Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:01:08.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part VIII - Measuring and Evaluating Compliance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2021

Benjamin van Rooij
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Amsterdam
D. Daniel Sokol
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Advani, Arun, Elming, William, and Shaw, Jonathan. 2015. “How Long-Lasting Are the Effects of Audits?” TARC Discussion Paper 011–15. Exeter, UK: Tax Administration Research Centre, University of Exeter.Google Scholar
Agostini, Claudio A., and Martínez, Claudia. 2014. “Response of Tax Credit Claims to Tax Enforcement: Evidence from a Quasi-experiment in Chile.” Fiscal Studies 35(1): 4165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allingham, Michael G., and Sandmo, Agnar. 1972. “Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis.” Journal of Public Economics 1(3–4): 323–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, James. 2012. “Measuring, Explaining, and Controlling Tax Evasion: Lessons from Theory, Field Studies, and Experiments.” International Tax and Public Finance 19(1): 5477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, James. 2019. “What Motivates Tax Compliance?Journal of Economic Surveys 33(2): 353–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, James, and Malézieux, Antoine. in press. “40 Years of Tax Evasion Games: A Meta-analysis.” Experimental Economics.Google Scholar
Alm, James, and Michael, McKee. 2004. “Tax Compliance as a Coordination Game.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 54(3): 297312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, James, and Michael, McKee. 2006. “Audit Certainty, Audit Productivity, and Taxpayer Compliance.” National Tax Journal 59(4): 801–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, James, and Shimshack, Jay. 2014. “Environmental Enforcement and Compliance: Lessons from Pollution, Safety, and Tax Settings.” Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics 10(4): 209–74.Google Scholar
Alm, James, Bahl, Roy, and Murray, Matthew N.. 1990. “Tax Structure and Tax Compliance.” Review of Economics and Statistics 72(4): 603–13.Google Scholar
Alm, James, Jackson, Betty R., and Michael, McKee. 1992a. “Deterrence and Beyond: Toward a Kinder, Gentler IRS.” In Why People Pay Taxes: Tax Compliance and Enforcement, Slemrod, Joel (ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 311–29.Google Scholar
Alm, James, Jackson, Betty R., and Michael, McKee. 1992b. “Estimating the Determinants of Taxpayer Compliance with Experimental Data.” National Tax Journal 45(1): 107–14.Google Scholar
Alm, James, Jackson, Betty R., and Michael, McKee. 1993a. “Fiscal Exchange, Collective Decision Institutions, and Tax Compliance.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 22(4): 285303.Google Scholar
Alm, James, Jackson, Betty R., and Michael, McKee. 1993b. “Institutional Uncertainty and Taxpayer Compliance.” American Economic Review 82(4): 1018–26.Google Scholar
Alm, James, Jackson, Betty R., and Michael, McKee. 2009. “Getting the Word Out: Increased Enforcement, Audit Information Dissemination, and Compliance Behavior.” Journal of Public Economics 93(3–4): 6084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, James, McClelland, Gary H., and Schulze, William D.. 1992. “Why Do People Pay Taxes?Journal of Public Economics 48(1): 2138.Google Scholar
Alm, James, McClelland, Gary H., and Schulze, William D.. 1999. “Changing the Social Norm of Tax Compliance by Voting.” Kyklos 52(2): 141–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, James, Cronshaw, Mark B., and Michael, McKee. 1993. “Tax Compliance with Endogenous Audit Selection Rules.” Kyklos 46(1): 2745.Google Scholar
Alm, James, Sanchez, Isabel, and de Juan, Anna. 1995. “Economic and Noneconomic Factors in Tax Compliance.” Kyklos 48(1): 318.Google Scholar
Alm, James, Deskins, John, and Michael, McKee. 2009. “Do Individuals Comply on Income Not Reported by Their Employer?Public Finance Review 37(2): 120–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, James, Cherry, Todd L., Jones, Michael, and Michael, McKee. 2010. “Taxpayer Information Assistance Services and Tax Reporting Behavior.” Journal of Economic Psychology 31(4): 577–86.Google Scholar
Alm, James, Cherry, Todd L., Jones, Michael, and Michael, McKee. 2012. “Social Programs as Positive Inducements for Tax Participation.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 84(1): 8596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, James, Bloomquist, Kim M., and McKee, Michael. 2015. “On the External Validity of Laboratory Tax Compliance Experiments.” Economic Inquiry 53(2): 1170–86.Google Scholar
Alm, James, Bloomquist, Kim M., and McKee, Michael. 2017. “When You Know Your Neighbor Pays Taxes: Information, Peer Effects, and Tax Compliance.” Fiscal Studies 38(4): 587613.Google Scholar
Alm, James, Bruner, David, and Michael, McKee. 2016. “Honesty and Dishonesty in Taxpayer Communications in an Enforcement Regime.” Journal of Economic Psychology 56: 8596.Google Scholar
Alm, James, Clark, Jeremy, and Leibel, Kara. 2016. “Enforcement, Socio-economic Diversity, and Tax Filing Compliance in the United States.” Southern Economic Journal 82(3): 725–47.Google Scholar
Alm, James, Bernasconi, Michele, Laury, Susan, Lee, Daniel J., and Wallace, Sally. 2017. “Culture, Compliance, and Confidentiality: Taxpayer Behavior in the United States and Italy.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 140: 176–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, James, Schulze, William D., von Bose, Carrie, and Yan, Jubo. 2019a. “Appeals to Social Norms and Taxpayer Compliance.” Department of Economics Working Paper. New Orleans, LA: Tulane University.Google Scholar
Alm, James, Schulze, William D., von Bose, Carrie, and Yan, Jubo. 2019b. “A Taxpayer’s Use of a Tax Preparer: Choice Considerations and Compliance Effects.” Department of Economics Working Paper. New Orleans, LA: Tulane University.Google Scholar
Amberger, Harald, Eberhartinger, Eva, and Kasper, Matthias. 2019. “Tax-Rate Biases in Tax-Planning Decisions: Experimental Evidence.” WU International Taxation Research Paper Series. Vienna.Google Scholar
Andreoni, James, Erard, Brian, and Feinstein, Jonathan. 1998. “Tax Compliance.” Journal of Economic Literature 36(2): 818–60.Google Scholar
Andrighetto, Giulia, Zhang, Nan, Ottone, Stefania, Ponzano, Ferruccio, D’Attoma, John, and Steinmo, Sven. 2016. “Are Some Countries More Honest than Others? Evidence from a Tax Compliance Experiment in Sweden and Italy.” Frontiers in Psychology 7. www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00472/full.Google Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D., and Pischke, Jorn-Steffen. 2010. “The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con out of Econometrics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24(2): 330.Google Scholar
Baldry, Jonathan C. 1987. “Income Tax Evasion and the Tax Schedule: Some Experimental Results.” Public Finance 42(3): 357–83.Google Scholar
Bazart, Cecile, and Pickhardt, Michael. 2011. “Fighting Income Tax Evasion with Positive Rewards.” Public Finance Review 39(1): 124–49.Google Scholar
Beck, Paul J., Davis, Jon S., and Jung, Woon-Oh. 1991. “Experimental Evidence on Taxpayer Reporting Behavior.” Accounting Review 66(3): 535–58.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1968. “Crime and Punishment – An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 76(2): 169217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Winfried, Buchner, Heinz-Jurgen, and Sleeking, Simon. 1987. “The Impact of Public Transfer Expenditures on Tax Evasion: An Experimental Approach.” Journal of Public Economics 34(2): 243–52.Google Scholar
Beer, Sebastian, Kasper, Mattias, and Loeprick, Jan. 2019. “Puzzling Tax Law – Behavioral Responses to Complex Rules.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Beer, Sebastian, Kasper, Matthias, Kirchler, Erich, and Erard, Brian. 2020. “Do Audits Deter or Provoke Future Tax Noncompliance? Evidence on Self-Employed Taxpayers.” CESifo Economic Studies 66(3): 248–64.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Michele, and Zanardi, Alberto. 2004. “Tax Evasion, Tax Rates, and Reference Dependence.” FinanzArchiv 60(3): 422–45.Google Scholar
Beron, Kurt J., Tauchen, Helen V., and Witte, Ann D.. 1992. “The Effect of Audits and Socio-economic Variables on Compliance.” In Who Pays Their Taxes and Why? Slemrod, Joel (ed.), Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 6789.Google Scholar
Blackwell, Calvin. 2010. “A Meta-analysis of Incentive Effects in Tax Compliance Experiments.” In Developing Alternative Frameworks for Explaining Tax Compliance Behavior, Alm, James, Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge, and Torgler, Benno (eds.). New York: Routledge, 97112.Google Scholar
Bosco, Luigi, and Mittone, Luigi. 1997. “Tax Evasion and Moral Constraints: Some Experimental Evidence.” Kyklos 50(3): 297324.Google Scholar
Camerer, Colin F. 2015. “The Promise and Success of Lab-Field Generalizability in Experimental Economics: A Reply to Levitt and List.” In The Methods of Modern Experimental Economics, Frechette, Guillaume R. and Schotter, Andrew (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, ch. 14.Google Scholar
Carillo, Paul, Pomeranz, Dina, and Singhal, Monica. 2017. “Dodging the Taxman: Firm Misreporting and Limits to Tax Enforcement.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9(2): 144–64.Google Scholar
Casagrande, Alberto, Di Cagno, Daniela, Pandimiglio, Alessandro, and Spallone, Marco. 2015. “The Effect of Competition on Tax Compliance: The Role of Audit Rules and Shame.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 59: 96110.Google Scholar
Casal, Sandro, Kogler, Christoph, Mittone, Luigi, and Kirchler, Erich. 2016. “Tax Compliance Depends on Voice of Taxpayers.” Journal of Economic Psychology 56: 141–50.Google Scholar
Casal, Sandro, and Mittone, Luigi. 2016. “Social Esteem versus Social Stigma: The Role of Anonymity in an Income Reporting Game.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 124: 5566.Google Scholar
Choo, C. Y. Lawrence, Fonseca, Miguel A., and Myles, Gareth D.. 2016. “Do Students Behave like Real Taxpayers in the Lab? Evidence from a Real Effort Tax Compliance Experiment.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 124: 102–14.Google Scholar
