed, problem-solving scripts. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 77–101.Google Scholar
Hester, K. S., Robledo, I. C., Barrett, J. D., Peterson, D. R., Hougen, D. P., Day, E. A., & Mumford, M. D. (2012). Causal analysis to enhance creative problem-solving: Performance and effects on mental models. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 115–133.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. B. (2009). Revolutions, leaders, and diagnosticians: Reflections on the themes in chapters 2–4. In Ericsson, K. A. (ed.), Development of professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments (pp. 108–130). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, S. T., Bedell-Avers, K., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). Impact of situational framing and complexity on charismatic, ideological and pragmatic leaders: Investigation using a computer simulation. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 383–404.Google Scholar
Hunter, S. T., Cushenbery, L., Thoroughgood, C., Johnson, J. E., & Ligon, G. S. (2011). First and ten leadership: A historiometric investigation of the CIP leadership model. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 70–91.Google Scholar
Isaacson, W. (2014). The innovators: How a group of hackers, geniuses, and geeks created the digital revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Thinking and managing: A verbal protocol analysis of managerial problem solving. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 775–788.Google Scholar
Jiang, M., & Thagard, P. (2014). Creative cognition in social innovation. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 375–388.Google Scholar
Kanigel, R. (1997). Taylor‐made: How the world’s first efficiency expert refashioned modern life in his own image. The Sciences, 37, 18–23.Google Scholar
Lajoie, S. P. (2009). Developing professional expertise with a cognitive apprenticeship model: Examples from avionics and medicine. In Ericsson, K. A. (ed.), Development of professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments (pp. 61–83). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ligon, G. S., Hunter, S. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2008). Development of outstanding leadership: A life narrative approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 312–334.Google Scholar
Marcy, R. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Social innovation: Enhancing creative performance through casual analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 123–140.Google Scholar
Marcy, R. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Leader cognition: Improving leader performance through causal analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1–19.Google Scholar
Marta, S., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Leadership skills and the group performance: Situational demands, behavioral requirements, and planning. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 97–120.Google Scholar
Maslin-Wicks, K. (2007). Forsaking transformational leadership: Roscoe Conkling, the great senator from New York. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 463–476.Google Scholar
Medeiros, K. E., Partlow, P. J., & Mumford, M. D. (2014). Not too much, not too little: The influence of constraints on creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 198–210.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D. (2002). Social innovation: Ten cases from Benjamin Franklin. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 253–266.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D. (2006). Pathways to outstanding leadership: A comparative analysis of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Antes, A. L., Caughron, J. J., & Friedrich, T. L. (2008). Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leadership: Multi-level influences on emergence and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 144–160.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Supinski, E. P., & Maher, M. A. (1996). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: II. Information encoding. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 77–88.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Connelly, M. S., Scott, G., Espejo, J., Sohl, L. M., Hunter, S. T., & Bedell, K. E. (2005). Career experiences and scientific performance: A study of social, physical, life, and health sciences. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 105–129.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Espejo, J., Hunter, S. T., Bedell-Avers, K., Eubanks, D. L., & Connelly, S. (2007). The sources of leader violence: A comparison of ideological and non-ideological leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 217–235.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Friedrich, T. L., Caughron, J. J., & Antes, A. L. (2009). Leadership development and assessment: Describing and rethinking the state of the art. In Ericsson, K. A. (ed.), Development of professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments (pp. 84–107). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., & Mecca, J. (2013). Addendum: Vision and mental models – A decade later. In Avolio, B. J. & Yammarino, F. J. (eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead (2nd edn.) (pp. 159–164). Bingley: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., & Moertl, P. (2003). Cases of social innovation: Lessons from two innovations in the 20th century. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 261–266.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Peterson, D., & Robledo, I. (2013). Leading scientists and engineers: Cognition in a socio-technical context. In Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M., Martin, B. R., & Mumford, M. D. (eds.), Creativity and leadership in science, technology, and innovation (pp. 29–58). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Connor, J., Mumford, M. D., Clifton, T. C., Gessner, T. L., & Connelly, M. S. (1995). Charismatic leaders and destructiveness: An historiometric study. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 529–555.Google Scholar
