Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance
- The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Compliance as the Interaction between Rules and Behavior
- Part I Compliance Concepts and Approaches
- Part II Deterrence and Incapacitation
- Part III Incentives
- Part IV Legitimacy and Social Norms
- 27 Procedural Justice and Legal Compliance
- 28 Social Norms and Persuasion
- 29 Social Contagion and Goal Framing: The Sustainability of Rule Compliance
- 30 Shaming and Compliance
- 31 Neutralization
- Part V Capacity and Opportunity
- Part VI Compliance and Cognition
- Part VII Management and Organizational Processes
- Part VIII Measuring and Evaluating Compliance
- Part IX Analysis of Particular Fields
- References
31 - Neutralization
from Part IV - Legitimacy and Social Norms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 May 2021
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance
- The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Compliance as the Interaction between Rules and Behavior
- Part I Compliance Concepts and Approaches
- Part II Deterrence and Incapacitation
- Part III Incentives
- Part IV Legitimacy and Social Norms
- 27 Procedural Justice and Legal Compliance
- 28 Social Norms and Persuasion
- 29 Social Contagion and Goal Framing: The Sustainability of Rule Compliance
- 30 Shaming and Compliance
- 31 Neutralization
- Part V Capacity and Opportunity
- Part VI Compliance and Cognition
- Part VII Management and Organizational Processes
- Part VIII Measuring and Evaluating Compliance
- Part IX Analysis of Particular Fields
- References
Summary
Abstract: Neutralization theory helps explain how people overcome the negative emotions associated with engaging in crime. Developed by Gresham Sykes and David Matza (1957), neutralization theory proposes that people use linguistic devices (i.e., techniques of neutralizations) when presented with opportunities to engage in crime. Techniques of neutralization allow individuals to temporarily overcome the deterrent effects of negative emotions (e.g., shame and guilt), preserve their self-image, and reinterpret crime as acceptable. Research testing the theory shows that neutralizations play an important role in the decision to engage in crime and deviance. Evidence also shows that neutralization use can be nullified through a variety of crime prevention and intervention methods. However, there are theoretical issues surrounding the theory, especially in regards to understanding what factors may make people more or less likely to use neutralizations, whether neutralizations come before deviant behavior, whether neutralization use is stable over the life-course, and how neutralization use explains persistence and desistance in criminal behavior over the life-course.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance , pp. 451 - 464Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Agnew, Robert. 1994. “The Techniques of Neutralization and Violence.” Criminology 32: 555–80.Google Scholar
Ball, Richard A. 1966. “An Empirical Exploration of Neutralization Theory.” Criminology 4: 22–32.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. 2002. “Selective Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency.” Journal of Moral Education 31: 101–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, Albert, Barbaranelli, Claudio, Caprara, Gian V., and Pastorelli, Concetta. 1996. “Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 364–74.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 1989. Crime, Shame, and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cardwell, Stephanie M., Piquero, Alex R., Jennings, Wesley G., Copes, Heith, Schubert, Carol A., and Mulvey, Edward P.. 2015. “Variability in Moral Disengagement and Its Relation to Offending in a Sample of Serious Adolescent Offenders.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 42: 819–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardwell, Stephanie M., Mazerolle, Lorraine, and Piquero, Alex R.. 2020. “Parental Attachment and Truant Rationalizations of Antisocial Behavior: Findings from a Randomized Controlled Trial.” Journal of Crime and Justice 43: 263–81.Google Scholar
Chua, Yi T., and Holt, Thomas J.. 2016. “A Cross-National Examination of the Techniques of Neutralization to Account for Hacking Behaviors.” Victims & Offenders 11: 534–55.Google Scholar
Clarke, Ronald V. 1997. Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Cases, 2nd ed. Albany, NY: Harroy and Heston Publishers.Google Scholar