Christensen, Garret, and Miguel, Edward. 2018. “Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research.” Journal of Economic Literature 56(3): 920–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, Roberta Calvet, and Alm, James. 2014. “Sympathy, Empathy, and Tax Compliance.” Journal of Economic Psychology 40: 6282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clotfelter, Charles T. 1983. “Tax Evasion and Tax Rates: An Analysis of Individual Returns.” Review of Economics and Statistics 65(3): 363–73.Google Scholar
Collins, Julie H., and David Plumlee, R.. 1991. “The Taxpayer’s Labor and Reporting Decisions: The Effect of Audit Schemes.” Accounting Review 66(3): 559–76.Google Scholar
Coricelli, Giorgio, Joffily, Mateus, Montmarquette, Claude, and Villeval, Marie Claire. 2010. “Cheating, Emotions, and Rationality: An Experiment on Tax Evasion.” Experimental Economics 13(2): 226–47.Google Scholar
Cowell, Frank A. 1990. Cheating the Government: The Economics of Evasion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cummings, Ronald G., Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge, McKee, Michael, and Torgler, Benno. 2009. “Tax Morale Affects Tax Compliance: Evidence from Surveys and an Artefactual Field Experiment.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 70(3): 447–57.Google Scholar
Davis, Douglas D., and Holt, Charles A.. 1993. “Experimental Economics: Methods, Problems, and Promise.” Estudios Economicos: 179212.Google Scholar
DeBacker, Jason, Heim, Bradley T., Tran, Anh, and Yuskavage, Alexander. 2015. “Legal Enforcement and Corporate Behavior: An Analysis of Tax Aggressiveness after an Audit.” Journal of Law and Economics 58(2): 291324.Google Scholar
Dhami, Sanjit, and al-Nowaihi, Ali. 2007. “Why Do People Pay Taxes? Prospect Theory versus Expected Utility Theory.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 64(1): 171–92.Google Scholar
Doerrenberg, Philipp, and Duncan, Denvil. 2014. “Experimental Evidence on the Relationship between Tax Evasion Opportunities and Labor Supply.” European Economic Review 68: 4870.Google Scholar
Dubin, Jeffrey, Graetz, Michael, and Wilde, Louis L.. 1990. “The Effect of Audit Rates on the Federal Individual Income Tax, 1977–1986.” National Tax Journal 43(4): 395409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubin, Jeffrey A., and Wilde, Louis L.. 1988. “An Empirical Analysis of Federal Income Tax Auditing and Compliance.” National Tax Journal 41(1): 6174.Google Scholar
Dulleck, Uwe, Fooken, Jonas, Newton, Cameron, Ristl, Andrea, Schaffner, Markus, and Torgler, Benno. 2016. “Tax Compliance and Psychic Costs: Behavioral Experimental Evidence Using a Physiological Marker.” Journal of Public Economics 134: 918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enachescu, Janina, Puklavec, Žiga, Bauer, Christian Martin, Olsen, Jerome, Kirchler, Erich, and Alm, James. 2020. “Incidental Emotions, Integral Emotions, and Decisions to Pay Taxes.” In Behavioral Public Finance: Individuals, Society, and the State, Batrancea, Larissa, Cevik, Savas, and Mustafa Erdoğdu, M. (eds.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Erard, Brian. 1992. “The Influence of Tax Audits on Reporting Behavior.” In Why People Pay Taxes: Tax Compliance and Enforcement, Slemrod, Joel (ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 95114.Google Scholar
Erard, Brian. 1993. “Taxation with Representation: An Analysis of the Role of Tax Practitioners in Tax Compliance.” Journal of Public Economics 52(2): 163–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erard, Brian, and Ho, Chih-Chin. 2001. “Searching for Ghosts: Who Are the Nonfilers and How Much Tax Do They Owe?Journal of Public Economics 81(1): 2550.Google Scholar
Fack, Gabrielle and Landais, Camille. 2016. “The Effect of Tax Enforcement on Tax Elasticities: Evidence from Charitable Contributions in France.” Journal of Public Economics 133: 2340.Google Scholar
Falk, Armin, and Heckman, James J.. 2009. “Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences.” Science 326(5952): 535–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinstein, Jonathan S. 1991. “An Econometric Model of Income Tax Evasion and Its Detection.” RAND Journal of Economics 22(1): 1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, Lars P., and Frey, Bruno S.. 2002. “Trust Breeds Trust: How Taxpayers Are Treated.” Economics of Governance 3(2): 8799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, Lars P., Frey, Bruno S., and Torgler, Benno. 2006. “Rewarding Honest Taxpayers.” In Managing and Maintaining Compliance, Elffers, Henk, Verboon, Peter, and Huisman, Wim (eds.). The Hague: Boom Legal Publishers, 4561.Google Scholar
Feld, Lars P., and Tyran, Jean-Robert. 2002. “Tax Evasion and Voting: An Experimental Analysis.” Kyklos 55(2): 197221.Google Scholar
Fochmann, Martin, and Kroll, Eike B.. 2016. “The Effects of Rewards on Tax Compliance Decisions.” Journal of Economic Psychology 52: 3855.Google Scholar
Fortin, Bernard, Lacroix, Guy, and Villeval, Marie Claire. 2007. “Tax Evasion and Social Interactions.” Journal of Public Economics 91(11–12): 20892112.Google Scholar
Frechette, Guillaume R. 2015. “Laboratory Experiments: Professionals versus Students.” In The Methods of Modern Experimental Economics, Frechette, Guillaume R. and Schotter, Andrew (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, ch. 17.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno. 1997. Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Friedland, Nehemiah, Maital, Shlomo, and Rutenberg, Aryeh. 1978. “A Simulation Study of Income Tax Evasion.” Journal of Public Economics 10(1): 107–16.Google Scholar
Gangl, Katharina, Torgler, Benno, and Kirchler, Erich. 2016. “Patriotism’s Impact on Cooperation with the State: An Experimental Study on Tax Compliance.” Political Psychology 37(6): 867–81.Google Scholar
Gemmell, Norman, and Ratto, Marisa. 2012. “Behavioral Responses to Taxpayer Audits: Evidence from Random Taxpayer Inquiries.” National Tax Journal 65(1): 3358.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1996. Full House: The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin. New York: Harmony Books.Google Scholar
Guala, Francesco, and Mittone, Luigi. 2005. “Experiments in Economics: External Validity and the Robustness of Phenomena.” Journal of Economic Methodology 12: 495515.Google Scholar
Guala, Francesco, and Mittone, Luigi. 2010. “How History and Convention Create Norms: An Experimental Study.” Journal of Economic Psychology 31(4): 749–56.Google Scholar
Hallsworth, Michael. 2014. “The Use of Field Experiments to Increase Tax Compliance.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 30(4): 658–79.Google Scholar
Harrison, Glenn W., Lau, Morten, and Elisabet Rutström, E.. 2015. “Theory, Experimental Design and Econometrics Are Complementary (and So Are Lab and Field Experiments).” In The Methods of Modern Experimental Economics, Frechette, Guillaume R. and Schotter, Andrew (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, ch. 15.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Makoto, Hoopes, Jefrey L., Ishida, Ryo, and Slemrod, Joel. 2013. “The Effect of Public Disclosure on Reported Taxable Income: Evidence from Individuals and Corporations in Japan.” National Tax Journal 66(3): 571608.Google Scholar
Hashimzade, Nigar, Myles, Gareth D., and Tran-Nam, Binh. 2013. “Applications of Behavioural Economics to Tax Evasion.” Journal of Economic Surveys 27(5): 941–77.Google Scholar
Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC). 2009. Individual’s Prioritisation: An Investigation into Segmentation of the Individuals Customer Base. London: HMRC.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Eva, Voracek, Martin, Bock, Christine, and Kirchler, Erich. 2017. “Tax Compliance across Sociodemographic Categories: Meta-analyses of Survey Studies in 111 Countries.” Journal of Economic Psychology 62: 6371.Google Scholar
Internal Revenue Service (IRS). 2006. Tax Year 2001 Federal Tax Gap (Extended Version). Washington, DC: IRS Office of Research, Analysis, and Statistics. www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/01rastg07map.pdf.Google Scholar
Internal Revenue Service (IRS). 2010. Final Report for Planning Theoretical Research (T.O. 0002). Washington, DC: Internal Revenue Service.Google Scholar
Internal Revenue Service (IRS). 2012. Tax Gap Estimates for Tax Year 2006 – Overview. Washington, DC: IRS Office of Research, Analysis, and Statistics. www.irs.gov/pub/newsroom/overview_tax_gap_2006.pdf.Google Scholar
Internal Revenue Service (IRS). 2016. Tax Gap Estimates for Tax Years 2008–2010. Washington, DC: IRS Office of Research, Analysis, and Statistics. www.irs.gov/pub/newsroom/tax%20gap%20estimates%20for%202008%20through%202010.pdf.Google Scholar
Kagel, John H. 2015. “Laboratory Experiments: The Lab in Relationship to Field Experiments, Field Data, and Economic Theory.” In The Methods of Modern Experimental Economics, Frechette, Guillaume R. and Schotter, Andrew (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, ch. 16.Google Scholar
Kagel, John H., and Roth, Alvin E. (eds.). 1995. The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakostas, Alexandrow, and Zizzo, Daniel John. 2016. “Compliance and the Power of Authority.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 124: 6780.Google Scholar
Kasper, Matthias, and Alm, James. 2020. “Audits, Audit ‘Effectiveness’, and Post-audit Tax Compliance.” WU International Taxation Research Paper Series 2020-12.Google Scholar
Kasper, Matthias, Kogler, Christoph, and Kirchler, Erich. 2015. “Tax Policy and the News: An Empirical Analysis of Taxpayers’ Perceptions of Tax-Related Media Coverage and Its Impact on Tax Compliance.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 54: 5863.Google Scholar
Kastlunger, Barbara, Kirchler, Erich, Mittone, Luigi, and Pitters, Julia. 2009. “Sequences of Audits, Tax Compliance, and Taxpaying Strategies.” Journal of Economic Psychology 30(3): 405–18.Google Scholar
Kessler, Judd B., and Vesterlund, Lise. 2015. “The External Validity of Laboratory Experiments: The Misleading Emphasis on Quantitative Effects.” In The Methods of Modern Experimental Economics, Frechette, Guillaume R. and Schotter, Andrew (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, ch. 18.Google Scholar
Kinsey, Karyl A. 1992. “Deterrence and Alienation Effects of IRS Enforcement: An Analysis of Survey Data.” In Why People Pay Taxes: Tax Compliance and Enforcement, Slemrod, Joel (ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 259–85.Google Scholar
