Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T00:18:32.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - The Development of the Heritage Language in Childhood Bi-/Multilingualism

from Part Five - Socialization in Childhood Multilingualism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2022

Anat Stavans
Affiliation:
Beit Berl College, Israel
Ulrike Jessner
Affiliation:
Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, Austria
Get access

Summary

The vast majority of children grow up in bilingual or multilingual households, but the extent to which they develop advanced linguistic abilities and even literacy in all their languages depends on many factors. These include age of acquisition of the two languages, the amount of exposure to and use of the languages daily and in specific or diverse contexts, and the status of the languages in the society, including access to schooling. For some simultaneous and sequential bilingual children, one or more of their languages is a minority language not widely spoken outside the home and with little cultural, educational, social and political status. In some other circumstances, the language or languages can be minoritized, available beyond the home but considered lower in status in the society. In this chapter, I discuss research on the development of the minority/heritage language(s) in simultaneous and sequential bilingual and multilingual children, with specific focus on the school-age period. I focus on how bilingual balance and language shift in these children and in many cases lead to language attrition and incomplete acquisition of morphosyntactic aspects of the minority language.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albirini, A. (2015). Factors affecting the acquisition of plural morphology in Jordanian Arabic. Journal of Child Language, 42(4), 734–62.Google Scholar
Allen, S. (2007). The future of Inuktitut in the face of majority languages: Bilingualism or language shift? Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(3), 515–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, S. Crago, M., & Presco, D. (2006). The effect of majority language exposure on minority language skills: The case of Inuktitut. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(5), 578–96.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. (1999). Loss of gender agreement in L1 attrition: Preliminary results. Bilingual Research Journal, 23(4), 389408.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. (2001). Lexical morphology and verb use in child first language loss. A preliminary case study investigation. International Journal of Bilingualism, 5(4), 377401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cenoz, J. (2013). The influence of bilingualism on third language acquisition: Focus on multilingualism. Language Teaching, 46(1), 7186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coşkun-Kunduz, A. & Montrul, S. (2021). Sources of variability in the acquisition of Differential Object Marking by Turkish heritage language children in the United States. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–14.Google Scholar
Cummins, J., & Danesi, M. (1990). Heritage Languages: The Development and Denial of Canada’s Linguistic Resources. Toronto: Garamond Press.Google Scholar
Deuchar, M., & Quay, S. (2000). Bilingual Acquisition: Theoretical Implications of a Case Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Domínguez, L., Hicks, G., & Slabakova, R. (2019). Choice of words matters, but so does scientific accuracy: Reply to peer commentaries. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 283–86.Google Scholar
Flores, C., & Barbosa, P. (2014). When reduced input leads to delayed acquisition: A study on the acquisition of clitic placement by Portuguese heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(3), 304–25.Google Scholar
Fukuda, M. (2017). Language use in the context of double minority: The case of Japanese–Catalan/Spanish families in Catalonia. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(4), 401–18.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M., & Thomas, E. M. (2009). Bilingual first-language development: Dominant language takeover, threatened minority language take-up. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(2), 213–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2008). Studying Bilinguals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hakuta, K., & D’Andrea, D. (1992). Some properties of bilingual maintenance and loss in Mexican background high-school students. Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 7299.Google Scholar
Jia, G., & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(1), 131–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, R., & Paradis, J. (2015). The use of referring expressions in narratives by Mandarin heritage language children and the role of language environment factors in predicting individual differences. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(4), 737–52.Google Scholar
Jia, R., & Paradis, J. (2020). The acquisition of relative clauses by Mandarin heritage language children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 10(20), 153–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juan-Garau, M. (2014). Heritage language use and maintenance in multilingual communities. Applied Linguistics Review, 5(2), 425–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, D., & Aronoff, M. (1991). Morphological disintegration and reconstruction in first language attrition. In Seliger, H. & Vago, R., eds., First Language Attrition, pp. 175–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., & Rothman, J. (2018). Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22(5), 564–82.Google Scholar
Maneva, B., & Genesee, F. (2002). Bilingual babbling: Evidence for language differentiation in dual language acquisition. In Skarabela, B., Fish, S., & Do, A. H.-J., eds., Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 383–92. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Merino, B. (1983). Language loss in bilingual Chicano children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 4(3), 277–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montanari, S. (2006). Language Differentiation in Early Trilingual Development: Evidence from a Case Study. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Montanari, S. (2009). Multi-word combinations and the emergence of differentiated ordering patterns in early trilingual development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(4), 503–19.Google Scholar