Clarke, Ronald V., and Homel, Ross. 1997. “A Revised Classification of Situational Crime Prevention Techniques.” In Crime Prevention at the Crossroads, edited by Lab, Steven P., 17–27. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.Google Scholar
Cohen, Albert K. 1955. Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Copes, Heith. 2003. “Societal Attachments, Offending Frequency, and Techniques of Neutralization.” Deviant Behavior 24: 101–27.Google Scholar
Copes, Heith, and Vieraitis, Lynne M.. 2012. Identity Thieves: Motives and Methods. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Copes, Heith, and Williams, J. Patrick. 2007. “Techniques of Affirmation: Deviant Behavior, Moral Commitment, and Subcultural Identity.” Deviant Behavior 28: 247–72.Google Scholar
Costello, Barbara J. 2000. “Techniques of Neutralization and Self-Esteem: A Critical Test of Social Control and Neutralization Theory.” Deviant Behavior 21: 307–29.Google Scholar
Cressey, Donald R. 1953. Other People’s Money: Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Cromwell, Paul, and Thurman, Quint. 2003. “The Devil Made Me Do It: Use of Neutralizations by Shoplifters.” Deviant Behavior 24: 535–50.Google Scholar
Daly, Kahleen. 2002. “Restorative Justice: The Real Story.” Punishment & Society 4: 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, John C., Potter, Granville B., and Goldstein, Arnold P.. 1995. The EQUIP Program: Teaching Youth to Think and Act Responsibly through a Peer-Helping Approach. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Hennessey. 2006. “Apologies and Accounts in Youth Justice Conferencing: Reinterpreting Research Outcomes.” Contemporary Justice Review 9: 369–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmond, Petra, Overbeek, G., Brugman, Daniel, and Gibbs, John C.. 2015. “A Meta-analysis on Cognitive Distortions and Externalizing Problem Behavior: Associations, Moderators, and Treatment Effects.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 42: 245–62.Google Scholar
Hirschi, Travis. 1969. Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hulley, Joanne L. 2016. “‘While This Does Not in Any Way Excuse My Conduct …’: The Role of Treatment and Neutralizations in Desistance from Sexual Offending.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 60: 1776–90.Google Scholar
Johnston, Matthew S., and Kilty, Jennifer M.. 2016. “‘It’s for Their Own Good’: Techniques of Neutralization and Security Guard Violence Against Psychiatric Patients.” Punishment & Society 18: 177–97.Google Scholar
Kaptein, Muel, and van Helvoort, Martien. 2019. “A Model of Neutralization Techniques.” Deviant Behavior 40: 1260–85.Google Scholar
Kieffer, Scott M., and Sloan, John J. III. 2009. “Overcoming Moral Hurdles: Using Techniques of Neutralization by White-Collar Suspects as an Interrogation Tool.” Security Journal 22: 317–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laub, John H., and Sampson, Robert J.. 2001. “Understanding Desistance from Crime.” Crime & Justice 28: 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBel, Thomas P., Burnett, Ros, Maruna, Shadd, and Bushway, Shawn. 2008. “The ‘Chicken and Egg’ of Subjective and Social Factors in Desistance from Crime.” European Journal of Criminology 5(2): 131–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maruna, Shadd. 2001. Making Good: How Ex-convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Maruna, Shadd. 2004. “Desistance from Crime and Explanatory Style: A New Direction in the Psychology of Reform.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 20: 184–200.Google Scholar
Maruna, Shadd, and Copes, Heith. 2005. “What Have We Learned from Five Decades of Neutralization Research?” Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 32: 221–320.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, Lorraine. 2014. “The Power of Policing Partnerships: Sustaining the Gains.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 10: 341–65.Google Scholar
Minor, W. William. 1981. “Techniques of Neutralization: A Reconceptualization and Empirical Examination.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 18: 295–318.Google Scholar
Minor, W. William. 1984. “Neutralization as a Hardening Process: Considerations in the Modeling of Change.” Social Forces 62: 995–1019.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Jim, and Dodder, Richard A.. 1983. “Types of Neutralization and Types of Delinquency.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 12: 307–18.Google Scholar
Morris, Robert G., and Copes, Heith. 2012. “Exploring the Temporal Dynamics of the Neutralization/Delinquency Relationship.” Criminal Justice Review 37: 442–60.Google Scholar