Pant, P. N., & Starbuck, W. H. (1990). Innocents in the forest: Forecasting and research methods. Journal of Management, 16, 433–460.Google Scholar
Parry, K., Mumford, M. D., Bower, I., & Watts, L. L. (2014). Qualitative and historiometric methods in leadership research: A review of the first 25 years of The Leadership Quarterly. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 132–151.Google Scholar
Pillemer, D. B. (1998). Momentous events, vivid memories: How unforgettable moments help us understand the meaning of our lives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ramey, C. H., & Weisberg, R. W. (2004). The “poetical activity” of Emily Dickinson: A further test of the hypothesis that affective disorders foster creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 173–185.Google Scholar
Rich, J. D., & Weisberg, R. W. (2004). Creating All In The Family: A case study in creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 247–259.Google Scholar
Robledo, I. C., Hester, K. S., Peterson, D. R., Barrett, J. D., Day, E. A., Hougen, D. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2012). Errors and understanding: The effects of error-management training on creative problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 220–234.Google Scholar
Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 349–363.Google Scholar
Schreiber, B. T., Bennett, W. Jr., Colegrove, C. M., Portrey, A. M., Greschke, D. A., & Bell, H. H. (2009). Evaluating pilot performance. In Ericsson, K. A. (ed.), Development of professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments (pp. 247–270) Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shipman, A. S., Byrne, C. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Leader vision formation and forecasting: The effects of forecasting extent, resources, and timeframe. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 439–456.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2015). Thomas Edison’s creative career: The multilayered trajectory of trials, errors, failures, and triumphs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 2–14.Google Scholar
Stierand, M., & Dörfler, V. (2016). The role of intuition in the creative process of expert chefs. Journal of Creative Behavior, 50, 178–185.Google Scholar
Stokes, P. D. (2008). Creativity from constraints: What can we learn from Motherwell? From Modrian? From Klee? Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 223–236.Google Scholar
Stokes, P. D. (2009). Using constraints to create novelty: A case study. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 174–180.Google Scholar
Stokes, P. D., & Fisher, D. (2005). Selection, constraints, and creativity case studies: Max Beckmann and Philip Guston. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 283–291.Google Scholar
Vessey, W. B., Barrett, J. D., Mumford, M. D., Johnson, G., & Litwiller, B. (2014). Leadership of highly creative people in highly creative fields: A historiometric study of scientific leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 672–691.Google Scholar
Weber, R. J., & Perkins, D. N. (1992). Inventive minds: Creativity in technology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1998). Introductory essay: Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9, 543–555.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2011). Frank Lloyd Wright’s Fallingwater: A case study in inside-the-box creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 296–312.Google Scholar
Xiao, Y., Milgram, P., & Doyle, D. J. (1997). Capturing and modeling planning expertise in anesthesiology: Results of a field study. In Zsambok, C. E. & Klein, G. (eds.), Naturalistic decision making. (pp. 197–205) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Yammarino, F. J., Mumford, M. D., Serban, A., & Shirreffs, K. (2013). Assassination and leadership: Traditional approaches and historiometric methods. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 822–841.Google Scholar
Yammarino, F. J., Mumford, M. D., Vessey, W. B., Friedrich, T. L., Ruark, G. A., & Brunner, J. M. (2010a). Collective leadership measurement for the U.S. Army. Technical Report, Contract No. W91WAW-09-C-0090. Arlington, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Yammarino, F. J., Mumford, M. D., Vessey, W. B., Friedrich, T. L., Ruark, G. A., & Brunner, J. M. (2010b). Collective leadership measurement for the U.S. Army: Measures. Research Note, Contract No. W91WAW-09-C-0090. Arlington, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Yammarino, F. J., Salas, E., Serban, A., Shirreffs, K., & Shuffler, M. L. (2012). Collectivistic leadership approaches: Putting the “we” in leadership science and practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 382–402.Google Scholar
Zeni, T. A. (2014). Ethical decision making by business leaders: The impact of cognitive biases and strategies. PhD Dissertation, University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
References
Bramwell, B. S. (1948). Galton’s “Hereditary Genius” and the three following generations since 1869. Eugenics Review, 39, 146–153.Google Scholar
Candolle, A. (1873). Histoire des sciences et des savants depuis deux siècles. Geneva: Georg.Google Scholar
Cassandro, V. J. (1998). Explaining premature mortality across fields of creative endeavor. Journal of Personality, 66, 805–833.Google Scholar
Cattell, J. M. (1903). A statistical study of eminent men. Popular Science Monthly, 62, 359–377.Google Scholar
Charness, N., & Gerchak, Y. (1996). Participation rates and maximal performance: A log-linear explanation for group differences, such as Russian and male dominance in chess. Psychological Science, 7, 46–51.Google Scholar
Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Damian, R. I., & Simonton, D. K. (2014). Diversifying experiences in the development of genius and their impact on creative cognition. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 375–393). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Damian, R. I., & Simonton, D. K. (2015). Psychopathology, adversity, and creativity: Diversifying experiences in the development of eminent African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 623–636.Google Scholar
Dennis, W. (1966). Creative productivity between the ages of 20 and 80 years. Journal of Gerontology, 21, 1–8.Google Scholar
Elo, A. E. (1965). Age changes in master chess performance. Journal of Gerontology, 20, 289–299.Google Scholar
Elo, A. E. (1986). The rating of chessplayers, past and present (2nd edn.). New York: Arco.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Creative genius: A view from the expert-performance approach. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 321–349). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (2014). Psychometric studies of scientific talent and eminence. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 62–86). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1865). Hereditary talent and character. Macmillan’s Magazine, 12, 157–166, 318–327.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. Z., Macnamara, B. N., Campitelli, G., Ullén, F., & Mosing, M. A. (2016). Beyond born versus made: A new look at expertise. In Ross, B. H. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 64, pp. 1–55). Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hass, R. W., & Weisberg, R. W. (2015). Revisiting the 10-year rule for composers from the Great American Songbook: On the validity of two measures of creative production. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 471–479.Google Scholar
Jones, B. F., Reedy, E. J., & Weinberg, B. A. (2014). Age and scientific genius. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 422–450). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Karlson, J. I. (1970). Genetic association of giftedness and creativity with schizophrenia. Hereditas, 66, 177–182.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Ten years to expertise, many more to greatness: An investigation of modern writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 114–124.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2005). Factors affecting aesthetic success and improvement in creativity: A case study of musical genres in Mozart. Psychology of Music, 33, 235–255.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2008). Longitudinal hit ratios of classical composers: Reconciling “Darwinian” and expertise acquisition perspectives on lifespan creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 221–235.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2014). Musical creativity over the lifespan. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 451–472). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. (1944). Configurations of culture growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kyaga, S. (2015). Creativity and mental illness: The mad genius in question. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lehman, H. C. (1946). Age of starting to contribute versus total creative output. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30, 460–480.Google Scholar
Manniche, E., & Falk, G. (1957). Age and the Nobel Prize. Behavioral Science, 2, 301–307.Google Scholar
McKay, A. S., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Literary geniuses: Their life, work, and death. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 473–487). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Murray, C. (2003). Human accomplishment: The pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Nakamura, J., & Fajans, J. (2014). Interviewing highly eminent creators. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 33–61). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Ohlsson, S. (1992). The learning curve for writing books: Evidence from Professor Asimov. Psychological Science, 3, 380–382.Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A., Holden, J., & Neustadter, D. (2008). The criterion problem and creativity in film: Psychometric characteristics of various measures. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 190–196.Google Scholar
Quételet, A. (1968). A treatise on man and the development of his faculties. New York: Franklin. (Reprint of 1842 Edinburgh translation of 1835 French original)Google Scholar
Raskin, E. A. (1936). Comparison of scientific and literary ability: A biographical study of eminent scientists and men of letters of the nineteenth century. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 31, 20–35.Google Scholar
Root-Bernstein, R., Allen, L., Beach, L. Bhadula, R., Fast, J., Hosey, C., … & Weinlander, S. (2008). Arts foster scientific success: Avocations of Nobel, National Academy, Royal Society, and Sigma Xi members. Journal of the Psychology of Science and Technology, 1, 51–63.Google Scholar
Root-Bernstein, R. S., Bernstein, M., & Garnier, H. (1993). Identification of scientists making long-term, high-impact contributions, with notes on their methods of working. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 329–343.Google Scholar