Kirchler, Erich. 2007. The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchler, Erich, Hoelzl, Erik, and Wahl, Ingrid. 2008. “Enforced versus Voluntary Tax Compliance: The ‘Slippery Slope’ Framework.” Journal of Economic Psychology 29(2): 210–25.Google Scholar
Kleven, Henrik J., Knudsen, Martin B., Kreiner, Claus T., Pedersen, Søren, and Saez, Emmanuel. 2011. “Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence from a Randomized Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark.” Econometrica 79(3): 651–92.Google Scholar
Kogler, Christoph, Batrancea, Larissa, Nichita, Anca, Pantya, Jozsef, Belianin, Alexis, and Kirchler, Erich. 2013. “Trust and Power as Determinants of Tax Compliance: Testing the Assumptions of the Slippery Slope Framework in Austria, Hungary, Romania, and Russia.” Journal of Economic Psychology 34(1): 169–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogler, Christoph, Mittone, Luigi, and Kirchler, Erich. 2016. “Delayed Feedback on Tax Audits Affects Compliance and Fairness Perceptions.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 124: 81–7.Google Scholar
Konrad, Kai A., and Qari, Salmai. 2012. “The Last Refuge of a Scoundrel? Patriotism and Tax Compliance.” Economica 79(315): 516–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Mathieu, Pestieau, Pierre, Riedl, Arno, and Villeval, Marie Claire. 2015. “Tax Evasion and Social Information: An Experiment in Belgium, France, and the Netherlands.” International Tax and Public Finance 22(3): 401–25.Google Scholar
Levitt, Steven D., and List, John A.. 2007. “What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal about the Real World?Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(2): 153–74.Google Scholar
Maciejovsky, Boris, Kirchler, Erich, and Schwarzenberger, Herbert. 2007. “Misperceptions of Chance and Loss Repair: On the Dynamics of Tax Compliance.” Journal of Economic Psychology 28(6): 678–91.Google Scholar
Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge, Harwood, Gordon B., and Larkins, Ernest R.. 1992. “Withholding Position and Income Tax Compliance: Some Experimental Evidence.” Public Finance Review 20(2): 152–74.Google Scholar
Mascagni, Giulia. 2018. “From the Lab to the Field: A Review of Tax Experiments.” Journal of Economic Surveys 32(2): 273301.Google Scholar
Mittone, Luigi. 2006. “Dynamic Behaviour in Tax Evasion: An Experimental Approach.” Journal of Socio-Economics 35(5): 813–35.Google Scholar
Mittone, Luigi, Panebianco, Fabrizio, and Santoro, Alessandro. 2017. “The Bomb-Crater Effect of Tax Audits: Beyond the Misperception of Chance.” Journal of Economic Psychology 61: 225–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muehlbacher, Stephan, Hartl, Barbara, and Kirchler, Erich. 2017. “Mental Accounting and Tax Compliance: Experimental Evidence for the Effect of Mental Segregation of Tax Due and Revenue on Compliance.” Public Finance Review 45(1): 118–39.Google Scholar
Olsen, Jerome, Kasper, Matthias, Enachescu, Janina, Budak, Tamer, Benk, Serkan, and Kirchler, Erich. 2018. “Emotions and Tax Compliance among Small Business Owners: An Experimental Survey.” International Review of Law and Economics 56: 4252.Google Scholar
Olsen, Jerome, Kasper, Matthias, Kogler, Christoph, Muehlbacher, Stephan, and Kirchler, Erich. 2019a. “Mental Accounting of Income Tax and Value Added Tax among Self-Employed Business Owners.” Journal of Economic Psychology 70: 125–39.Google Scholar
Olsen, Jerome, Kogler, Christoph, Brandt, Mark J., Dezső, Linda, and Kirchler, Erich. 2019b. “Are Consumption Taxes Really Disliked More than Equivalent Costs? Inconclusive Results in the USA and No Effect in the UK.” Journal of Economic Psychology 75, 102145, DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2019.02.001.Google Scholar
Onu, Diana, and Oats, Lynne. 2016. “‘Paying Tax Is Part of Life’: Social Norms and Social Influence in Tax Communications.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 124: 2942.Google Scholar
Parker, Christine, and Nielsen, Vibeke. 2009. “The Challenge of Empirical Research on Business Compliance in Regulatory Capitalism.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5: 4570.Google Scholar
Perez-Truglia, Ricardo, and Troiano, Ugo. 2018. “Shaming Tax Delinquents.” Journal of Public Economics 167: 120–37.Google Scholar
Plott, Charles R. 1987. “Dimensions of Parallelism: Some Policy Applications of Experimental Methods.” In Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View, Roth, Alvin E. (ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 193219.Google Scholar
Pomeranz, Dina. 2015. “No Taxation without Information: Deterrence and Self-Enforcement in the Value Added Tax.” American Economic Review 105(8): 2539–69.Google Scholar
Pyle, D. J. 1991. “The Economics of Taxpayer Compliance.” Journal of Economic Surveys 5(2): 163–98.Google Scholar
Roth, Alvin E. 1987. “Laboratory Experimentation in Economics.” In Advances in Economic Theory, Fifth World Congress, Bewley, Truman (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 269–99.Google Scholar
Sandmo, Agnar. 2012. “An Evasive Topic: Theorizing about the Hidden Economy.” International Tax and Public Finance 19(1): 524.Google Scholar
Slemrod, Joel. 2007. “Cheating Ourselves: The Economics of Tax Evasion.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(1): 2548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slemrod, Joel, and Weber, Caroline. 2012. “Evidence of the Invisible: Toward a Credibility Revolution in the Empirical Analysis of Tax Evasion and the Informal Economy.” International Tax and Public Finance 19(1): 2553.Google Scholar
Slemrod, Joel, and Yitzhaki, Shlomo. 2002. “Tax Avoidance, Evasion, and Administration.” In Handbook of Public Economics, Volume 4 (ch. 22), Auerbach, Alan J. and Feldstein, Martin (eds.). Amsterdam, London, New York: Elsevier B.V. North Holland Publishers, 1423–70.Google Scholar
Smith, Vernon L. 1976. “Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory.” American Economic Review 66(2): 274–9.Google Scholar
Smith, Vernon L. 1982. “Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science.” American Economic Review 72(5): 923–55.Google Scholar
Spicer, Michael W., and Becker, Lee A.. 1980. “Fiscal Inequity and Tax Compliance: An Experimental Approach.” National Tax Journal 33(2): 171–5.Google Scholar
Spicer, Michael W., and Hero, Rodney E.. 1985. “Tax Evasion and Heuristics: A Research Note.” Journal of Public Economics 26(2): 263–7.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, T. N. 1973. “Tax Evasion: A Model.” Journal of Public Economics 2(4): 339–46.Google Scholar
Torgler, Benno. 2002. “Speaking to Theorists and Searching for Facts: Tax Morale and Compliance in Experiments.” Journal of Economic Surveys 16(5): 657–83.Google Scholar
Torgler, Benno. 2003. “Tax Morale, Rule-Governed Behaviour, and Trust.” Constitutional Political Economy 14(2): 119–40.Google Scholar
Torgler, Benno. 2007. Tax Compliance and Tax Morale: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Torgler, Benno. 2016. “Tax Compliance and Data: What Is Available and What Is Needed.” Australian Economic Review 49(3): 352–64.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, Joachim. 1974. “Taxation and Public Opinion in Sweden: An Interpretation of Recent Data.” National Tax Journal 27(4): 499514.Google Scholar
Wahl, Ingrid, Muehlbacher, Stephan, and Kirchler, Erich. 2010. “The Impact of Voting on Tax Payments.” Kyklos 63(1): 144–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webley, Paul. 1987. “Audit Probabilities and Tax Evasion in a Business Simulation.” Economics Letters 25(3): 267–70.Google Scholar
Webley, Paul, Robben, Henry, Elffers, Henk, and Hessing, Dick. 1991. Tax Evasion: An Experimental Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Witte, Ann D., and Woodbury, Diane F.. 1985. “The Effect of Tax Laws and Tax Administration on Tax Compliance.” National Tax Journal 38: 113.Google Scholar
Yaniv, Gideon. 1999. “Tax Compliance and Advanced Tax Payments: A Prospect Theory Analysis.” National Tax Journal 52(4): 753–64.Google Scholar
Zhang, Nan, Andrighetto, Giulia, Ottone, Stefania, Ponzano, Ferruccio, and Steimo, Sven. 2016. “‘Willing to Pay’? Tax Compliance in Britain and Italy: An Experimental Analysis.” PLoS ONE 11(2). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0150277.Google Scholar

References

Abramowitz, Michael, Ayres, Ian, and Listokin, Yair. 2011. “Randomizing Law.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 159(4): 929.Google Scholar
Abrams, David S., and Rohlfs, Chris. 2011. “Optimal Bail and the Value of Freedom: Evidence from the Philadelphia Bail Experiment.” Economic Inquiry 49(3): 750–70.Google Scholar
Aizer, Anna, and Doyle, Joseph J. Jr. 2015. “Juvenile Incarceration, Human Capital, and Future Crime: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Judges.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 130(2): 759803.Google Scholar
Alm, James. 2012. “Measuring, Explaining, and Controlling Tax Evasion: Lessons from Theory, Experiments, and Field Studies.” International Tax and Public Finance 19(1): 5477.Google Scholar
Alm, James, and Michael, McKee. 1998. “Extending the Lessons of Laboratory Experiments on Tax Compliance to Managerial and Decision Economics.” Managerial and Decision Economics 19(4/5): 259–75.Google Scholar
Anderson, James M., Kling, Jeffrey R., and Stith, Kate. 1999. “Measuring Inter-judge Sentencing Disparity before and after the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.” Journal of Law and Economics 42: 271.Google Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D., and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. 2010. “The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con out of Econometrics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24(2): 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelgren, Leif. 2008. “The Effect of Audit Strategy Information on Tax Compliance – An Empirical Study.” eJournal of Tax Research 6(1): 6781.Google Scholar
Ariel, Barak. 2012. “Deterrence and Moral Persuasion Effects on Corporate Tax Compliance: Findings from a Randomized Controlled Trial.” Criminology 50(1): 2769.Google Scholar
Ariel, Barak, Sutherland, Alex, Henstock, Darren, Young, Josh, Drover, Paul, Sykes, Jayne, Megicks, Simon, and Henderson, Ryan. 2017. “Contagious Accountability: A Global Multistate Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Police Body-Worn Cameras on Citizens’ Complaints against the Police.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 44(2): 293316.Google Scholar