Morris, Robert G., and Higgins, George E.. 2009. “Neutralizing Potential and Self-Reported Digital Piracy: A Multitheoretical Exploration among College Undergraduates.” Criminal Justice Review 34: 173–95.Google Scholar
Paciello, Marinella, Fida, Roberta, Tramontano, Carlo, Lupinetti, Catia, and Caprara, Gian V.. 2008. “Stability and Change of Moral Disengagement and Its Impact on Aggression and Violence in Late Adolescence.” Child Development 27: 1288–1309.Google Scholar
Piquero, Alex R., Farrington, David P., and Blumstein, Alfred. 2003. “The Criminal Career Paradigm.” Crime and Justice 30: 359–506.Google Scholar
Piquero, Nicole L., Tibbetts, Stephen G., and Blankenship, Michael B.. 2005. “Examining the Role of Differential Association and Techniques of Neutralization in Explaining Corporate Crime.” Deviant Behavior 26: 159–88.Google Scholar
Reckless, Walter C. 1961. “A New Theory of Delinquency and Crime.” Federal Probation 25: 42–6.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Richard, Jacobs, Bruce A., and Wright, Richard. 2003. “Snitching and the Code of the Street.” British Journal of Criminology 43: 291–309.Google Scholar
Scott, Marvin B., and Lyman, Stanford M.. 1968. “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33: 46–62.Google Scholar
Serin, Ralph C., and Lloyd, Caleb D.. 2009. “Examining the Process of Offender Change: The Transition to Crime Desistance.” Psychology, Crime & Law 15(4): 347–64.Google Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W., Strang, Heather, Barnes, Geoffrey, Woods, Daniel J., Bennett, Sarah, Inkpen, Nova, Newbury-Birch, Dorothy, Rossner, Meredith, Angel, Caroline, Mearns, Malcom, and Slothtower, Molly. 2015a. “Twelve Experiments in Restorative Justice: The Jerry Lee Program of Randomized Trials of Restorative Justice.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 11: 501–40.Google Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W., Strang, Heather, Mayo-Wilson, Evan, Woods, Daniel J., and Ariel, Barak. 2015b. “Are Restorative Justice Conferences Effective in Reducing Repeat Offending? Findings from a Campbell Systematic Review.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 31: 1–24.Google Scholar
Shields, Ian W., and Whitehall, Georga C.. 1994. “Neutralization and Delinquency among Teenagers.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 21: 223–35.Google Scholar
Shulman, Elizabeth P., Cauffman, Elizabeth, Piquero, Alex R., and Fagan, Jeffrey. 2011. “Moral Disengagement among Serious Juvenile Offenders: A Longitudinal Study of the Relations between Morally Disengaged Attitudes and Offending.” Developmental Psychology 47: 1619–32.Google Scholar
Strang, Heather, Sherman, Lawrence W., Mayo-Wilson, Evan, Woods, Daniel, and Ariel, Barak. 2013. “Restorative Justice Conferencing (RJC) Using Face-to-Face Meetings of Offenders and Victims: Effects on Offender Recidivism and Victim Satisfaction. A Systematic Review.” Campbell Systematic Reviews 9: 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, Edwin H. 1955. Principles of Criminology, 5th ed., edited by Cressey, Donald R.. Chicago, IL: J. B. Lippincott Company.Google Scholar
Sykes, Gresham M., and Matza, David. 1957. “Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency.” American Sociological Review 22: 664–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurman, Quint C. 1984. “Deviance and the Neutralization of Moral Commitment: An Empirical Analysis.” Deviant Behavior 5: 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topalli, Volkan. 2005. “When Being Good Is Bad: An Expansion of Neutralization Theory.” Criminology 43: 797–835.Google Scholar
Topalli, Volkan, Higgins, George E., and Copes, Heith. 2014. “A Causal Model of Neutralization Acceptance and Delinquency: Making the Case for an Individual Difference Model.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 41: 553–73.Google Scholar
Vasquez, Arthur, and Vieraitis, Lynne M.. 2016. “‘It’s Just Paint’: Street Taggers’ Use of Neutralization Techniques.” Deviant Behavior 37: 1179–95.Google Scholar
Vieraitis, Lynne M., Piquero, Nicole L., Piquero, Alex R., Tibbetts, Stephen G., and Blankenship, Michael. 2012. “Do Women and Men Differ in Their Neutralizations of Corporate Crime?” Criminal Justice Review 37: 478–93.Google Scholar
Walters, Glenn D. 2020. “Neutralization, Moral Disengagement, and Delinquency in Adolescence: Testing the Reciprocal Effects of Proactive Criminal Thinking and Guilt on Future Offending.” Justice Quarterly 37: 210–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4
- Cited by