Schultz, W. T. (2014). The psychobiography of genius. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 20–32). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Schulz, R., & Curnow, C. (1988). Peak performance and age among super athletes: Track and field, swimming, baseball, tennis, and golf. Journal of Gerontology, 43, 113–120.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1975a). Age and literary creativity: A cross-cultural and transhistorical survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6, 259–277.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1975b). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1119–1133.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1976a). Biographical determinants of achieved eminence: A multivariate approach to the Cox data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 218–226.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1976b). Philosophical eminence, beliefs, and zeitgeist: An individual-generational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 630–640.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1977a). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 791–804.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1977b). Eminence, creativity, and geographic marginality: A recursive structural equation model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 805–816.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1979). Was Napoleon a military genius? Score: Carlyle 1, Tolstoy 1. Psychological Reports, 44, 21–22.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1980). Land battles, generals, and armies: Individual and situational determinants of victory and casualties. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 110–119.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1983). Intergenerational transfer of individual differences in hereditary monarchs: Genetic, role-modeling, cohort, or sociocultural effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 354–364.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1984a). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1273–1286.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1984b). Creative productivity and age: A mathematical model based on a two-step cognitive process. Developmental Review, 4, 77–111.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1984c). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1984d). Leader age and national condition: A longitudinal analysis of 25 European monarchs. Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 111–114.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1985). Quality, quantity, and age: The careers of 10 distinguished psychologists. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 21, 241–254.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1986a). Biographical typicality, eminence, and achievement style. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 14–22.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1986b). Popularity, content, and context in 37 Shakespeare plays. Poetics, 15, 493–510.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1987a). Developmental antecedents of achieved eminence. Annals of Child Development, 5, 131–169.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1987b). Musical aesthetics and creativity in Beethoven: A computer analysis of 105 compositions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 5, 87–104.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1988a). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin, 104, 251–267.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1988b). Galtonian genius, Kroeberian configurations, and emulation: A generational time-series analysis of Chinese civilization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 230–238.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1989). Age and creative productivity: Nonlinear estimation of an information-processing model. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 29, 23–37.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1990). Psychology, science, and history: An introduction to historiometry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1991a). Career landmarks in science: Individual differences and interdisciplinary contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 27, 119–130.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1991b). Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 829–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1991c). Latent-variable models of posthumous reputation: A quest for Galton’s G. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 607–619.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1992a). Gender and genius in Japan: Feminine eminence in masculine culture. Sex Roles, 27, 101–119.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1992b). Leaders of American psychology, 1879–1967: Career development, creative output, and professional achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 5–17.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1992c). The social context of career success and course for 2,026 scientists and inventors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 452–463.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1995). Drawing inferences from symphonic programs: Musical attributes versus listener attributions. Music Perception, 12, 307–322.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1996a). Creative expertise: A life-span developmental perspective. In Ericsson, K. A. (ed.), The road to expert performance: Empirical evidence from the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 227–253). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1996b). Individual genius and cultural configurations: The case of Japanese civilization. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 354–375.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1998). Political leadership across the life span: Chronological versus career age in the British monarchy. The Leadership Quarterly, 9, 195–206.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999a). Significant samples: The psychological study of eminent individuals. Psychological Methods, 4, 425–451.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999b). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106, 435–457.