Ariel, Barak, Sutherland, Alex, and Sherman, Lawrence W.. 2018. “Preventing Treatment Spillover Contamination in Criminological Field Experiments: The Case of Body-Worn Police Cameras.” Journal of Experimental Criminology: 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Barak, Farrer, William A., and Sutherland, Alex. 2015. “The Effect of Police Body-Worn Cameras on Use of Force and Citizens’ Complaints against the Police: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 31(3): 509–35.Google Scholar
Aronow, Peter M., and Samii, Cyrus. 2017. “Estimating Average Causal Effects under General Interference, with Application to a Social Network Experiment.” Annals of Applied Statistics 11(4): 1912–47.Google Scholar
Baradaran, Shima, Findley, Michael, Nielson, Daniel, and Sharman, Jason C.. 2013. “Does International Law Matter?Minnesota Law Review 97(3): 743837.Google Scholar
Baradaran, Shima, Findley, Michael, Nielson, Daniel, and Sharman, Jason C.. 2014. “Funding Terror.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 162(3): 477536.Google Scholar
Bergolo, Marcelo, Ceni, Rodrigo, Cruces, Guillermo, Giaccobasso, Matias, and Perez-Truglia, Ricardo. 2019. “Tax Audits as Scarecrows. Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment.” IZA Institute of Labor Economics Discussion Paper No. 12335.Google Scholar
Blumstein, Alfred, Cohen, Jacqueline, and Nagin, Daniel S., eds. 1978. Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates. National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Bothwell, Laura E., Greene, Jeremy A., Podolsky, Scott H., and Jones, David S.. 2016. “Assessing the Gold Standard – Lessons from the History of RCTs.” New England Journal of Medicine 374(22): 2175–81.Google Scholar
Braga, Anthony A., and Bond, Brenda J.. 2008. “Policing Crime and Disorder Hot Spots: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Criminology 46(3): 577608.Google Scholar
Braga, Anthony A., Papachristos, Andrew V., and Hureau, David M.. 2014. “The Effects of Hot Spots Policing on Crime: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” Justice Quarterly 31(4): 633–63.Google Scholar
Braga, Anthony A., Weisburd, David L., Waring, Elin J., Mazerolle, Lorraine G., Spelman, William, and Gajewski, Francis. 1999. “Problem-Oriented Policing in Violent Crime Places: A Randomized Controlled Experiment.” Criminology, 37(3): 541–80.Google Scholar
Braga, Anthony A., Sousa, William H., Coldren, James R. Jr., and Rodriquez, Denise. 2018. “The Effects of Body-Worn Cameras on Police Activity and Police-Citizen Encounters: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 108(3): 511–38.Google Scholar
Bursztyn, Leonardo, Fiorin, Stefano, Gottlieb, Daniel, and Kanz, Marin. 2019. “Moral Incentives in Credit Card Debt Repayment: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Journal of Political Economy 127(4): 1641–83.Google Scholar
Castro, Lucio, and Scartascini, Carlos. 2015. “Tax Compliance and Enforcement in the Pampas: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 116: 6582.Google Scholar
Chilton, Adam S., and Levy, Marin K.. 2015. “Challenging the Randomness of Panel Assignment in the Federal Courts of Appeal.” Cornell Law Review 101: 1.Google Scholar
Chirico, Michael, Inman, Robert P., Loeffler, Charles, MacDonald, John, and Sieg, Holger. 2016. “An Experimental Evaluation of Notification Strategies to Increase Property Tax Compliance: Free-Riding in the City of Brotherly Love.” Tax Policy and the Economy 30(1): 129–61.Google Scholar
Coleman, Stephen. 1996. “The Minnesota Income Tax Compliance Experiment: State Tax Results.” MPRA Paper No. 4827. University of Munich.Google Scholar
Cummings, Ronald G., Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge, McKee, Michael, and Torgler, Benno. 2009. “Tax Morale Affects Tax Compliance: Evidence from Surveys and an Artefactual Field Experiment.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 70(3): 447–57.Google Scholar
Daniels, Brigham, Buntaine, Mark, and Bangerter, Tanner. 2020. “Testing Transparency.” Northwestern University Law Review 114(5): 12631333.Google Scholar
Del Carpio, Lucia. 2013. “Are the Neighbors Cheating? Evidence from a Social Norm Experiment on Property Taxes in Peru.” Princeton University Working Paper.Google Scholar
Desposato, Scott, ed. 2015. Ethics and Experiments: Problems and Solutions for Social Scientists and Policy Professionals. Routledge.Google Scholar
Dickinson, David L., Dutcher, E. Glenn, and Rodet, Cortney S.. 2015. “Observed Punishment Spillover Effects: A Laboratory Investigation of Behavior in a Social Dilemma.” Experimental Economics 18: 136–53.Google Scholar
Dobbie, Will, Goldin, Jacob, and Yang, Crystal. 2018. “The Effects of Pre-trial Detention on Conviction, Future Crime, and Employment: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Judges.” American Economic Review 108(2): 201–40.Google Scholar
Doerrenberg, Phillip, and Schmitz, Jan. 2015. “Tax Compliance and Information Provision – A Field Experiment with Small Firms.” Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy 1(1): 4754.Google Scholar
Drago, Francesco, Mengel, Friederike, and Traxler, Christian. 2020. “Compliance Behavior in Networks: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 12(2): 96133.Google Scholar
Duflo, Esther, and Banerjee, Abhijit, eds. 2017. Handbook of Field Experiments, Volume 1. North Holland.Google Scholar
Dustan, Andrew, Maldonado, Stanislao, and Juan Hernandez-Agramonte, Manuel. 2018. “Motivating Bureaucrats with Non-monetary Incentives when State Capacity Is Weak: Evidence from Large-Scale Field Experiments in Peru.” MPRA Working Paper No. 90952.Google Scholar
Dwenger, Nadja, Kleven, Henrik, Rasul, Imran, and Rinke, Johannes. 2016. “Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivations for Tax Compliance: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Germany.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 8(3): 203–32.Google Scholar
Empey, LaMar T. 1980. “Field Experimentation in Criminal Justice: Rationale and Design.” In Handbook of Criminal Justice Evaluation, eds. Klein, Malcolm and Teilman, Katherine, 143–76. Sage.Google Scholar
Falk, Armin, and Heckman, James J.. 2009. “Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences.” Science 326(5952): 535–8.Google Scholar
Farrington, David P. 1983. “Randomized Experiments on Crime and Justice.” Crime and Justice 4: 257308.Google Scholar
Fellner, Gerlinde, Sausgruber, Rupert, and Traxler, Christian. 2013. “Testing Enforcement Strategies in the Field: Threat, Moral Appeal and Social Information.” Journal of the European Economic Association 11(3): 634–60.Google Scholar
Findley, Michael, Nielson, Daniel L., and Sharman, Jason C.. 2013. “Using Field Experiments in International Relations: A Randomized Study of Anonymous Incorporation.” International Organization 67(4): 657–3.Google Scholar
Findley, Michael, Nielson, Daniel L., and Sharman, Jason C.. 2014. Global Shell Games: Experiments in Transnational Relations, Crime, and Terrorism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Findley, Michael, Nielson, Daniel L., and Sharman, Jason C.. 2015. “Causes of Noncompliance with International Law: A Field Experiment on Anonymous Incorporation.” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 146–61.Google Scholar
Galeotti, Fabio, Maggian, Valeria, and Villeval, Marie Claire. 2019. “Fraud Detterrence Institutions Reduce Intrinsic Honesty.” Groupe d’Analyse et de Théorie Economique Working Paper.Google Scholar
Gangl, Katharina, Torgler, Benno, Kirchler, Erich, and Hofmann, Eva. 2014. “Effects of Supervision on Tax Compliance: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Austria.” Economics Letters 123(3): 378–82.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P., and Kaplan, Edward H.. 2004. “The Illusion of Learning from Observational Research.” In Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics, eds. Shapiro, Ian, Smith, Rogers M., and Masoud, Tarek E., 251–73. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P.. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Gneezy, Uri, and Imas, Alex. 2018. “Lab in the Field: Measuring Preferences in the Wild.” In Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, Volume 1, eds. Banerjee, Abhijit Vinayak and Duflo, Esther. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Thorley, Dane R.. 2014. “Field Experimentation and the Study of Law and Policy.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10: 5372.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Winik, Daniel. 2010. “Using Random Judge Assignments to Estimate the Effects of Incarceration and Probation on Recidivism among Drug Offenders.” Criminology 48(2): 357–87.Google Scholar
Guala, Francesco. 2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guala, Francesco. 2009. “Methodological Issues in Experimental Design and Interpretation.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Economics, eds. Ross, Don and Kincaid, Harold, 280305. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, Arpit, Hansman, Christopher, and Frenchman, Ethan. 2016. “The Heavy Costs of High Bail: Evidence from Judge Randomization.” Journal of Legal Studies 45(2): 471505.Google Scholar
Hall, Matthew. 2010. “Randomness Reconsidered: Modeling Random Judicial Assignment in the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 7: 574.Google Scholar
Hallsworth, Michael. 2014. “The Use of Field Experiments to Increase Tax Compliance.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 30(4): 658–79.Google Scholar
Hallsworth, Michael, List, John A., Metcalfe, Robert D., and Vlaev, Ivo. 2017. “The Behavioralist as Tax Collector: Using Natural Field Experiments to Enhance Tax Compliance.” Journal of Public Economics 148: 1431.Google Scholar
Handan-Nader, Cassandra, Ho, Daniel E., and Elias, Becky. 2020. “Feasibly Policy Evaluation by Design: A Randomized Synthetic-Wedge Trial of Mandated Disclosure in King County.” Evaluation Review 44(1): 350.Google Scholar
Harju, Jarkko, Kosonen, Tuomas, and Ropponen, Olli. 2014. “Do Honest Hairdressers Get a Haircut?” Government Institute for Economic Research (VATT) Working Paper.Google Scholar
Harrison, Glenn W. 2013. “Field Experiments and Methodological Intolerance.” Journal of Economic Methodology 20(2): 110–11.Google Scholar
Hasseldine, John, Hite, Peggy, James, Simon, and Toumi, Marika. 2007. “Persuasive Communications: Tax Compliance Enforcement Strategies for Sole Proprietors.” Contemporary Accounting Research 24(1): 171–94.Google Scholar