Montanari, S. (2013). Productive trilingualism in infancy. What makes it possible? World Journal of English Language, 3(1), 6277.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2002). Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(1), 3968.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2008). Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism. Reexamining the Age Factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2016). The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., & Potowski, K. (2007). Command of gender agreement in school-age Spanish bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(3), 301–28.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., & Silva-Corvalán, C. (2019). The social context contributes to the incomplete acquisition of aspects of heritage languages. A critical commentary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 269273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Bhatt, R., Bhatia, A., & Puri, V. (2019). Case marking in Hindi as the weaker language. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 461, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00461.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., & Yoon, J. (2019). Morphology in language attrition. In Aronoff, M. et al., eds., Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, oxfordre.com/linguistics.Google Scholar
Mueller Gathercole, V. (2002a). Command of the mass/count distinction in bilingual and monolingual children. An English morphosyntactic distinction. In Oller, D. K. & Eilers, R., eds., Language and Literacy in Bilingual Children. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 175206.Google Scholar
Mueller Gathercole, V. (2002b). Grammatical gender in monolingual and bilingual acquisition. A Spanish morphosyntactic distinction. In Oller, D. K. & Eilers, R., eds., Language and Literacy in Bilingual Children. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 207–19.Google Scholar
Mueller Gathercole, V. (2002c). Monolingual and bilingual acquisition. Learning different treatments of the that-trace phenomena in English and Spanish. In Oller, D. K. & Eilers, R., eds., Language and Literacy in Bilingual Children. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 22054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, W., Kwak, H. Y., Lee, O.-S., & Lee, M. (2011). An emergentist perspective on heritage language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 223–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oller, K., & Jarmulowicz, L. (2009). Language and literacy in bilingual children in the early school years. In Hoff, E. & Shatz, M., eds., Blackwell Handbook of Language Development. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 368–87.Google Scholar
Oller, D. K., Pearson, B., & Cobo-Lewis, A. (2007). Profile effects in early bilingual language and literacy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(2), 495514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otheguy, R. (2016). The linguistic competence of second-generation bilinguals: A critique of “incomplete acquisition”. In Tortora, C., den Dikken, M., Montoya, I. L., & O’Neill, T., eds., Romance Linguistics 2013. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 301–20.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2001). Do bilingual two-year-olds have separate phonological systems? International Journal of Bilingualism, 5(1), 1938.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2007). Early bilingualism and multilingual acquisition. In Auer, P. & Li, W., eds., Handbook of Multilingualism and Multilingual Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1544.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2011). Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(3), 213–37.Google Scholar
Pascual y Cabo, D., & Rothman, J. (2012). The (il)logical problem of heritage speaker bilingualism and incomplete acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 450–55.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. (2007). Social factors in childhood bilingualism in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(3), 399410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, B., Fernández, S., & Oller, D. (1995). Cross-language synonyms in the lexicons of bilingual infants: One system or two? Journal of Child Language, 22(2), 345–68.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2006). Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14(2), 191262.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2018). Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quay, S. (2008). Dinner conversations with a trilingual two-year-old: Language socialization in a multilingual context. First Language, 28(1), 533.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (2014). Bilingual Language Acquisition: Spanish and English in the First Six Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (2018). Bilingual acquisition: Difference or incompleteness? In Shin, N. L. & Erker, D., eds., Questioning Theoretical Primitives in Linguistic Inquiry: Papers in Honor of Ricardo Otheguy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 245–68.Google Scholar
Stavans, A., Olshtain, E., & Goldzweig, G. (2009). Parental perceptions of children’s literacy and bilingualism: The case of Ethiopian immigrants in Israel. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 30(2), 111–26.Google Scholar
Wong-Fillmore, L. (1991). When learning a second language means losing the first. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 6(3), 323–46.Google Scholar
Wright, S., Taylor, D., & Macarthur, J. (2000). Subtractive bilingualism and the survival of the Inuit language: Heritage-versus second-language education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 6384.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×