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20, 283–318.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2002). Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology’s history. Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2003a). Creative cultures, nations, and civilizations: Strategies and results. In Paulus, P. B. & Nijstad, B. A. (eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 304–328). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2003b). Qualitative and quantitative analyses of historical data. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 617–640.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2004a). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2004b). Group artistic creativity: Creative clusters and cinematic success in 1,327 feature films. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1494–1520.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2007). Cinema composers: Career trajectories for creative productivity in film music. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 160–169.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2008a). Childhood giftedness and adulthood genius: A historiometric analysis of 291 eminent African Americans. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 243–255.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2008b). Gender differences in birth order and family size among 186 eminent psychologists. Journal of Psychology of Science and Technology, 1, 15–22.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creativity as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 156–179.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2012). Creative productivity and aging: An age decrement – or not? In Whitbourne, S. K. & Sliwinski, M. (eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of adult development and aging (pp. 477–496). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2013). Presidential leadership. In Rumsey, M. G. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership (pp. 327–342). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014a). Creative performance, expertise acquisition, individual-differences, and developmental antecedents: An integrative research agenda. Intelligence, 45, 66–73.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014b). Historiometric studies of genius. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 87–106). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014c). More method in the mad-genius controversy: A historiometric study of 204 historic creators. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 53–61.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2015a). Historiometry. In Martin, J., Sugarman, J., & Slaney, K. (eds.), Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology (pp. 183–199). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2015b). Numerical odds and evens in Beethoven’s nine symphonies: Can a computer really tell the difference? Empirical Studies of the Arts, 33, 18–35.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2015c). Thomas Alva Edison’s creative career: The multilayered trajectory of trials, errors, failures, and triumphs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 2–14.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2016). Early and late bloomers among classical composers: Were the greatest geniuses also prodigies? In McPherson, G. (ed.), Musical prodigies: Interpretations from psychology, music education, musicology and ethnomusicology (pp. 185–197). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K., & Song, A. V. (2009). Eminence, IQ, physical and mental health, and achievement domain: Cox’s 282 geniuses revisited. Psychological Science, 20, 429–434.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K., & Ting, S.-S. (2010). Creativity in Eastern and Western civilizations: The lessons of historiometry. Management and Organization Review, 6, 329–350.Google Scholar
Stephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (1993). Age and the Nobel Prize revisited. Scientometrics, 28, 387–399.Google Scholar
Stroebe, W. (2010). The graying of academia: Will it reduce scientific productivity? American Psychologist, 65, 660–673.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. J., & Zweigenhaft, R. L. (2010). Birth order and risk taking in athletics: A meta-analysis and study of major league baseball players. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 402–416.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M. (1925–59). Genetic studies of genius, 5 vols. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wai, J. (2014). Investigating the world‘s rich and powerful: Education, cognitive ability, and sex differences. Intelligence, 46, 54–72.Google Scholar
Wai, J., & Rindermann, H. (2015). The path and performance of a company leader: An historical examination of the education and cognitive ability of Fortune 500 CEOs. Intelligence, 53, 102–107.Google Scholar
Walberg, H. J., Rasher, S. P., & Parkerson, J. (1980). Childhood and eminence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 13, 225–231.Google Scholar
White, R. K. (1931). The versatility of genius. Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 460–489.Google Scholar
Yuasa, M. (1974). The shifting center of scientific activity in the West: From the sixteenth to the twentieth century. In. Shigeru, N., Swain, D. L., & Eri, Y. (eds.), Science and society in modern Japan (pp. 81–103). University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Zickar, M. J, & Slaughter, J. E. (1999). Examining creative performance over time using hierarchical linear modeling: An illustration using film directors. Human Performance, 12, 211–230.Google Scholar
Zusne, L. (1976). Age and achievement in psychology: The harmonic mean as a model. American Psychologist, 31, 805–807.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by