Haynes, Laura C., Green, Donald P., Gallagher, Rory, John, Peter, and Torgerson, David J.. 2013. “Collection of Delinquent Fines: An Adaptive Randomized Trial to Assess the Effectiveness of Alternative Text Messages.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 32(4): 718–30.Google Scholar
Henstock, Darren, and Ariel, Barak. 2017. “Testing the Effects of Police Body-Worn Cameras on Use of Force during Arrests: A Randomised Controlled Trial in a Large British Police Force.” European Journal of Criminology 14(6): 720–50.Google Scholar
Hertwig, Ralph, and Ortmann, Andreas. 2008. “Deception in Experiments: Revisiting the Arguments in Its Defense.” Ethics and Behavior 18(1): 5992.Google Scholar
Ho, Daniel E. 2017. “Does Peer Review Work? An Experiment of Experimentalism.” Stanford Law Review 69: 1119.Google Scholar
Ho, Daniel E., Handan-Nader, Cassandra, Armes, David, and Marcus, David. 2019. “Quality Review of Mass Adjudication: A Randomized Natural Experiment at the Board of Veterans Appeals, 2013–16.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 25: 239–88.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan. 2015. “Reflections on the Ethics of Social Experimentation.” Journal De Gruyter 6: 87.Google Scholar
Iyer, Govind S., Reckers, Phillip M. J., and Sanders, Debra L.. 2010. “Increasing Tax Compliance in Washington State: A Field Experiment.” National Tax Journal 63(1): 732.Google Scholar
Jennings, Wesley G., Lynch, Matthew D., and Fridell, Lorie A.. 2015. “Evaluating the Impact of Police Officer Body-Worn Cameras (BWCs) on Response-to-Resistance and Serious External Complaints: Evidence from the Orlando Police Department (OPD) Experience Utilizing a Randomized Controlled Experiment.” Journal of Criminal Justice 43(6): 480–6.Google Scholar
Kalla, Joshua L., and Broockman, David E.. 2015. “Campaign Contributions Facilitate Access to Congressional Officials: A Randomized Field Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 60(3): 545–58.Google Scholar
Kleven, Henrik J., Knudsen, Martin B., Kreiner, Claus Thustrup, Pederson, Soren, and Saez, Emmanuel. 2011. “Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence from a Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark.” Econometrica 79(3): 651–92.Google Scholar
Krasno, Jonathan S., Green, Donald P., Panagolpoulos, Costas, Thorley, Dane, and Schwam-Baird, Michael. in press. “Campaign Donations, Judicial Recusal, and Disclosure: A Field Experiment.” Journal of Politics.Google Scholar
Leslie, Emily, and Pope, Nolan G.. 2017. “The Unintended Impact of Pretrial Detention on Case Outcomes: Evidence from New York City Arraignments.” Journal of Law and Economics 60: 529–57.Google Scholar
Levitt, Steven D., and List, John A.. 2007. “What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World?Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(2): 153–74.Google Scholar
Levitt, Steven D., and List, John A.. 2008. “Homo Economicus Evolves.” Science 319(5856): 909–10.Google Scholar
Loeffler, Charles E. 2013.“Does Imprisonment Alter the Life Course? Evidence on Crime and Unemployment from a Natural Experiment.” Criminology 51: 137.Google Scholar
Lum, Cynthia, Stoltz, Megan, Koper, Christopher, and Scherer, J. Amber. 2019. “Research on Body-Worn Cameras.” Criminology and Public Policy 18(1): 93118.Google Scholar
Mascagni, Giulia. 2018. “From the Lab to the Field: A Review of Tax Experiments.” Journal of Economic Surveys 32(2): 273301.Google Scholar
Mascagni, Giulia, Nell, Christopher, and Monkam, Nara. 2017. “One Size Does Not Fit All: A Field Experiment on the Drivers of Tax Compliance and Delivery Methods in Rwanda.” ICTD Working Paper 58.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, Lorraine G., Price, James F., and Roehl, Jan. 2000. “Civil Remedies and Drug Control: A Randomized Field Trial in Oakland, California.” Evaluation Review 24(2): 212–41.Google Scholar
Miller, Lindsay, Toliver, Jessica, and Police Executive Research Forum. 2014. “Implementing a Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations and Lessons Learned.” Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services Report.Google Scholar
Moulton, Stephanie, Collins, J. Michael, Loibl, Cäzilia, Haurin, Donald, and Brown, Julia. 2019. “Reminder to Pay Property Tax Payments: A Field Experiment of Older Adults with Reverse Mortgages.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. April 18, 1979. “The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research.”Google Scholar
Neyroud, Peter W. 2017. “Learning to Field Test in Policing: Using an Analysis of Completed Randomised Controlled Trials Involving the Police to Develop a Grounded Theory on the Factors Contributing to High Levels of Treatment Integrity in Police Experiments.” University of Cambridge Doctoral Dissertation.Google Scholar
OECD. 2010. “Understanding and Influencing Taxpayers’ Compliance Behavior.”Google Scholar
Ortega, Daniel E., and Scartascini, Carlos. 2020. “Don’t Blame the Messenger: The Delivery Method of a Message Matters.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 170: 286300.Google Scholar
Ortega, Daniel E., and Sanguinetti, Pablo. 2013. “Deterrence and Reciprocity Effects on Tax Compliance: Experimental Evidence from Venezuela.” CAF Working Paper, 2013/08.Google Scholar
Peterson, Bryce E., Lilly, Yu, and Nancy, La Vigne. 2018. “The Milwaukee Police Department’s Body-Worn Camera Program: Evaluation Findings and Key Takeaways.” Urban Institute Report.Google Scholar
Piza, Eric L., Caplan, Joel M., Kennedy, Leslie W., and Gilchrist, Andrew M.. 2015. “The Effects of Merging Proactive CCTV Monitoring with Directed Policy Patrol: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 11(1): 4369.Google Scholar
Pomeranz, Dina. 2015. “No Taxation without Information: Deterrence and Self-Enforcement in the Value Added Tax.” American Economic Review 105(8): 2538–69.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, Jerry H., Taniguchi, Travis, Groff, Elizabeth R., and Wood, Jennifer D.. 2011. “The Philadelphia Foot Patrol Experiment: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Police Patrol Effectiveness in Violent Crime Hot Spots.” Criminology 49(3): 795831.Google Scholar
Rousu, Matthew C., Colson, Gregory, Corrigan, Jay R., Grebitus, Carola, and Loureiro, Maria L.. 2015. “Deception in Experiments: Towards Guidelines on Use in Applied Economics Research.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 37(3): 524–36.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Richard D. 1961. “Field Experimentation in Sociolegal Research.” Journal of Legal Education 13: 401.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Richard D., and Orleans, Sonya. 1967. “On Legal Sanctions.” University of Chicago Law Review 34: 274300.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Richard D., and Skolnick, Jerome H.. 1963. “Televised Communication and Income Tax Compliance.” In Television and Human Behavior: Tomorrow’s Research in Mass Communication, eds. May, Mark A. and Arons, Leon, 155. Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W., and Cohn, Ellen G.. 1989. “The Impact of Research on Legal Policy: The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment.” Law and Society Review 23(1): 117–44.Google Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W., and Weisburd, David. 1995. “General Deterrent Effects of Police Patrol in Crime Hot Spots: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Justice Quarterly 12:x625–48.Google Scholar
Taylor, Bruce, Koper, Christopher S., and Woods, Daniel J.. 2011. “A Randomized Controlled Trial of Different Policing Strategies at Hot Spots of Violent Crime. Journal of Experimental Criminology 7(2): 149–81.Google Scholar
Teele, Dawn L. 2014. “Reflections on the Ethics of Field Experiments.” In Field Experiments and Their Critics, ed. Teele, Dawn L., 115–40. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thorley, Dane R. 2020. “Randomness Pre-Considered: Recognizing and Accounting for ‘De-Randomizing’ Events When Utilizing Random Judicial Assignment.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 17(2): 342–82.Google Scholar
Torgler, Benno. 2013. “A Field Experiment in Moral Suasion and Tax Compliance Focusing on Underdeclaration and Overeducation.” FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis 69(4): 393411.Google Scholar
Weisburd, David, and Green, Lorraine. 1995. “Policing Drug Hot Spots: The Jersey City DMA Experiment.” Justice Quarterly 12(4): 711–36.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Michael. 2005. “Misperceptions of Social Norms about Tax Compliance: From Theory to Intervention.” Journal of Economic Psychology 26(6): 862–83.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Michael. 2006. “A Letter from the Tax Office: Compliance Effects of Informational and Interpersonal Justice.” Social Justice Research 19: 345–64.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Michael, and Taylor, Natalie. 2003. “Toward Evidence-Based Tax Administration.” Australian Journal of Social Issues 38(3): 413–32.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Michael, and Taylor, Natalie. 2004. “An Experimental Evaluation of Tax-Reporting Schedules: A Case of Evidence-Based Tax Administration.” Journal of Public Economics 88(12): 2785–99.Google Scholar
Yanow, Dvora, and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine. 2008. “Reforming Institutional Review Board Policy: Issues in Implementation and Field Research.” PS, Political Science and Politics 41: 483–94.Google Scholar
Yokum, David, Ravishankar, Anita, and Coppock, Alexander. 2019. “A Randomized Control Trial Evaluating the Effects of Police Body-Worn Cameras.” PNAS 116(21): 10329–32.Google Scholar

References

Alexander, Cindy R. 1999. ‘On the Nature of the Reputational Penalty for Corporate Crime: Evidence’. Journal of Law & Economics. 42: 489526.Google Scholar
Arlen, Jennifer, and Kraakman, Reinier. 1997. ‘Controlling Corporate Misconduct: An Analysis of Corporate Liability Regimes’. New York University Law Review, 72(4): 687779.Google Scholar
Armour, John. 2009. ‘Enforcement Strategies in UK Corporate Governance’. In Armour, John and Payne, Jennifer (eds.), Rationality in Company Law, 71119. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Armour, John, Deakin, Simon, Siems, Mathias and Singh, Ajit. 2009a. ‘Shareholder Protection and Stock Market Development: An Empirical Test of the Legal Origins Hypothesis’. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 6(2): 343–80.Google Scholar
Armour, John, Black, Bernard S., Cheffins, Brian R. and Nolan, Richard. 2009b. ‘Private Enforcement of Corporate Law: An Empirical Comparison of the United Kingdom and the United States’. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 6(4): 701–45.Google Scholar
Armour, John, Mayer, Colin and Polo, Andrea. 2017. ‘Regulatory Sanctions and Reputational Damage in Financial Markets’. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 52(4): 1429–48.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary. 1968. ‘Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach’. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2): 169217.Google Scholar
Bhagat, Sanjai, Bizjak, John and Coles, Jeffrey L.. 1998. ‘The Shareholder Wealth Implications of Corporate Lawsuits’. Financial Management, 527.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, Sudipto. 1979. ‘Imperfect Information, Dividend Policy, and the “Bird in the Hand” Fallacy’. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1): 259–70.Google Scholar
Clark, Robert C. 1976. ‘The Soundness of Financial Intermediaries’. Yale Law Journal, 86(1): 1102.Google Scholar
Coffee, John C. Jr. 2007. ‘Law and the Market: The Impact of Enforcement’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 156(2): 229311.Google Scholar
Correia, Luis, Franks, Julian and Mayer, Colin. 2002. Asset Management and Investor Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Paul. 2007. Davies Review of Issuer Liability: Final Report. London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
Dyck, Alexander, Morse, Adair and Zingales, Luigi. 2014. ‘How Pervasive Is Corporate Fraud?’ Working Paper No. 2222608, Rotman School of Management.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H. 1984. ‘Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends’. American Economic Review, 74(4): 650–9.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 1991. Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fama, Eugene F., Fisher, Lawrence, Jensen, Michael C. and Roll, Richard. 1969. ‘The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information’. International Economic Review, 10(1): 121.Google Scholar
Godfrey, Paul C., Merrill, Craig B. and Hansen, Jared M., 2009. ‘The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value: An Empirical Test of the Risk Management Hypothesis’. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 425–45.Google Scholar
Graham, John R., Li, Si and Qiu, Jiaping. 2008. ‘Corporate Misreporting and Bank Loan Contracting’. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1): 4461.Google Scholar
Hribar, Paul, and Jenkins, Nicole Thorne. 2004. ‘The Effect of Accounting Restatements on Earnings Revisions and the Estimated Cost of Capital’. Review of Accounting Studies, 9(2–3), 337–56.Google Scholar
Jackson, Howell E. 2008. ‘Response. The Impact of Enforcement: A Reflection’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 156(2): 400–11.Google Scholar
Jackson, Howell E., and Roe, Mark J.. 2009. ‘Public Enforcement of Securities Laws: Preliminary Evidence’. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2): 207–38.Google Scholar
Jarrell, Gregg, and Peltzman, Sam. 1985. ‘The Impact of Product Recalls on the Wealth of Sellers’. Journal of Political Economy, 93(3): 512–36.Google Scholar
Jones, Kari, and Rubin, Paul H.. 2001. ‘Effects of Harmful Environmental Events on Reputations of Firms’. In Hirschey, Mark, John, Kose and Makhija, Anil (eds.), Advances in Financial Economics, Vol. VI, 161–82. Amsterdam: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Karpoff, Jonathan M. 2012. ‘Does Reputation Work to Discipline Corporate Misconduct?’ In Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation. 361–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karpoff, Jonathan M., and Lott, John R. Jr. 1993. ‘The Reputational Penalty Firms Bear from Committing Criminal Fraud’. Journal of Law & Economics, 36(2): 757802.Google Scholar
Karpoff, Jonathan M., and Lott, John R. 1999. ‘On the Determinants and Importance of Punitive Damage Awards’. Journal of Law & Economics, 42(S1): 527–73.Google Scholar
Karpoff, Jonathan M., Lott, John R. Jr. and Wehrly, Eric W.. 2005. ‘The Reputational Penalties for Environmental Violations: Empirical Evidence’. Journal of Law & Economics, 48(2): 65375.Google Scholar
Karpoff, Jonathan M., Lee, D. Scott and Martin, Gerald S.. 2008. ‘The Cost to Firms of Cooking the Books’. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(3): 581611.Google Scholar
Karpoff, Jonathan M., Lee, D. Scott and Martin, Gerald S.. 2017. ‘Foreign Bribery: Incentives and Enforcement’. Working paper. University of Washington.Google Scholar
Klein, Benjamin, and Laffler, Keith B.. 1981. ‘The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance’. Journal of Political Economy, 89(4): 615–41.Google Scholar
Kothari, S. P., and Warner, Jerrold B. 2007. ‘Econometrics of Event Studies’. In Eckbo, B. Espen (ed.), Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance, Vol 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 336.Google Scholar
Kravet, Todd, and Shevlin, Terry. 2010. ‘Accounting Restatements and Information Risk’. Review of Accounting Studies, 15(2): 264–94.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Shleifer, Andrei and Vishny, Robert. 1997. ‘Legal Determinants of External Finance’. Journal of Finance, 52(3): 1131–50.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Shleifer, Andrei and Vishny, Robert. 1998. ‘Law and Finance’. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6): 1113–55.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio and Shleifer, Andrei. 2006. ‘What Works in Securities Laws?Journal of Finance, 61(1): 132.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio and Shleifer, Andrei. 2008. ‘The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins’. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2): 285332.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Mark L., and Maloney, Michael T.. 1989. ‘Crisis in the Cockpit? The Role of Market Forces in Promoting Air Travel Safety’. Journal of Law & Economics, 32(2): 329–55.Google Scholar
Murphy, Deborah L., Shrieves, Ronald E. and Tibbs, Samuel L.. 2009. ‘Understanding the Penalties Associated with Corporate Misconduct: An Empirical Examination of Earnings and Risk’. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44(1): 5583.Google Scholar
Peltzman, Sam. 1981. ‘The Effects of FTC Advertising Regulation’. Journal of Law & Economics, 24(3): 405–48.Google Scholar
Prince, David W., and Rubin, Paul H.. 2002. ‘The Effects of Product Liability Litigation on the Value of Firms’. American Law and Economics Review, 4(1): 4487.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Carl. 1983. ‘Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(4): 659–80.Google Scholar
Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W.. 1997. ‘A Survey of Corporate Governance’. Journal of Finance, 52(2): 737–83.Google Scholar
Spamann, Holger. 2009. ‘The “Antidirector Rights Index” Revisited’. Review of Financial Studies, 23(2): 467–86.Google Scholar

References

Averdijk, M., and Elffers, H.. 2012. ‘The Discrepancy between Survey-Based Victim Accounts and Police Reports Data Revisited’. International Review of Victimology, 18(2), 91107.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. 1982. ‘A Self-Presentational View of Social Phenomena’. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 326.Google Scholar
Bem, C. G., and McConnell, H. K.. 1970. ‘Testing the Self-Perception Explanation of Dissonance Phenomena: On the Salience of Premanipulation Attitudes’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 2331.Google Scholar
Billiet, J., and McClendon, J.. 2000. ‘Modelling Acquiescence in Measurement Models for Two Balanced Sets of Items’. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(4), 608–28.Google Scholar
Calahan, D. 1968. ‘Correlates of Respondent Accuracy in the Denver Reliability Survey’. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32, 608–21.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. 1996. Memory in the Real World, 2nd ed. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. 1959. Essentials of Psychological Testing, 2nd ed. London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D.. 1960. ‘A New Scale of Social Desirability Independent of Psychopathology’. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–54.Google Scholar
Cruyff, M. J., van den Hout, A., van der Heijden, P. G., and Böckenholt, U.. 2007. ‘Log-Linear Randomized-Response Models Taking Self-Protective Response Behavior into Account’. Sociological Methods and Research, 36(2), 266–82.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. L. 1990. ‘Construct Validity and Social Desirability’. American Psychologist, 45, 287–9.Google Scholar
Elffers, H. 1980. ‘On Interpreting the Product Moment Correlation Coefficient’. Statistica Neerlandica, 34, 311.Google Scholar
Elffers, H. 1991. Income Tax Evasion: Theory and Measurement. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Elffers, H. 2010. ‘Misinformation, Misunderstanding and Misleading S Validity Threats to Offenders’ Accounts of Offending’. In Bernasco, W. (ed.), Offenders on Offending. Learning about Crime from Criminals, 1322. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P. 1973. ‘Self-Reports of Deviant Behaviour: Predictive and Stable?Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 64, 99110.Google Scholar
Fetchenhauer, D. 1998. Versicherungsbetrug: Eine theoretische und empirische Analyse betrügerischen Verhaltens gegenüber einem anonymen Geschädigten. Nomos-Verlag-Ges.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hessing, D. J., Elffers, H., and Weigel, R. H.. 1988. ‘Exploring the Limits of Self-Reports and Reasoned Action: An Investigation of the Psychology of Tax Evasion Behavior’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 405–13.Google Scholar
Hessing, D. J., Elffers, H., Robben, H. S. J., and Webley, P.. 1993. ‘Needy or Greedy? The Social Psychology of Individuals Who Fraudulently Claim Unemployment Benefits’. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(3), 226–43.Google Scholar
Medanik, L. 1982. ‘The Validity of Self-Reported Alcohol Consumption and Alcohol Problems: A Literature Review’. British Journal of Addiction 77, 357–82.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., and Wilson, T. D.. 1977. ‘Telling More than We Can Know: Verbal Reports of Mental Processes’. Psychological Bulletin 84, 231–57.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L. 1984. ‘Two-Component Models of Socially Desirable Responding’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 598609.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L. 1991. ‘Measurement and Control of Response Bias’. In Robinson, J., Shaver, P., and Wrightman, L. (eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, 1760. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sobell, L. C. 1976. ‘The Validity of Self-Reports. Towards a Predictive Model’. Unpublished dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Stein, N. L., Ornstein, P. A., Tversky, B., and Brainerd, C.. (eds.) 1997. Memory for Everyday and Emotional Events. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Tourangeau, R., and Smith, T. W.. 1996. ‘Asking Sensitive Questions: The Impact of Data Collection Mode, Question Format, and Question Context’. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 275304.Google Scholar
Van den Hout, A., van der Heijden, P. G., and Gilchrist, R.. 2007. ‘The Logistic Regression Model with Response Variables Subject to Randomized Response’. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 51(12), 6060–9.Google Scholar
Van Gelder, J. L., Nee, C., Otte, M., Demetriou, A., Van Sintemaartensdijk, I., and Van Prooijen, J. W.. 2017. ‘Virtual Burglary: Exploring the Potential of Virtual Reality to Study Burglary in Action’. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(1), 2962.Google Scholar
Van Giels, B., Hessing, D. J., and Elffers, H.. 1991a. Rood Rijden: Determinanten van het Rijden door Rood onder Automobilisten [Determinants of Red Light Jumping]. Rotterdam: ECSTR.Google Scholar
Van Giels, B., Hessing, D. J., and Elffers, H.. 1991b. Dubbel Parkeren: Determinanten van het Dubbel Parkeren onder Automobilisten [Determinants of Illegal Parking]. Rotterdam: ECSTR.Google Scholar
Van Onna, J. H., Van Der Geest, V. R., Huisman, W., and Denkers, A. J.. 2014. ‘Criminal Trajectories of White-Collar Offenders’. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(6), 759–84.Google Scholar
Vrij, A. 2008. Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Webley, P., Adams, C., and Elffers, H.. 2006. ‘Value Added Tax Compliance’. In McCaffery, E. J. and Slemrod, J. (eds.), Behavioral Public Finance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 175205.Google Scholar
Webley, P., and Siviter, C.. 2000. ‘Why Do Some Dog Owners Allow Their Dogs to Foul the Pavement? The Social Psychology of Minor Rule Transgression’. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30, 1371–80.Google Scholar
Weigel, R. H., Hessing, D. J., and Elffers, H.. 1987. ‘Tax Evasion Research: A Critical Appraisal and Theoretical Model’. Journal of Economic Psychology, 8, 215–35.Google Scholar
Wentland, E. J., and Smith, K. W. (1993. Survey Responses: An Evaluation of Their Validity. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wolters, G. 2002. ‘Herinneren door getuigen [Eyewitness Memory]’. In van Koppen, P. J., Hessing, D. J., Merckelbach, H. L. G. J. and Crombag, H. F. M. (eds.), Het Recht van Binnen. Psychologie van het Recht [Handbook of Psychology of Law]. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar

References

Alexander, C. S., and Becker, H. J. (1978). “The Use of Vignettes in Survey Research.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 42: 93104.Google Scholar
Aviram, H. (2012). “What Would You Do? Conducting Web-Based Factorial Vignette Surveys.” In Gideon, L. (ed.), Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences, 463–73. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Elis, L. A., and Simpson, S. S. (1995). “Informal Sanction Threats and Corporate Crime: Additive versus Multiplicative Models.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32: 399425.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Green, D. E. (1989). “Measures of Illegal Behavior in Individual-Level Deterrence Research.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26(3): 253–75.Google Scholar
Hickman, M., Piquero, A., Lawton, B., and Greene, J. (2001). “Applying Tittle’s Control-Balance Theory to Police Deviance.” Policing, 24: 497520.Google Scholar
Kim, M., and Hunter, J. E. (1993). “Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Meta-analysis of Attitudinal Relevance and Topic.” Journal of Communications, 43(1): 101–42.Google Scholar
Klepper, S., and Nagin, D. S. (1989). “Tax Compliance and Perceptions of the Risks of Detection and Criminal Prosecution.” Law & Society Review, 23: 209–40.Google Scholar
Nagin, D. S., and Paternoster, R. (1993). “Enduring Individual Differences and Rational Choice Theories of Crime.” Law & Society Review, 27(3): 467–96.Google Scholar
Nagin, D. S., Piquero, A. R., Scott, E. S., and Steinberg, L. (2006). “Public Preferences for Rehabilitation versus Incarceration of Juvenile Offenders: Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Survey.” Criminology & Public Policy, 5: 627–52.Google Scholar
Paternoster, R., and Simpson, S. (1996). “Sanction Threats and Appeals to Morality: Testing a Rational Choice Model of Corporate Crime.” Law & Society Review, 30: 549–83.Google Scholar
Piquero, A. R., and Hickman, M. (1999). “An Empirical Test of Tittle’s Control Balance Theory.” Criminology, 37: 319–42.Google Scholar
Piquero, A., and Tibbetts, S. (1996). “Specifying the Direct and Indirect Effects of Low Self-Control and Situational Factors in Offending Decision Making: Toward a More Complete Model of Rational Offending.” Justice Quarterly, 13: 481510.Google Scholar
Piquero, N. L., Exum, M. L., and Simpson, S. S. (2005). “Integrating the Desire for Control and Rational Choice in a Corporate Crime Context.” Justice Quarterly, 22(2): 253–80.Google Scholar
Piquero, N. L., Tibbetts, S. G., and Blankenship, M. (2005). “Examining the Role of Differential Association and Techniques of Neutralization in Explaining Corporate Crime.” Deviant Behavior, 26(2): 159–88.Google Scholar
Piquero, N. L., Schoepfer, A., and Langton, L. (2010). “Completely Out of Control or the Desire to Be in Complete Control? An Examination of How Low Self-Control and the Desire for Control Relate to Corporate Offending.” Crime & Delinquency, 56(4): 627–47.Google Scholar
Piquero, N. L., Cohen, M., and Piquero, A. R. (2011). “How Much Is the Public Willing to Pay to Be Protected from Identity Theft?Justice Quarterly, 28(3): 437–59.Google Scholar
Pogarsky, G. (2004). “Projected Offending and Contemporaneous Rule-Violation: Implications for Heterotypic Continuity.” Criminology, 42: 111–35.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. H., and Nock, S. L. (eds.) (1982) Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Schoepfer, A., Piquero, N. L., Langton, L. (2014). “Low Self-Control versus the Desire-for-Control: An Empirical Test of White-Collar Crime and Conventional Offending.” Deviant Behavior, 35: 197214.Google Scholar
Simpson, S. (2002). Corporate Crime, Law, and Social Control. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, S. S., and Piquero, N. L. (2002). “Low Self-Control, Organizational Theory, and Corporate Crime.” Law & Society Review, 36(3): 509–47.Google Scholar
Vieraitis, L. M., Piquero, N. L., Piquero, A. R., Tibbetts, S. G., and Blankenship, M. (2012). “Do Women and Men Differ in Their Neutralizations of Corporate Crime?Criminal Justice Review, 37(4): 480–94.Google Scholar
Wallander, L. (2009). “25 Years of Factorial Surveys in Sociology: A Review.” Social Science Research, 38: 505–20.Google Scholar

References

Abrego, Leisy. 2011. ‘Legal Consciousness of Undocumented Latinos: Fear and Stigma as Barriers to Claims-Making for First- and 1.5-Generation Immigrants’. Law & Society Review 45(2): 337–69.Google Scholar
Almond, Paul, and Gray, Garry. 2017. ‘Frontline Safety: Understanding the Workplace as a Site of Regulatory Engagement’. Law & Policy 39(1): 526.Google Scholar
Biggart, Nicole. 1989. Charismatic Capitalism: Direct Selling Organizations in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bourgeault, Ivy, Dingwall, Robert, and de Vries, Raymond (eds.). 2010. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Clarke, John. 2005. ‘New Labour’s Citizens: Activated, Empowered, Responsibilized, Abandoned?’. Critical Social Policy 25(4): 447–63.Google Scholar
Coffey, Amanda. 2018. Doing Ethnography, 2nd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Denzin, Norman, and Lincoln, Yvonna. 2005. ‘Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research’. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Denzin, Normal and Lincoln, Yvonna, 132. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, J. S. 1980. ‘Adapting to Danger: A Participant Observation Study of an Underground Mine’. Sociology of Work and Occupations 7(2): 131–58.Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney. 2001. The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney, and Strauss, Anselm. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Gray, Garry. 2009. ‘The Responsibilization Strategy of Health and Safety: Neo-liberalism and the Reconfiguration of Individual Responsibility for Risk’. British Journal of Criminology 49: 326–42.Google Scholar
Gray, Garry. 2006. ‘The Regulation of Corporate Violations: Punishment, Compliance, and the Blurring of Responsibility’. British Journal of Criminology 46: 875–92.Google Scholar
Gray, Garry. 2002. ‘A Socio-legal Ethnography of the Right to Refuse Dangerous Work’. Studies in Law, Politics & Society 24: 133–69.Google Scholar
Gray, Garry, and Lindsay, Katie. 2019. ‘Workplace Violence: Examining Interpersonal and Impersonal Violence among Truck Drivers’. Law & Policy 41(3): 271–85.Google Scholar
Gray, Garry, and Nikolakakos, Tomas. 2007. ‘The Self-Regulation of Virtual Reality: Issues of Voluntary Compliance and Enforcement in the Video Game Industry’. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 22(1): 93108.Google Scholar
Gray, Garry, and Pélisse, Jérôme. 2019. ‘Frontline Workers and the Role of Legal and Regulatory Intermediaries’. Sciences Po LIEPP Working Paper No. 94, 2019–10-12.Google Scholar
Gray, Garry, and Silbey, Susan. 2014. ‘Governing Inside the Organization: Interpreting Regulation and Compliance’. American Journal of Sociology 120: 96145.Google Scholar
Gray, Garry, and Silbey, Susan. 2011. ‘The Other Side of the Compliance Relationship’. In Explaining Compliance: Business Responses to Regulation, edited by Parker, Christine and Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann, 123–38. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hass, Jack. 1977. ‘Learning Real Feelings: A Study of High Steel Ironworkers’ Reactions to Fear and Danger’. Sociology of Work and Occupations 4(2): 147–70.Google Scholar
Heimer, Carol 1999. ‘Competing Institutions: Law, Medicine, and Family in Neonatal Intensive Care’.Law & Society Review 33(1): 1766.Google Scholar
Hutter, Bridget. 2001. Regulation and Risk: Occupational Health and Safety on the Railways. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackall, Robert. 1998. Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jurovich, Tom. 1985. Chaos on the Shop Floor: A Worker’s View of Quality, Productivity, and Management. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Leavy, Patricia (ed.). 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Na. 2016. ‘Compliance as Process: Work Safety in the Chinese Construction Industry’. PhD Dissertation. Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Loe, Meika. 1996. ‘Working for Men at the Intersection of Power, Gender, and Sexuality’. Sociological Inquiry 66(4): 399422.Google Scholar
Mars, Gerald, and Nicod, Michael. 1984. The World of Waiters. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria (2005). ‘Idle Rights: Employees’ Rights Consciousness and the Construction of Sexual Harassment Policies’. Law & Society Review 39(1): 83124.Google Scholar
Mascini, Peter, and van Wijk, Eelco. 2009. ‘Responsive Regulation at the Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority: An Empirical Assessment of Assumptions Underlying the Theory’. Regulation & Governance 3(1): 2747.Google Scholar
McDermott, Vanessa, Henne, Kathryn, and Hayes, Jan. 2018. ‘Shifting Risk to the Frontline: Case Studies in Different Contract Working Environments’. Journal of Risk Research 21(12): 1502–16.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miele, Mara, and Evans, Adrian. 2010. ‘When Foods Become Animals: Ruminations on Ethics and Responsibility in Care-Full Practices of Consumption’. Ethics, Place and Environment 13: 171–90.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, David. 2019. Basic and Advanced Focus Groups. Singapore: Sage.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2000. ‘Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment’. Law & Society Review 34(4): 1055–90.Google Scholar
Parker, Christine. 2013. ‘Voting with Your Fork? Industrial Free-Range Eggs and the Regulatory Construction of Consumer Choice’. Annals of the American Academy of Social and Political Science 649: 5273.Google Scholar
Parker, Christine, and De Costa, Josephine. 2016. ‘Misleading the Ethical Consumer: The Regulation of Free-Range Egg Labelling’. Melbourne University Law Review 39: 895949.Google Scholar
Parker, Christine, Brunswick, Carly, and Kotey, Jane. 2013. ‘The Happy Hen on Your Supermarket Shelf: What Choice Does Industrial Strength Free-Range Represent for Consumers?’. Bioethical Inquiry 10(2): 165–86.Google Scholar
Pélisse, Jérôme. 2006. ‘Time, Legal Consciousness and Power: The Case of France’s 35-Hour Workweek Laws’. In The New Civil Rights Research: A Constitutive Approach, edited by Fleury-Steiner, Benjamin and Nielson, Laura Beth, 201–15. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Joel. 2011. ‘Enabling Selves to Conduct Themselves Safely: Safety Committee Discourse as Governmentality in Practice’. Human Relations 64(3): 459–78.Google Scholar
Roff, Robin Jane. 2007. ‘Shopping for Change? Neoliberalizing Activism and the Limits to Eating Non-GMO’. Agriculture and Human Values 24: 511–22.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan. 2011. ‘The Sociological Citizen: Pragmatic and Relational Regulation in Law and Organizations’. Regulation & Governance 5: 113.Google Scholar
Van Rooij, Benjamin, Wainwright, Anna Lora, Wu, Yunmei, and Zhang, Yiyun. 2012. ‘The Compensation Trap: The Limits of Community-Based Pollution Regulation in China’. Pace Environmental Law Review 29(3): 701–45.Google Scholar
Van Wijk, Eelco, and Mascini, Peter. 2019. ‘The Responsibilization of Entrepreneurs in Legalized Local Prostitution in the Netherlands’. Regulation & Governance. DOI:10.1111/rego.12273.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Diane. 2004. ‘Theorizing Disaster: Analogy, Historical Ethnography, and the Challenger Accident’. Ethnography 5(3): 315–47.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Diane. 1998. ‘Rational Choice, Situated Action, and the Social Control of Organizations’. Law & Society Review 32(1): 2362.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Diane. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Yunmei. 2017. ‘Compliance Pluralism and Processes: Understanding Compliance Behavior in Restaurants in China’. PhD Dissertation. Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Wu, Yunmei, and van Rooij, Benjamin. 2019. ‘Compliance Dynamism: Capturing the Polynormative and Situational Nature of Business Responses to Law’. Journal of Business Ethics. DOI:.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04234-4.Google Scholar
Yapp, Charlotte, and Fairman, Robyn. 2005. ‘Assessing Compliance with Food Safety Legislation in Small Businesses’. British Food Journal 107(3): 150–61.Google Scholar
Young, Jock. 2011. The Criminological Imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

References

Becker, Gary. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 76, No. 2: 523–37.Google Scholar
Beratan, Kathi K. 2007. “A Cognition Based View of Decision Processes in Complex Social-Ecological Systems.” Ecology & Society 12, No. 1: 27.Google Scholar
Burby, Raymond J., and Paterson, Robert G.. 1993. “Improving Compliance with State Environmental Regulations.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 12: 753–72.Google Scholar
Camerer, Colin, Issacharoff, Samuel, Loewenstein, George, O’Donoghue, Ted, and Rabin, Matthew. 2003. “Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for Asymmetric Paternalism.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151, No. 3: 1211–54.Google Scholar
Carter, David, and Siddiki, Saba. in press. “Participation Rationales, Regulatory Enforcement, and Compliance Motivations in a Voluntary Program Context.” Regulation & Governance.Google Scholar
Chetty, Raj. 2015. “Behavioral Economics and Public Policy: A Pragmatic Perspective.” American Economic Review 105, No. 5: 133.Google Scholar
Crawford, Sue E. S., and Ostrom, Elinor. 1995. “A Grammar of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 89, No. 3: 582600.Google Scholar
DeCaro, Daniel. 2018. “Humanistic Rational Choice and Compliance Motivation in Complex Societal Dilemmas.” In Contextualizing Compliance in the Public Sector: Individual Motivations, Social Processes, and Institutional Design, edited by Siddiki, Saba, Espinosa, Salvador, and Heikkila, Tanya. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil A., Kagan, Robert A., and Thornton, Dorothy. 2003. Shades of Green: Business, Regulation, and Environment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Carolyn J. 2002. “Outcomes-Based Performance Measurement in the Public Sector: Implications for Government Accountability and Effectiveness.” Public Administration Review 62, No. 6: 712–25.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael, and Rayner, Jeremy. 2007. “Design Principles for Policy Mixes: Cohesion and Coherence in ‘New Governance Arrangements.’” Policy & Society 26, No. 4: 118.Google Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, George, and Chater, Nick. 2017. “Putting Nudges in Perspective.” Behavioural Public Policy 1, No. 1: 2653.Google Scholar
Madrian, Brigitte C. 2014. “Applying Insights from Behavioral Economics to Policy Design.” Annual Review of Economics 6: 663–88.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan. 1995. Democratic Governance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
May, Peter J., and Burby, Raymond J.. 1998. “Making Sense Out of Regulatory Enforcement.” Law & Policy 20, No. 2: 157–82.Google Scholar
May, Peter J., and Wood, Robert S.. 2003. “At the Regulatory Front Lines: Inspectors’ Enforcement Styles and Regulatory Compliance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13, No. 2: 117–39.Google Scholar
May, Peter J., Sapotichne, Joshua, and Workman, Samuel. 2006. “Policy Coherence and Policy Domains.” Policy Studies Journal 34, No. 2: 381403.Google Scholar
Moffitt, T. E. 1993. “Adolescence-Limited and Life-Course Persistent Antisocial Behavior: A Developmental Taxonomy.” Psychological Review 100, No. 4: 674701.Google Scholar
Ryan, Richard M., and Deci, Edward L.. 2000. “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” American Psychologist 55, No. 1: 6875.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul, and Mazmanian, Daniel. 1980. “The Implementation of Public Policy: A Framework for Analysis.” Policy Studies Journal 8, No. 4: 538–60.Google Scholar
Sampson, Robert J., and Laub, John H.. 1993. Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen. 1990. “Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools.” Journal of Politics 52, No. 2: 510–29.Google Scholar
Scholz, John T., and Gray, Wayne B.. 1997. “Can Government Facilitate Cooperation? An Informational Model of OSHA Enforcement.” American Journal of Political Science 41, No. 3: 693717.Google Scholar
Siddiki, Saba. 2014. “Assessing Policy Design and Interpretation: An Institutions-Based Analysis in the Context of Aquaculture in Florida and Virginia, United States.”Review of Policy Research 31, No. 4: 281303.Google Scholar
Siddiki, Saba. 2020. Understanding and Analyzing Public Policy Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siddiki, Saba, and Goel, Shilpi. 2017. “Assessing Collaborative Policymaking Outcomes: An Analysis of U.S. Marine Aquaculture Partnerships.” American Review of Public Administration 47, No. 2: 253–71.Google Scholar
Siddiki, Saba, Carley, Sanya, Zirogiannis, Nikolaos, Duncan, Denvil, and Graham, John. 2018. “Does Dynamic Federalism Yield Compatible Policies? A Study of the Designs of Federal and State Vehicle Policies.” Policy Design and Practice 1, No. 3: 215–32.Google Scholar
Siddiki, Saba, Espinosa, Salvador, and Hekkila, Tanya, eds. 2019. Contextualizing Compliance in the Public Sector: Individual Motivations, Social Processes, and Institutional Design. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vedung, Evert. 1997. Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Winter, Soren C., and May, Peter J.. 2001. “Motivation for Compliance with Environmental Regulations.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20, No. 4: 675–98.Google Scholar
Young, Oran. 2002. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×